Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you be the donor you had better get a writ of non-liability from the donee...Fags want equal rights. Give it to them. When those two queers split up the one without the child should have paid NOT THE DONORThey won on a technicality. He should have signed an agreement or had a physician present as required by law. If he'd won then any man could say he was just a sperm donor to get out of child support.Funny you didn't have that position when a couple fags sued for child support from a sperm donorThat's what happens when you don't get a legal marriage license.
The name of the father has to be on the birth certificate and entered with the state.. I know states like Texass that allow any name to be put in the Fathers box even if it's not the named ones child...and will have to pay child support even if it is proven that the name is not the real Dad..If you be the donor you had better get a writ of non-liability from the donee...Fags want equal rights. Give it to them. When those two queers split up the one without the child should have paid NOT THE DONORThey won on a technicality. He should have signed an agreement or had a physician present as required by law. If he'd won then any man could say he was just a sperm donor to get out of child support.Funny you didn't have that position when a couple fags sued for child support from a sperm donorThat's what happens when you don't get a legal marriage license.
Haven't there been cases where that doesn't matter if the State ends up paying for the kid? Wasn't there a case somewhere where the guy ended up paying when two lesbians split up, and one ended up on the dole? I thought that guy signed a contract, but the State found it void.
The name of the father has to be on the birth certificate and entered with the state.. I know states like Texass that allow any name to be put in the Fathers box even if it's not the named ones child...and will have to pay child support even if it is proven that the name is not the real Dad..If you be the donor you had better get a writ of non-liability from the donee...Fags want equal rights. Give it to them. When those two queers split up the one without the child should have paid NOT THE DONORThey won on a technicality. He should have signed an agreement or had a physician present as required by law. If he'd won then any man could say he was just a sperm donor to get out of child support.Funny you didn't have that position when a couple fags sued for child support from a sperm donor
Haven't there been cases where that doesn't matter if the State ends up paying for the kid? Wasn't there a case somewhere where the guy ended up paying when two lesbians split up, and one ended up on the dole? I thought that guy signed a contract, but the State found it void.
They have shown they will abuse the system when they deem it necessary..and in retribution I have done the same to the govt...The name of the father has to be on the birth certificate and entered with the state.. I know states like Texass that allow any name to be put in the Fathers box even if it's not the named ones child...and will have to pay child support even if it is proven that the name is not the real Dad..If you be the donor you had better get a writ of non-liability from the donee...Fags want equal rights. Give it to them. When those two queers split up the one without the child should have paid NOT THE DONORThey won on a technicality. He should have signed an agreement or had a physician present as required by law. If he'd won then any man could say he was just a sperm donor to get out of child support.
Haven't there been cases where that doesn't matter if the State ends up paying for the kid? Wasn't there a case somewhere where the guy ended up paying when two lesbians split up, and one ended up on the dole? I thought that guy signed a contract, but the State found it void.
Another example of laws being stupid.
Nope, doesn't work that way. If can't come to an agreement, keep your pants on, and if she changes her mind either way, you're fucked, by that which you fucked.Not married, her baby not his, unless he could work it out with her which he couldn't, obviously.He should get custody and the mother should have to pay child support.
Get Baby Kaylee Home to her Daddy
Then any woman who gets PG and doesn't marry receives no child support. See how it works?
The name of the father has to be on the birth certificate and entered with the state.. I know states like Texass that allow any name to be put in the Fathers box even if it's not the named ones child...and will have to pay child support even if it is proven that the name is not the real Dad..
Yes, The Attorney General.. I had to pay child support for 18 years to the state of Texass........The name of the father has to be on the birth certificate and entered with the state.. I know states like Texass that allow any name to be put in the Fathers box even if it's not the named ones child...and will have to pay child support even if it is proven that the name is not the real Dad..
Woah wut? Can you give me a source on that bullshit cause I'm going to raise a stink if they prove their not the father and still have to pay child support...
No, this is what happens when the bigotry of institutional feminist sexism is challenged by logic.That's what happens when you don't get a legal marriage license.
Nope, doesn't work that way. If can't come to an agreement, keep your pants on, and if she changes her mind either way, you're fucked, by that which you fucked.Not married, her baby not his, unless he could work it out with her which he couldn't, obviously.He should get custody and the mother should have to pay child support.
Get Baby Kaylee Home to her Daddy
Then any woman who gets PG and doesn't marry receives no child support. See how it works?
Don't Republicans say either the mother take care of the unwanted child as punishment for sex or let someone adopt it? Seems she's just doing what Republicans recommend.
Life is unfair, deal with it.Nope, doesn't work that way. If can't come to an agreement, keep your pants on, and if she changes her mind either way, you're fucked, by that which you fucked.Not married, her baby not his, unless he could work it out with her which he couldn't, obviously.He should get custody and the mother should have to pay child support.
Get Baby Kaylee Home to her Daddy
Then any woman who gets PG and doesn't marry receives no child support. See how it works?
Sexist.
It's not the name in the box, it's the paternity and, sometimes, the established relationship with the child. Think it's yours for too long, and it is...Yes, The Attorney General.. I had to pay child support for 18 years to the state of Texass........The name of the father has to be on the birth certificate and entered with the state.. I know states like Texass that allow any name to be put in the Fathers box even if it's not the named ones child...and will have to pay child support even if it is proven that the name is not the real Dad..
Woah wut? Can you give me a source on that bullshit cause I'm going to raise a stink if they prove their not the father and still have to pay child support...
Life is unfair, deal with it.Nope, doesn't work that way. If can't come to an agreement, keep your pants on, and if she changes her mind either way, you're fucked, by that which you fucked.Not married, her baby not his, unless he could work it out with her which he couldn't, obviously.He should get custody and the mother should have to pay child support.
Get Baby Kaylee Home to her Daddy
Then any woman who gets PG and doesn't marry receives no child support. See how it works?
Sexist.
Life is unfair, deal with it.Nope, doesn't work that way. If can't come to an agreement, keep your pants on, and if she changes her mind either way, you're fucked, by that which you fucked.Not married, her baby not his, unless he could work it out with her which he couldn't, obviously.
Get Baby Kaylee Home to her Daddy
Then any woman who gets PG and doesn't marry receives no child support. See how it works?
Sexist.
Unfair is one thing, the law not being neutral is another. Consistency is another issue. If you are going to force a man to support a kid he doesn't want, you shouldn't be able to deny him custody of one he does, at least joint custody.
Nope. Her body. He made his choice when he dropped his underpants. After that it is up to her.Life is unfair, deal with it.Nope, doesn't work that way. If can't come to an agreement, keep your pants on, and if she changes her mind either way, you're fucked, by that which you fucked.Then any woman who gets PG and doesn't marry receives no child support. See how it works?
Sexist.
Unfair is one thing, the law not being neutral is another. Consistency is another issue. If you are going to force a man to support a kid he doesn't want, you shouldn't be able to deny him custody of one he does, at least joint custody.
Step it up a notch, if you're going to force payments, then a father should have a say so in any abortion decisions.
Nope. Her body. He made his choice when he dropped his underpants. After that it is up to her.Life is unfair, deal with it.Nope, doesn't work that way. If can't come to an agreement, keep your pants on, and if she changes her mind either way, you're fucked, by that which you fucked.
Sexist.
Unfair is one thing, the law not being neutral is another. Consistency is another issue. If you are going to force a man to support a kid he doesn't want, you shouldn't be able to deny him custody of one he does, at least joint custody.
Step it up a notch, if you're going to force payments, then a father should have a say so in any abortion decisions.
Society is not gender-neutral, nor will it ever be. Those who can create life will never be the same as those who simply donate to the process. They are your betters actually. Just a few of you could keep a multitude of them in business no problems at all. And if they only want girls, they don't even need you.Nope. Her body. He made his choice when he dropped his underpants. After that it is up to her.Life is unfair, deal with it.Sexist.
Unfair is one thing, the law not being neutral is another. Consistency is another issue. If you are going to force a man to support a kid he doesn't want, you shouldn't be able to deny him custody of one he does, at least joint custody.
Step it up a notch, if you're going to force payments, then a father should have a say so in any abortion decisions.
That you can't see the consistency error with that if you support a gender neutral society speaks volumes of the intellectual dishonesty of your ilk.
Yes, The Attorney General.. I had to pay child support for 18 years to the state of Texass........The name of the father has to be on the birth certificate and entered with the state.. I know states like Texass that allow any name to be put in the Fathers box even if it's not the named ones child...and will have to pay child support even if it is proven that the name is not the real Dad..
Woah wut? Can you give me a source on that bullshit cause I'm going to raise a stink if they prove their not the father and still have to pay child support...
Society is not gender-neutral, nor will it ever be. Those who can create life will never be the same as those who simply donate to the process. They are your betters actually. Just a few of you could keep a multitude them in business no problems at all. And if they only want girls, they don't even need you.Nope. Her body. He made his choice when he dropped his underpants. After that it is up to her.Life is unfair, deal with it.
Unfair is one thing, the law not being neutral is another. Consistency is another issue. If you are going to force a man to support a kid he doesn't want, you shouldn't be able to deny him custody of one he does, at least joint custody.
Step it up a notch, if you're going to force payments, then a father should have a say so in any abortion decisions.
That you can't see the consistency error with that if you support a gender neutral society speaks volumes of the intellectual dishonesty of your ilk.
