🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

USA Today editorial board declares Trump unfit for Presidency

You should sue the school you went to for not teaching you logic and critical thinking skills.

Government education does not teach logic or critical thinking skills.

The evidence is all around you.
You make a good point: you are the evidence you didn't learn any logic or critical thinking skills in what was probably a public school. But, like everything else, you get out of education what you put into it. I imagine that's what went wrong with your education.
 
Yes they do you fucking idiot. You have just made my point. LOL

Presumption is not a synonym for fact. When one presumes, they are regarding something to be true for practical purposes, even if it is not actually true.

You should of been paying attention in government schooling.
 
Yes they do you fucking idiot. You have just made my point. LOL

Presumption is not a synonym for fact. When one presumes, they are regarding something to be true for practical purposes, even if it is not actually true.

You should of been paying attention in government schooling.
Bullshit. That's total bullshit. You're pathetic. You are making it up as you go along to fit your irrational understanding of the law. Too funny.
 
It is slander to call someone a criminal when they have not been convicted of a crime.

If you were prosecuted for doing so, you'd be the one who is a criminal.

Irrelevant.

Defamation is not illegal. It is actually justified if the individual in question did indeed commit an illegal offense.

You can add this lack of knowledge to the lawsuit you will surely be filing against your government schooling institution.
 
Yes they do you fucking idiot. You have just made my point. LOL

Presumption is not a synonym for fact. When one presumes, they are regarding something to be true for practical purposes, even if it is not actually true.

You should of been paying attention in government schooling.
You are tiresome too, VERY TIRESOME, as stupid people usually are. :bye1:
 
It is slander to call someone a criminal when they have not been convicted of a crime.

If you were prosecuted for doing so, you'd be the one who is a criminal.

Irrelevant.

Defamation is not illegal. It is actually justified if the individual in question did indeed commit an illegal offense.

You can add this lack of knowledge to the lawsuit you will surely be filing against your government schooling institution.
Slander is illegal. Get a life. You are such a FOOL. It's hilarious. And TIRESOME.
 
Bullshit. That's total bullshit. You're pathetic. You are making it up as you go along to fit your irrational understanding of the law. Too funny.

Exhibit A: The uneducated tool resorts to childish deflectionary attacks.

If you decide to sue your government schooling institution after all, I will be more than happy to represent you.
 
Slander is illegal. Get a life. You are such a FOOL. It's hilarious. And TIRESOME.

Only highly specific forms of defamation are illegal.

Personal opinion is protected under the first amendment. Voicing the opinion that someone could of committed a crime and also never had been convicted, is sanctioned by the constitution of the United States of America.
 
Slander is illegal. Get a life. You are such a FOOL. It's hilarious. And TIRESOME.

Only highly specific forms of defamation are illegal.

Personal opinion is protected under the first amendment. Voicing the opinion that someone could of committed a crime and also never had been convicted, is sanctioned by the constitution of the United States of America.
Damn...you just turned her into mush. Congrats!

Liberals...so much of what they know is wrong...but this fact never stops them from continually spouting ignorance.
 
Slander is illegal. Get a life. You are such a FOOL. It's hilarious. And TIRESOME.

Only highly specific forms of defamation are illegal.

Personal opinion is protected under the first amendment. Voicing the opinion that someone could of committed a crime and also never had been convicted, is sanctioned by the constitution of the United States of America.
Damn...you just turned her into mush. Congrats!

Liberals...so much of what they know is wrong...but this fact never stops them from continually spouting ignorance.
The mush is what's in your head.
 
SassyIrishLass, post: 15414052
Ooooh noes Trump is finished now!!!!!

First time you are right about something.

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/?ex_cid=2016-forecast

Eleven Hours ago. Trump back down to less than 33% chance of winning.

That'd be one more time than you've ever been right you old broke joke commie. I don't take these polls serious, too many are getting caught on the demographics....that and the media is inherently corrupt
 
I know a coke snort and trump got some bad coke. It's why he got buggy half way thru the debate. Twitchy. He's a coke head. Up all night, crazy tweets, you trumpeters are blind

I believe he is a coke whore too.

Most of the people on this site probably do not know what a coke whore looks like.


af892631902495ff5e5cc5143002ba7a7ea6deab355a3abc0c7729f666af3372.jpg
 
Nothing in your post addressed anything in my post.


Calling me names is not a challenge to my position.


You fucking asshole.

Did you dun der need someone to help you with the big words you didn't learn in Home School, Cleetus.

Trump hires illegals.
Trump has products made in China and Mexico.
Trump is part of the very problem you point out. (as are we all, really. We all benefit from these things, we just don't like them.)


None of that in any way addresses my post you seem to think you have been attacking.

Having national borders, and wanting to enforce them is not bigotry.

Pointing out that the Law of Supply and Demand applies to labor is not xenophobia.

Discussing the fact that exporting jobs, means fewer jobs for Americans, is not xenophobia.

Liberals, such as the Ideological Hacks at the USA Today, are the problem that is destroying this once great nation.

Fuck them.

FUCK THEM ALL.


If you have something to say about that, please get to the point.
 
ANYTHING to avoid discussing their current policy positions, right?

Well, if Trump could discuss immigration and trade policy coherently, maybe we could have a discussion.

But his position changes about ev ery other week, so not so much.



Bullshit.


Deport the illegals, thus reducing the labor pool and increasing jobs, wages and working conditions for Americans.

Bring back manufacturing jobs, thus increasing jobs, wages and working conditions for Americans.


Stop fucking with Russia, thus making Americans safer.


That is his core platform and easy enough to discuss.
 
Sometimes you have to just do what's right

USA TODAY's Editorial Board: Trump is 'unfit for the presidency'

He is erratic. Trump has been on so many sides of so many issues that attempting to assess his policy positions is like shooting at a moving target. A list prepared by NBC details 124 shifts by Trump on 20 major issues since shortly before he entered the race. He simply spouts slogans and outcomes (he’d replace Obamacare with “something terrific”) without any credible explanations of how he’d achieve them.

He is ill-equipped to be commander in chief. Trump’s foreign policy pronouncements typically range from uninformed to incoherent. It’s not just Democrats who say this. Scores of Republican national security leaders have signed an extraordinary open letter calling Trump’s foreign policy vision “wildly inconsistent and unmoored in principle.” In a Wall Street Journal column this month, Robert Gates, the highly respected former Defense secretary who served presidents of both parties over a half-century, described Trump as “beyond repair.”

He traffics in prejudice. From the very beginning, Trump has built his campaign on appeals to bigotry and xenophobia, whipping up resentment against Mexicans, Muslims and migrants. His proposals for mass deportations and religious tests are unworkable and contrary to America’s ideals.

Trump has stirred racist sentiments in ways that can’t be erased by his belated and clumsy outreach to African Americans. His attacks on an Indiana-born federal judge of Mexican heritage fit “the textbook definition of a racist comment,” according to House Speaker Paul Ryan, the highest-ranking elected official in the Republican Party. And for five years, Trump fanned the absurd “birther” movement that falsely questioned the legitimacy of the nation’s first black president.

His business career is checkered. Trump has built his candidacy on his achievements as a real estate developer and entrepreneur. It’s a shaky scaffold, starting with a 1973 Justice Department suit against Trump and his father for systematically discriminating against blacks in housing rentals. (The Trumps fought the suit but later settled on terms that were viewed as a government victory.) Trump’s companies have had some spectacular financial successes, but this track record is marred by six bankruptcy filings, apparent misuse of the family’s charitable foundation, and allegations by Trump University customers of fraud. A series of investigative articles published by the USA TODAY Network found that Trump has been involved in thousands of lawsuits over the past three decades, including at least 60 that involved small businesses and contract employees who said they were stiffed. So much for being a champion of the little guy.

He isn’t leveling with the American people. Is Trump as rich as he says? No one knows, in part because, alone among major party presidential candidates for the past four decades, he refuses to release his tax returns. Nor do we know whether he has paid his fair share of taxes, or the extent of his foreign financial entanglements.

He speaks recklessly. In the days after the Republican convention, Trump invited Russian hackers to interfere with an American election by releasing Hillary Clinton’s emails, and he raised the prospect of “Second Amendment people” preventing the Democratic nominee from appointing liberal justices. It’s hard to imagine two more irresponsible statements from one presidential candidate.

He has coarsened the national dialogue. Did you ever imagine that a presidential candidate would discuss the size of his genitalia during a nationally televised Republican debate? Neither did we. Did you ever imagine a presidential candidate, one who avoided service in the military, would criticize Gold Star parents who lost a son in Iraq? Neither did we. Did you ever imagine you’d see a presidential candidate mock a disabled reporter? Neither did we. Trump’s inability or unwillingness to ignore criticism raises the specter of a president who, like Richard Nixon, would create enemies’ lists and be consumed with getting even with his critics.

He’s a serial liar. Although polls show that Clinton is considered less honest and trustworthy than Trump, it’s not even a close contest. Trump is in a league of his own when it comes to the quality and quantity of his misstatements. When confronted with a falsehood, such as his assertion that he was always against the Iraq War, Trump’s reaction is to use the Big Lie technique of repeating it so often that people begin to believe it.

We are not unmindful of the issues that Trump’s campaign has exploited: the disappearance of working-class jobs; excessive political correctness; the direction of the Supreme Court; urban unrest and street violence; the rise of the Islamic State terrorist group; gridlock in Washington and the influence of moneyed interests. All are legitimate sources of concern.








.
Wow. I think USA Today nailed it. Trump has changed his position on so many issues it's hard to tell what he believes. The only thing we can be sure of is he's not Hillary. Apparently he's thinks that's enough to become president.


The positions he does hold are just empty rhetoric. Nothing specific.


Plenty of specifics on his web site. You are lying.
 
SassyIrishLass, post: 15425381
I don't take these polls serious, too many are getting caught on the demographics....that and the media is inherently corrupt

Is Fox News corrupt? Nate Silver takes them all seriously. Show us an intelligent Republican who thinks Trump is going to win following Trump's disastrous first debate.

Demographics are a reality. White Christian women that want a dominate male fulfilling some psychological/spiritual need sitting in the Oval Office, are a diminished demographic.

You and your numbers are in steep decline.
 
SassyIrishLass, post: 15425381
I don't take these polls serious, too many are getting caught on the demographics....that and the media is inherently corrupt

Is Fox News corrupt? Nate Silver takes them all seriously. Show us an intelligent Republican who thinks Trump is going to win following Trump's disastrous first debate.

Demographics are a reality. White Christian women that want a dominate male fulfilling some psychological/spiritual need sitting in the Oval Office, are a diminished demographic.

You and your numbers are in steep decline.

I said I don't take polls serious....therefore your meager attempt is just that, meager. Now cease bothering me you old loon
 
You have to be terribly ignorant or a crazed Dem partisan to believe that.

Which is it?

The Clintons have been investigated at least 16 times by Special Prosecutors, Congressional Committees, and the FBI. Republicans have spent $100 million investigating the Clintons for the sole purpose of destroying them. 16 investigations, $100 million, one special prosecutor, and what have the Republicans found. NOTHING. Because their lies about the Clintons aren't true.

You chose to ignore the investigations, and believe the lies. No one has been under as much scrutiny as the Clintons. EVER. Either they are the smartest criminals ever, or they haven't done anything illegal. Trump is a criminal but he keeps getting caught. I'd rather have the smarter criminals, please.


Liberals are inherently corrupt and will reflexively abuse whatever power they have to advance their vile agenda.


If you want to see an awesome example of this, mindless mob phenomenon, I strongly recommend reading up on the Rotherham rape crisis.

No conspiracy, but ever liberal just responded to type to protect and advance the lib agenda.
 

Forum List

Back
Top