Uh-oh! Terrible news for Hillary in new poll

Yes, there is, indeed, such a thing as a Like-able Thief, isn't there?

Doesn't detract from the perception, nor its likely accuracy.

Rightwing media has been trying to pin something on Hillary for twenty years......crying wolf helping you much?
LOL! Hillary and Bill have been the Bonnie and Clyde of the American political scene for 20 years. Useful idiots like you have enabled them.
Why isnt the Justice Dept looking ito these serious allegations?

Bonnie and Clyde?

Giving up on Hitler and Eva already?
I'd say that hadnt killed enough people, or that Hitler had far more principle than Bill and Hillary ever had. But whatever.

Winner, winner chicken dinner

Rabbi being Rabbi
Hillary is ethically challenged like Nixon, true. I wonder if she'll sweat under the lights like him.

Ethically challenged according to the rightwing nut jobs

How many Benghazi investigations now? Eleven?
LOL! No, she didnt sell her services as SecState to corporations and foreign governments. No sirree! Just a coincidence Bill got paid 750K for a speech in Kazakhstan, a place he had previously had zero interest in.

More rightwing conspiracy theories....Kazakstan?

Heavy shit
Are you disputing that Bill got paid $750K for a speech in Kazakhstan?
Are you disputing that Kazakhstan had important business that needed the US?
Are you disputing that Hillary as SecState made the decisions that Kazakhstan was looking for?
Do you dispute there actually is such a place?

As a former US president, Bill gets a shitload of money wherever he speaks.

Your Kazakhstan conspiracy theories are pathetic....but then again, you ARE the Rabbi
OK so you're going with "Denial." Fortunately voters arent quite so pathetically stupid as you are.
 
Rightwing media has been trying to pin something on Hillary for twenty years......crying wolf helping you much?
LOL! Hillary and Bill have been the Bonnie and Clyde of the American political scene for 20 years. Useful idiots like you have enabled them.
Why isnt the Justice Dept looking ito these serious allegations?

Bonnie and Clyde?

Giving up on Hitler and Eva already?
I'd say that hadnt killed enough people, or that Hitler had far more principle than Bill and Hillary ever had. But whatever.

Winner, winner chicken dinner

Rabbi being Rabbi
Ethically challenged according to the rightwing nut jobs

How many Benghazi investigations now? Eleven?
LOL! No, she didnt sell her services as SecState to corporations and foreign governments. No sirree! Just a coincidence Bill got paid 750K for a speech in Kazakhstan, a place he had previously had zero interest in.

More rightwing conspiracy theories....Kazakstan?

Heavy shit
Are you disputing that Bill got paid $750K for a speech in Kazakhstan?
Are you disputing that Kazakhstan had important business that needed the US?
Are you disputing that Hillary as SecState made the decisions that Kazakhstan was looking for?
Do you dispute there actually is such a place?

As a former US president, Bill gets a shitload of money wherever he speaks.

Your Kazakhstan conspiracy theories are pathetic....but then again, you ARE the Rabbi
OK so you're going with "Denial." Fortunately voters arent quite so pathetically stupid as you are.
This is a six year old story. It is one of the alleged scandals that constitute the creation of the GOP crying wolf to many times. The story didn't get legs back in 2009 and 2010, so why do you think it would be of any serious interest today? The decisions made by the Sec. of State benefited both Kazakhstan and the US. That is where the conspiracy theory of a scandal fell apart. The US got the things it wanted, including a non proliferation agreements. It was viewed as a good deal and was one of the early accomplishments that helped restore confidence in the new administration.
 
Last edited:
If she is going to continue to be a coward, then how will she get the independants to vote for her when she wont take questions from anyone? well maybe her pet gerbils.

Independents seem to want her to run.
I don't. You keep dragging that heavy assed brush around, lady. Isn't your arm tired YET? :lol:

(Teasin' ya)

It was a poll. I think the poll clearly states my point and whether you agree with it or not is on you.
:chillpill:
I see you don't have wry humor. Noted.


In my defense I was very drunk.
 
LOL! Hillary and Bill have been the Bonnie and Clyde of the American political scene for 20 years. Useful idiots like you have enabled them.
Why isnt the Justice Dept looking ito these serious allegations?

Bonnie and Clyde?

Giving up on Hitler and Eva already?
I'd say that hadnt killed enough people, or that Hitler had far more principle than Bill and Hillary ever had. But whatever.

Winner, winner chicken dinner

Rabbi being Rabbi
LOL! No, she didnt sell her services as SecState to corporations and foreign governments. No sirree! Just a coincidence Bill got paid 750K for a speech in Kazakhstan, a place he had previously had zero interest in.

More rightwing conspiracy theories....Kazakstan?

Heavy shit
Are you disputing that Bill got paid $750K for a speech in Kazakhstan?
Are you disputing that Kazakhstan had important business that needed the US?
Are you disputing that Hillary as SecState made the decisions that Kazakhstan was looking for?
Do you dispute there actually is such a place?

As a former US president, Bill gets a shitload of money wherever he speaks.

Your Kazakhstan conspiracy theories are pathetic....but then again, you ARE the Rabbi
OK so you're going with "Denial." Fortunately voters arent quite so pathetically stupid as you are.
This is a six year old story. It is one of the alleged scandals that constitute the creation of the GOP crying wolf to many times. The story didn't get legs back in 2009 and 2010, so why do you think it would be of any serious interest today? The decisions made by the Sec. of State benefited both Kazakhstan and the US. That is where the conspiracy theory of a scandal fell apart. The US got the things it wanted, including a non proliferation agreements. It was viewed as a good deal and was one of the early accomplishments that helped restore confidence in the new administration.
1) It didnt happen
2) It did happen but it was really legal
3) It's old news
4) It's a product of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy.
These are all Hillary's tactics for dealing with scandals. Nice to see they still work on the weak minded among us.
 
Bonnie and Clyde?

Giving up on Hitler and Eva already?
I'd say that hadnt killed enough people, or that Hitler had far more principle than Bill and Hillary ever had. But whatever.

Winner, winner chicken dinner

Rabbi being Rabbi
More rightwing conspiracy theories....Kazakstan?

Heavy shit
Are you disputing that Bill got paid $750K for a speech in Kazakhstan?
Are you disputing that Kazakhstan had important business that needed the US?
Are you disputing that Hillary as SecState made the decisions that Kazakhstan was looking for?
Do you dispute there actually is such a place?

As a former US president, Bill gets a shitload of money wherever he speaks.

Your Kazakhstan conspiracy theories are pathetic....but then again, you ARE the Rabbi
OK so you're going with "Denial." Fortunately voters arent quite so pathetically stupid as you are.
This is a six year old story. It is one of the alleged scandals that constitute the creation of the GOP crying wolf to many times. The story didn't get legs back in 2009 and 2010, so why do you think it would be of any serious interest today? The decisions made by the Sec. of State benefited both Kazakhstan and the US. That is where the conspiracy theory of a scandal fell apart. The US got the things it wanted, including a non proliferation agreements. It was viewed as a good deal and was one of the early accomplishments that helped restore confidence in the new administration.
1) It didnt happen
2) It did happen but it was really legal
3) It's old news
4) It's a product of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy.
These are all Hillary's tactics for dealing with scandals. Nice to see they still work on the weak minded among us.
There is no case to be made on this particular allegation of some kind of corruption. The sarcastic list of excuses for this particular alleged scandal doesn't work for most people. Only the hard core haters revert to these kinds of excuses. Of course there was no scandal if nothing illegal happened. And old regurgitated news that failed to show any corruption is indeed old news. If there is something new to report on these old stories, tell the world. Otherwise, mentioning them is indeed, a rw wing conspiracy of wittingly or unwittingly spreading false information. It is the propaganda of disinformation distribution. The bearing of false witness on a grand and quasi controlled scale. Just because the dupes may be unwitting participants doesn't make it any less of a conspiracy.
 
I'd say that hadnt killed enough people, or that Hitler had far more principle than Bill and Hillary ever had. But whatever.

Winner, winner chicken dinner

Rabbi being Rabbi
Are you disputing that Bill got paid $750K for a speech in Kazakhstan?
Are you disputing that Kazakhstan had important business that needed the US?
Are you disputing that Hillary as SecState made the decisions that Kazakhstan was looking for?
Do you dispute there actually is such a place?

As a former US president, Bill gets a shitload of money wherever he speaks.

Your Kazakhstan conspiracy theories are pathetic....but then again, you ARE the Rabbi
OK so you're going with "Denial." Fortunately voters arent quite so pathetically stupid as you are.
This is a six year old story. It is one of the alleged scandals that constitute the creation of the GOP crying wolf to many times. The story didn't get legs back in 2009 and 2010, so why do you think it would be of any serious interest today? The decisions made by the Sec. of State benefited both Kazakhstan and the US. That is where the conspiracy theory of a scandal fell apart. The US got the things it wanted, including a non proliferation agreements. It was viewed as a good deal and was one of the early accomplishments that helped restore confidence in the new administration.
1) It didnt happen
2) It did happen but it was really legal
3) It's old news
4) It's a product of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy.
These are all Hillary's tactics for dealing with scandals. Nice to see they still work on the weak minded among us.
There is no case to be made on this particular allegation of some kind of corruption. The sarcastic list of excuses for this particular alleged scandal doesn't work for most people. Only the hard core haters revert to these kinds of excuses. Of course there was no scandal if nothing illegal happened. And old regurgitated news that failed to show any corruption is indeed old news. If there is something new to report on these old stories, tell the world. Otherwise, mentioning them is indeed, a rw wing conspiracy of wittingly or unwittingly spreading false information. It is the propaganda of disinformation distribution. The bearing of false witness on a grand and quasi controlled scale. Just because the dupes may be unwitting participants doesn't make it any less of a conspiracy.
The prima facie evidence is that Hillary gave quid pro quo to foreign governments and corporations from her position as SecState. The FBI is investigatig Bob Menendez on similar charges but with far less evidence.
 
Winner, winner chicken dinner

Rabbi being Rabbi
As a former US president, Bill gets a shitload of money wherever he speaks.

Your Kazakhstan conspiracy theories are pathetic....but then again, you ARE the Rabbi
OK so you're going with "Denial." Fortunately voters arent quite so pathetically stupid as you are.
This is a six year old story. It is one of the alleged scandals that constitute the creation of the GOP crying wolf to many times. The story didn't get legs back in 2009 and 2010, so why do you think it would be of any serious interest today? The decisions made by the Sec. of State benefited both Kazakhstan and the US. That is where the conspiracy theory of a scandal fell apart. The US got the things it wanted, including a non proliferation agreements. It was viewed as a good deal and was one of the early accomplishments that helped restore confidence in the new administration.
1) It didnt happen
2) It did happen but it was really legal
3) It's old news
4) It's a product of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy.
These are all Hillary's tactics for dealing with scandals. Nice to see they still work on the weak minded among us.
There is no case to be made on this particular allegation of some kind of corruption. The sarcastic list of excuses for this particular alleged scandal doesn't work for most people. Only the hard core haters revert to these kinds of excuses. Of course there was no scandal if nothing illegal happened. And old regurgitated news that failed to show any corruption is indeed old news. If there is something new to report on these old stories, tell the world. Otherwise, mentioning them is indeed, a rw wing conspiracy of wittingly or unwittingly spreading false information. It is the propaganda of disinformation distribution. The bearing of false witness on a grand and quasi controlled scale. Just because the dupes may be unwitting participants doesn't make it any less of a conspiracy.
The prima facie evidence is that Hillary gave quid pro quo to foreign governments and corporations from her position as SecState. The FBI is investigatig Bob Menendez on similar charges but with far less evidence.
Good luck with that fishing trip. I'm sure it will be as successful as your past failed efforts.
 
I'd prefer some other Democrats for the job, but she'd do if need be.
And that's the trouble... ya'll have nobody else warmin' up in the bullpen... the Dems are a One Trick Ponly this time around.
What difference does it make to have so many candidates running when they're all saying the same thing and pandering to the same constituents?
Dynasty versus Dynasty-busting?

We don't need to elect someone from a family who has already "had a turn".

At the very least, let's not make ourselves a party to the establishing of a visible Ruling Class.

Or shall we just toss in the towel and set up a monarchy and dukedoms and earldoms and all that?

Perhaps it's not too late to get the Brits to take us back.

Not.
I see you haven't answered the question.
Sure I did.

You asked 'what difference'?

I responded: the difference between Dynasty versus Dynasty-busting.
 
Hillary is old?

That is the best you got?
No... Shrillary and Bubba are widely perceived to be corrupt... and America is a little tired of Democrats and Executive Orders and Dynasties.

Both Bill and Hillary have very high favorability ratings........unless all your news comes from the rightwing media
Yes, there is, indeed, such a thing as a Like-able Thief, isn't there?

Doesn't detract from the perception, nor its likely accuracy.

Rightwing media has been trying to pin something on Hillary for twenty years......crying wolf helping you much?

.
Nope.

Then again, most of the current crop of ammunition is quite new, and has yet to be fully exploited. Give it time.
 
Rightwing media has been trying to pin something on Hillary for twenty years......crying wolf helping you much?
LOL! Hillary and Bill have been the Bonnie and Clyde of the American political scene for 20 years. Useful idiots like you have enabled them.
Why isnt the Justice Dept looking ito these serious allegations?

Bonnie and Clyde?

Giving up on Hitler and Eva already?
I'd say that hadnt killed enough people, or that Hitler had far more principle than Bill and Hillary ever had. But whatever.

Winner, winner chicken dinner

Rabbi being Rabbi
Ethically challenged according to the rightwing nut jobs

How many Benghazi investigations now? Eleven?
LOL! No, she didnt sell her services as SecState to corporations and foreign governments. No sirree! Just a coincidence Bill got paid 750K for a speech in Kazakhstan, a place he had previously had zero interest in.

More rightwing conspiracy theories....Kazakstan?

Heavy shit
Are you disputing that Bill got paid $750K for a speech in Kazakhstan?
Are you disputing that Kazakhstan had important business that needed the US?
Are you disputing that Hillary as SecState made the decisions that Kazakhstan was looking for?
Do you dispute there actually is such a place?

As a former US president, Bill gets a shitload of money wherever he speaks.

Your Kazakhstan conspiracy theories are pathetic....but then again, you ARE the Rabbi
OK so you're going with "Denial." Fortunately voters arent quite so pathetically stupid as you are.

Voters are not stupid enough to elect a Republican president

You won't see one for a generation
 
Hillary is old?

That is the best you got?
No... Shrillary and Bubba are widely perceived to be corrupt... and America is a little tired of Democrats and Executive Orders and Dynasties.

Both Bill and Hillary have very high favorability ratings........unless all your news comes from the rightwing media
Yes, there is, indeed, such a thing as a Like-able Thief, isn't there?

Doesn't detract from the perception, nor its likely accuracy.

Rightwing media has been trying to pin something on Hillary for twenty years......crying wolf helping you much?

.
Nope.

Then again, most of the current crop of ammunition is quite new, and has yet to be fully exploited. Give it time.
Seriously folks......Hillary really did something bad this time

Trust us
 
LOL! Hillary and Bill have been the Bonnie and Clyde of the American political scene for 20 years. Useful idiots like you have enabled them.
Why isnt the Justice Dept looking ito these serious allegations?

Bonnie and Clyde?

Giving up on Hitler and Eva already?
I'd say that hadnt killed enough people, or that Hitler had far more principle than Bill and Hillary ever had. But whatever.

Winner, winner chicken dinner

Rabbi being Rabbi
LOL! No, she didnt sell her services as SecState to corporations and foreign governments. No sirree! Just a coincidence Bill got paid 750K for a speech in Kazakhstan, a place he had previously had zero interest in.

More rightwing conspiracy theories....Kazakstan?

Heavy shit
Are you disputing that Bill got paid $750K for a speech in Kazakhstan?
Are you disputing that Kazakhstan had important business that needed the US?
Are you disputing that Hillary as SecState made the decisions that Kazakhstan was looking for?
Do you dispute there actually is such a place?

As a former US president, Bill gets a shitload of money wherever he speaks.

Your Kazakhstan conspiracy theories are pathetic....but then again, you ARE the Rabbi
OK so you're going with "Denial." Fortunately voters arent quite so pathetically stupid as you are.

Voters are not stupid enough to elect a Republican president

You won't see one for a generation
"Voters are not stupid enough to elect a GOP House. You wont see one for a generation.
"Voters are not stupid enough to elect a GOP Senate. You wont see one for a generation."
See a pattern here?
 
No... Shrillary and Bubba are widely perceived to be corrupt... and America is a little tired of Democrats and Executive Orders and Dynasties.

Both Bill and Hillary have very high favorability ratings........unless all your news comes from the rightwing media
Yes, there is, indeed, such a thing as a Like-able Thief, isn't there?

Doesn't detract from the perception, nor its likely accuracy.

Rightwing media has been trying to pin something on Hillary for twenty years......crying wolf helping you much?

.
Nope.

Then again, most of the current crop of ammunition is quite new, and has yet to be fully exploited. Give it time.
Seriously folks......Hillary really did something bad this time

Trust us
You dont think bribery is bad?
 
...Seriously folks......Hillary really did something bad this time Trust us
This time (Benghazi, Email Server, Foundation Revenue Sources, Influence Peddling) the record is a little more out in the open.

Each week brings something new for the Democratic National Committee to cringe over.

I just don't know if your girl can withstand the assault that's coming.
 
...Voters are not stupid enough to elect a Republican president You won't see one for a generation
Hmmmmm... that's pretty arrogant thinking, given the loss of the House in 2010 and the loss of the Senate in 2014...

The problem for Republicans is they do not start the electoral process even with the Democrats. They start out having to win two of every three electoral votes in swing states. It is tough for Republicans to break 270 while it is difficult for Dems to drop below 310
 
I'd prefer some other Democrats for the job, but she'd do if need be.
And that's the trouble... ya'll have nobody else warmin' up in the bullpen... the Dems are a One Trick Ponly this time around.
What difference does it make to have so many candidates running when they're all saying the same thing and pandering to the same constituents?
Dynasty versus Dynasty-busting?

We don't need to elect someone from a family who has already "had a turn".

At the very least, let's not make ourselves a party to the establishing of a visible Ruling Class.

Or shall we just toss in the towel and set up a monarchy and dukedoms and earldoms and all that?

Perhaps it's not too late to get the Brits to take us back.

Not.
I see you haven't answered the question.
Sure I did.

You asked 'what difference'?

I responded: the difference between Dynasty versus Dynasty-busting.
Okay, if you say so.
 
...Seriously folks......Hillary really did something bad this time Trust us
This time (Benghazi, Email Server, Foundation Revenue Sources, Influence Peddling) the record is a little more out in the open.

Each week brings something new for the Democratic National Committee to cringe over.

I just don't know if your girl can withstand the assault that's coming.

I imagine

Just think of the nonstop congressional investigations she will face
The public will provide a collective yawn......just like all the other times
 
No... Shrillary and Bubba are widely perceived to be corrupt... and America is a little tired of Democrats and Executive Orders and Dynasties.

Both Bill and Hillary have very high favorability ratings........unless all your news comes from the rightwing media
Yes, there is, indeed, such a thing as a Like-able Thief, isn't there?

Doesn't detract from the perception, nor its likely accuracy.

Rightwing media has been trying to pin something on Hillary for twenty years......crying wolf helping you much?

.
Nope.

Then again, most of the current crop of ammunition is quite new, and has yet to be fully exploited. Give it time.
Seriously folks......Hillary really did something bad this time

Trust us
LoL!
 

Forum List

Back
Top