Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
USA Today's editorial board is unfit for providing news.
USA TODAY is the published equivalent of the self-admitting, ass-kissing, all-in CNN.
Their declaration is as surprising as Slick Willy opining that he thinks Hillary should be elected.
Says someone supporting a rapist defender, habitual liar, grifter for president.
Ooooh noes Trump is finished now!!!!!
I could see him or someone just like him being president of a very screwed up 3rd world country: not president of the USA.Trumps probably only fit for a nut house or a padded room. The national disgrace need to seek help.
Anyone that would consider Trump for president is sick in the head.
When someone askes what crime a person has committed, it means what crime have they been indicted for and found guilty of. In our country, according to our constitution, no one is guilty of a crime unless found guilty through the court system. Hillary Clinton has never been indicted for or found guilty of any crime. You saying she has commtted a crime, anyone just saying so, any accusations, gossip, smear campaigns, etc., mean nothing. She has never been indicted or tried for any crime, much less found guilty.a career criminal like Clinton over a mega-successful
What crime has Clinton committed? Seriously. Can you be specific and name one?
1. Mishandling Classified Information
Executive Order 13526 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 793(f) of the federal code make it unlawful to send of store classified information on personal email. Casey Harper at The Daily Caller delved into this angle:
"'By using a private email system, Secretary Clinton violated the Federal Records Act and the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual regarding records management, and worse, could have left classified and top secret documents vulnerable to cyber attack,' Cause of Action Executive Director Dan Epstein said in an email to reporters.
'This is an egregious violation of the law, and if it were anyone else, they could be facing fines and criminal prosecution.'”
Harper goes on to point out that multiple violations of this law have been enforced recently, including in 1999, when former CIA Director John M. Deutch's security clearance was suspended for using his personal email to send classified information.
Additionally, this past week, Gen. David Patraeus pleaded guilty for mishandling classified information by using a Gmail account instead of his official government email.
2. Violation of The 2009 Federal Records Act
Section 1236.22 of the 2009 National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) requirements states that:
"Agencies that allow employees to send and receive official electronic mail messages using a system not operated by the agency must ensure that Federal records sent or received on such systems are preserved in the appropriate agency record keeping system."
According to the original story on Clinton's emails published in The New York Times:
"Federal regulations, since 2009, have required that all emails be preserved as part of an agency’s record-keeping system. In Mrs. Clinton’s case, her emails were kept on her personal account and her staff took no steps to have them preserved as part of State Department record.
In response to a State Department request, Mrs. Clinton’s advisers, late last year, reviewed her account and decided which emails to turn over to the State Department."
The fact that the State Department combs through the 55,000 pages of emails sent on Clinton's private email account seems to verify that at least some of the emails Clinton sent contained classified information.
3. Violation of the Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA)
Veterans for a Strong America has filed a lawsuit against the State Department over potential violations of FOIA. Joel Arends, chairman of the non-profit group, explained to the Washington Examiner that their FOIA request over the Benghazi affair specifically asked for any personal email accounts Secretary Clinton may have used:
"'At this point in time, I think we're the only ones that specifically asked for both her personal and government email and phone logs,' Arends said of his group's Benghazi-related request."
When someone askes what crime a person has committed, it means what crime have they been indicted for and found guilty of. In our country, according to our constitution, no one is guilty of a crime unless found guilty through the court system. Hillary Clinton has never been indicted of nor found guilty of any crime. You saying she has commtted a crime, anyone just saying so, any accusations, gossip, smear campaigns, etc., mean nothing. She has never been indicted or tried for any crime, much less found guilty.
So, you claiming she is a criminal is simply out and out bullshit.
You mean the third worldcountry obama turned America into?I could see him or someone just like him being president of a very screwed up 3rd world country: not president of the USA.Trumps probably only fit for a nut house or a padded room. The national disgrace need to seek help.
Anyone that would consider Trump for president is sick in the head.
Tom Horn, post: 154148421. Mishandling Classified Information
Do you believe in law and order?
No person is a criminal until they have been charged and convicted of a crime.
Ted Bundy wasn't a serial-killer until the cops finally caught him? Al Capone wasn't a murderer, racketeer, loan shark, pimp, extortionist, and mob boss until he got convicted for tax-evasion? You should sue the public school you went to for fraud.
It makes no sense to someone who doesn't know how to think. Logic and reason are needed. You have no right to call someone a criminal when they have not been convicted of a crime. For you to do so is slander: a crime. You could be taken to court and convicted of a crime for calling Clinton a criminal. If you only knew how to think, you would get this. But you allow emotion and self serving partisanship to block any critical thinking skills.When someone askes what crime a person has committed, it means what crime have they been indicted for and found guilty of. In our country, according to our constitution, no one is guilty of a crime unless found guilty through the court system. Hillary Clinton has never been indicted of nor found guilty of any crime. You saying she has commtted a crime, anyone just saying so, any accusations, gossip, smear campaigns, etc., mean nothing. She has never been indicted or tried for any crime, much less found guilty.
So, you claiming she is a criminal is simply out and out bullshit.
This makes no sense.
You can commit a crime and not be caught or convicted. They call it presumption of innocence for a reason.
You mean the third worldcountry obama turned America into?
It makes no sense to someone who doesn't know how to think. Logic and reason are needed.
And then there are you clueless LWNJs......You mean the third worldcountry obama turned America into?
Lol.
Most likely you are stuffing your face with Walmart brand cheese puffs as you type these messages on a computer.
You should sue the school you went to for not teaching you logic and critical thinking skills.
When someone askes what crime a person has committed, it means what crime have they been indicted for and found guilty of. In our country, according to our constitution, no one is guilty of a crime unless found guilty through the court system. Hillary Clinton has never been indicted of nor found guilty of any crime. You saying she has commtted a crime, anyone just saying so, any accusations, gossip, smear campaigns, etc., mean nothing. She has never been indicted or tried for any crime, much less found guilty.
So, you claiming she is a criminal is simply out and out bullshit.
This makes no sense.
You can commit a crime and not be caught or convicted. They call it presumption of innocence for a reason.
Yes they do. You obviously didn't pay attention.You should sue the school you went to for not teaching you logic and critical thinking skills.
Government education does not teach logic or critical thinking skills.
The evidence is all around you.
It is slander to call someone a criminal when they have not been convicted of a crime. If you were prosecuted for doing so, you'd be the one who is a criminal.It makes no sense to someone who doesn't know how to think. Logic and reason are needed.
Okay, well logically someone can commit an illegal offense without ever being convicted.
So how about that reason?
