Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 124,334
- 80,978
That's his baby, he should be allowed to keep her.Utah dad says baby taken from him for adoption against his will
What the fuck!? Why hasn't this been fixed in Utah? Come on folks....jeez.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's his baby, he should be allowed to keep her.Utah dad says baby taken from him for adoption against his will
What the fuck!? Why hasn't this been fixed in Utah? Come on folks....jeez.
Tell us, what the hell are you so worried about? Oh right, gays could do what only heterosexuals can do currently. Got it.If you think it can't be pulled off you're fooling yourself, it just hasn't been done yet. They can make a human with three parents as well, egg from from one and genetics from two others. The science is no longer a fiction, they just haven't pulled the trigger.Scientists create artificial human eggs and spermNo, its still science fiction for humans.
Their final products were not actually working sperm and eggs, but rather germ cells that potentially could mature and become viable for fertility. The study's findings were published Wednesday in the journal Cell.
This doesn't mean men and women will soon be donating skin cells rather than sperm and egg at fertility clinics. Eventually, however, the findings could open the door to more intensive research on human genetics and certain cancers, and could impact fertility treatments sometime in the future.
Still science fiction at the level you are talking about. Man-rage women will have to wait for their lesbian dystopian fantasies a little while longer.
A concept and an initial product isn't an automatic end result. Just ask the Fusion guys about that one.
Nope. I'm talking the future while you're living in the past.Tell us, what the hell are you so worried about? Oh right, gays could do what only heterosexuals can do currently. Got it.If you think it can't be pulled off you're fooling yourself, it just hasn't been done yet. They can make a human with three parents as well, egg from from one and genetics from two others. The science is no longer a fiction, they just haven't pulled the trigger.
Their final products were not actually working sperm and eggs, but rather germ cells that potentially could mature and become viable for fertility. The study's findings were published Wednesday in the journal Cell.
This doesn't mean men and women will soon be donating skin cells rather than sperm and egg at fertility clinics. Eventually, however, the findings could open the door to more intensive research on human genetics and certain cancers, and could impact fertility treatments sometime in the future.
Still science fiction at the level you are talking about. Man-rage women will have to wait for their lesbian dystopian fantasies a little while longer.
A concept and an initial product isn't an automatic end result. Just ask the Fusion guys about that one.
Not really, the issue is it isn't viable right now, and your only reason for wanting it seems to be to piss off people you don't like.
Nope. I'm talking the future while you're living in the past.Tell us, what the hell are you so worried about? Oh right, gays could do what only heterosexuals can do currently. Got it.If you think it can't be pulled off you're fooling yourself, it just hasn't been done yet. They can make a human with three parents as well, egg from from one and genetics from two others. The science is no longer a fiction, they just haven't pulled the trigger.Still science fiction at the level you are talking about. Man-rage women will have to wait for their lesbian dystopian fantasies a little while longer.
A concept and an initial product isn't an automatic end result. Just ask the Fusion guys about that one.
Not really, the issue is it isn't viable right now, and your only reason for wanting it seems to be to piss off people you don't like.
I'm sure that you do, you are simply wrong, as usual.Nope. I'm talking the future while you're living in the past.Tell us, what the hell are you so worried about? Oh right, gays could do what only heterosexuals can do currently. Got it.If you think it can't be pulled off you're fooling yourself, it just hasn't been done yet. They can make a human with three parents as well, egg from from one and genetics from two others. The science is no longer a fiction, they just haven't pulled the trigger.
A concept and an initial product isn't an automatic end result. Just ask the Fusion guys about that one.
Not really, the issue is it isn't viable right now, and your only reason for wanting it seems to be to piss off people you don't like.
I stand by my statement.
I'm sure that you do, you are simply wrong, as usual.Nope. I'm talking the future while you're living in the past.Tell us, what the hell are you so worried about? Oh right, gays could do what only heterosexuals can do currently. Got it.A concept and an initial product isn't an automatic end result. Just ask the Fusion guys about that one.
Not really, the issue is it isn't viable right now, and your only reason for wanting it seems to be to piss off people you don't like.
I stand by my statement.
Yep, and with that we're done. Move on.I'm sure that you do, you are simply wrong, as usual.Nope. I'm talking the future while you're living in the past.Tell us, what the hell are you so worried about? Oh right, gays could do what only heterosexuals can do currently. Got it.
Not really, the issue is it isn't viable right now, and your only reason for wanting it seems to be to piss off people you don't like.
I stand by my statement.
Nope.
What's your obsession with my past got to do with this thread or two irresponsible fags?Because one of them got sick. It even happens with straight couples.Fags ask for a child. A man helps them get a child. Fags then can't support the child. Fags demand & receive welfare. State sues innocent man for the laziness & irresponsibility of 2 fags.Oh wow, you lying sack of shit. Two lesbians had this child with the help of a sperm donor. They were doing fine until one got sick and couldn't work any more. Then the STATE, NOT the other lesbian sued the guy for child support. They did that to scare off potential sperm donors in the future from fathering a child.Funny you didn't have that position when a couple fags sued for child support from a sperm donorThat's what happens when you don't get a legal marriage license.
You are one lying ass. You know you are. And you of all people say "fags". After all that time you spent trying to pick up wet soap? It shouldn't have taken that much time. It's not that hard to do.
Fags & Rderp fail
Ben Carson says prison makes you gay. Is that why you're so angry? That it made you gay or didn't make you gay. Not sure which. Please clarify.
But only one to complain. If he wanted rights, he should have married the girl.It takes two to fornicate.His rights ended when he fucked a girl without marrying her. I have no sympathy.
Hopefully he has now learned his lesson.
Complaining? So that's your arbitrary standard to decide who gets rights or not? And who's to say if he wanted to marry her she would have agreed?The girlfriend put the child up for adoption. She isn't complaining. He's the one with the gripe. He's the only one that could have changed the circumstances and eliminated the foundation for his gripe.A father is a father married or not. You sound silly blaming the father when the mother also decided to have sex out of wedlock.But only one to complain. If he wanted rights, he should have married the girl.It takes two to fornicate.His rights ended when he fucked a girl without marrying her. I have no sympathy.
Hopefully he has now learned his lesson.
What's your issue? Do you just hate men? Daddy issues?
Because the girl obviously doesn't want the baby, I don't understand this. To me, a person who wants to be a parent, the guy that is, shouldn't have to marry a person who doesn't want kids, the girl that is, in order to be the parent that they want to be.But only one to complain. If he wanted rights, he should have married the girl.It takes two to fornicate.His rights ended when he fucked a girl without marrying her. I have no sympathy.
Hopefully he has now learned his lesson.
Women who hate men are irrational. Your post is well intended, but you can't fix bat shit crazy.Because the girl obviously doesn't want the baby, I don't understand this. To me, a person who wants to be a parent, the guy that is, shouldn't have to marry a person who doesn't want kids, the girl that is, in order to be the parent that they want to be.But only one to complain. If he wanted rights, he should have married the girl.It takes two to fornicate.His rights ended when he fucked a girl without marrying her. I have no sympathy.
Hopefully he has now learned his lesson.
God bless you and the guy always!!!
Holly
P.S. If anyone's rights are going to be signed away, it should be the girl's rights when she doesn't want the baby in the first place. This is when I feel bad for guys because something that they help create and want to keep has to be in the possession of another person.
Sex has consequences. The consequence is a child. No one is forcing him to get married. He just loses his voice with respect to the child. Exactly as if the girl had decided to get an abortion.Complaining? So that's your arbitrary standard to decide who gets rights or not? And who's to say if he wanted to marry her she would have agreed?The girlfriend put the child up for adoption. She isn't complaining. He's the one with the gripe. He's the only one that could have changed the circumstances and eliminated the foundation for his gripe.A father is a father married or not. You sound silly blaming the father when the mother also decided to have sex out of wedlock.But only one to complain. If he wanted rights, he should have married the girl.It takes two to fornicate.His rights ended when he fucked a girl without marrying her. I have no sympathy.
Hopefully he has now learned his lesson.
What's your issue? Do you just hate men? Daddy issues?
Just tell me you want to bring back shotgun weddings and I'll think you're at least partially reasonable because that I agree with. Two people who made a baby should be subject to compulsory marriage.
Nonsense. Before giving birth, the woman has 100% of the rights of what she does with her body. At that time, the man has no rights. However, that changes once the baby is born. From that point forward, both parents have equal rights.Sex has consequences. The consequence is a child. No one is forcing him to get married. He just loses his voice with respect to the child. Exactly as if the girl had decided to get an abortion.Complaining? So that's your arbitrary standard to decide who gets rights or not? And who's to say if he wanted to marry her she would have agreed?The girlfriend put the child up for adoption. She isn't complaining. He's the one with the gripe. He's the only one that could have changed the circumstances and eliminated the foundation for his gripe.A father is a father married or not. You sound silly blaming the father when the mother also decided to have sex out of wedlock.But only one to complain. If he wanted rights, he should have married the girl.It takes two to fornicate.
What's your issue? Do you just hate men? Daddy issues?
Just tell me you want to bring back shotgun weddings and I'll think you're at least partially reasonable because that I agree with. Two people who made a baby should be subject to compulsory marriage.
That first thing you say here is why I hate it for guys. They can't help it that they can't carry the babies that they want themselves.Before giving birth, the woman has 100% of the rights of what she does with her body. At that time, the man has no rights. However, that changes once the baby is born. From that point forward, both parents have equal rights.