Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I predict the snowflakes will not be interested in this thread:
Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee late Saturday released a 414-page report in which the panel members say they found no supporting evidence for any of the allegations of sexual misconduct made against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh ahead of his confirmation.
“Committee investigators spoke with 45 individuals and took 25 written statements relating to the various allegations made in the course of the #SCOTUS confirmation process,” the Senate Judiciary Committee tweeted Saturday.
“The revelation of last minute allegations tested the committee in many ways. But these investigative efforts rose to the occasion and were critical to helping us obtain the truth. This was a serious and thorough investigation that left no stone unturned in our pursuit of the facts,” Grassley said. “In the end, there was no credible evidence to support the allegations against the nominee.”
Did Dems “try” to ruin Gorsuch’s life?Dems tried to ruin Kavanaughs life.Huh? The man’s life was not ruined. Is he not on your Supreme Court?How can you support politicians who tried to exploit a lie to ruin a man’s life?
The partisan politicians (both sides) exploit their positions; do you vote?
Pubs didn’t try to ruin Garlands life.
Yes I vote
414 pages - what did you want? for those who will accept no other outcome than what they pre-determined - fuck you. you are the problem these days.Is that the “investigation” by Trumpest FBI guys who did not even interview Ford or some of Kavanaugh’s drinking buddies under oath?I predict the snowflakes will not be interested in this thread:
Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee late Saturday released a 414-page report in which the panel members say they found no supporting evidence for any of the allegations of sexual misconduct made against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh ahead of his confirmation.
“Committee investigators spoke with 45 individuals and took 25 written statements relating to the various allegations made in the course of the #SCOTUS confirmation process,” the Senate Judiciary Committee tweeted Saturday.
“The revelation of last minute allegations tested the committee in many ways. But these investigative efforts rose to the occasion and were critical to helping us obtain the truth. This was a serious and thorough investigation that left no stone unturned in our pursuit of the facts,” Grassley said. “In the end, there was no credible evidence to support the allegations against the nominee.”
Haha, what a partisan joke!
you've yet to show that as an ability of yours.Why? Have you heard of “cross examination”?didn't she give her testimony under oath in the committee? why did she need to speak to the FBI exactly? Please explain.Is that the “investigation” by Trumpest FBI guys who did not even interview Ford or some of Kavanaugh’s drinking buddies under oath?I predict the snowflakes will not be interested in this thread:
Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee late Saturday released a 414-page report in which the panel members say they found no supporting evidence for any of the allegations of sexual misconduct made against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh ahead of his confirmation.
“Committee investigators spoke with 45 individuals and took 25 written statements relating to the various allegations made in the course of the #SCOTUS confirmation process,” the Senate Judiciary Committee tweeted Saturday.
“The revelation of last minute allegations tested the committee in many ways. But these investigative efforts rose to the occasion and were critical to helping us obtain the truth. This was a serious and thorough investigation that left no stone unturned in our pursuit of the facts,” Grassley said. “In the end, there was no credible evidence to support the allegations against the nominee.”
Haha, what a partisan joke!
If not, it’s to allow a witness to respond to another’s testimony, especially if contradictory.
Do I know more about USA law than you do?
anyone who lied about it - prosecute.These people all need prosecuted. All of them that created these fake accusations were radical Leftist DemNazi Activists.
Only ONE OF THEM WAS HONEST.
"HE HAD TO BE STOPPED"...she said...when asked why she falsely accused Kavaugh of sexual assualt. The Woman is decades older than Kavanaugh and never met him either.
Another Kavanaugh accuser admits to fabricating rape story
“I was angry, and I sent it out,” she told investigators.
“In short, during the committee’s time-sensitive investigation of allegations against Judge Kavanaugh, Ms. Munro-Leighton submitted a fabricated allegation, which diverted committee resources,” Mr. Grassley wrote. “When questioned by Committee investigators she admitted it was false, a ‘ploy,’ and a ‘tactic.’ She was opposed to Judge Kavanaugh’s confirmation.”
414 pages - what did you want? for those who will accept no other outcome than what they pre-determined - fuck you. you are the problem these days.Is that the “investigation” by Trumpest FBI guys who did not even interview Ford or some of Kavanaugh’s drinking buddies under oath?I predict the snowflakes will not be interested in this thread:
Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee late Saturday released a 414-page report in which the panel members say they found no supporting evidence for any of the allegations of sexual misconduct made against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh ahead of his confirmation.
“Committee investigators spoke with 45 individuals and took 25 written statements relating to the various allegations made in the course of the #SCOTUS confirmation process,” the Senate Judiciary Committee tweeted Saturday.
“The revelation of last minute allegations tested the committee in many ways. But these investigative efforts rose to the occasion and were critical to helping us obtain the truth. This was a serious and thorough investigation that left no stone unturned in our pursuit of the facts,” Grassley said. “In the end, there was no credible evidence to support the allegations against the nominee.”
Haha, what a partisan joke!
Do you have any intelligent retorts, other than stupid rants?you've yet to show that as an ability of yours.Why? Have you heard of “cross examination”?didn't she give her testimony under oath in the committee? why did she need to speak to the FBI exactly? Please explain.Is that the “investigation” by Trumpest FBI guys who did not even interview Ford or some of Kavanaugh’s drinking buddies under oath?I predict the snowflakes will not be interested in this thread:
Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee late Saturday released a 414-page report in which the panel members say they found no supporting evidence for any of the allegations of sexual misconduct made against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh ahead of his confirmation.
“Committee investigators spoke with 45 individuals and took 25 written statements relating to the various allegations made in the course of the #SCOTUS confirmation process,” the Senate Judiciary Committee tweeted Saturday.
“The revelation of last minute allegations tested the committee in many ways. But these investigative efforts rose to the occasion and were critical to helping us obtain the truth. This was a serious and thorough investigation that left no stone unturned in our pursuit of the facts,” Grassley said. “In the end, there was no credible evidence to support the allegations against the nominee.”
Haha, what a partisan joke!
If not, it’s to allow a witness to respond to another’s testimony, especially if contradictory.
Do I know more about USA law than you do?
just stop dude. so fucking sick and tired of one way minds that will bitch about anything they don't personally approve of. never a shortage of fools and idiots to ignore.
when you talk like TRUMPEST FBI guys and go into drinking buddies - you show the world what a fucktard you are.Do you have any intelligent retorts, other than stupid rants?you've yet to show that as an ability of yours.Why? Have you heard of “cross examination”?didn't she give her testimony under oath in the committee? why did she need to speak to the FBI exactly? Please explain.Is that the “investigation” by Trumpest FBI guys who did not even interview Ford or some of Kavanaugh’s drinking buddies under oath?I predict the snowflakes will not be interested in this thread:
Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee late Saturday released a 414-page report in which the panel members say they found no supporting evidence for any of the allegations of sexual misconduct made against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh ahead of his confirmation.
“Committee investigators spoke with 45 individuals and took 25 written statements relating to the various allegations made in the course of the #SCOTUS confirmation process,” the Senate Judiciary Committee tweeted Saturday.
“The revelation of last minute allegations tested the committee in many ways. But these investigative efforts rose to the occasion and were critical to helping us obtain the truth. This was a serious and thorough investigation that left no stone unturned in our pursuit of the facts,” Grassley said. “In the end, there was no credible evidence to support the allegations against the nominee.”
Haha, what a partisan joke!
If not, it’s to allow a witness to respond to another’s testimony, especially if contradictory.
Do I know more about USA law than you do?
just stop dude. so fucking sick and tired of one way minds that will bitch about anything they don't personally approve of. never a shortage of fools and idiots to ignore.
I’m glad Denmark has few morons like you.
I predict the snowflakes will not be interested in this thread:
Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee late Saturday released a 414-page report in which the panel members say they found no supporting evidence for any of the allegations of sexual misconduct made against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh ahead of his confirmation.
“Committee investigators spoke with 45 individuals and took 25 written statements relating to the various allegations made in the course of the #SCOTUS confirmation process,” the Senate Judiciary Committee tweeted Saturday.
“The revelation of last minute allegations tested the committee in many ways. But these investigative efforts rose to the occasion and were critical to helping us obtain the truth. This was a serious and thorough investigation that left no stone unturned in our pursuit of the facts,” Grassley said. “In the end, there was no credible evidence to support the allegations against the nominee.”
The Investigation in to Kavanaugh was started far before that 414 page report summarizing The so called Investigation in to Lying Accusations. Every one of them was proven false and was proven to just be another Democrat Smear Tactic.....just like Russia Russia Russia was.414 pages - what did you want? for those who will accept no other outcome than what they pre-determined - fuck you. you are the problem these days.Is that the “investigation” by Trumpest FBI guys who did not even interview Ford or some of Kavanaugh’s drinking buddies under oath?I predict the snowflakes will not be interested in this thread:
Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee late Saturday released a 414-page report in which the panel members say they found no supporting evidence for any of the allegations of sexual misconduct made against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh ahead of his confirmation.
“Committee investigators spoke with 45 individuals and took 25 written statements relating to the various allegations made in the course of the #SCOTUS confirmation process,” the Senate Judiciary Committee tweeted Saturday.
“The revelation of last minute allegations tested the committee in many ways. But these investigative efforts rose to the occasion and were critical to helping us obtain the truth. This was a serious and thorough investigation that left no stone unturned in our pursuit of the facts,” Grassley said. “In the end, there was no credible evidence to support the allegations against the nominee.”
Haha, what a partisan joke!
Only in America....
Confirm the Joker first THEN waste tax payer money putting out a 414 report "clearing" said Joker.
.. and why the fuck do we need 414 pages just to say "We've found no evidence supporting the accusations" ?
#AmericaHasGoneInsane
I predict the snowflakes will not be interested in this thread:
Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee late Saturday released a 414-page report in which the panel members say they found no supporting evidence for any of the allegations of sexual misconduct made against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh ahead of his confirmation.
“Committee investigators spoke with 45 individuals and took 25 written statements relating to the various allegations made in the course of the #SCOTUS confirmation process,” the Senate Judiciary Committee tweeted Saturday.
“The revelation of last minute allegations tested the committee in many ways. But these investigative efforts rose to the occasion and were critical to helping us obtain the truth. This was a serious and thorough investigation that left no stone unturned in our pursuit of the facts,” Grassley said. “In the end, there was no credible evidence to support the allegations against the nominee.”
The Investigation in to Kavanaugh was started far before that 414 page report summarizing The so called Investigation in to Lying Accusations. Every one of them was proven false and was proven to just be another Democrat Smear Tactic.....just like Russia Russia Russia was.414 pages - what did you want? for those who will accept no other outcome than what they pre-determined - fuck you. you are the problem these days.Is that the “investigation” by Trumpest FBI guys who did not even interview Ford or some of Kavanaugh’s drinking buddies under oath?I predict the snowflakes will not be interested in this thread:
Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee late Saturday released a 414-page report in which the panel members say they found no supporting evidence for any of the allegations of sexual misconduct made against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh ahead of his confirmation.
“Committee investigators spoke with 45 individuals and took 25 written statements relating to the various allegations made in the course of the #SCOTUS confirmation process,” the Senate Judiciary Committee tweeted Saturday.
“The revelation of last minute allegations tested the committee in many ways. But these investigative efforts rose to the occasion and were critical to helping us obtain the truth. This was a serious and thorough investigation that left no stone unturned in our pursuit of the facts,” Grassley said. “In the end, there was no credible evidence to support the allegations against the nominee.”
Haha, what a partisan joke!
Only in America....
Confirm the Joker first THEN waste tax payer money putting out a 414 report "clearing" said Joker.
.. and why the fuck do we need 414 pages just to say "We've found no evidence supporting the accusations" ?
#AmericaHasGoneInsane
Only in America can a DemNazi make baseless accusations and then expect everyone to abandon things like Due Process, Presumption of Innocence, Burden of Proof, Right to Privacy etc. etc. just so they can get their desired outcome.
Again, no substance, like a retarded Trumpeter? I bet you can’t even spell “intelligent” like Danish folks learn at age 6.when you talk like TRUMPEST FBI guys and go into drinking buddies - you show the world what a fucktard you are.Do you have any intelligent retorts, other than stupid rants?you've yet to show that as an ability of yours.Why? Have you heard of “cross examination”?didn't she give her testimony under oath in the committee? why did she need to speak to the FBI exactly? Please explain.Is that the “investigation” by Trumpest FBI guys who did not even interview Ford or some of Kavanaugh’s drinking buddies under oath?
Haha, what a partisan joke!
If not, it’s to allow a witness to respond to another’s testimony, especially if contradictory.
Do I know more about USA law than you do?
just stop dude. so fucking sick and tired of one way minds that will bitch about anything they don't personally approve of. never a shortage of fools and idiots to ignore.
I’m glad Denmark has few morons like you.
Did Dems “try” to ruin Gorsuch’s life?Dems tried to ruin Kavanaughs life.Huh? The man’s life was not ruined. Is he not on your Supreme Court?How can you support politicians who tried to exploit a lie to ruin a man’s life?
The partisan politicians (both sides) exploit their positions; do you vote?
Pubs didn’t try to ruin Garlands life.
Yes I vote
Why did Pubs not give Garland the respect he deserved?
Try to be objective ...
WTF was the FBI supposed to investigate? No time, no location, no witnesses.The Investigation in to Kavanaugh was started far before that 414 page report summarizing The so called Investigation in to Lying Accusations. Every one of them was proven false and was proven to just be another Democrat Smear Tactic.....just like Russia Russia Russia was.414 pages - what did you want? for those who will accept no other outcome than what they pre-determined - fuck you. you are the problem these days.Is that the “investigation” by Trumpest FBI guys who did not even interview Ford or some of Kavanaugh’s drinking buddies under oath?I predict the snowflakes will not be interested in this thread:
Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee late Saturday released a 414-page report in which the panel members say they found no supporting evidence for any of the allegations of sexual misconduct made against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh ahead of his confirmation.
“Committee investigators spoke with 45 individuals and took 25 written statements relating to the various allegations made in the course of the #SCOTUS confirmation process,” the Senate Judiciary Committee tweeted Saturday.
“The revelation of last minute allegations tested the committee in many ways. But these investigative efforts rose to the occasion and were critical to helping us obtain the truth. This was a serious and thorough investigation that left no stone unturned in our pursuit of the facts,” Grassley said. “In the end, there was no credible evidence to support the allegations against the nominee.”
Haha, what a partisan joke!
Only in America....
Confirm the Joker first THEN waste tax payer money putting out a 414 report "clearing" said Joker.
.. and why the fuck do we need 414 pages just to say "We've found no evidence supporting the accusations" ?
#AmericaHasGoneInsane
Only in America can a DemNazi make baseless accusations and then expect everyone to abandon things like Due Process, Presumption of Innocence, Burden of Proof, Right to Privacy etc. etc. just so they can get their desired outcome.
You have to know what you are looking for. The FBI was not allowed to conduct a proper investigation. Due process, Presumption of Innocence, Burden of Proof does not matter here. The fact is that Rachel Mitchell has made cases on this. This is a attack on women who have been sexually assaulted and Republicans are covering this up.
maybe not. but you sure are helping me get "fucktard" down.Again, no substance, like a retarded Trumpeter? I bet you can’t even spell “intelligent” like Danish folks learn at age 6.when you talk like TRUMPEST FBI guys and go into drinking buddies - you show the world what a fucktard you are.Do you have any intelligent retorts, other than stupid rants?you've yet to show that as an ability of yours.Why? Have you heard of “cross examination”?didn't she give her testimony under oath in the committee? why did she need to speak to the FBI exactly? Please explain.
If not, it’s to allow a witness to respond to another’s testimony, especially if contradictory.
Do I know more about USA law than you do?
just stop dude. so fucking sick and tired of one way minds that will bitch about anything they don't personally approve of. never a shortage of fools and idiots to ignore.
I’m glad Denmark has few morons like you.
LOL!
whatever they needed to in order to find him guilty. anything less is a failure for them to do their job it would seem.WTF was the FBI supposed to investigate? No time, no location, no witnesses.The Investigation in to Kavanaugh was started far before that 414 page report summarizing The so called Investigation in to Lying Accusations. Every one of them was proven false and was proven to just be another Democrat Smear Tactic.....just like Russia Russia Russia was.414 pages - what did you want? for those who will accept no other outcome than what they pre-determined - fuck you. you are the problem these days.Is that the “investigation” by Trumpest FBI guys who did not even interview Ford or some of Kavanaugh’s drinking buddies under oath?
Haha, what a partisan joke!
Only in America....
Confirm the Joker first THEN waste tax payer money putting out a 414 report "clearing" said Joker.
.. and why the fuck do we need 414 pages just to say "We've found no evidence supporting the accusations" ?
#AmericaHasGoneInsane
Only in America can a DemNazi make baseless accusations and then expect everyone to abandon things like Due Process, Presumption of Innocence, Burden of Proof, Right to Privacy etc. etc. just so they can get their desired outcome.
You have to know what you are looking for. The FBI was not allowed to conduct a proper investigation. Due process, Presumption of Innocence, Burden of Proof does not matter here. The fact is that Rachel Mitchell has made cases on this. This is a attack on women who have been sexually assaulted and Republicans are covering this up.
It was a non-starter from the getgo. It was also amazingly sleazy.
which she couldn't prove. and since no proof, anything else was useless in the hearing. so still no evidence. just curious, you drink? how many americans you think drink?Wrong. His drinking was related to Ford’s claim of attempted rape.First, the investigation had nothing to do with whether or not Kavanaugh was a heavy drinker when he was in school.Is that the “investigation” by Trumpest FBI guys who did not even interview Ford or some of Kavanaugh’s drinking buddies under oath?I predict the snowflakes will not be interested in this thread:
Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee late Saturday released a 414-page report in which the panel members say they found no supporting evidence for any of the allegations of sexual misconduct made against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh ahead of his confirmation.
“Committee investigators spoke with 45 individuals and took 25 written statements relating to the various allegations made in the course of the #SCOTUS confirmation process,” the Senate Judiciary Committee tweeted Saturday.
“The revelation of last minute allegations tested the committee in many ways. But these investigative efforts rose to the occasion and were critical to helping us obtain the truth. This was a serious and thorough investigation that left no stone unturned in our pursuit of the facts,” Grassley said. “In the end, there was no credible evidence to support the allegations against the nominee.”
Haha, what a partisan joke!
Was Mark Judge, his drinking buddy, interviewed under oath by FBI?
