US 'backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria, blame it on Assad govt':

[dilloduck]

Why would government forces release chemical weapons upon people two days before UN inspectors were granted permission to enter Syria and investigate chem weapon claims?

What exactly would Assad's regime stand to gain from such an action?

It definitely stinks like provocation.

Stop, you're making too much sense for the war mongering pussies on this site.

and war mongering to discredit Obama. Obama can be discredited without clamoring for war.

 

[OnePercenter]

HOT DAMN, even Russia is claiming it!

US 'backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria, blame it on Assad govt': Report

Russia suggests Syria ?chemical attack? was ?planned provocation? by rebels ? RT News

» Hacked Emails Reveal ?Washington-Approved? Plan to Stage Chemical Weapons Attack in Syria Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

Russia insinuates Syria ?chemical attack? was ?planned provocation? by rebels [Photos] - The Herald - The Herald

The Russian Foreign Ministry is highly skeptical of the attack and the rush in the United States to attribute it to al-Assad. A flood of reports issued by “biased regional media” about alleged chemical weapons use near Damascus might be “a provocation planned in advance,” Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman, Aleksandr Lukashevich, said on Wednesday.

“It draws attention to the fact that biased regional media have immediately, as if on command, begun an aggressive information attack, laying all the responsibility on the government,” Lukashevich said in a statement.

Republicans continue the economic terrorism on the middle class and continue the deception. You're a sheep.....

 

[The Rabbi]

Yeah, somehow I just don't find Russians terribly trust-worthy. Might be due to their 100 year history of lying through their gold teeth.

 

[The Rabbi]

Why would government forces release chemical weapons upon people two days before UN inspectors were granted permission to enter Syria and investigate chem weapon claims?

What exactly would Assad's regime stand to gain from such an action?

It definitely stinks like provocation.

Stop, you're making too much sense for the war mongering pussies on this site.

and war mongering to discredit Obama. Obama can be discredited without clamoring for war.

Obama would first have to have credit in order to be discredited.

 

[dilloduck]

Stop, you're making too much sense for the war mongering pussies on this site.

and war mongering to discredit Obama. Obama can be discredited without clamoring for war.

Obama would first have to have credit in order to be discredited.

That doesn't appear to stop the war mongers.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Why would government forces release chemical weapons upon people two days before UN inspectors were granted permission to enter Syria and investigate chem weapon claims?

What exactly would Assad's regime stand to gain from such an action?

It definitely stinks like provocation.

By having commie symps like you and Pete, who apparently uses the term "bedwetters" when he is losing a discussion, suck up Asad's black flag operation.

 

[dilloduck]

Why would government forces release chemical weapons upon people two days before UN inspectors were granted permission to enter Syria and investigate chem weapon claims?

What exactly would Assad's regime stand to gain from such an action?

It definitely stinks like provocation.

By having commie symps like you suck up Asad's black flag operation.

Commie symps ?
Black Flag ?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Yup. You guys are backing Asad and his Russian and Chinese allies: you must be commie symps.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

Who said anything about backing anyone? Leave it to Fakey to pull shit out of his ass and call it noteworthy.

 

[JakeStarkey]

You are supporting Asad and attacking the US, TASB: you are commie symps.

 

[dilloduck]

Black Flag

Assad is being accused of using roach spray now.

 

[JakeStarkey]

dillo, your argument does appear befuddled and confused.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

You are supporting Asad and attacking the US, TASB: you are commie symps.

Yeah, except the part where I didn't support anyone. Another turd out the ass from Fakey. Is it squishy in your hand, Fake?

 

[ba1614]

There's no way this group is smart enough to pull something like that off.

 

[JakeStarkey]

You are supporting Asad and attacking the US, TASB: you are commie symps.

Yeah, except the part where I didn't support anyone. Another turd out the ass from Fakey. Is it squishy in your hand, Fake?

You support Asad if you are saying the operations were organized by the opposition, when you have absolutely no proof of that. By attacking, the opposition and the US's support for it, you then are ipso facto supporting Asad and his communist backers.

Personal attacks won't deflect that you are failing here.

 

[dilloduck]

dillo, your argument does appear befuddled and confused.

Get a mentor to help you with it.

 

[JakeStarkey]

dillo, your argument does appear befuddled and confused.

Get a mentor to help you with it.

An Einstein would have trouble unraveling the illogic of your ill-woven thread.

 

[dilloduck]

 

[TakeAStepBack]

You are supporting Asad and attacking the US, TASB: you are commie symps.

Yeah, except the part where I didn't support anyone. Another turd out the ass from Fakey. Is it squishy in your hand, Fake?

You support Asad if you are saying the operations were organized by the opposition, when you have absolutely no proof of that. By attacking, the opposition and the US's support for it, you then are ipso facto supporting Asad and his communist backers.

Personal attacks won't deflect that you are failing here.

Uh huh.

No, see. Objectively looking at the information, does not mean I support anyone, Fake. You're, or course, free to your freshly handled turd of an opinion. Which is completely irrelevant. The hacked email indicates that qatar was working with a British contractor to make this sort of thing happen. And again, being that Assad would stand to gain absolutely nothing by using chem weapons days after allowing UN officials to come in over the claims, doesn't exactly add up. Quite the opposite.

Furthermore, with "logic" such as that you diplay, by wearing a Chinese article of clothing, or any other item they may have made and shipped here for your use, yo're are "ipso facto" supporting "communism".

Fuckin' dipshit.

 

[BlindBoo]

No no no, it was Russia pretending to be the USA that gave the go ahead to launch the strike so they could blame the United States.

Putin is a rascal.