vanka Trump used a personal email account to send hundreds of emails about government business last

[easyt65]

Only a Democrat would be stupid enough to do what Hillary did after Hillary was caught red handed doing.

Once again, unimaginative butt-hurt snowflakes are accusing others of what Democrats have already been caught doing.

 

[Pilot1]

The killing the messenger schtick is getting old and tired. Yes, it is breaking the law if she uses private emails for government business.

So why didn't Hillary get prosecuted, and go to jail? So you agree that she should have gone to jail?

 

[Claudette]

A waste of time but them I expect the new House will be doing a lot of that.

 

[easyt65]

The killing the messenger schtick is getting old and tired. Yes, it is breaking the law if she uses private emails for government business.

ACTUALLY ... it is NOT illegal to use personal e-mail for govt business as long as all e-mails are copied and provided to the govt for official records.

Hillary not only f*ed up by storing TOP SECRET+ data on a personal, unclassified, unencrypted server - she also violated the FOIA and Federal Records Act ... 15000+ times ... And illegally attempted to destroy the subpoenaed documents.

 

[sparky]

Hillary was stupid. But Ivanka is way beyond stupid

maybe they should get a room.....?

~S~

 

[JLW]

The killing the messenger schtick is getting old and tired. Yes, it is breaking the law if she uses private emails for government business.

So why didn't Hillary get prosecuted, and go to jail? So you agree that she should have gone to jail?

I never though it rose to the level where Hillary should have been prosecuted, and neither do I with Ivanka. Chastised maybe, but not prosecuted. But if you believed that Hillary should have been prosecuted, then why not Ivanka? The same law was broken.

 

[JLW]

A waste of time but them I expect the new House will be doing a lot of that.

But it was okay with the Republican House did it?

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Ivanka used personal email for WH business

Can we all finally admit that we really don't care about people using their personal emails for government business? Ivanka Trump used a personal email account to send hundreds of messages discussing official White House business last year, officials confirm.

From the article: A review into her emails revealed she had used her private address to contact government officials; Ms. Trump sent the emails before she was briefed on the rules, her lawyer says.

To be fair to Ivanka, she didn't know there was an issue about using your personal emails to conduct government business -- yea we know her Pops accused Hillary Clinton of putting the US "in danger" over her use of a private email while secretary of state -- the difference is, Ivanka is not Sec Of State so the likelihood of her having any national security level information is zero -- she was most likely sending cute cat videos or pictures of her clothing outfits trying to get feedback on the upcoming fall collection.

This may also be a distraction orchestrated by Obama and Hillary to take attention off of her real email scandal -- something that she will be going to jail for in the very near future, now that Matt Whitaker or Jeanine Pirro will be Attorney General.

 

[Claudette]

A waste of time but them I expect the new House will be doing a lot of that.

But it was okay with the Republican House did it?

Sure was.

 

[JLW]

A waste of time but them I expect the new House will be doing a lot of that.

But it was okay with the Republican House did it?

Sure was.

So you are being hypocritical...

 

[mudwhistle]

Hilary outright ignored a congressional subpoena and destroyed evidence. Who else in America could even

get away with that?! Oh! But the FBI seized Trump's lawyer's stuff like gangbusters.

Ivanka turned all her stuff over to the archives last year.

How do you know Ivanka is telling the truth? How do you know she did not send classified info over her private e-mail? Because her lawyer said so? Just like Hillary's lawyer said so.

Stop with your hypocrisy. Be consistent and admit that Ivanka should be locked up.

There there, cupcake.

Don't be too downtrodden when this doesn't go the way you think it will, because the media lied and got

your hopes up.

That is where you are wrong. It is your type that wanted Hillary put away. Be consistent. You can be true to your convictions, can't you? Or, are you like Trump and just discard them when it suits you?

First of all the source of this story is the Washington Post.
Everyone knows the owner is not only a big liberal but has a bad case of TDS.
Second of all this is not a case of obstruction or of espionage like in Hillary's case.
This is just somebody who is accused of sending emails to government officials using a private email address.
Jesus.....so every time we send an email to Washington we're breaking the law??????

The killing the messenger schtick is getting old and tired. Yes, it is breaking the law if she uses private emails for government business.

Then state the US code that deals with it.
There is a law against transmitting classified information over a private account.
There is no law against using a private email address to do government business.
As a matter of fact, Gmail has better encryption than the government servers do.
The problem is the legal aspects according to the freedom of information act.
However, the communications must be retained and in accordance to the records act they must be transferred to government servers within 20 days.

Addressing the Federal Records Act, NPR's Scott Horsley reported last month on the question of whether Clinton's exclusive reliance on a private email account violated it. Here's some of what he reported:

"A State Department spokeswoman says Hillary Clinton did not break any rules by relying solely on her personal email account. Federal law allows government officials to use personal email so long as relevant documents are preserved for history."​

The law was amended in late 2014 to require that personal emails be transferred to government servers within 20 days. But that was after Clinton left office. Watchdog groups conceded that she may not have violated the text of the law, but they argue she violated the spirit of it. The Sunlight Foundation's John Wonderlich explained to Horsley:

"[O]ur expectations for public service are [that] public servants use their official email accounts."​

Wonderlich also found it ethically challenged, if not legally, for Clinton and her team to have been the filter for her emails:

"The final arbiter of what's public or what's turned over to Congress shouldn't be private staff working for Hillary Clinton. It should be State Department employees who are bound by duty to the public interest."

Fact Check: Hillary Clinton, Those Emails And The Law
​

 

[JLW]

How do you know Ivanka is telling the truth? How do you know she did not send classified info over her private e-mail? Because her lawyer said so? Just like Hillary's lawyer said so.

Stop with your hypocrisy. Be consistent and admit that Ivanka should be locked up.

There there, cupcake.

Don't be too downtrodden when this doesn't go the way you think it will, because the media lied and got

your hopes up.

That is where you are wrong. It is your type that wanted Hillary put away. Be consistent. You can be true to your convictions, can't you? Or, are you like Trump and just discard them when it suits you?

First of all the source of this story is the Washington Post.
Everyone knows the owner is not only a big liberal but has a bad case of TDS.
Second of all this is not a case of obstruction or of espionage like in Hillary's case.
This is just somebody who is accused of sending emails to government officials using a private email address.
Jesus.....so every time we send an email to Washington we're breaking the law??????

The killing the messenger schtick is getting old and tired. Yes, it is breaking the law if she uses private emails for government business.

Then state the US code that deals with it.
There is a law against transmitting classified information over a private account.
There is no law against using a private email address to do government business.
As a matter of fact, Gmail has better encryption than the government servers do.
The problem is the legal aspects according to the freedom of information act.
However, the communications must be retained and in accordance to the records act they must be transferred to government servers within 20 days.

Addressing the Federal Records Act, NPR's Scott Horsley reported last month on the question of whether Clinton's exclusive reliance on a private email account violated it. Here's some of what he reported:

"A State Department spokeswoman says Hillary Clinton did not break any rules by relying solely on her personal email account. Federal law allows government officials to use personal email so long as relevant documents are preserved for history."​

The law was amended in late 2014 to require that personal emails be transferred to government servers within 20 days. But that was after Clinton left office. Watchdog groups conceded that she may not have violated the text of the law, but they argue she violated the spirit of it. The Sunlight Foundation's John Wonderlich explained to Horsley:

"[O]ur expectations for public service are [that] public servants use their official email accounts."​

Wonderlich also found it ethically challenged, if not legally, for Clinton and her team to have been the filter for her emails:

"The final arbiter of what's public or what's turned over to Congress shouldn't be private staff working for Hillary Clinton. It should be State Department employees who are bound by duty to the public interest."

Fact Check: Hillary Clinton, Those Emails And The Law​

That is the point, Ivanka also broke the Federal Records Act. Ironically, she is making the same excuses as Hillary.

 

[mudwhistle]

There there, cupcake.

Don't be too downtrodden when this doesn't go the way you think it will, because the media lied and got

your hopes up.

That is where you are wrong. It is your type that wanted Hillary put away. Be consistent. You can be true to your convictions, can't you? Or, are you like Trump and just discard them when it suits you?

First of all the source of this story is the Washington Post.
Everyone knows the owner is not only a big liberal but has a bad case of TDS.
Second of all this is not a case of obstruction or of espionage like in Hillary's case.
This is just somebody who is accused of sending emails to government officials using a private email address.
Jesus.....so every time we send an email to Washington we're breaking the law??????

The killing the messenger schtick is getting old and tired. Yes, it is breaking the law if she uses private emails for government business.

Then state the US code that deals with it.
There is a law against transmitting classified information over a private account.
There is no law against using a private email address to do government business.
As a matter of fact, Gmail has better encryption than the government servers do.
The problem is the legal aspects according to the freedom of information act.
However, the communications must be retained and in accordance to the records act they must be transferred to government servers within 20 days.

Addressing the Federal Records Act, NPR's Scott Horsley reported last month on the question of whether Clinton's exclusive reliance on a private email account violated it. Here's some of what he reported:

"A State Department spokeswoman says Hillary Clinton did not break any rules by relying solely on her personal email account. Federal law allows government officials to use personal email so long as relevant documents are preserved for history."​

The law was amended in late 2014 to require that personal emails be transferred to government servers within 20 days. But that was after Clinton left office. Watchdog groups conceded that she may not have violated the text of the law, but they argue she violated the spirit of it. The Sunlight Foundation's John Wonderlich explained to Horsley:

"[O]ur expectations for public service are [that] public servants use their official email accounts."​

Wonderlich also found it ethically challenged, if not legally, for Clinton and her team to have been the filter for her emails:

"The final arbiter of what's public or what's turned over to Congress shouldn't be private staff working for Hillary Clinton. It should be State Department employees who are bound by duty to the public interest."

Fact Check: Hillary Clinton, Those Emails And The Law​

That is the point, Ivanka also broke the Federal Records Act. Ironically, she is making the same excuses as Hillary.

No. Hillary hid the fact that she was using a private server.....Ivanka did not.
There are remedies to when people use a private email account.
All they have to do is send copies to the government so they can be documented.
Hillary decided what was okay to turn over and what was personal business.
We have no proof that she didn't just destroy any evidence of wrongdoing.

 

[JLW]

That is where you are wrong. It is your type that wanted Hillary put away. Be consistent. You can be true to your convictions, can't you? Or, are you like Trump and just discard them when it suits you?

First of all the source of this story is the Washington Post.
Everyone knows the owner is not only a big liberal but has a bad case of TDS.
Second of all this is not a case of obstruction or of espionage like in Hillary's case.
This is just somebody who is accused of sending emails to government officials using a private email address.
Jesus.....so every time we send an email to Washington we're breaking the law??????

The killing the messenger schtick is getting old and tired. Yes, it is breaking the law if she uses private emails for government business.

Then state the US code that deals with it.
There is a law against transmitting classified information over a private account.
There is no law against using a private email address to do government business.
As a matter of fact, Gmail has better encryption than the government servers do.
The problem is the legal aspects according to the freedom of information act.
However, the communications must be retained and in accordance to the records act they must be transferred to government servers within 20 days.

Addressing the Federal Records Act, NPR's Scott Horsley reported last month on the question of whether Clinton's exclusive reliance on a private email account violated it. Here's some of what he reported:

"A State Department spokeswoman says Hillary Clinton did not break any rules by relying solely on her personal email account. Federal law allows government officials to use personal email so long as relevant documents are preserved for history."​

The law was amended in late 2014 to require that personal emails be transferred to government servers within 20 days. But that was after Clinton left office. Watchdog groups conceded that she may not have violated the text of the law, but they argue she violated the spirit of it. The Sunlight Foundation's John Wonderlich explained to Horsley:

"[O]ur expectations for public service are [that] public servants use their official email accounts."​

Wonderlich also found it ethically challenged, if not legally, for Clinton and her team to have been the filter for her emails:

"The final arbiter of what's public or what's turned over to Congress shouldn't be private staff working for Hillary Clinton. It should be State Department employees who are bound by duty to the public interest."

Fact Check: Hillary Clinton, Those Emails And The Law​

That is the point, Ivanka also broke the Federal Records Act. Ironically, she is making the same excuses as Hillary.

No. Hillary hid the fact that she was using a private server.....Ivanka did not.
There are remedies to when people use a private email account.
All they have to do is send copies to the government so they can be documented.

We do not know what Ivanka did or did not do. We are relying on what her attorney and the administration is telling us. Once again, Hillary redux.

 

[AvgGuyIA]

LOCK HER UP. LOCK HER UP.

Just kidding. Probably nothing of importance was exposed.

But it does warrant an investigation.

You people are itching to see Hillary in prison aren't you? There is a new DOJ AG in town who won't be squeamish like the last one.

 

[peach174]

If Hillary can why not Ivanka?

The question should be ,did Ivanka use hers overseas like Hillary did so that it became easier to hack into?

 

[mudwhistle]

First of all the source of this story is the Washington Post.
Everyone knows the owner is not only a big liberal but has a bad case of TDS.
Second of all this is not a case of obstruction or of espionage like in Hillary's case.
This is just somebody who is accused of sending emails to government officials using a private email address.
Jesus.....so every time we send an email to Washington we're breaking the law??????

The killing the messenger schtick is getting old and tired. Yes, it is breaking the law if she uses private emails for government business.

Then state the US code that deals with it.
There is a law against transmitting classified information over a private account.
There is no law against using a private email address to do government business.
As a matter of fact, Gmail has better encryption than the government servers do.
The problem is the legal aspects according to the freedom of information act.
However, the communications must be retained and in accordance to the records act they must be transferred to government servers within 20 days.

Addressing the Federal Records Act, NPR's Scott Horsley reported last month on the question of whether Clinton's exclusive reliance on a private email account violated it. Here's some of what he reported:

"A State Department spokeswoman says Hillary Clinton did not break any rules by relying solely on her personal email account. Federal law allows government officials to use personal email so long as relevant documents are preserved for history."​

The law was amended in late 2014 to require that personal emails be transferred to government servers within 20 days. But that was after Clinton left office. Watchdog groups conceded that she may not have violated the text of the law, but they argue she violated the spirit of it. The Sunlight Foundation's John Wonderlich explained to Horsley:

"[O]ur expectations for public service are [that] public servants use their official email accounts."​

Wonderlich also found it ethically challenged, if not legally, for Clinton and her team to have been the filter for her emails:

"The final arbiter of what's public or what's turned over to Congress shouldn't be private staff working for Hillary Clinton. It should be State Department employees who are bound by duty to the public interest."

Fact Check: Hillary Clinton, Those Emails And The Law​

That is the point, Ivanka also broke the Federal Records Act. Ironically, she is making the same excuses as Hillary.

No. Hillary hid the fact that she was using a private server.....Ivanka did not.
There are remedies to when people use a private email account.
All they have to do is send copies to the government so they can be documented.

We do not know what Ivanka did or did not do. We are relying on what her attorney and the administration is telling us. Once again, Hillary redux.

Not hardly.
The fact that we are talking about it means somebody knows. Hillary hid her communications on a private server in her home, and used private IT folks that had no security clearances. Then she destroyed evidence of roughly 30,000 communications after they were part of an investigation. This is textbook obstruction.
Ivanka probably sent a bunch of emails to government employees. I haven't heard anything about her destroying the evidence.

 

[AvgGuyIA]

Instead of serving the American people, those morons will keep launching all kinds of moronic "investigations" to pretend they are doing something important and potentially keep president Trump and Republicans from improving the life of Americans and from draining the Swamp

With all these investigations and judges trying to overturn every decision the President undertakes to keep America safe, it is obvious the Democrats are the enemy of the People.

 

[12icer]

You read the halfassed news too much. Facts are the government related emails were all archived. There are two ends to an email and one (or both) of them in most cases were archived.

 

[Penelope]

No matter what security clearance the Kushner's have , they should know better, lock them up. They have the most secret of info and Trump depends on them. HIs close family advisors.