Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is how stupid union people are. Dumbsses!
LIUNA Endorses President Obama for Second Term as President
LIUNA Endorses President Obama for Second Term as President
Washington, D.C. (March 8, 2012) – The General Executive Board of LIUNA – the Laborers International Union of North America – has endorsed Barack Obama for a second term as President. The endorsement comes after a unanimous vote of the union’s board on Wednesday.
“President Obama has earned a second term as President,” said Terry O’Sullivan, LIUNA General President. “Despite unprecedented and unrelenting hostility from extremist Republicans determined to see him fail, President Obama has achieved many laudable goals. We think America needs a leader who will fight to create jobs and build a bigger middle class. It's a no- brainer – Barack Obama is the only choice to lead this country for four more years.”
Only a jackass idiot like Obama would prevent Americans from building a pipeline to carry energy. Like a world class jackass in the back pocket of the Environmental Wackos.
We need to get this jackass out of office and replace him with somebody that understand economics and not somebody that thinks this AGW scam is the most important issue in the world.
So now the Idiot that's lucky he's not serving a term in Leavenworth for thinking a security clearance means you can hand out classified information like candy on Halloween knows all about pipelines...
RFLMAO
Do you mean the "f...K up" of getting a congress run by democrats in 2006? We all can see where that got us in 2008 and then with a 10 trillion dollar debt. Yeah that was a real f..k up.
Why shouldn't Obama throw union workers under the bus? It's not like he needs their campaign donations and votes for re-election...he's done with that. So under the bus for them while Obama self-promotes his future with Global GreeNazis.
Why shouldn't Obama throw union workers under the bus? It's not like he needs their campaign donations and votes for re-election...he's done with that. So under the bus for them while Obama self-promotes his future with Global GreeNazis.
I think you are a little confused. Trans-Canada already announced its intention to cancel the pipeline project before Obama rejected it.
[
I believe his idea is to wean people off of oil. Not a bad idea but for now it is only for the rich. The rich will be able to afford high gasoline prices, the poor not so much. So his agenda, as everything with democrats, hurt the poor the most. But then again if the poor are to only stay in the cities, democrat concentration camps, then they don't need to drive, except to the polls to vote for their masters.
Do you mean the "f...K up" of getting a congress run by democrats in 2006? We all can see where that got us in 2008 and then with a 10 trillion dollar debt. Yeah that was a real f..k up.
Uh, guy, it was only a 5 Trillion dollar debt when Bush took office, before he gave a huge tax cut to the rich and put a war on a credit card.
All the things that were fucked up were not because thepeople put a stop to Bush's craziness by putting Democrats in Congress.
No, but the military definitely has a way of convincing misfits to find another line of work, don't they???So now the Idiot that's lucky he's not serving a term in Leavenworth for thinking a security clearance means you can hand out classified information like candy on Halloween knows all about pipelines...
RFLMAO
Yeah, guy, you don't send people to Leavenworth for what they "think".
Okay, the thing is, the Oil Companies wanted this, that's a good enough reason to deep six it.
[
Uh, guy, it was only a 5 Trillion dollar debt when Bush took office, before he gave a huge tax cut to the rich and put a war on a credit card.
All the things that were fucked up were not because thepeople put a stop to Bush's craziness by putting Democrats in Congress.
Using that logic why don't we just transport it with buckets and mules? just think how many "jobs" that would "create", of course then we'd have the PETA people freakin' out about the low wages the mules were getting.What about the union jobs in transport ? Wouldn't the pipeline destroy those jobs?
I'm not talking about creating jobs , I'm talking about not destroying them.
The implication of this thread is that we are throwing jobs away . But are we really ? Once the pipeline is built those construction jobs are gone and the transport jobs are also gone .
Net loss of jobs ??
Well construction jobs are by their very nature temporary. And my issue with both rail and transport is that the crude is travelling thru very populated areas.
This was an epic disaster. Lac Megantic. 47 people died.
Lac-Mégantic rail disaster - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Timmy is ignoring the jobs created by processing the oil
Using that logic why don't we just transport it with buckets and mules? just think how many "jobs" that would "create", of course then we'd have the PETA people freakin' out about the low wages the mules were getting.What about the union jobs in transport ? Wouldn't the pipeline destroy those jobs?
I'm not talking about creating jobs , I'm talking about not destroying them.
The implication of this thread is that we are throwing jobs away . But are we really ? Once the pipeline is built those construction jobs are gone and the transport jobs are also gone .
Net loss of jobs ??
Well construction jobs are by their very nature temporary. And my issue with both rail and transport is that the crude is travelling thru very populated areas.
This was an epic disaster. Lac Megantic. 47 people died.
Lac-Mégantic rail disaster - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Timmy is ignoring the jobs created by processing the oil
Is there some shortage of oil ? Those refineries are working fine wh us oil.
Why doesn't Canada fefine it's own shit?
Another whining ass Union surprised that they are getting it up the butt by a democrat. What is wrong with them? The democrats have promised them so much yet given them so little, except legislation that actually takes away Union power. They supported Obamacare until they realized how it hurt their union. But I will just bet they don't blame Obama or cut a deal with him.
But with this, like with Clinton's "free" trade deals the Unions will do NOTHING but whine. I can't imagine what would have happened with Unions if all they did was whine at Homestead. Of course what the Union is saying is right, but what will they really do about it? Support Mrs. Clinton? Of course they will.
You want to know why the demise of Unions? This is why, they do it to themselves.
The main union for construction workers is accusing President Obama of throwing them “under the bus” by rejecting the Keystone XL oil pipeline.
Union: Obama threw workers 'under the bus' in Keystone decision
The Laborers’ International Union of North America (LIUNA) is one of the few labor unions that broke with the majority of Democrats and supported the project, which Obama rejected Friday after a seven-year review.
“We are dismayed and disgusted that the President has once again thrown the members of LIUNA, and other hard-working, blue-collar workers under the bus of his vaunted ‘legacy,’ while doing little or nothing to make a real difference in global climate change,” Terry O’Sullivan, the union’s general president, said in a statement. “His actions are shameful.”
The group’s statement cited a State Department report that Keystone could reduce greenhouse gas emissions when compared with oil transportation by rail.
“But facts apparently mean as little to the president as the construction jobs he repeatedly derided as insignificant because they are ‘temporary,’ ” O’Sullivan said. “Ironically, the very temporary nature of the president’s own job seems to be fueling a legacy of doing permanent harm to middle- and working class families.”
Using that logic why don't we just transport it with buckets and mules? just think how many "jobs" that would "create", of course then we'd have the PETA people freakin' out about the low wages the mules were getting.
I'm not talking about creating jobs , I'm talking about not destroying them.
The implication of this thread is that we are throwing jobs away . But are we really ? Once the pipeline is built those construction jobs are gone and the transport jobs are also gone .
Net loss of jobs ??
Well construction jobs are by their very nature temporary. And my issue with both rail and transport is that the crude is travelling thru very populated areas.
This was an epic disaster. Lac Megantic. 47 people died.
Lac-Mégantic rail disaster - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Timmy is ignoring the jobs created by processing the oil
Is there some shortage of oil ? Those refineries are working fine wh us oil.
Why doesn't Canada fefine it's own shit?
Canada most certainly refines her own oil. But you do not produce enough on your own yet so consequently Canada is still your number one supplier of oil.
Here's some stats for you Timmy.
"The U.S. is the largest oil consumer in the world and uses 15 million barrels of crude oil every single day. The latest data shows that about half of that is imported. Even with growing U.S. production and increasing fuel efficiency standards, the International Energy Agency and the U.S.'s own Energy Information Administration forecast the need for between four to six million barrels of imported crude oil a day until 2040."
Gulf Coast Project Begins Delivering Crude Oil to Nederland, Texas
Using that logic why don't we just transport it with buckets and mules? just think how many "jobs" that would "create", of course then we'd have the PETA people freakin' out about the low wages the mules were getting.What about the union jobs in transport ? Wouldn't the pipeline destroy those jobs?
I'm not talking about creating jobs , I'm talking about not destroying them.
The implication of this thread is that we are throwing jobs away . But are we really ? Once the pipeline is built those construction jobs are gone and the transport jobs are also gone .
Net loss of jobs ??
Well construction jobs are by their very nature temporary. And my issue with both rail and transport is that the crude is travelling thru very populated areas.
This was an epic disaster. Lac Megantic. 47 people died.
Lac-Mégantic rail disaster - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Timmy is ignoring the jobs created by processing the oil
Is there some shortage of oil ? Those refineries are working fine wh us oil.
Why doesn't Canada fefine it's own shit?
Using that logic why don't we just transport it with buckets and mules? just think how many "jobs" that would "create", of course then we'd have the PETA people freakin' out about the low wages the mules were getting.
I'm not talking about creating jobs , I'm talking about not destroying them.
The implication of this thread is that we are throwing jobs away . But are we really ? Once the pipeline is built those construction jobs are gone and the transport jobs are also gone .
Net loss of jobs ??
Well construction jobs are by their very nature temporary. And my issue with both rail and transport is that the crude is travelling thru very populated areas.
This was an epic disaster. Lac Megantic. 47 people died.
Lac-Mégantic rail disaster - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Timmy is ignoring the jobs created by processing the oil
Is there some shortage of oil ? Those refineries are working fine wh us oil.
Why doesn't Canada fefine it's own shit?
Canada most certainly refines her own oil. But you do not produce enough on your own yet so consequently Canada is still your number one supplier of oil.
Here's some stats for you Timmy.
"The U.S. is the largest oil consumer in the world and uses 15 million barrels of crude oil every single day. The latest data shows that about half of that is imported. Even with growing U.S. production and increasing fuel efficiency standards, the International Energy Agency and the U.S.'s own Energy Information Administration forecast the need for between four to six million barrels of imported crude oil a day until 2040."
Gulf Coast Project Begins Delivering Crude Oil to Nederland, Texas
I'm not talking about creating jobs , I'm talking about not destroying them.
The implication of this thread is that we are throwing jobs away . But are we really ? Once the pipeline is built those construction jobs are gone and the transport jobs are also gone .
Net loss of jobs ??
Well construction jobs are by their very nature temporary. And my issue with both rail and transport is that the crude is travelling thru very populated areas.
This was an epic disaster. Lac Megantic. 47 people died.
Lac-Mégantic rail disaster - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Timmy is ignoring the jobs created by processing the oil
Is there some shortage of oil ? Those refineries are working fine wh us oil.
Why doesn't Canada fefine it's own shit?
Canada most certainly refines her own oil. But you do not produce enough on your own yet so consequently Canada is still your number one supplier of oil.
Here's some stats for you Timmy.
"The U.S. is the largest oil consumer in the world and uses 15 million barrels of crude oil every single day. The latest data shows that about half of that is imported. Even with growing U.S. production and increasing fuel efficiency standards, the International Energy Agency and the U.S.'s own Energy Information Administration forecast the need for between four to six million barrels of imported crude oil a day until 2040."
Gulf Coast Project Begins Delivering Crude Oil to Nederland, Texas
So is that why they are capping all those new wells and waiting for the price to go back up before they use any of that new found oil?
Well construction jobs are by their very nature temporary. And my issue with both rail and transport is that the crude is travelling thru very populated areas.
This was an epic disaster. Lac Megantic. 47 people died.
Lac-Mégantic rail disaster - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Timmy is ignoring the jobs created by processing the oil
Is there some shortage of oil ? Those refineries are working fine wh us oil.
Why doesn't Canada fefine it's own shit?
Canada most certainly refines her own oil. But you do not produce enough on your own yet so consequently Canada is still your number one supplier of oil.
Here's some stats for you Timmy.
"The U.S. is the largest oil consumer in the world and uses 15 million barrels of crude oil every single day. The latest data shows that about half of that is imported. Even with growing U.S. production and increasing fuel efficiency standards, the International Energy Agency and the U.S.'s own Energy Information Administration forecast the need for between four to six million barrels of imported crude oil a day until 2040."
Gulf Coast Project Begins Delivering Crude Oil to Nederland, Texas
So is that why they are capping all those new wells and waiting for the price to go back up before they use any of that new found oil?
Non sequitur
Timmy is ignoring the jobs created by processing the oil
Is there some shortage of oil ? Those refineries are working fine wh us oil.
Why doesn't Canada fefine it's own shit?
Canada most certainly refines her own oil. But you do not produce enough on your own yet so consequently Canada is still your number one supplier of oil.
Here's some stats for you Timmy.
"The U.S. is the largest oil consumer in the world and uses 15 million barrels of crude oil every single day. The latest data shows that about half of that is imported. Even with growing U.S. production and increasing fuel efficiency standards, the International Energy Agency and the U.S.'s own Energy Information Administration forecast the need for between four to six million barrels of imported crude oil a day until 2040."
Gulf Coast Project Begins Delivering Crude Oil to Nederland, Texas
So is that why they are capping all those new wells and waiting for the price to go back up before they use any of that new found oil?
Non sequitur
Not at all. The claim that we NEED to import oil is proven false by the number of existing wells that are closed in.
Obama doubled the debt.
The democrat congress caused the recession whose recovery was made the longest and weakest in history.
War in Syria, Libya and Iraq.
Bombing in our ally countries.
Yeah, Obama sure made things better. BTW the Iraq war was over when Obama took office.
