USA Today editorial board declares Trump unfit for Presidency

[NotfooledbyW]

Oldstyle, post: 15414975

I've never seen such blatant obstruction of justice EVER as I have with Hillary Clinton and her email scandal

You've still never seen it. You are imagining it.

 

[Oldstyle]

Oldstyle, post: 15414975

I've never seen such blatant obstruction of justice EVER as I have with Hillary Clinton and her email scandal

You've still never seen it. You are imagining it.

Let's look at the evidence that Clinton and her minions have destroyed since Congress started looking into her email communications!

What have they gotten rid of?

# A personal Apple email server used by Clinton the first two months she was in office.

# An Apple Macbook and thumbdrive containing her email archives. (She claimed those were "lost in the mail"!)

# Two Blackberry devices that were missing SIM cards and SD data cards.

# 13 mobile devices either lost or smashed with hammers.

# Two i-Pads.

# Server backup files that were deleted.

# Copies of emails located on the laptops of Cheryl Mills and another aid wiped clean with Bleachbit after the Benghazi Committee sought them with a subpoena.

# Clinton's server email archive again Bleachbit wiped after emails were subpoenaed.

# Backups of the server email files which were manually deleted.

If you or I did what Hillary Clinton has done while being investigated by Congress...WE WOULD BE IN PRISON!

What took place literally SCREAMS Obstruction of Justice...yet Hillary got a pass from the FBI...an institution that used to pretend it was above politics. I'm "imagining" this? I wish I was. What I'm SEEING fills me with disgust that this women is even being considered for high office!

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Oldstyle, post: 15415073

What took place literally SCREAMS Obstruction of Justice...yet Hillary got a pass from the FBI...an institution that used to pretend it was above politics. I'm "imagining" this? I wish I was. What I'm SEEING fills me with disgust that this women is even being considered for high office!

The FBI didn't arrive at the conclusion you Clinton hate-mangers wanted, so you trash the FBI. Your imagination has become so calloused by hatred it's no fun having an imagination anymore isn't it?

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Oldstyle, post: 15415073

Let's look at the evidence that Clinton and her minions have destroyed since Congress started looking into her email communications!

Source?

 

[Oldstyle]

Oldstyle, post: 15415073

Let's look at the evidence that Clinton and her minions have destroyed since Congress started looking into her email communications!

Source?

It's scary how little you liberal shills know when it comes to the facts of this investigation, Notfooled! That's all information compiled from the Congressional investigations and the FBI report.

 

[Oldstyle]

Let me guess...you probably still believe Hillary from when she was saying that she only did what she did because it was easier for her to use just one device? Only then it turned out that she had used 15 and they were all destroyed or "missing"!

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Oldstyle, post: 15415375

It's scary how little you liberal shills know when it comes to the facts of this investigation, Notfooled! That's all information compiled from the Congressional investigations and the FBI report.

All I know is no criminal charges were brought because no crime was committed. So stop calling Hillary a criminal. She is in no way a criminal.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Oldstyle, post: 15415387

Let me guess...you probably still believe Hillary from when she was saying that she only did what she did because it was easier for her to use just one device? Only then it turned out that she had used 15 and they were all destroyed or "missing"!

I have a laptop, an IPhone and an Ipad. I only use one at a time. Hillary broke no laws and whatever happened to her devices was not found to be breaking the law or obstructing justice. You need to find something new to obsess about.

Of course I believe her. No one wants to carry two devices around if they can carry one.

 

[mudwhistle]

Oldstyle, post: 15415375

It's scary how little you liberal shills know when it comes to the facts of this investigation, Notfooled! That's all information compiled from the Congressional investigations and the FBI report.

All I know is no criminal charges were brought because no crime was committed. So stop calling Hillary a criminal. She is in no way a criminal.

I think you're confused with what being a criminal is. One doesn't have to be charged to be a criminal because criminals break the law. Being charged or convicted has nothing to do with it. One can be a Criminal Suspect and not be charged.

 

[Oldstyle]

You couldn't find a more blatant example of obstruction of justice if you looked for years, Notfooled! Clinton and anyone on her staff who helped her to destroy all of those files and devices have all participated in a criminal cover-up.

 

[Oldstyle]

Oldstyle, post: 15415387

Let me guess...you probably still believe Hillary from when she was saying that she only did what she did because it was easier for her to use just one device? Only then it turned out that she had used 15 and they were all destroyed or "missing"!

I have a laptop, an IPhone and an Ipad. I only use one at a time. Hillary broke no laws and whatever happened to her devices was not found to be breaking the law or obstructing justice. You need to find something new to obsess about.

Of course I believe her. No one wants to carry two devices around if they can carry one.

You really are a moron! Clinton used the excuse that she only wanted to use one device but in reality she used FIFTEEN! She lied.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Oldstyle, post: 15415375

It's scary how little you liberal shills know when it comes to the facts of this investigation, Notfooled!

So you know all about the investigations, the facts, and the results. The results are no laws were broken.

The case is closed. Why in the hell are you re-litigating it in your kangaroo court?

Clinton never mocked and ridiculed a disabled journalist like Trump did. She is qualified and prepared to be president. Trump is not.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Oldstyle, post: 15415473

You really are a moron! Clinton used the excuse that she only wanted to use one device but in reality she used FIFTEEN! She lied.

And you know she lied, how? Do you have photos of her using fifteen devices at once? Or two? You are making a very ignorant argument.

 

[Oldstyle]

Oldstyle, post: 15415473

You really are a moron! Clinton used the excuse that she only wanted to use one device but in reality she used FIFTEEN! She lied.

And you know she lied, how? Do you have photos of her using fifteen devices at once? Or two? You are making a very ignorant argument.

Are you deliberately trying to appear ignorant? I didn't SAY she used fifteen devices at once...what I said was that she claimed to have set up the server in her private home because she found it easier to only use one device...but then it was learned that she had in fact used fifteen different devices and all of them had been either destroyed or "lost"! She lied when she made that excuse.

 

[Oldstyle]

Oldstyle, post: 15415375

It's scary how little you liberal shills know when it comes to the facts of this investigation, Notfooled!

So you know all about the investigations, the facts, and the results. The results are no laws were broken.

The case is closed. Why in the hell are you re-litigating it in your kangaroo court?

Clinton never mocked and ridiculed a disabled journalist like Trump did. She is qualified and prepared to be president. Trump is not.

Trump never destroyed evidence like Hillary did! If he DID...he would have been indited under this Administration!

 

[Mustang]

Sometimes you have to just do what's right

USA TODAY's Editorial Board: Trump is 'unfit for the presidency'

He is erratic. Trump has been on so many sides of so many issues that attempting to assess his policy positions is like shooting at a moving target. A list prepared by NBC details 124 shifts by Trump on 20 major issues since shortly before he entered the race. He simply spouts slogans and outcomes (he’d replace Obamacare with “something terrific”) without any credible explanations of how he’d achieve them.

He is ill-equipped to be commander in chief. Trump’s foreign policy pronouncements typically range from uninformed to incoherent. It’s not just Democrats who say this. Scores of Republican national security leaders have signed an extraordinary open letter calling Trump’s foreign policy vision “wildly inconsistent and unmoored in principle.” In a Wall Street Journal column this month, Robert Gates, the highly respected former Defense secretary who served presidents of both parties over a half-century, described Trump as “beyond repair.”

He traffics in prejudice. From the very beginning, Trump has built his campaign on appeals to bigotry and xenophobia, whipping up resentment against Mexicans, Muslims and migrants. His proposals for mass deportations and religious tests are unworkable and contrary to America’s ideals.

Trump has stirred racist sentiments in ways that can’t be erased by his belated and clumsy outreach to African Americans. His attacks on an Indiana-born federal judge of Mexican heritage fit “the textbook definition of a racist comment,” according to House Speaker Paul Ryan, the highest-ranking elected official in the Republican Party. And for five years, Trump fanned the absurd “birther” movement that falsely questioned the legitimacy of the nation’s first black president.

His business career is checkered. Trump has built his candidacy on his achievements as a real estate developer and entrepreneur. It’s a shaky scaffold, starting with a 1973 Justice Department suit against Trump and his father for systematically discriminating against blacks in housing rentals. (The Trumps fought the suit but later settled on terms that were viewed as a government victory.) Trump’s companies have had some spectacular financial successes, but this track record is marred by six bankruptcy filings, apparent misuse of the family’s charitable foundation, and allegations by Trump University customers of fraud. A series of investigative articles published by the USA TODAY Network found that Trump has been involved in thousands of lawsuits over the past three decades, including at least 60 that involved small businesses and contract employees who said they were stiffed. So much for being a champion of the little guy.

He isn’t leveling with the American people. Is Trump as rich as he says? No one knows, in part because, alone among major party presidential candidates for the past four decades, he refuses to release his tax returns. Nor do we know whether he has paid his fair share of taxes, or the extent of his foreign financial entanglements.

He speaks recklessly. In the days after the Republican convention, Trump invited Russian hackers to interfere with an American election by releasing Hillary Clinton’s emails, and he raised the prospect of “Second Amendment people” preventing the Democratic nominee from appointing liberal justices. It’s hard to imagine two more irresponsible statements from one presidential candidate.

He has coarsened the national dialogue. Did you ever imagine that a presidential candidate would discuss the size of his genitalia during a nationally televised Republican debate? Neither did we. Did you ever imagine a presidential candidate, one who avoided service in the military, would criticize Gold Star parents who lost a son in Iraq? Neither did we. Did you ever imagine you’d see a presidential candidate mock a disabled reporter? Neither did we. Trump’s inability or unwillingness to ignore criticism raises the specter of a president who, like Richard Nixon, would create enemies’ lists and be consumed with getting even with his critics.

He’s a serial liar. Although polls show that Clinton is considered less honest and trustworthy than Trump, it’s not even a close contest. Trump is in a league of his own when it comes to the quality and quantity of his misstatements. When confronted with a falsehood, such as his assertion that he was always against the Iraq War, Trump’s reaction is to use the Big Lie technique of repeating it so often that people begin to believe it.

We are not unmindful of the issues that Trump’s campaign has exploited: the disappearance of working-class jobs; excessive political correctness; the direction of the Supreme Court; urban unrest and street violence; the rise of the Islamic State terrorist group; gridlock in Washington and the influence of moneyed interests. All are legitimate sources of concern.








.

I've previously stated that I believe that Trump has some kind of personality disorder.

Putting that issue aside for the moment, I think it's safe to say that the normal nominating process of both political parties tends to winnow out the men and women who have personal "issues" of one kind or another. However, campaigns can 'protect' their candidates and spin certain behaviors as being more benign than they otherwise really are. That's not to say that we haven't had our share of presidents who have had personality shortcomings or faults of one kind or another. For example, both JFK and Clinton were serial womanizers who risked a great deal, seemingly unable to suppress their desires. Likewise, Richard Nixon was pretty darn paranoid after a lifetime of being on the defensive. I could list more, but the point is made.

But I have never seen a candidate run for president who is so clearly childish and emotionally immature and insecure as Trump. Frankly, it scares the bejesus out of me to think that a man who so clearly craves the attention of adoring crowds who is also seemingly unable to ignore and/or tune out the petty slights of others could become the most powerful man on the planet.

 

[charwin95]

That is embracing reality and knowing the difference between partisan opinion and fact.

Undeniable fact?


An 'ass-load' of people disagree and deny it...you lose.


USA TODAY is FISH WRAP

How about 4 newspapers came out at the same day (Sept. 25/16 ) calling Trump a liar? LA TIMES, NEW YORK TIMES, WASHINGTON POST, POLITICO.
Very impressive. Your messiah is very good.

The weekend America's newspapers called Donald Trump a liar

 

[Tom Horn]

Tom Horn, post: 15414842

1. Mishandling Classified Information

Do you believe in law and order?

No person is a criminal until they have been charged and convicted of a crime.

Ted Bundy wasn't a serial-killer until the cops finally caught him? Al Capone wasn't a murderer, racketeer, loan shark, pimp, extortionist, and mob boss until he got convicted for tax-evasion? You should sue the public school you went to for fraud.

 

[Tom Horn]

Oldstyle, post: 15415473

You really are a moron! Clinton used the excuse that she only wanted to use one device but in reality she used FIFTEEN! She lied.

And you know she lied, how? Do you have photos of her using fifteen devices at once? Or two? You are making a very ignorant argument.

Piss up a rope, needle-dick.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Oldstyle, post: 15415375

It's scary how little you liberal shills know when it comes to the facts of this investigation, Notfooled!

So you know all about the investigations, the facts, and the results. The results are no laws were broken.

The case is closed. Why in the hell are you re-litigating it in your kangaroo court?

Clinton never mocked and ridiculed a disabled journalist like Trump did. She is qualified and prepared to be president. Trump is not.

How would you...they gave immunity to a bunch of crooks and liars.

There was no case. They never investigated anything beyond the narrow scope they thought would shut everyone up. The FBI is led by an incompetent.

NotfooledbyW....good.

CertainlyfooledbyClinton.....go figure.