Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'd like to know why the unequal distribution of wealth is a bad thing. This seems to be a major premise from those on the left, but it's like you just assume it's a bad thing without every really providing evidence or justifying the premise.
Forcing me to work for somebody else is what the distribution of wealth is.
Distribution of wealth is Marxism.
Wealth is nothing more than ones labor, wealth is my labor in a tangible form I can trade for another person's labor.
That is why its bad, distribution of wealth is stealing, forced slavery, servitude, socialist/marxism.
Wealth is the physical representation of my labor, my work, my success, or my dumb luck.
Again, its the unequal distribution of intelligence that is the problem.
Wealth is much more than ones labor.
The 1% did not do the labor that created their wealth.
Most of them inherited it.
America was a superpower under such a system as I advocate.
America became a super power under the New Deal which was in large measure, a redistribution of wealth. America is declining before your eyes under the system that you advocate.
Only what you put forth for public consumption.
I'm a moderate social democrat
Nor can you deny that you wish to take from the individual
Nor have I. Taking from one individual won't do it though. You have to take from the class and redistribute it. That's what made the great american middle class. Not doing it is what is eroding the great american middle class.
America was a superpower under such a system as I advocate.
America became a super power under the New Deal which was in large measure, a redistribution of wealth. America is declining before your eyes under the system that you advocate.
Reality, but you want none of it.
Do you even know the slightest thing of my philosophy?
Only what you put forth for public consumption. You're duped by faux moralism and inane rhetoric. The only cure i can see for you is in pain.
I was responding to only one concept in that post.
Live with it.
The New Deal was a government induced coma.
Here comes reality again, not that the wingnut cares...
http://politicalreform.com/charts/Depression_GDP_output_1.gif
The New Deal was a government induced coma.
Here comes reality again, not that the wingnut cares...
http://politicalreform.com/charts/Depression_GDP_output_1.gif
Nor can you deny that you wish to take from the individual
Nor have I. Taking from one individual won't do it though. You have to take from the class and redistribute it. That's what made the great american middle class. Not doing it is what is eroding the great american middle class.
America was a superpower under such a system as I advocate.
America became a super power under the New Deal which was in large measure, a redistribution of wealth. America is declining before your eyes under the system that you advocate.
Reality, but you want none of it.
Do you even know the slightest thing of my philosophy?
Only what you put forth for public consumption. You're duped by faux moralism and inane rhetoric. The only cure i can see for you is in pain.
You are kidding, aren't you?
The Great Society concept was not from the New Deal. That cash cow re-distribution program was initiated by Lyndon Johnson and Tip O'Neill.
And it has been a colossal failure.
Wealth that is re-distributed is never appreciated. Take a look at all of the social programs and all have failed as after trillions of government cash these folks ARE WORSE off now than when they fended for themselves.
Redistribution sets a bad example for citizens. It makes them believe they ARE ENTITLED to other's production and the rewards of such.
Wealth is never to be redistributed. It is to be earned.
The government NEVER produces any product or service to the economy. They TAKE the proceeds from the private sector as taxes.
Government never has any $$$ UNLESS they take it at the point of a gun from taxpayers that EARNED it in the free market.
The single most common attribute seems to be large sums of moneyWonder what the common factor is in the highest wealth group. Anybody wanna bet it's not education. LOL
Wonder what the common factor is in the highest wealth group. Anybody wanna bet it's not education. LOL
