Ray From Cleveland
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2015
- 97,215
- 37,439
- 2,290
Who said Facebook was the same as a search engine, dumbass? Was that a knee-jerk reaction producing wrong information?Sorry, turd, but your search engine history is not public information. There's also a lot of data in your social media accounts that isn't public.Did I mention the 10th Amendment? I don't think I did. This legislation clearly violates the two of the amendments I listed. However, the 6th Amendment isn't one of the Amendments I wanted to list. It's the 4th Amendment:I suggest you read each of the Amendments very carefully, and if you need help find someone who can explain how the 10th Amendment impacts your comment and how privacy of We the People is not guaranteed anywhere in COTUS.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
4th doesn't apply to social media. Why? Because social media is a public place. Simply looking at someone's social media on a publicly accessible platform isn't "unreasonable search and seizure". That applies to your house, and also means that the police can't check your house without a warrant or just cause to enter your house.
Umm.................a Facebook page isn't the same as a search engine. You might want to find out the difference. And, what data exactly would your social media account have that isn't public? If a person doesn't set their privacy settings, anyone can see it. And, if a person friends another, then the person who was friended can see all the data. What exactly are you talking about?
Oh wait...................forgot..............knee jerk reactions and wrong information are in your wheelhouse.
However, your search history on Facebook is private information. No one has access to it but you and Facebook. If you do set your privacy settings, then all the information affected is PRIVATE. Why should the government has access to it without a warrant?
They're okay with that. What they didn't approve of is surveillance of Americans on the phone or email for national security reasons. Nobody was ever really prosecuted using surveillance alone, but the left claimed monitoring sound waves which are in every one of our faces this moment was still a Forth Amendment violation.