Uh, Do Liberals Realize that the Stormy Daniels-Donald Trump Incident Happened 12 Years Ago?

[Syriusly]

Looking at the continual stream of liberal threads on the Stormy Daniels scandal, one wonders if liberals realize that Daniels' alleged hookup with Trump supposedly occurred in 2006, 12 years ago, and that Cohen's payoff to her occurred in 2016, 10 years after the alleged encounter and long before Donald Trump even ran for president?

Looking at the continual stream of liberal threads on the Stormy Daniels scandal, one wonders if liberals realize that Daniels' alleged hookup with Trump supposedly occurred in 2006, 12 years ago, and that Cohen's payoff to her occurred in 2016, 10 years after the alleged encounter and long before Donald Trump even ran for president?

She's not even attractive. If I was Trump I wouldn't touch her with a ten foot...Prick.

So if she was attractive you would cheat on your model wife with a porn star- but not if you don't find her attractive.

 

[Syriusly]

Now why waste time, resources, and taxpayer dollars on a 12 year old consensual involvement with a porn star?

The raid had nothing to do with Trump boinking a porn star 12 years ago. However Cohen paying off the porn star 11 days before the General Election is the problem and could possibly violate campaign finance laws which is a federal offense. Over $25,000 could be prosecuted as a felony with up to 5-years in prision.

All facts point to either (1) an ADHD Mullier, assigned to special council, that he has to be all over the place ... or (2) they can’t find any strong impeachable offense, so let’s waste our time and resources on a porn star to attempt to find an actual crime they can use on Trump (3) this (like the FISA WARRANT) is really about opposition research for the next election. The leaks to the media supports point (3).

Just laying out the facts and connecting the dots through a little actual research, as opposed to the (from the hip) commentaries we find among those with their glass tables and network coffee mug logos.

Psst...

The serving of the search warrant wasn't conducted by Mueller, information was turned over to the US District Attorney for Sourthern New York. That office conducted the and will be handling any prossecutions resulting from the finding that have to bank fraud, money laundering, mail fraud, and/or campaign finance law violations.


Glad to help.



>>>>

You know what’s funny is a reporter asked trump all these questions and all trump kept saying was ask my lawyer. Apparently the fbi took him up on it.

The story is awful suspicious don’t you agree? Lying is covering up a crime and obstruction of justice and all to cover up collusion republicans don’t even think is illegal.

Or they’ll say hillary did it too.

Pathetic

That conversation you are bringing up was between Trump and a journalist. Unless of course, You are stating that the media and NOT the special council is actually leading this investigation?

Of course if Russia collusion is SO absolutely certain and SO SOLID in evidence that can not be questioned, there is no need to waste time, resources, and taxpayer dollars bothering with a porn star. You already have strong evidence of impeachment without the need to look into Cohen .

You see how easy it is to find fault in liberal logic?

It’s an ongoing investigation. Is trump ready to testify?

Did the Washington Post not say that Trump is not the center of the investigation into Russia Colusion by Mullier? I could find the article for you, if you like.

Actually the Washington Post didn't say that.

Are you perhaps referring to the comment about Trump not being a criminal suspect by Mueller?

 

[Syriusly]

He has stayed out of it. He referred the case to New York months ago.

It’s still early, as they really JUST raided the personal attorney of Trump just days ago. I will be following closely on this in the months ahead, awaiting for the information to change hands.

We don't know how early it is. Mueller referred the case to New York months ago, and it sometimes takes months to obtain a search warrant. First you need probable cause. Obviously this federal judge was provided enough evidence already to authorize the raids.

If he referred, then he is expanding his resources. Mullier and the US district attorney of New York are still in communication with each other.

The New York US attorney claims Mueller has had nothing to do with the investigation since the referral, and why would he have to be involved? Cohen handed his own ass on a platter when acknowledging the Stormy Daniels payment, and the FBI raided his home. They have more information than Mueller ever had. Why would they need his assistance?

Where did the initial information of these findings “originate” to suggest a need to raid on Trump’s personal attorney, from Mullier or the US attorney from New York? I’m bringing rational thought into the discussion in connecting the dots. If this discovery came from Mullier, he is connected to the need for the raid into Cohen by means of a referral. A referral that comes from a request under his authority of investigation, to the attorney referred in using their resources to uncover information. If the US district attorney found this information completely on their own, separate from anything that the special council ever desired to be suspect or uncovered, a referral FROM special council Mullier would not have been required.

So what??? SO what??? It's not illegal to pay a person in a settlement to get them to sign a non-disclosure agreement. Happens quite a lot. There's nothing illegal about it.

However, putting Top Secret and Special Access information on an unsecured server in your basement is very illegal. But, yeah, you don't care about that, right?

You are right, 99% of the time it is not illegal to pay a person in a settlement to get them to sign a non-disclosure agreement, but when it is done as part of a Presidential campaign and the funds are not reported, then it is a problem.

Actually I did care about that greatly Hillary doing that, one of the many reasons I would never vote for Hillary. I spent many years as a Secondary Control Point Custodian while in the Corps and care about classified rules.

But, you see that is the difference between us, I care about illegal stuff when both sides do it, not just one.

It wasn't done as part of a Presidential campaign, snowflake.

Yes, actually it was my little zealot. I know that nothing anyone says will ever get you to say an ill word about your savior, but the payoff was done specifically because of the campaign. Had their been no campaign, there would have been no payoff

You have nothing put assumptions to support that claim.

Well, we know that for 10 years after Trump banged the porn star she was not paid to stay silent. Then during the heart of a very close campaign she was paid to stay silent...some of us are able to add 1 plus 1 and get 2. I cannot help that you lack that basic level of intelligence.

LOL yeah considering that most of Brip's fellow travellers are convinced that Hillary Clinton whacked Vince Foster- having them lecture us about how it is just a coincidence that Stormy Daniels was bribed to keep quiet about Trump days before the election is pretty hilarious.

 

[Syriusly]

Looking at the continual stream of liberal threads on the Stormy Daniels scandal, one wonders if liberals realize that Daniels' alleged hookup with Trump supposedly occurred in 2006, 12 years ago, and that Cohen's payoff to her occurred in 2016, 10 years after the alleged encounter and long before Donald Trump even ran for president?

Bribery happened less than 2 years ago. No one really cares about the sex and perversions. Bribery is what counts.

Let’s start with a comparison of Trump’s special council investigation to that of the investigation of President Clinton. Monica Lewinsky occurred during the “political office” of the presidency, this led to other women coming forward (to include Jennifer Flowers during the “political office” of his governorship). In each case against Clinton there was a building common thread.

Now why waste time, resources, and taxpayer dollars on a 12 year old consensual involvement with a porn star? .

Do you have any indication that Mueller cares about or investigating a 12 year old adultererous affair between Trump and a porn star?

What I see is Mueller referring to another U.S. attorney a case of possible election campaign contribution fraud- which took place in the last few weeks of the 2016 election.

 

[Syriusly]

Looking at the continual stream of liberal threads on the Stormy Daniels scandal, one wonders if liberals realize that Daniels' alleged hookup with Trump supposedly occurred in 2006, 12 years ago, and that Cohen's payoff to her occurred in 2016, 10 years after the alleged encounter and long before Donald Trump even ran for president?

Bribery happened less than 2 years ago. No one really cares about the sex and perversions. Bribery is what counts.

Let’s start with a comparison of Trump’s special council investigation to that of the investigation of President Clinton. Monica Lewinsky occurred during the “political office” of the presidency, this led to other women coming forward (to include Jennifer Flowers during the “political office” of his governorship). In each case against Clinton there was a building common thread.

Now why waste time, resources, and taxpayer dollars on a 12 year old consensual involvement with a porn star? Especially when she admitted that her efforts by come forward, was motivated by personal gain and even more money. If there is really a case of “Russia Collusion” that effected the outcome of a Presidential election, and it’s SOLD in its efforts to build towards impeachment (the original mandate parameters Mullier was given), you don’t waste your time in petty “distractions”. If This is in fact your best hand, with solid evidence, you don’t need to pursue a porn star.

Again, what does this have to do with Russia? The media tried to claim Trump obstructed justice with the firing of FBI director James Comey. Until there was a memo from Rod Rosenstein recommending the firing of Comey. Incidentally, it was Rosenstein who started the special council of Mueller into the firing of Comey as possible obstruction.

All facts point to either (1) an ADHD Mullier, assigned to special council, that he has to be all over the place ... or (2) they can’t find any strong impeachable offense so they might as well spread themselves thin wasting resources on a porn star to dig up a crime they can use on Trump (3) this (like the FISA WARRANT) is really about opposition research for the next election. The leaks to the media supports point (3).

Just laying out the facts and connecting the dots through a little actual research, as opposed to the (from the hip) commentaries we find among those with their glass tables and network coffee mug logos.

It has already been said a million times in this thread that Daniels and Russia are two completely different matters. Mueller has nothing to do with the Cohen investigation. It's the New York US Attorney.

They do want to talk about anything but Trump's attorney bribing Stormy Daniels right before the election- and the possible campaign financing violation.

 

[Synthaholic]

Looking at the continual stream of liberal threads on the Stormy Daniels scandal, one wonders if liberals realize that Daniels' alleged hookup with Trump supposedly occurred in 2006, 12 years ago, and that Cohen's payoff to her occurred in 2016, 10 years after the alleged encounter and long before Donald Trump even ran for president?

Realize yes care no we as a nation have gotten so moronic in our quest to find dirt on politicans we don't like we will go all the way back to their time in high school hell maybe farther than that.

What year was the whitewater investment made?

And the Democrats response to that was what?

Can’t answer the question?

 

[bripat9643]

Who cares what the Washington Post says?

Said no snowflake ever.

But really who cares if the Washington post says trump isn’t the center of the investigation? Not saying they are or were lying but maybe they are wrong. Or maybe he wasn’t yet but now is.

Of course they’re trying to find evidence that implicates trump. If they do then he will become the center of the investigation

If not Trump

Who is the center of the investigation?

The investigation would be regarding Russia’s interference and influence into the election, not Trump. The special councils efforts are geared towards the Presidential election, towards that interest in finding Russian interference as well as influence. If not... Then this is about a personal investigation of Trump, regardless of what the Special Council parameters are and it’s original mandate states.

The investigation was in regards to Russia's interference in the election and possible collusion by the Trump campaign.

And any crimes discovered in the course of the investigation. The Special counsel is authorized to pursue any suspected crimes that arise out of the investigation into Russia and Trump.

Which he is doing.

Herr Obergruppenfuhrer Mewler is going way beyond that. He's investigating everyone Trump ever knew for any infraction they may have committed. There is absolutely no reason for him to be investigating the Stormy Daniels matter. That has no concievable connection with Russian collusion.

Mewler is a goosestepping Nazi Gestapo agent.

 

[Syriusly]

Said no snowflake ever.

But really who cares if the Washington post says trump isn’t the center of the investigation? Not saying they are or were lying but maybe they are wrong. Or maybe he wasn’t yet but now is.

Of course they’re trying to find evidence that implicates trump. If they do then he will become the center of the investigation

If not Trump

Who is the center of the investigation?

The investigation would be regarding Russia’s interference and influence into the election, not Trump. The special councils efforts are geared towards the Presidential election, towards that interest in finding Russian interference as well as influence. If not... Then this is about a personal investigation of Trump, regardless of what the Special Council parameters are and it’s original mandate states.

The investigation was in regards to Russia's interference in the election and possible collusion by the Trump campaign.

And any crimes discovered in the course of the investigation. The Special counsel is authorized to pursue any suspected crimes that arise out of the investigation into Russia and Trump.

Which he is doing.

Herr Obergruppenfuhrer is going way beyond that. He's nivestigating everyone Trump ever knew for any infraction they may have committed. .

No you have been listening to your Fuehrer too much.

Like your Fuehrer said- he could shoot someone on the street and you would still defend him.

 

[bripat9643]

It’s still early, as they really JUST raided the personal attorney of Trump just days ago. I will be following closely on this in the months ahead, awaiting for the information to change hands.

We don't know how early it is. Mueller referred the case to New York months ago, and it sometimes takes months to obtain a search warrant. First you need probable cause. Obviously this federal judge was provided enough evidence already to authorize the raids.

If he referred, then he is expanding his resources. Mullier and the US district attorney of New York are still in communication with each other.

The New York US attorney claims Mueller has had nothing to do with the investigation since the referral, and why would he have to be involved? Cohen handed his own ass on a platter when acknowledging the Stormy Daniels payment, and the FBI raided his home. They have more information than Mueller ever had. Why would they need his assistance?

Where did the initial information of these findings “originate” to suggest a need to raid on Trump’s personal attorney, from Mullier or the US attorney from New York? I’m bringing rational thought into the discussion in connecting the dots. If this discovery came from Mullier, he is connected to the need for the raid into Cohen by means of a referral. A referral that comes from a request under his authority of investigation, to the attorney referred in using their resources to uncover information. If the US district attorney found this information completely on their own, separate from anything that the special council ever desired to be suspect or uncovered, a referral FROM special council Mullier would not have been required.

You are right, 99% of the time it is not illegal to pay a person in a settlement to get them to sign a non-disclosure agreement, but when it is done as part of a Presidential campaign and the funds are not reported, then it is a problem.

Actually I did care about that greatly Hillary doing that, one of the many reasons I would never vote for Hillary. I spent many years as a Secondary Control Point Custodian while in the Corps and care about classified rules.

But, you see that is the difference between us, I care about illegal stuff when both sides do it, not just one.

It wasn't done as part of a Presidential campaign, snowflake.

Yes, actually it was my little zealot. I know that nothing anyone says will ever get you to say an ill word about your savior, but the payoff was done specifically because of the campaign. Had their been no campaign, there would have been no payoff

You have nothing put assumptions to support that claim.

Well, we know that for 10 years after Trump banged the porn star she was not paid to stay silent. Then during the heart of a very close campaign she was paid to stay silent...some of us are able to add 1 plus 1 and get 2. I cannot help that you lack that basic level of intelligence.

LOL yeah considering that most of Brip's fellow travellers are convinced that Hillary Clinton whacked Vince Foster- having them lecture us about how it is just a coincidence that Stormy Daniels was bribed to keep quiet about Trump days before the election is pretty hilarious.

I have never posted a thing about Vince Foster, you sleazy lying jackass. Getting fucked up the ass must cause brain damage. That's the only explanation for your posts.

 

[mikegriffith1]

LOL yeah considering that most of Brip's fellow travellers are convinced that Hillary Clinton whacked Vince Foster- having them lecture us about how it is just a coincidence that Stormy Daniels was bribed to keep quiet about Trump days before the election is pretty hilarious.

I've never said it's a coincidence. But, look at the timing. She was paid to keep quiet--specifically, to sign a non-disclosure agreement--because Trump was in a very close election for president. Obviously, she was making some private noises that she was gonna go public--that's a form of blackmail. So Trump's lawyer paid her to keep quiet and he ensured her cooperation by having her sign a non-disclosure agreement. There is nothing the least bit illegal about that. It was a voluntary, legal transaction. So why are we even talking about this? Didn't you guys scream for years that a politician's private sex life was irrelevant to his job performance? Remember?

 

[aaronleland]

We don't know how early it is. Mueller referred the case to New York months ago, and it sometimes takes months to obtain a search warrant. First you need probable cause. Obviously this federal judge was provided enough evidence already to authorize the raids.

If he referred, then he is expanding his resources. Mullier and the US district attorney of New York are still in communication with each other.

The New York US attorney claims Mueller has had nothing to do with the investigation since the referral, and why would he have to be involved? Cohen handed his own ass on a platter when acknowledging the Stormy Daniels payment, and the FBI raided his home. They have more information than Mueller ever had. Why would they need his assistance?

Where did the initial information of these findings “originate” to suggest a need to raid on Trump’s personal attorney, from Mullier or the US attorney from New York? I’m bringing rational thought into the discussion in connecting the dots. If this discovery came from Mullier, he is connected to the need for the raid into Cohen by means of a referral. A referral that comes from a request under his authority of investigation, to the attorney referred in using their resources to uncover information. If the US district attorney found this information completely on their own, separate from anything that the special council ever desired to be suspect or uncovered, a referral FROM special council Mullier would not have been required.

It wasn't done as part of a Presidential campaign, snowflake.

Yes, actually it was my little zealot. I know that nothing anyone says will ever get you to say an ill word about your savior, but the payoff was done specifically because of the campaign. Had their been no campaign, there would have been no payoff

You have nothing put assumptions to support that claim.

Well, we know that for 10 years after Trump banged the porn star she was not paid to stay silent. Then during the heart of a very close campaign she was paid to stay silent...some of us are able to add 1 plus 1 and get 2. I cannot help that you lack that basic level of intelligence.

LOL yeah considering that most of Brip's fellow travellers are convinced that Hillary Clinton whacked Vince Foster- having them lecture us about how it is just a coincidence that Stormy Daniels was bribed to keep quiet about Trump days before the election is pretty hilarious.

I have never posted a thing about Vince Foster, you sleazy lying jackass. Getting fucked up the ass must cause brain damage. That's the only explanation for your posts.

Do you believe the Clintons murdered Vince Foster?

 

[aaronleland]

LOL yeah considering that most of Brip's fellow travellers are convinced that Hillary Clinton whacked Vince Foster- having them lecture us about how it is just a coincidence that Stormy Daniels was bribed to keep quiet about Trump days before the election is pretty hilarious.

I've never said it's a coincidence. But, look at the timing. She was paid to keep quiet--specifically, to sign a non-disclosure agreement--because Trump was in a very close election for president. Obviously, she was making some private noises that she was gonna go public--that's a form of blackmail. So Trump's lawyer paid her to keep quiet and he ensured her cooperation by having her sign a non-disclosure agreement. There is nothing the least bit illegal about that. It was a voluntary, legal transaction. So why are we even talking about this? Didn't you guys scream for years that a politician's private sex life was irrelevant to his job performance? Remember?

The timing is the problem. A few days before the election. Tell me about that time Clinton made Lewinsky sign an NDA. Oh, he was actually impeached for less? Silly me.

 

[Syriusly]

We don't know how early it is. Mueller referred the case to New York months ago, and it sometimes takes months to obtain a search warrant. First you need probable cause. Obviously this federal judge was provided enough evidence already to authorize the raids.

If he referred, then he is expanding his resources. Mullier and the US district attorney of New York are still in communication with each other.

The New York US attorney claims Mueller has had nothing to do with the investigation since the referral, and why would he have to be involved? Cohen handed his own ass on a platter when acknowledging the Stormy Daniels payment, and the FBI raided his home. They have more information than Mueller ever had. Why would they need his assistance?

Where did the initial information of these findings “originate” to suggest a need to raid on Trump’s personal attorney, from Mullier or the US attorney from New York? I’m bringing rational thought into the discussion in connecting the dots. If this discovery came from Mullier, he is connected to the need for the raid into Cohen by means of a referral. A referral that comes from a request under his authority of investigation, to the attorney referred in using their resources to uncover information. If the US district attorney found this information completely on their own, separate from anything that the special council ever desired to be suspect or uncovered, a referral FROM special council Mullier would not have been required.

It wasn't done as part of a Presidential campaign, snowflake.

Yes, actually it was my little zealot. I know that nothing anyone says will ever get you to say an ill word about your savior, but the payoff was done specifically because of the campaign. Had their been no campaign, there would have been no payoff

You have nothing put assumptions to support that claim.

Well, we know that for 10 years after Trump banged the porn star she was not paid to stay silent. Then during the heart of a very close campaign she was paid to stay silent...some of us are able to add 1 plus 1 and get 2. I cannot help that you lack that basic level of intelligence.

LOL yeah considering that most of Brip's fellow travellers are convinced that Hillary Clinton whacked Vince Foster- having them lecture us about how it is just a coincidence that Stormy Daniels was bribed to keep quiet about Trump days before the election is pretty hilarious.

I have never posted a thing about Vince Foster, you sleazy lying jackass. Getting fucked up the ass must cause brain damage. That's the only explanation for your posts.

Brip words
"I have never posted a thing about Vince Foster"
Meet Brip lies

1. 
   Post
   Hillary "scrubbed" From Benghazi
   It sounds like a replay of what happened when Vince Foster committed suicide. This woman is a snake and a criminal. It would be a travesty if...
   Post by: bripat9643, Sep 18, 2014 in forum: Politics

 

[bripat9643]

Who cares what the Washington Post says?

Said no snowflake ever.

But really who cares if the Washington post says trump isn’t the center of the investigation? Not saying they are or were lying but maybe they are wrong. Or maybe he wasn’t yet but now is.

Of course they’re trying to find evidence that implicates trump. If they do then he will become the center of the investigation

If not Trump

Who is the center of the investigation?

The investigation would be regarding Russia’s interference and influence into the election, not Trump. The special councils efforts are geared towards the Presidential election, towards that interest in finding Russian interference as well as influence. If not... Then this is about a personal investigation of Trump, regardless of what the Special Council parameters are and it’s original mandate states.

The investigation was in regards to Russia's interference in the election and possible collusion by the Trump campaign.

And any crimes discovered in the course of the investigation. The Special counsel is authorized to pursue any suspected crimes that arise out of the investigation into Russia and Trump.

Which he is doing.

What is the connection between Stormy Daniels and Russian collusion? Where's the connection with anything Manafort is charged with and Russian collusion? Face it, Herr Mewler is conducting a witch hunt. That couldn't be more obvious.

 

[depotoo]

Funny how the change the parameters almost on a daily basis. I can just hear them thinking, surely one of these will fly!
If at first you don’t succeed, try, try again. Truth be damned!

Looking at the continual stream of liberal threads on the Stormy Daniels scandal, one wonders if liberals realize that Daniels' alleged hookup with Trump supposedly occurred in 2006, 12 years ago, and that Cohen's payoff to her occurred in 2016, 10 years after the alleged encounter and long before Donald Trump even ran for president?

Bribery happened less than 2 years ago. No one really cares about the sex and perversions. Bribery is what counts.

It was a signed NDA. First it was “coerced”, now it’s a “bribe”? You lefties need to keep your lies straight.

 

[aaronleland]

If he referred, then he is expanding his resources. Mullier and the US district attorney of New York are still in communication with each other.

The New York US attorney claims Mueller has had nothing to do with the investigation since the referral, and why would he have to be involved? Cohen handed his own ass on a platter when acknowledging the Stormy Daniels payment, and the FBI raided his home. They have more information than Mueller ever had. Why would they need his assistance?

Where did the initial information of these findings “originate” to suggest a need to raid on Trump’s personal attorney, from Mullier or the US attorney from New York? I’m bringing rational thought into the discussion in connecting the dots. If this discovery came from Mullier, he is connected to the need for the raid into Cohen by means of a referral. A referral that comes from a request under his authority of investigation, to the attorney referred in using their resources to uncover information. If the US district attorney found this information completely on their own, separate from anything that the special council ever desired to be suspect or uncovered, a referral FROM special council Mullier would not have been required.

Yes, actually it was my little zealot. I know that nothing anyone says will ever get you to say an ill word about your savior, but the payoff was done specifically because of the campaign. Had their been no campaign, there would have been no payoff

You have nothing put assumptions to support that claim.

Well, we know that for 10 years after Trump banged the porn star she was not paid to stay silent. Then during the heart of a very close campaign she was paid to stay silent...some of us are able to add 1 plus 1 and get 2. I cannot help that you lack that basic level of intelligence.

LOL yeah considering that most of Brip's fellow travellers are convinced that Hillary Clinton whacked Vince Foster- having them lecture us about how it is just a coincidence that Stormy Daniels was bribed to keep quiet about Trump days before the election is pretty hilarious.

I have never posted a thing about Vince Foster, you sleazy lying jackass. Getting fucked up the ass must cause brain damage. That's the only explanation for your posts.

Brip words
"I have never posted a thing about Vince Foster"
Meet Brip lies

1. 
   Post
   Hillary "scrubbed" From Benghazi
   It sounds like a replay of what happened when Vince Foster committed suicide. This woman is a snake and a criminal. It would be a travesty if...
   Post by: bripat9643, Sep 18, 2014 in forum: Politics

So there's an extensive criminal cabal run by the Clintons that hasn't been uncovered by investigators for 30 years, but Michael Cohen couldn't have done shit wrong, because who would believe a New York lawyer may be dirty. They're usually well-known for their hatred of right-wingers, but there's no way the long time Neocon could be lying.

 

[aaronleland]

Said no snowflake ever.

But really who cares if the Washington post says trump isn’t the center of the investigation? Not saying they are or were lying but maybe they are wrong. Or maybe he wasn’t yet but now is.

Of course they’re trying to find evidence that implicates trump. If they do then he will become the center of the investigation

If not Trump

Who is the center of the investigation?

The investigation would be regarding Russia’s interference and influence into the election, not Trump. The special councils efforts are geared towards the Presidential election, towards that interest in finding Russian interference as well as influence. If not... Then this is about a personal investigation of Trump, regardless of what the Special Council parameters are and it’s original mandate states.

The investigation was in regards to Russia's interference in the election and possible collusion by the Trump campaign.

And any crimes discovered in the course of the investigation. The Special counsel is authorized to pursue any suspected crimes that arise out of the investigation into Russia and Trump.

Which he is doing.

What is the connection between Stormy Daniels and Russian collusion? Where's the connection with anything Manafort is charged with and Russian collusion? Face it, Herr Mewler is conducting a witch hunt. That couldn't be more obvious.

There is no connection. Mueller has nothing to do with the Stormy Daniels investigation.

 

[jc456]

Looking at the continual stream of liberal threads on the Stormy Daniels scandal, one wonders if liberals realize that Daniels' alleged hookup with Trump supposedly occurred in 2006, 12 years ago, and that Cohen's payoff to her occurred in 2016, 10 years after the alleged encounter and long before Donald Trump even ran for president?

Bribery happened less than 2 years ago. No one really cares about the sex and perversions. Bribery is what counts.

Nothing to do with trump though

 

[jc456]

The New York US attorney claims Mueller has had nothing to do with the investigation since the referral, and why would he have to be involved? Cohen handed his own ass on a platter when acknowledging the Stormy Daniels payment, and the FBI raided his home. They have more information than Mueller ever had. Why would they need his assistance?

Where did the initial information of these findings “originate” to suggest a need to raid on Trump’s personal attorney, from Mullier or the US attorney from New York? I’m bringing rational thought into the discussion in connecting the dots. If this discovery came from Mullier, he is connected to the need for the raid into Cohen by means of a referral. A referral that comes from a request under his authority of investigation, to the attorney referred in using their resources to uncover information. If the US district attorney found this information completely on their own, separate from anything that the special council ever desired to be suspect or uncovered, a referral FROM special council Mullier would not have been required.

You have nothing put assumptions to support that claim.

Well, we know that for 10 years after Trump banged the porn star she was not paid to stay silent. Then during the heart of a very close campaign she was paid to stay silent...some of us are able to add 1 plus 1 and get 2. I cannot help that you lack that basic level of intelligence.

LOL yeah considering that most of Brip's fellow travellers are convinced that Hillary Clinton whacked Vince Foster- having them lecture us about how it is just a coincidence that Stormy Daniels was bribed to keep quiet about Trump days before the election is pretty hilarious.

I have never posted a thing about Vince Foster, you sleazy lying jackass. Getting fucked up the ass must cause brain damage. That's the only explanation for your posts.

Brip words
"I have never posted a thing about Vince Foster"
Meet Brip lies

1. 
   Post
   Hillary "scrubbed" From Benghazi
   It sounds like a replay of what happened when Vince Foster committed suicide. This woman is a snake and a criminal. It would be a travesty if...
   Post by: bripat9643, Sep 18, 2014 in forum: Politics

So there's an extensive criminal cabal run by the Clintons that hasn't been uncovered by investigators for 30 years, but Michael Cohen couldn't have done shit wrong, because who would believe a New York lawyer may be dirty. They're usually well-known for their hatred of right-wingers, but there's no way the long time Neocon could be lying.

So name something Nancy

 

[depotoo]

See, you guys so want it all to be true, you never realize it could also be a case of extortion.

Looking at the continual stream of liberal threads on the Stormy Daniels scandal, one wonders if liberals realize that Daniels' alleged hookup with Trump supposedly occurred in 2006, 12 years ago, and that Cohen's payoff to her occurred in 2016, 10 years after the alleged encounter and long before Donald Trump even ran for president?

Bribery happened less than 2 years ago. No one really cares about the sex and perversions. Bribery is what counts.

Let’s start with a comparison of Trump’s special council investigation to that of the investigation of President Clinton. Monica Lewinsky occurred during the “political office” of the presidency, this led to other women coming forward (to include Jennifer Flowers during the “political office” of his governorship). In each case against Clinton there was a building common thread.

Now why waste time, resources, and taxpayer dollars on a 12 year old consensual involvement with a porn star? .

Do you have any indication that Mueller cares about or investigating a 12 year old adultererous affair between Trump and a porn star?

What I see is Mueller referring to another U.S. attorney a case of possible election campaign contribution fraud- which took place in the last few weeks of the 2016 election.