Unconstitutional: N Y to Check Social Media of Gun Buyers.

[HereWeGoAgain]

You're a leftist,of course you support terrorist.

Can you show me where I supported terrorists?

You support leftist...you support terrorist.

Uh huh. Do you support tRump bending over and spreading his cheeks for Saudi Arabia like he just did?

So who makes the most money for America?
Illegal invaders or SA?

So it's all about money to you?

Damn right it is!!!
If you go broke I dont give a fuck!!!
If it enriches me you can kiss my ass!!!

 

[Crepitus]

Can you show me where I supported terrorists?

You support leftist...you support terrorist.

Uh huh. Do you support tRump bending over and spreading his cheeks for Saudi Arabia like he just did?

So who makes the most money for America?
Illegal invaders or SA?

So it's all about money to you?

Damn right it is!!!
If you go broke I dont give a fuck!!!
If it enriches me you can kiss my ass!!!

Typical money grubbing sycophant.

Dismissed.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

You support leftist...you support terrorist.

Uh huh. Do you support tRump bending over and spreading his cheeks for Saudi Arabia like he just did?

How did he do that, by minding his own business and not meddling in middle-eastern affairs?

Oh, is that what you call it?

That's what I call it. It's not really any of our business. Criticize their neanderthal death methods, of course, but not to get involved.

If we don't want other nation's involved in our ways of dealing with those that we feel are traitors or have done bad things, then of course we don't want to get involved in their ways of doing things.

Criticism of these countries doing bad things to their own people is about as far as we can go if not going to be the policeman of the world. Now the Demon-crats wanting to be the policeman of the world is always subjective or convenient for a political reason, but it's not truly out of compassion or humanitarian reasons like it is attempted to be played as.

And we've been taking plenty of criticism from people overseas on how we handle illegals coming to this country, but nobody (to my knowledge) has ever suggested cutting all ties to the US or trying to punish us somehow.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

You support leftist...you support terrorist.

Uh huh. Do you support tRump bending over and spreading his cheeks for Saudi Arabia like he just did?

So who makes the most money for America?
Illegal invaders or SA?

So it's all about money to you?

Damn right it is!!!
If you go broke I dont give a fuck!!!
If it enriches me you can kiss my ass!!!

Typical money grubbing sycophant.

Dismissed.

No matter...
You can dismiss me all ya want but I'll still make money.
I hope it pains you....

 

[Wyatt earp]

You support leftist...you support terrorist.

Uh huh. Do you support tRump bending over and spreading his cheeks for Saudi Arabia like he just did?

So who makes the most money for America?
Illegal invaders or SA?

So it's all about money to you?

Damn right it is!!!
If you go broke I dont give a fuck!!!
If it enriches me you can kiss my ass!!!

Typical money grubbing sycophant.

Dismissed.

How is it when the population of the USA grew by what 60 million people since 1980? And most were Illegals ?


250 thousand anchor babies born a year now.


.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

You guys will just say anything to excuse tRump.

Subjective....and incorrect.
Conservatives tend to have better moral character and will more often stand with RIGHT over WRONG, regardless. Not always, but more often.
Remember, we fear that silly "Sky God" you call non existent. And fear landing in Hell.....(aka, Blue states, your Utopia)

Fuck, if you guys were actually right and honest at least 51% of the time....I'd be a Democrat

 

[Timmy]

Why are you so paranoid? For as many years as you have been scared of someone coming to get your guns, how many times has someone actually come to your door to do that?

Gun siezures under Maryland 'Red Flag' law exceed expectations

Maryland officers serving "red flag" gun removal order fatally shoot armed man - CBS News

What’s your point ? “Red flag” laws require that someone is a danger . The guy in your link sure did seem to fall under that definition .

They never disclosed the reason for the order, so you don’t really know that, do you

They have to go to court and get a judge to order .The guy shows up at the door with gun in hand. Struggle ensues .

Just reading the story you can pick out that the old man was a danger. You imply the police just randomly showed up at his door .

I said the reason was never disclosed and just because he responded with force to an order that was implemented to infringe on his rights does not necessarily make him crazy.

The point was that you guys keep insisting you aren’t trying to confiscate anybody’s guns and yet in this one month there’s been over 100 other of those red flag orders issued in just that one state, so why do you continue to deny it?

Give me one example that wasn’t justified . And it doesn’t take months to have a hearing .


Let me ask you . If someone is obviously mentally ill and a danger to themselves or others , we should do nothing ?

 

[BuckToothMoron]

A blatant violation of the First and Second and Sixth Amendments. These Blue State Dims are indistinguishable from Stalinists.

Gun purchasers may need to submit social media history under proposed New York legislation​

Those looking to buy a gun in New York may need to submit their social media profiles and search history prior to purchase if new firearm legislation in the state becomes law.

Under the legislation drafted by Brooklyn Borough President Eric Adams and State Senator Kevin Parker, both Democrats, up to three years’ worth of search history on social media would be able to be reviewed, ABC Action News reported.

Senate Bill 9191, according to WHAM, mandates "social media and search engine reviews prior to the approval of an application or renewal of a license to carry or possess a pistol or revolver; requires a person applying for a license to carry or possess a pistol or revolver or a renewal of such license to consent to having his or her social media accounts and search engine history reviewed and investigated for certain posts and/or searches over a period of 1-3 years prior to the approval of such application or renewal; defines terms." Under the proposed legislation, law enforcement officials could investigate "commonly known profane slurs used or biased language used to describe race, national origin, ancestry, gender, religion, disability or sexual orientation; threatening health or safety of another person, or an act of terrorism."​

I say if the people of New York want this, let them have it. Then we can all watch and see how it works. Just as long as the Feds don’t start passing more strict gun laws across the board, I’m cool.

 

[Wyatt earp]

A blatant violation of the First and Second and Sixth Amendments. These Blue State Dims are indistinguishable from Stalinists.

Gun purchasers may need to submit social media history under proposed New York legislation​

Those looking to buy a gun in New York may need to submit their social media profiles and search history prior to purchase if new firearm legislation in the state becomes law.

Under the legislation drafted by Brooklyn Borough President Eric Adams and State Senator Kevin Parker, both Democrats, up to three years’ worth of search history on social media would be able to be reviewed, ABC Action News reported.

Senate Bill 9191, according to WHAM, mandates "social media and search engine reviews prior to the approval of an application or renewal of a license to carry or possess a pistol or revolver; requires a person applying for a license to carry or possess a pistol or revolver or a renewal of such license to consent to having his or her social media accounts and search engine history reviewed and investigated for certain posts and/or searches over a period of 1-3 years prior to the approval of such application or renewal; defines terms." Under the proposed legislation, law enforcement officials could investigate "commonly known profane slurs used or biased language used to describe race, national origin, ancestry, gender, religion, disability or sexual orientation; threatening health or safety of another person, or an act of terrorism."​

I say if the people of New York want this, let them have it. Then we can all watch and see how it works. Just as long as the Feds don’t start passing more strict gun laws across the board, I’m cool.

What if they could get access to the internet anonymous social boards, like this one?


Could they?


.

 

[bripat9643]

A blatant violation of the First and Second and Sixth Amendments. These Blue State Dims are indistinguishable from Stalinists.

Gun purchasers may need to submit social media history under proposed New York legislation​

Those looking to buy a gun in New York may need to submit their social media profiles and search history prior to purchase if new firearm legislation in the state becomes law.

Under the legislation drafted by Brooklyn Borough President Eric Adams and State Senator Kevin Parker, both Democrats, up to three years’ worth of search history on social media would be able to be reviewed, ABC Action News reported.

Senate Bill 9191, according to WHAM, mandates "social media and search engine reviews prior to the approval of an application or renewal of a license to carry or possess a pistol or revolver; requires a person applying for a license to carry or possess a pistol or revolver or a renewal of such license to consent to having his or her social media accounts and search engine history reviewed and investigated for certain posts and/or searches over a period of 1-3 years prior to the approval of such application or renewal; defines terms." Under the proposed legislation, law enforcement officials could investigate "commonly known profane slurs used or biased language used to describe race, national origin, ancestry, gender, religion, disability or sexual orientation; threatening health or safety of another person, or an act of terrorism."​

I say if the people of New York want this, let them have it. Then we can all watch and see how it works. Just as long as the Feds don’t start passing more strict gun laws across the board, I’m cool.

No, the people of New York can't be allowed to pass laws that violate the Constitution. You think other states wouldn't try the same thing if New York gets away with it?

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

Which is why these "immigrants" have to leave their own countries!

Venezuela turned radial extreme Left in 2015 and got the Dictator they craved.

Since then the country has hemorrhaged 87% of it's wealth and 35% of it's population....and counting.
Inflation is staggering....it takes truck loads of their currency to buy a loaf of bread.

But dishonest leftist will scoff and try to pull a fast one saying that "Venezuelan Socialism is totally different"
Bullshit! No the Fuck it isn't. it's the SAME crap they are working to bring here.....they're just to stupid to even realize what they're doing.
Back before 2015, while the Right in Venezuela was still putting up at least a small fight and before it all collapsed, they were ALL bragging about how great Venezuela was becoming and how all the capitalist had been run out of town and how equality was gonna be so great for all the Venezuelan people. Today it's a complete failure and hell hole. Leftists built that.
Imbeciles.

But then, what kind of fucking asstards are WE The People here in the USA to be allowing it to take root here? We allow it, we deserve it.

 

[Clementine]

A blatant violation of the First and Second and Sixth Amendments. These Blue State Dims are indistinguishable from Stalinists.

Gun purchasers may need to submit social media history under proposed New York legislation​

Those looking to buy a gun in New York may need to submit their social media profiles and search history prior to purchase if new firearm legislation in the state becomes law.

Under the legislation drafted by Brooklyn Borough President Eric Adams and State Senator Kevin Parker, both Democrats, up to three years’ worth of search history on social media would be able to be reviewed, ABC Action News reported.

Senate Bill 9191, according to WHAM, mandates "social media and search engine reviews prior to the approval of an application or renewal of a license to carry or possess a pistol or revolver; requires a person applying for a license to carry or possess a pistol or revolver or a renewal of such license to consent to having his or her social media accounts and search engine history reviewed and investigated for certain posts and/or searches over a period of 1-3 years prior to the approval of such application or renewal; defines terms." Under the proposed legislation, law enforcement officials could investigate "commonly known profane slurs used or biased language used to describe race, national origin, ancestry, gender, religion, disability or sexual orientation; threatening health or safety of another person, or an act of terrorism."​

A clear violation of rights. More proof that the left wants to shred the constitution and Bill of Rights because those documents are in their way. Whoever wants to disarm you intends to oppress you. That would be the leftists who have taken control of the Dem party.

 

[Timmy]

A blatant violation of the First and Second and Sixth Amendments. These Blue State Dims are indistinguishable from Stalinists.

Gun purchasers may need to submit social media history under proposed New York legislation​

Those looking to buy a gun in New York may need to submit their social media profiles and search history prior to purchase if new firearm legislation in the state becomes law.

Under the legislation drafted by Brooklyn Borough President Eric Adams and State Senator Kevin Parker, both Democrats, up to three years’ worth of search history on social media would be able to be reviewed, ABC Action News reported.

Senate Bill 9191, according to WHAM, mandates "social media and search engine reviews prior to the approval of an application or renewal of a license to carry or possess a pistol or revolver; requires a person applying for a license to carry or possess a pistol or revolver or a renewal of such license to consent to having his or her social media accounts and search engine history reviewed and investigated for certain posts and/or searches over a period of 1-3 years prior to the approval of such application or renewal; defines terms." Under the proposed legislation, law enforcement officials could investigate "commonly known profane slurs used or biased language used to describe race, national origin, ancestry, gender, religion, disability or sexual orientation; threatening health or safety of another person, or an act of terrorism."​

A clear violation of rights. More proof that the left wants to shred the constitution and Bill of Rights because those documents are in their way. Whoever wants to disarm you intends to oppress you. That would be the leftists who have taken control of the Dem party.

The right is for stop n frisk, strict voter Id, expanded gov search powers , anti flag burning laws, against protests , against freedom of press, etc ...

Pick a non 2nd amendment freedom and they are out to stop it .

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

What if they could get access to the internet anonymous social boards, like this one?
Could they?.

Absolutely. Google indexes EVERY post at this site. Everthing ever posted here is archived at the NSA for easy reference. And they know exactly who you are....no matter how smart you may think you are with proxies.

They have access to things you wouldn't imagine.

 

[Wyatt earp]

A blatant violation of the First and Second and Sixth Amendments. These Blue State Dims are indistinguishable from Stalinists.

Gun purchasers may need to submit social media history under proposed New York legislation​

Those looking to buy a gun in New York may need to submit their social media profiles and search history prior to purchase if new firearm legislation in the state becomes law.

Under the legislation drafted by Brooklyn Borough President Eric Adams and State Senator Kevin Parker, both Democrats, up to three years’ worth of search history on social media would be able to be reviewed, ABC Action News reported.

Senate Bill 9191, according to WHAM, mandates "social media and search engine reviews prior to the approval of an application or renewal of a license to carry or possess a pistol or revolver; requires a person applying for a license to carry or possess a pistol or revolver or a renewal of such license to consent to having his or her social media accounts and search engine history reviewed and investigated for certain posts and/or searches over a period of 1-3 years prior to the approval of such application or renewal; defines terms." Under the proposed legislation, law enforcement officials could investigate "commonly known profane slurs used or biased language used to describe race, national origin, ancestry, gender, religion, disability or sexual orientation; threatening health or safety of another person, or an act of terrorism."​

A clear violation of rights. More proof that the left wants to shred the constitution and Bill of Rights because those documents are in their way. Whoever wants to disarm you intends to oppress you. That would be the leftists who have taken control of the Dem party.

The right is for stop n frisk, strict voter Id, expanded gov search powers , anti flag burning laws, against protests , against freedom of press, etc ...

Pick a non 2nd amendment freedom and they are out to stop it .

Against freedom of press, what are you smoking? Reagan ended the fairness doctrine that gave us freedom of the press back.



.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

The right is for stop n frisk,

No, the right is for criminals being removed from Society so that society is safe.
The ONLY reason we "might" need stop and frisk is because you idiots support pansy ass liberal judges who release criminals on a whim and put everyone in danger.

strict voter Id,

Yep....you need ID for a library card, an EBT card, a bank account and most black people will tell you that they are offended that racist white liberals think they are too stupid to get an ID. Besides, the corrupt Left has been found breaking the law to many times. YOU make it necessary to need strict ID for voting.

expanded gov search powers

Say what? Quick! Run get some Prep-H, you'll need it after pulling this whopper out your rear.

, anti flag burning laws

Awwwww...we respect our nation and those who fought for our freedom....terrible isn't it? Go burn your bra.

, against protests

Sure are...we're against ALL those violent Leftist protest...you know....like the ones Maxine Waters encourages where you go out and harass people while they're trying to live their PRIVATE lives.

, against freedom of press

You mean freedom of the propaganda? We're against outright lies and distortion. What you're referring to isn't the press, it's anti-American propaganda and more often false than factual. NBC and CNN have been caught lying more times than you've posted nonsense on this forum.....and that's a hell of a lot.

Pick a non 2nd amendment freedom and they are out to stop it .

You really are obedient and faithful to your Plantation masters aren't you?

 

[flacaltenn]

Fourth Amendment, right up front.

Not sure of the laws in New York. Can cities override state law? In Virginia, they cannot.

Gun purchasers may need to submit social media history under proposed New York legislation

Heck.. The Dems used the Big Brother domestic spy machine to hack an opposition political campaign -- imagine all the "great things" they could do spying on American citizens..

That's why -- despite the Civil Liberties risks -- ALL the statists in both parties love them some domestic spying. This is domestic spying on steroids. Even the FBI doesn't vet security candidates with that much intrusion into their speech..

 

[KGB]

Tad difference between the police talking to a minor who posts he wants to shoot up a school and denying Constitutional Rights to an adult over a perceived meme.

What "perceived meme" are you talking about? Are you projecting again and making up shit to be alarmed over? Just like you think that making AR's illegal will somehow trigger the government into somehow (without the military's help) taking over the citizenry and turning us into a dictatorship where we are all helpless slaves.

What defines and who defines a social media post that would deny you your Constitutional Rights?

My point exactly.

L.E. admits it is difficult to know what is just "hot air" and what is a true threat. No one has a crystal ball. My theory is that if a person is so full of hate/anger that they are talking violence and showing off their weapons and have a target they hate, WHY ON EARTH would you want to give them a gun?

So you’re ok with me deciding your rights should be suspended. Or maybe a board composed of Trump appointees.

FOCUS. They are talking about scanning social media to see if there are huge red flags before someone purchases a gun.

What part of “this is unconstitutional” do you not understand?

 

[beagle9]

Fourth Amendment, right up front.

Not sure of the laws in New York. Can cities override state law? In Virginia, they cannot.

Gun purchasers may need to submit social media history under proposed New York legislation

And what is this supposed to accomplish? Even if you post on Fakebook that illegals should be shot, that is not a crime and so therefore they have no grounds to deny you a gun purchase.

Shot where ??? While coming over the wall in an invasion type situation ? If the government moves troops to the border in order to stop an active invasion, and it orders those who come over the border in an invasion type force to then be shot if ignores warnings to turn back, then it is a possibility that most in America might agree with an invasion force being engaged in such a way if ordered by our government to do so.

Hopefully not, but who knows what is going to come from all this mess going on.

I'm not for shooting people, but I am for detaining them if they cross illegally, and then deport them back to their own country.

 

[beagle9]

Fourth Amendment, right up front.

Not sure of the laws in New York. Can cities override state law? In Virginia, they cannot.

Gun purchasers may need to submit social media history under proposed New York legislation

I wonder what they will say when they are told 'I don't have any social media'

-Geaux

You think that a background check won't mandatorily require that information if it were law before you get that gun ??