Uh, Do Liberals Realize that the Stormy Daniels-Donald Trump Incident Happened 12 Years Ago?

[Syriusly]

If not Trump

Who is the center of the investigation?

The investigation would be regarding Russia’s interference and influence into the election, not Trump. The special councils efforts are geared towards the Presidential election, towards that interest in finding Russian interference as well as influence. If not... Then this is about a personal investigation of Trump, regardless of what the Special Council parameters are and it’s original mandate states.

The investigation was in regards to Russia's interference in the election and possible collusion by the Trump campaign.

And any crimes discovered in the course of the investigation. The Special counsel is authorized to pursue any suspected crimes that arise out of the investigation into Russia and Trump.

Which he is doing.

What is the connection between Stormy Daniels and Russian collusion? .

The investigation was in regards to Russia's interference in the election and possible collusion by the Trump campaign.

And any crimes discovered in the course of the investigation. The Special counsel is authorized to pursue any suspected crimes that arise out of the investigation into Russia and Trump.

Which he is doing.

Mueller isn't investigating Stormy Daniels.

What? Collusion isn’t a crime, so why did their need to be an investigation?

Wow- if you are still asking this question after a year of the investigation- well I can't really help you.

 

[Syriusly]

Looking at the continual stream of liberal threads on the Stormy Daniels scandal, one wonders if liberals realize that Daniels' alleged hookup with Trump supposedly occurred in 2006, 12 years ago, and that Cohen's payoff to her occurred in 2016, 10 years after the alleged encounter and long before Donald Trump even ran for president?

Do conservatives realize this issue has nothing to do with Hillary Clinton?

Why not, she colluded with Russia?

Tell us more about how Clinton was the one who paid off Trump's mistress right before the election so she wouldn't talk about Trump's adulterous affair.

I am very curious.

 

[LuckyDuck]

Looking at the continual stream of liberal threads on the Stormy Daniels scandal, one wonders if liberals realize that Daniels' alleged hookup with Trump supposedly occurred in 2006, 12 years ago, and that Cohen's payoff to her occurred in 2016, 10 years after the alleged encounter and long before Donald Trump even ran for president?

Bribery happened less than 2 years ago. No one really cares about the sex and perversions. Bribery is what counts.

Trump can't be charged with anything related to Daniels or any other tramp, before he ran for office. They are CIVIL matters, even paying so-called hush money to a tramp to stay quiet about an affair. If he had a woman paid off to keep quiet about his committing an actual "crime." that would be different, but infidelity isn't a crime, just a civil matter.

 

[Syriusly]

Looking at the continual stream of liberal threads on the Stormy Daniels scandal, one wonders if liberals realize that Daniels' alleged hookup with Trump supposedly occurred in 2006, 12 years ago, and that Cohen's payoff to her occurred in 2016, 10 years after the alleged encounter and long before Donald Trump even ran for president?

Bribery happened less than 2 years ago. No one really cares about the sex and perversions. Bribery is what counts.

Trump can't be charged with anything related to Daniels or any other tramp, before he ran for office. They are CIVIL matters, even paying so-called hush money to a tramp to stay quiet about an affair. If he had a woman paid off to keep quiet about his committing an actual "crime." that would be different, but infidelity isn't a crime, just a civil matter.

True- Trump cannot be charged with any of his adulteries before he ran for office.

However- if he had a woman paid off to keep quiet in order to affect the election- that would be a campaign contribution. A possibly illegal campaign contribution.

Remember- it wasn't the blowjob that Clinton was impeached for.

 

[Billo_Really]

Why not, she colluded with Russia?

My girlfriend wouldn't suck my dick the other night, did Hillary have anything to do with that?

 

[Billo_Really]

Tell us more about how Clinton was the one who paid off Trump's mistress right before the election so she wouldn't talk about Trump's adulterous affair.

I am very curious.

Or how it was a republican who started and initially funded the Steele dossier.

 

[Kondor3]

Looking at the continual stream of liberal threads on the Stormy Daniels scandal, one wonders if liberals realize that Daniels' alleged hookup with Trump supposedly occurred in 2006, 12 years ago, and that Cohen's payoff to her occurred in 2016, 10 years after the alleged encounter and long before Donald Trump even ran for president?

Doesn't matter how long ago it was.

Your boy has publicly denied the allegations.

You DO believe him don't you?

If true, then, ya'll have nothing to worry about, and will not mind a brief time spent on a deeper probing... Trust But Verify.

Uhhhh... you DO believe him, right?

 

[mikegriffith1]

Tell us more about how Clinton was the one who paid off Trump's mistress right before the election so she wouldn't talk about Trump's adulterous affair. I am very curious.

You are again avoiding the point: It's not illegal to pay someone to sign a non-disclosure agreement about an affair that happened years earlier (in this case, 10 years earlier) to avoid public embarrassment. People get paid to sign NDAs every year in the U.S. It's not an unheard of occurrence, much less an illegal one.

Now, perhaps you can explain why you guys said over and over that private sexual conduct should be a non-issue in judging politicians when Bill Clinton, as president, repeatedly lied under oath and obstructed justice in response to Paul Jones' sexual harassment lawsuit.

 

[bripat9643]

Tell us more about how Clinton was the one who paid off Trump's mistress right before the election so she wouldn't talk about Trump's adulterous affair.

I am very curious.

Or how it was a republican who started and initially funded the Steele dossier.

Wrong, turd. They used Fusion GPS, but the dossier was funded totally by Hillary.

 

[bripat9643]

Looking at the continual stream of liberal threads on the Stormy Daniels scandal, one wonders if liberals realize that Daniels' alleged hookup with Trump supposedly occurred in 2006, 12 years ago, and that Cohen's payoff to her occurred in 2016, 10 years after the alleged encounter and long before Donald Trump even ran for president?

Doesn't matter how long ago it was.

Your boy has publicly denied the allegations.

You DO believe him don't you?

If true, then, ya'll have nothing to worry about, and will not mind a brief time spent on a deeper probing... Trust But Verify.

Uhhhh... you DO believe him, right?

That's utter horseshit. Herr Mewler has no business poking his nose into a matter that was totally legal. Whether we worried or not has no bearing on the issue. You're the kind of douche bag who says the government should be have house to house searches to look for drugs. You're a fucknig Nazi.

 

[bripat9643]

Why not, she colluded with Russia?

My girlfriend wouldn't suck my dick the other night, did Hillary have anything to do with that?

I would hope not, but she obviously is guilty as hell of Russian collusion.

 

[bripat9643]

Looking at the continual stream of liberal threads on the Stormy Daniels scandal, one wonders if liberals realize that Daniels' alleged hookup with Trump supposedly occurred in 2006, 12 years ago, and that Cohen's payoff to her occurred in 2016, 10 years after the alleged encounter and long before Donald Trump even ran for president?

Bribery happened less than 2 years ago. No one really cares about the sex and perversions. Bribery is what counts.

Trump can't be charged with anything related to Daniels or any other tramp, before he ran for office. They are CIVIL matters, even paying so-called hush money to a tramp to stay quiet about an affair. If he had a woman paid off to keep quiet about his committing an actual "crime." that would be different, but infidelity isn't a crime, just a civil matter.

Notice that the snowflakes aren't even interested as to whether Hillary's campaign paid the spurned gold diggers to smear Trump.

 

[bripat9643]

The investigation would be regarding Russia’s interference and influence into the election, not Trump. The special councils efforts are geared towards the Presidential election, towards that interest in finding Russian interference as well as influence. If not... Then this is about a personal investigation of Trump, regardless of what the Special Council parameters are and it’s original mandate states.

The investigation was in regards to Russia's interference in the election and possible collusion by the Trump campaign.

And any crimes discovered in the course of the investigation. The Special counsel is authorized to pursue any suspected crimes that arise out of the investigation into Russia and Trump.

Which he is doing.

What is the connection between Stormy Daniels and Russian collusion? .

The investigation was in regards to Russia's interference in the election and possible collusion by the Trump campaign.

And any crimes discovered in the course of the investigation. The Special counsel is authorized to pursue any suspected crimes that arise out of the investigation into Russia and Trump.

Which he is doing.

Mueller isn't investigating Stormy Daniels.

What? Collusion isn’t a crime, so why did their need to be an investigation?

Wow- if you are still asking this question after a year of the investigation- well I can't really help you.

You douchebags have never answered it.

 

[bripat9643]

Looking at the continual stream of liberal threads on the Stormy Daniels scandal, one wonders if liberals realize that Daniels' alleged hookup with Trump supposedly occurred in 2006, 12 years ago, and that Cohen's payoff to her occurred in 2016, 10 years after the alleged encounter and long before Donald Trump even ran for president?

Bribery happened less than 2 years ago. No one really cares about the sex and perversions. Bribery is what counts.

Trump can't be charged with anything related to Daniels or any other tramp, before he ran for office. They are CIVIL matters, even paying so-called hush money to a tramp to stay quiet about an affair. If he had a woman paid off to keep quiet about his committing an actual "crime." that would be different, but infidelity isn't a crime, just a civil matter.

True- Trump cannot be charged with any of his adulteries before he ran for office.

However- if he had a woman paid off to keep quiet in order to affect the election- that would be a campaign contribution. A possibly illegal campaign contribution.

Remember- it wasn't the blowjob that Clinton was impeached for.

Even if all that is true, it has nothing to do with Russian collusion, and the penalty for violating the rules on campaign violations is normally a small financial penalty. Hillary and Bill have both been fined a number of times. It's still a big nothing burger.

 

[initforme]

What Clinton did was immoral and wrong. Associating with a pornstar is immoral. But you lessers will take to their defense because you just have to defend the person you vote for.

 

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

They don't care how they do it................They are dirty........and use every BS excuse to get their way.

When they do it.............oh well.............we know that.

Here's their GREAT RUSSIA COLLUSION.

Yeah- Donald colluded the heck out of her while his new wife and baby stayed at home......

And then his attorney paid her off so voters wouldn't hear about it.

Extra marital affairs are issues for a different court.........where they divide up assets in the divorce.................Not a Russia investigation.

Your side is fishing.............and will fish for anything......anyway.........anyhow........

People with have a brain cell KNOW THAT..............guess needing a full brain cell leaves you guys out.

You realize no one cares who the sexual predator had affairs with, right?

lol

Predator........she agreed to do him...............which one was the Predator............

LOL

did I say he attacked her. moron?

someone who grabs women by the genitals without their consent and watches 15 years old girls in a dressing room is a sexual predator (not to mention the dozen women who said he accosted them).

I forgot I have to spell everything out specifically for uneducated trumptards.

With regard to Trump’s grabbing comment - We all know there are women “groupies” our tyere who throw themselves at celebrities, infatuated with the idea of an involvement in some form of relationship fantasy over those of fame and wealth. These women throw themselves at them for the chance to get close to them, and yes offer themselves in ways they wouldn’t otherwise do with the common everyday hard working man without either. Trump obviously speaks of the lifestyle that’s associated with fame recognition and wealth, in reference towards those particular women who gravitate towards both. These particular women throw themselves at these men over what they have. There has never been a discussion made by Trump “in context” where women are forced upon. Apparently an explanation is needed for those who can’t tell the difference.

Aside of that.. the discussion took place not from the White House, nor any act from a political office, so it has no bearing on Trump’s presidency. This was an event prior from any plan to pursue political office. Also, after the democrat embarrassment of Harvey Weinstein, the photos of Al Franken, supporting a woman candidate who protects a sexual predator during his political tenure, and the sexual behavior of Anthony Weiner, progressives are in no position to lecture republican conservatives on proper sexual behavior. Laugh if you may,, but I speak the truth.

 

[Billo_Really]

Wrong, turd. They used Fusion GPS, but the dossier was funded totally by Hillary.

The Hillary campaign and the DNC. You act as though she personally cut a check. Lets just say, for the sake of argument, she actually went down to her local ATM, withdrew the money and gave it to Steele over a cup of coffee, that doesn't mean everything in Steele's memos are false. All the information Steele received from his contacts in Russia, could be true. Some of which was corroborated by another source within the Trump campaign.

 

[eagle1462010]

Wrong, turd. They used Fusion GPS, but the dossier was funded totally by Hillary.

The Hillary campaign and the DNC. You act as though she personally cut a check. Lets just say, for the sake of argument, she actually went down to her local ATM, withdrew the money and gave it to Steele over a cup of coffee, that doesn't mean everything in Steele's memos are false. All the information Steele received from his contacts in Russia, could be true. Some of which was corroborated by another source within the Trump campaign.

That is not how the money laundering Clinton Foundation works....................

Always middle men and deniability........

 

[Billo_Really]

I would hope not, but she obviously is guilty as hell of Russian collusion.

And what was her collusion with the Russians?

 

[Billo_Really]

That is not how the money laundering Clinton Foundation works....................

Always middle men and deniability........

Maybe she can take a few tips from Trumps money laundering?