At least one of the Canadian provinces had a sub-minimum wage law similar to the USA sub-minimal wage provision enacted due to a 1996 amendment of USAs Fair Labor Standards Act.
[Refer to Fact Sheet #32: Youth Minimum Wage - Fair Labor Standards Act,
http://www.dol.gov/whd/regs/compliance/whdfs32.pdf ].
[I dont know why the Canadians dropped their acceptance from their own laws but I can foresee some of the problems that are likely to occur (if they havent yet already been encountered) within the USA].
When this amendment becomes more familiar and publically acceptable, it will be a boon for enterprises with a need for 90 days temporary seasonal employees.
Many enterprises would be hiring on a trial basis and retaining only exceptional well performing workers beyond the 90 days deadline.
Some employers would conclude that their recruiting expenses and the learning curve limitations of their tasks require more selective hiring.
They must consider the costs associated with poor rates of employee retention. For such enterprises the more qualified youths will continue to be those first hired but at possibly much lesser wage rates.
Those who previously might have been disregarded due to the hiring of equally qualified older job applicants will now be preferred to those older job applicants. No one ever becomes younger.
All other youths similar to those that were unemployed due to their lesser qualifications, will not have significantly better chance of being now hired by an enterprise concerned with their recruiting and/or their on the job training costs. Such enterprises and such jobs are among the most desirable opportunities.
Respectfully, Supposn
[Refer to Fact Sheet #32: Youth Minimum Wage - Fair Labor Standards Act,
http://www.dol.gov/whd/regs/compliance/whdfs32.pdf ].
[I dont know why the Canadians dropped their acceptance from their own laws but I can foresee some of the problems that are likely to occur (if they havent yet already been encountered) within the USA].
When this amendment becomes more familiar and publically acceptable, it will be a boon for enterprises with a need for 90 days temporary seasonal employees.
Many enterprises would be hiring on a trial basis and retaining only exceptional well performing workers beyond the 90 days deadline.
Some employers would conclude that their recruiting expenses and the learning curve limitations of their tasks require more selective hiring.
They must consider the costs associated with poor rates of employee retention. For such enterprises the more qualified youths will continue to be those first hired but at possibly much lesser wage rates.
Those who previously might have been disregarded due to the hiring of equally qualified older job applicants will now be preferred to those older job applicants. No one ever becomes younger.
All other youths similar to those that were unemployed due to their lesser qualifications, will not have significantly better chance of being now hired by an enterprise concerned with their recruiting and/or their on the job training costs. Such enterprises and such jobs are among the most desirable opportunities.
Respectfully, Supposn