Stephanie
Diamond Member
- Jul 11, 2004
- 70,230
- 10,864
- 2,040
Using that logic why don't we just transport it with buckets and mules? just think how many "jobs" that would "create", of course then we'd have the PETA people freakin' out about the low wages the mules were getting.What about the union jobs in transport ? Wouldn't the pipeline destroy those jobs?![]()
I'm not talking about creating jobs , I'm talking about not destroying them.
The implication of this thread is that we are throwing jobs away . But are we really ? Once the pipeline is built those construction jobs are gone and the transport jobs are also gone .
Net loss of jobs ??
Well construction jobs are by their very nature temporary. And my issue with both rail and transport is that the crude is travelling thru very populated areas.
This was an epic disaster. Lac Megantic. 47 people died.
Lac-Mégantic rail disaster - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
![]()
Timmy is ignoring the jobs created by processing the oil
I find myself ignoring little timmy. They sound like they are still in high school and spews nothing but the DNC talking points. nonsense.