Various Thoughts on the Issues of Homosexuality

[Seawytch]

I already did, but apparently you want more? Okay...Regnerus:

In attendance were scholars such as Mark Regnerus, a sociologist who sparked controversy after he published a 2012 journal article funded by religious conservatives arguing that children of same-sex parents fared worse than others—even though he never studied children of same-sex parents. Regnerus’ study was condemned in a letter by 200 scholarly peers and his own university department issued a stern rebuke calling the study “fundamentally flawed on conceptual and methodological grounds.” An internal audit found “serious flaws and distortions” and concluded the paper never should have been published.​

Michigan Courtroom Deals Fake Anti-Gay Research Strategy A Stinging Blow

Cameron:

On December 2, 1983, the American Psychological Association sent Paul Cameron a letter informing him that he had been dropped from membership. Early in 1984, all members of the American Psychological Association received official written notice that "Paul Cameron (Nebraska) was dropped from membership for a violation of the Preamble to the Ethical Principles of Psychologists" by the APA Board of Directors.5 Cameron has posted an elaborate argument about his expulsion from APA on his website, claiming that he resigned from APA before he was dropped from membership. Like most organizations, however, APA does not allow a member to resign when they are being investigated. And even if Cameron's claims were accepted as true, it would be remarkable that the largest professional organization of psychologists in the United States (and other professional associations, as noted below) went to such lengths to disassociate itself from one individual.

At its membership meeting on October 19, 1984, the Nebraska Psychological Association adopted a resolution stating that it "formally disassociates itself from the representations and interpretations of scientific literature offered by Dr. Paul Cameron in his writings and public statements on sexuality."6

In 1985, the American Sociological Association (ASA) adopted a resolution which asserted that "Dr. Paul Cameron has consistently misinterpreted and misrepresented sociological research on sexuality, homosexuality, and lesbianism" and noted that "Dr. Paul Cameron has repeatedly campaigned for the abrogation of the civil rights of lesbians and gay men, substantiating his call on the basis of his distorted interpretation of this research."7 The resolution formally charged an ASA committee with the task of "critically evaluating and publicly responding to the work of Dr. Paul Cameron."

At its August, 1986 meeting, the ASA officially accepted the committee's report and passed the following resolution:

The American Sociological Association officially and publicly states that Paul Cameron is not a sociologist, and condemns his consistent misrepresentation of sociological research. Information on this action and a copy of the report by the Committee on the Status of Homosexuals in Sociology, "The Paul Cameron Case," is to be published in Footnotes, and be sent to the officers of all regional and state sociological associations and to the Canadian Sociological Association with a request that they alert their members to Cameron's frequent lecture and media appearances."8

In August, 1996, the Canadian Psychological Association adopted the following policy statement:

The Canadian Psychological Association takes the position that Dr. Paul Cameron has consistently misinterpreted and misrepresented research on sexuality, homosexuality, and lesbianism and thus, it formally disassociates itself from the representation and interpretations of scientific literature in his writings and public statements on sexuality.
​

Paul Cameron Bio and Fact Sheet

You can't debunk the Regnerus work , so you try to deflect by linking him to Paul Cameron ?

TWO DIFFERENT PEOPLE - I am not that familiar with Cameron, and don't wish to become so - you are attempting to "frame"the debate and deflect with somewhat off-topic sub issues . The Link you would want to adress would be the Regnerus study - NOT CAMERON - .

I also notice you neglected or refused to adress any of the content of the studies, either youare incapable of it - orcan't do so because it destroys your stance. At issue are Evelyn Hooker, Alfred Kinsey and Mark Regnerus and their studies . Try again - Paul Cameron is a ppropagandist not a researcher and I hold him in as much disdain as the Gay propagandists who have infiltrated the scientific and journalistic communities.



As far as being fundamentally flawed - Nonsense - it was done at standards that make Hooker and Kinsey turn over in their graves. The UNiversity initially defended him, only after three years of intense , persistent and unabated political pressure and underhanded harassment did it finally distance itself from his studies.

Regnerus's work was debunked by the Michigan court...amoung others. Here's the link AGAIN:

Michigan Courtroom Deals Fake [Regnerus] Anti-Gay Research Strategy A Stinging Blow

In attendance were scholars such as Mark Regnerus, a sociologist who sparked controversy after he published a 2012 journal article funded by religious conservatives arguing that children of same-sex parents fared worse than others—even though he never studied children of same-sex parents. Regnerus’ study was condemned in a letter by 200 scholarly peers and his own university department issued a stern rebuke calling the study “fundamentally flawed on conceptual and methodological grounds.” An internal audit found “serious flaws and distortions” and concluded the paper never should have been published.

 

[thanatos144]

Here is a thought though.... Hey homosexuals if this country does become the socialist utopia Progressives want you guys do know you will be of the first they take to the mass killings right? Right along with all the minorities ...you will all be right behind the Jews. So why do you all wish to be progressives again?

 

[GreenBean]

You can't debunk the Regnerus work , so you try to deflect by linking him to Paul Cameron ?

TWO DIFFERENT PEOPLE - I am not that familiar with Cameron, and don't wish to become so - you are attempting to "frame"the debate and deflect with somewhat off-topic sub issues . The Link you would want to adress would be the Regnerus study - NOT CAMERON - .

I also notice you neglected or refused to adress any of the content of the studies, either youare incapable of it - orcan't do so because it destroys your stance. At issue are Evelyn Hooker, Alfred Kinsey and Mark Regnerus and their studies . Try again - Paul Cameron is a ppropagandist not a researcher and I hold him in as much disdain as the Gay propagandists who have infiltrated the scientific and journalistic communities.




As far as being fundamentally flawed - Nonsense - it was done at standards that make Hooker and Kinsey turn over in their graves. The UNiversity initially defended him, only after three years of intense , persistent and unabated political pressure and underhanded harassment did it finally distance itself from his studies.

Regnerus's work was debunked by the Michigan court...amoung others. Here's the link AGAIN:

Michigan Courtroom Deals Fake [Regnerus] Anti-Gay Research Strategy A Stinging Blow

In attendance were scholars such as Mark Regnerus, a sociologist who sparked controversy after he published a 2012 journal article funded by religious conservatives arguing that children of same-sex parents fared worse than others—even though he never studied children of same-sex parents. Regnerus’ study was condemned in a letter by 200 scholarly peers and his own university department issued a stern rebuke calling the study “fundamentally flawed on conceptual and methodological grounds.” An internal audit found “serious flaws and distortions” and concluded the paper never should have been published.

children of same-sex parents fared worse than others is what his study proved and presented valids arguments and evidence of such. That politically controlled organizations and ideologically motivated individuals went into an uproar did not change the evidence he presented . His study was not perfect , none are , but incredibly more credible than any ever presented by Gay activists.

The only valid and credible evidence that Gay activists have ever presented regarding Same sex parenting is re: Lesbians, in which case these children generally fare better than those raised by faggots. Dykes, even though they are perverts, will generally maintain the mothering instincts - in the case of perverts such as yourself perhaps two moms are fine.

Regenerus : To obtain his data, he queried adults as to whether their parents ever had a "romantic" same-sex relationship, he drew from a large enough pool of people to capture not only those raised by same-sex parents -- who actually made up a minuscule percentage of the study's participants , and actually comprise a miniscule percent of the ooverall population-- but those who grew up in straight households. It was a random study - which iswhat the Gay ACtivists and Lords of Political Correctness are objecting to - he didn't initiate his study tyo arrive at a predtermined outcome such as Hooker and Kinsey - he initiated his work and let the results show whatever they showed - that is why he is being Demonized for being candid and truthful. Candid, honest and Truthful is a no-no to Liberal_progressive Socio_facists.

Regnerus's work was debunked by the Michigan court.

Who cares - the courts are not scientific organizations, they are political ones. Do you honestly believe that you live in a Free Country !!??

Utah courts say the complete opposite, but "what does it matter at this point !?"

 

[Seawytch]

Regnerus's work was debunked by the Michigan court...amoung others. Here's the link AGAIN:

Michigan Courtroom Deals Fake [Regnerus] Anti-Gay Research Strategy A Stinging Blow

In attendance were scholars such as Mark Regnerus, a sociologist who sparked controversy after he published a 2012 journal article funded by religious conservatives arguing that children of same-sex parents fared worse than others—even though he never studied children of same-sex parents. Regnerus’ study was condemned in a letter by 200 scholarly peers and his own university department issued a stern rebuke calling the study “fundamentally flawed on conceptual and methodological grounds.” An internal audit found “serious flaws and distortions” and concluded the paper never should have been published.

children of same-sex parents fared worse than others is what his study proved and presented valids arguments and evidence of such. That politically controlled organizations and ideologically motivated individuals went into an uproar did not change the evidence he presented . His study was not perfect , none are , but incredibly more credible than any ever presented by Gay activists.

The only valid and credible evidence that Gay activists have ever presented regarding Same sex parenting is re: Lesbians, in which case these children generally fare better than those raised by faggots. Dykes, even though they are perverts, will generally maintain the mothering instincts - in the case of perverts such as yourself perhaps two moms are fine.

Regenerus : To obtain his data, he queried adults as to whether their parents ever had a "romantic" same-sex relationship, he drew from a large enough pool of people to capture not only those raised by same-sex parents -- who actually made up a minuscule percentage of the study's participants , and actually comprise a miniscule percent of the ooverall population-- but those who grew up in straight households. It was a random study - which iswhat the Gay ACtivists and Lords of Political Correctness are objecting to - he didn't initiate his study tyo arrive at a predtermined outcome such as Hooker and Kinsey - he initiated his work and let the results show whatever they showed - that is why he is being Demonized for being candid and truthful. Candid, honest and Truthful is a no-no to Liberal_progressive Socio_facists.

Regnerus's work was debunked by the Michigan court.

Who cares - the courts are not scientific organizations, they are political ones. Do you honestly believe that you live in a Free Country !!??

Utah courts say the complete opposite, but "what does it matter at this point !?"

Other scientists debunked him too Greenie. His public humiliation came as the result of the court.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Here is a thought though.... Hey homosexuals if this country does become the socialist utopia Progressives want you guys do know you will be of the first they take to the mass killings right? Right along with all the minorities ...you will all be right behind the Jews. So why do you all wish to be progressives again?

No wants a Utopia, and the only people calling for the deaths of the faggots are on your side.

 

[RKMBrown]

Secure in papers from search and seizure is the definition of privacy. To pretend it's not there because they did not use the word privacy, thus arguing its constitutional to take away your privacy by unreasonably searching and seizing your papers is ludicrous.

Nothing in the Constitution, and especially nothing in the fourteen amendment provides for a definition of protection of marriage. The only thing that even comes close is the right to life and liberty, which one could argue includes marriage. But more particularly, the 14th is not the right TO life and liberty, the 14th is the right of the state to TAKE your life and liberty with due process. IOW the 14th is more the authoritarian right of the majority to limit, through due process, the rights of the people. For example the right to limit gays from getting married through tyranny of the majority if they say they used due process.

However privacy covers more than just searches of your papers, wouldn't you say? This is merely one part of privacy.

Who you choose to marry is your own matter and part of personal privacy.

A lot of what is considered privacy has come through interpretation through the courts, the same as the right to marry.

Also, you're missing the 9th amendment from this, which makes it clear not all rights are protected in writing with the actual words in the BoRs.

I think you are confusing personal decisions, such as private matters between you and your wife as privacy.

As to the 9th amendment... yeah the 9th and 10th amendments were made entirely moot by the amendments that came after the civil war.

 

[GreenBean]

children of same-sex parents fared worse than others is what his study proved and presented valids arguments and evidence of such. That politically controlled organizations and ideologically motivated individuals went into an uproar did not change the evidence he presented . His study was not perfect , none are , but incredibly more credible than any ever presented by Gay activists.

The only valid and credible evidence that Gay activists have ever presented regarding Same sex parenting is re: Lesbians, in which case these children generally fare better than those raised by faggots. Dykes, even though they are perverts, will generally maintain the mothering instincts - in the case of perverts such as yourself perhaps two moms are fine.

Regenerus : To obtain his data, he queried adults as to whether their parents ever had a "romantic" same-sex relationship, he drew from a large enough pool of people to capture not only those raised by same-sex parents -- who actually made up a minuscule percentage of the study's participants , and actually comprise a miniscule percent of the ooverall population-- but those who grew up in straight households. It was a random study - which iswhat the Gay ACtivists and Lords of Political Correctness are objecting to - he didn't initiate his study tyo arrive at a predtermined outcome such as Hooker and Kinsey - he initiated his work and let the results show whatever they showed - that is why he is being Demonized for being candid and truthful. Candid, honest and Truthful is a no-no to Liberal_progressive Socio_facists.



Who cares - the courts are not scientific organizations, they are political ones. Do you honestly believe that you live in a Free Country !!??

Utah courts say the complete opposite, but "what does it matter at this point !?"

Other scientists debunked him too Greenie. His public humiliation came as the result of the court.

Yet you can't point out anyone not influenced by political bias. Nobody outside the APA - which is not a scientific organization by the way - but a politicized one. In fact the only so called "debunking" was not based on any factual evidence, but misguided sense of social conscience, and ideological agenda.

Nobody in the scientific community or the the political arena was able to prove that his results were any less valid than that of Hooker or Kinsey - both of whom have been proven a laughing stock and total charlatans . Not a single MF fact he presented can be or ever will be disproven . YOu can not disprove Good SCience but only try to hide the truth behind a facade of false noise . The Regenrus Study is valid - never has been proven otherwise and when you can demonstrate that 2+2= 3 and not 4 than perhaps you'll be able to do something about altering reality - in the interim STFU .

 

[GreenBean]

Here is a thought though.... Hey homosexuals if this country does become the socialist utopia Progressives want you guys do know you will be of the first they take to the mass killings right? Right along with all the minorities ...you will all be right behind the Jews. So why do you all wish to be progressives again?

Like sheep to the slaughter House - lest we forget National Socialism, the Nazi movement was a Socialist movement not much different from todays Socio-facists.

 

[Vandalshandle]

Here is a thought though.... Hey homosexuals if this country does become the socialist utopia Progressives want you guys do know you will be of the first they take to the mass killings right? Right along with all the minorities ...you will all be right behind the Jews. So why do you all wish to be progressives again?

Like sheep to the slaughter House - lest we forget National Socialism, the Nazi movement was a Socialist movement not much different from todays Socio-facists.

I guess that I COULD go back and read 57 pages to find out how THIS spin was developed, but I was planning on washing my hair tonight.

 

[Votto]

Good morning, everyone.

I'd like to share with you some of my views regarding the topic of homosexuality. So, here goes.



You must be a hateful bigot. No. Just because I don't accept or agree with everything homosexuality doesn't make me a hateful bigot. That is intellectually lazy, not to mention very partisan. Since when does “I don't support gay marriage, agree with people being born gay, or think it's moral” the same as “I hate you for being gay.” There is so much difference there. Disagreeing isn't automatically hating. You may not believe it, but there are Christians out there who believe homosexuality is a sin and hate it, but don't hate the actual person.


...it's OK to insult and mock homosexuals? Sure, you can do that, if you want to be a completely incredulous jerk. That's especially bad when in the same breath you're calling homosexuality a sin. You give homosexuals justified ammo to call you hateful when you deliberately insult and mock them. Do you think Christians should mock and insult people with vile slurs like “faggot”? No. Those who don't support homosexuality can certainly be civil and respectful in their disagreement.


How completely intolerant of you.... Not 100% accepting homosexuality means I'm intolerant? Really? I don't think so. If I could not tolerate you, I would attempt to erase you from existence. Just because I disagree with you doesn't mean I don't tolerate you. I tolerate you plenty, with your obscene gay pride parades, snarky and flamboyant drama, and your annoyingly forced lisping. And when I say “you,” I mean certain loud homosexuals like Perez Hilton. So, no. I'm more than happy to disagree with you while coexisting peacefully. One can tolerate those who disagree. Do you?


But wait, homosexuals are pedophiles!!! Oh, god, be quiet. Homosexuality is when two people of the same sex have sexual attraction towards one another, which typically leads to them having sex. That ain't pedophilia. Being a pedophile is when you have sexual attraction towards a child. Gay, straight, and bisexual pedophiles exist. If you really want to poison the discussion, keep calling homosexuals pedophiles and see what happens. They are two completely different things.


Portrayal and reality regarding homosexuality. For some reason people have made it seem like homosexuals are happy, carefree, fabulous people. And they even took our rainbow and put it in their background. Now, the rainbow, a beautiful and natural phenomenon, has become a symbol of something that's not quite natural or beautiful. The reality is that gay men penetrate the anuses of other men with their genitalia. That means part of their body is going to have feces on it. Does that sound beautiful? No. Saying it like it is isn't a bad thing. Perhaps the “fabulous” imagery some homosexuals enshroud themselves in is compensation for the disgusting nature of their sex. As for lesbians, I've heard one puts on a modified strap that resembles male genitalia. I don't quite understand that. Do more expensive models warm up? Why a woman would prefer another woman with some modified contraption to a living, breathing man merits its own pile of questions. I don't believe in sacred cows, so I have no problem discussing any unsavory detail so long as it's done in a civil manner.


Homosexuals can't be good parents. I don't believe that for a minute. While in my view it'd be better if a child has both a mommy and a daddy for balance, I don't think gay couples are inherently bad parents, or people, at all. Two men or two women can definitely love, cherish, and care for children. It just isn't the same as one mama and one papa. For thousands of years it's been normal for offspring to have one mother and one father. Child's going to be confused, in my opinion. That imbalance doesn't mean homosexual people can't be loving parents. There are two issues here: 1) The imbalance two male or two female parents can bring and 2) Assuming homosexual couples are automatically bad, unfit parents. On the 2nd, no, that assumption is really wrong. On the 1st, I do favor how the yin and yang of man and woman together can bring a balance of two vastly different worlds and perspectives together. I wish my fellow conservatives would stop making that cruel assumption.


If you disagree, you must be gay. That's just juvenile. Seriously. You're not a teenager.


Don't you know people are born gay? According to who? How so, and why? Like I say to religious folk: show me your scientific evidence. In my opinion, people are born straight, because nature has it so that both man and woman have what they need to mate and procreate. I don't understand why homosexual people have their homosexual feelings/attractions. I may be wrong about everything; who knows? It could very well be due to a chemical imbalance in the brain. At the very least keep that possibility in your mind for the sake of unbiased, scientific research explanation. Instead of flying into a furor when some try to research and better understand the science behind homosexuality without a progressive slant, let everyone research the issue. Knowledge is power, and nothing should be beyond the scope of scientific inquiry. I wonder what research would unearth if the intelligentsia weren't of an incredibly liberal---or conservative---slant.


Homosexuals are evil and deserve Hellfire. Boy, this one is tough. I was raised in an Apostolic-Pentecostal home. Now, I'm a nonreligious conservative. Do I believe the traditional Bibles consider it a sin in spite of what revisionist liberals say? Yes. Do I believe in the Bible? Currently, no. That's a whole 'nother discussion. Are homosexuals inherently evil? Absolutely not. All have sinned in the eyes of God... … ...assuming a god even exists, and the one in question at that. Some liberal Christians say we shouldn't judge homosexuals as sinning, but I could just as easily turn the tables by taking the dusty old book and ask them why they absolutely won't acknowledge homosexuality as a sin, unlike other sins they do. If homosexuality is sinful, OK. Now how about greed, lust, and any other conceivable sin out there the Bible mentions? I think it would be wise for liberal Christians to stop ignoring what the Bible mentions about homosexuality, say “alright,” and then point out every other sin that all people so casually do. And I do completely acknowledge how supremely hypocritical some religious people can be.


You've a different opinion? How DARE you!! As history has shown, there's been quite a bit of outrage by some on the left when someone has an opinion in favor of Traditional marriage, etc. I don't understand how some people could get so angry and inflamed over someone else voicing an opinion. That kind of crap needs to stop, because it's immature and detrimental to general discussion. Not only that, but taking it a step further and actually trying to destroy peoples' livelihoods... Holy crap that's wrong. “OH, you believe in taxation? How dare you! I'm going to try and destroy everything you've worked so hard for!” Imagine if someone told you that because you did something so innocuous as sharing your opinion when asked for one. The whole Duck Dynasty debacle is one example of that kind of overreaction. Same with Chick-Fil-A. Same with Miss California (Carrie Prejean) and that loudmouth, Perez Hilton. People like those responsible for this kind of inflamed, Herpe-like overreaction is one thing that hurts the image of ALL homosexual people. It makes them look like they absolutely cannot stand opposing views, and that they have really, really, really thin skin. I'm aware people have very different views from mine, but you don't see me hopping up and down with seething rage while trying to ruin your life over it.


Romeikes & Mathericks. Europe isn't free like America.


Homosexuals and the Military Not sure what to say about this. Let 'em fight for our country. If they sexually harass other military members or do lewd sexual acts in front of other soldiers, punish them for misconduct. Have them fight, but don't tolerate sexual harassment from anyone, whoever they are.


Summary. I'd like to see everyone stop fighting, insulting, disrespecting, and slandering one another over this. All that does is stir up more hatred and anger, which is never going to bring peace about for all here. Respect each other's right to have an opinion, and don't freak out or try to destroy people for disagreeing with you. These sensitive issues aren't nearly as cut-and-dried as some would have you believe. Don't assume homosexuals are pedophiles or bad parents. Don't assume Christians are hateful or bigoted. You don't really understand each other, which makes it very easy to lob attacks. This vicious cycle of hatred and bitterness by all sides will result in nothing good for all involved. Please, I am asking you to stop, step back, and really question and think about how you've been thinking about people. Challenge yourselves to point out your own assumptions and question them vigorously. Ask others to help you if you want. And, whatever you do, talk with people as if they are people. As if they're your neighbors. Don't treat them special, but give them mutual respect. I strongly believe we can talk about virtually anything without becoming consumed in the raging fires of anger and hatred. We are as capable of understanding, coming together, and maintaining peace as we are the reverse.


Though you may disagree, at least try to love and respect one another.

Assorted Brain Candy
The Aftermath of the Trial
Thoughts from a Simple Man
Your Taxes, Your Beliefs​

That is a great speech and all, but don't expect the President to call you up and congratulate you.

 

[GreenBean]

Here is a thought though.... Hey homosexuals if this country does become the socialist utopia Progressives want you guys do know you will be of the first they take to the mass killings right? Right along with all the minorities ...you will all be right behind the Jews. So why do you all wish to be progressives again?

Like sheep to the slaughter House - lest we forget National Socialism, the Nazi movement was a Socialist movement not much different from todays Socio-facists.

I guess that I COULD go back and read 57 pages to find out how THIS spin was developed, but I was planning on washing my hair tonight.

Was your hair or get brainwashed - which one is it ?

 

[GISMYS]

GOD'S WORD SAYS= The Lord said, “Because the outcry against Sodom and Gomorrah is great, and because their sin is very grave. GOD'S ANGELS SAY= We will destroy this place, because the outcry against them has grown great before the face of the Lord, and the Lord has sent us to destroy it.” THE angels say at Lot's home,before the angels retired for the night, all the men of Sodom, young and old, came from all over the city and surrounded the house. 5 They shouted to Lot, “Where are the men who came to spend the night with you? Bring them out to us so we can have sex with them!”But the two angels reached out, pulled Lot into the house, and bolted the door. 11 Then they blinded all the men, young and old, who were at the door of the house, so they gave up trying to get inside. Lot and his family got out of Sodom.24 Then the Lord rained down fire and burning sulfur from the sky on Sodom and Gomorrah. 25 He utterly destroyed them, along with the other cities and villages of the plain, wiping out all the people and every bit of vegetation. Genesis 19 & 20 Best you sick minded sexual perverts learn a lesson!!

 

[frigidweirdo]

Here is a thought though.... Hey homosexuals if this country does become the socialist utopia Progressives want you guys do know you will be of the first they take to the mass killings right? Right along with all the minorities ...you will all be right behind the Jews. So why do you all wish to be progressives again?

You know what punctuation is, right?

Who says this has anything to do with socialism? Also, socialists don't kill people, supposed Communists do, but not socialists, though i'm beginning to suspect that the right don't know the difference between the two.

Now, shall we see how many Bush is responsible for killing. There's the 4000 US troops in Iraq, those in Afghanistan, then the locals who were killed too.

What about people like Leonard Peltier who has spent a lot of time in prison because the US govt didn't like what he had to say?
And all the other stuff.
The right are far worse with human rights, the fact that YOU are coming on here saying gay people don't have the right to marry is one sign of that. The fact that people taking drugs is seen as bad, even like alcohol which you can't have until 21, which is ridiculous, and other things where proponents of "small govt" are asking the govt to tell people how to live their lives.

Go figure.

 

[frigidweirdo]

GOD'S WORD SAYS= The Lord said, “Because the outcry against Sodom and Gomorrah is great, and because their sin is very grave. GOD'S ANGELS SAY= We will destroy this place, because the outcry against them has grown great before the face of the Lord, and the Lord has sent us to destroy it.” THE angels say at Lot's home,before the angels retired for the night, all the men of Sodom, young and old, came from all over the city and surrounded the house. 5 They shouted to Lot, “Where are the men who came to spend the night with you? Bring them out to us so we can have sex with them!”But the two angels reached out, pulled Lot into the house, and bolted the door. 11 Then they blinded all the men, young and old, who were at the door of the house, so they gave up trying to get inside. Lot and his family got out of Sodom.24 Then the Lord rained down fire and burning sulfur from the sky on Sodom and Gomorrah. 25 He utterly destroyed them, along with the other cities and villages of the plain, wiping out all the people and every bit of vegetation. Genesis 19 & 20 Best you sick minded sexual perverts learn a lesson!!

Okay, and does this have anything to do with gay people? No it doesn't.

As I said before, it was about sleeping with PRIESTS as a religious act that was being spoken about.

Also, most of what you write is nonsense, i can't be bothered to sift through religious nonsense you copied from a book and any opinion that may or may not be there. If you want a proper response put the quote you want down, then give opinion after this as to why this is the case.

Otherwise you just sound like a religious nutter.

 

[GISMYS]

GOD'S WORD SAYS= The Lord said, “Because the outcry against Sodom and Gomorrah is great, and because their sin is very grave. GOD'S ANGELS SAY= We will destroy this place, because the outcry against them has grown great before the face of the Lord, and the Lord has sent us to destroy it.” THE angels say at Lot's home,before the angels retired for the night, all the men of Sodom, young and old, came from all over the city and surrounded the house. 5 They shouted to Lot, “Where are the men who came to spend the night with you? Bring them out to us so we can have sex with them!”But the two angels reached out, pulled Lot into the house, and bolted the door. 11 Then they blinded all the men, young and old, who were at the door of the house, so they gave up trying to get inside. Lot and his family got out of Sodom.24 Then the Lord rained down fire and burning sulfur from the sky on Sodom and Gomorrah. 25 He utterly destroyed them, along with the other cities and villages of the plain, wiping out all the people and every bit of vegetation. Genesis 19 & 20 Best you sick minded sexual perverts learn a lesson!!

Okay, and does this have anything to do with gay people? No it doesn't.

As I said before, it was about sleeping with PRIESTS as a religious act that was being spoken about.

Also, most of what you write is nonsense, i can't be bothered to sift through religious nonsense you copied from a book and any opinion that may or may not be there. If you want a proper response put the quote you want down, then give opinion after this as to why this is the case.

Otherwise you just sound like a religious nutter.

God abandoned them to do whatever shameful things their hearts desired. As a result, they did vile and degrading things with each other’s bodies. 25 They traded the truth about God for a lie. So they worshiped and served the things God created instead of the Creator himself, who is worthy of eternal praise! Amen. 26 That is why God abandoned them to their shameful desires. Even the women turned against the natural way to have sex and instead indulged in sex with each other. 27 And the men, instead of having normal sexual relations with women, burned with lust for each other. Men did shameful things with other men, and as a result of this sin, they suffered within themselves the penalty they deserved.

28 Since they thought it foolish to acknowledge God, he abandoned them to their foolish thinking and let them do things that should never be done. 29 Their lives became full of every kind of wickedness, sin, greed, hate, envy, murder, quarreling, deception, malicious behavior, and gossip. 30 They are backstabbers, haters of God, insolent, proud, and boastful. They invent new ways of sinning, and they disobey their parents. 31 They refuse to understand, break their promises, are heartless, and have no mercy. 32 They know God’s justice requires that those who do these things deserve to die, yet they do them anyway. Worse yet, they encourage others to do them, too.
Romans 1:24-32

 

[PaintMyHouse]

GOD'S WORD SAYS= The Lord said, “Because the outcry against Sodom and Gomorrah is great, and because their sin is very grave. GOD'S ANGELS SAY= We will destroy this place, because the outcry against them has grown great before the face of the Lord, and the Lord has sent us to destroy it.” THE angels say at Lot's home,before the angels retired for the night, all the men of Sodom, young and old, came from all over the city and surrounded the house. 5 They shouted to Lot, “Where are the men who came to spend the night with you? Bring them out to us so we can have sex with them!”But the two angels reached out, pulled Lot into the house, and bolted the door. 11 Then they blinded all the men, young and old, who were at the door of the house, so they gave up trying to get inside. Lot and his family got out of Sodom.24 Then the Lord rained down fire and burning sulfur from the sky on Sodom and Gomorrah. 25 He utterly destroyed them, along with the other cities and villages of the plain, wiping out all the people and every bit of vegetation. Genesis 19 & 20 Best you sick minded sexual perverts learn a lesson!!

Okay, and does this have anything to do with gay people? No it doesn't.

As I said before, it was about sleeping with PRIESTS as a religious act that was being spoken about.

Also, most of what you write is nonsense, i can't be bothered to sift through religious nonsense you copied from a book and any opinion that may or may not be there. If you want a proper response put the quote you want down, then give opinion after this as to why this is the case.

Otherwise you just sound like a religious nutter.

God abandoned them to do whatever shameful things their hearts desired. As a result, they did vile and degrading things with each other’s bodies. 25 They traded the truth about God for a lie. So they worshiped and served the things God created instead of the Creator himself, who is worthy of eternal praise! Amen. 26 That is why God abandoned them to their shameful desires. Even the women turned against the natural way to have sex and instead indulged in sex with each other. 27 And the men, instead of having normal sexual relations with women, burned with lust for each other. Men did shameful things with other men, and as a result of this sin, they suffered within themselves the penalty they deserved.

28 Since they thought it foolish to acknowledge God, he abandoned them to their foolish thinking and let them do things that should never be done. 29 Their lives became full of every kind of wickedness, sin, greed, hate, envy, murder, quarreling, deception, malicious behavior, and gossip. 30 They are backstabbers, haters of God, insolent, proud, and boastful. They invent new ways of sinning, and they disobey their parents. 31 They refuse to understand, break their promises, are heartless, and have no mercy. 32 They know God’s justice requires that those who do these things deserve to die, yet they do them anyway. Worse yet, they encourage others to do them, too.
Romans 1:24-32

Have you rejected that false prophet Jesus and embraced the One True God, or are you still going to burn in Hell for all eternity?

 

[TemplarKormac]

no but they might beat a child to death because they act gay. Or drag one by a rope behind a truck. Or make the act of sodomy illegal, Or ban certain sections of the population from receiving rights.

no but lets just focus on beheadings as if we have some morally superior authority on the issue.

What a joke.

you are a hateful prick.

"grow up. Adults dont throw tantrums because others dont think they are right."

Hypocritical asswipe.

Regards from Rosie

"Asswipe"?

Aaand you're sitting there calling HIM a hypocrite?

 

[TemplarKormac]

Lol. No. Anti interracial marriage laws had nothing to do with Nixon's Southern Strategy, KNB.

No, but racist Southern Dixiecrats became racist Southern Republicans because of the southern strategy. That's why it's absolutely hilarious and horrifying to see Republican mouth-breathers today trying to claim to be the party of Lincoln.

Abraham Lincoln would shoot himself in the head if he ever watched FOX & Friends.

Don't even try. I have given up on him. Next.

You gave up because you used a faulty premise, Stat. When you questioned my humanity you lost the argument. Genetic arguments don't fly. Next.

 

[GISMYS]

JESUS RETURNS AS KING OF KINGS,LORD OF LORDS========The Rider on the White Horse

11 Then I saw heaven opened, and a white horse was standing there. Its rider was named Faithful and True, for he judges fairly and wages a righteous war. 12 His eyes were like flames of fire, and on his head were many crowns. A name was written on him that no one understood except himself. 13 He wore a robe dipped in blood, and his title was the Word of God. 14 The armies of heaven, dressed in the finest of pure white linen, followed him on white horses. 15 From his mouth came a sharp sword to strike down the nations. He will rule them with an iron rod. He will release the fierce wrath of God, the Almighty, like juice flowing from a winepress. 16 On his robe at his thigh[e] was written this title: King of all kings and Lord of all lords.

17 Then I saw an angel standing in the sun, shouting to the vultures flying high in the sky: “Come! Gather together for the great banquet God has prepared. 18 Come and eat the flesh of kings, generals, and strong warriors; of horses and their riders; and of all humanity, both free and slave, small and great.”

19 Then I saw the beast and the kings of the world and their armies gathered together to fight against the one sitting on the horse and his army. 20 And the beast was captured, and with him the false prophet who did mighty miracles on behalf of the beast—miracles that deceived all who had accepted the mark of the beast and who worshiped his statue. Both the beast and his false prophet were thrown alive into the fiery lake of burning sulfur. 21 Their entire army was killed by the sharp sword that came from the mouth of the one riding the white horse. And the vultures all gorged themselves on the dead bodies.
REVELATION 19:

 

[PaintMyHouse]

JESUS RETURNS AS KING OF KINGS,LORD OF LORDS========The Rider on the White Horse

11 Then I saw heaven opened, and a white horse was standing there. Its rider was named Faithful and True, for he judges fairly and wages a righteous war. 12 His eyes were like flames of fire, and on his head were many crowns. A name was written on him that no one understood except himself. 13 He wore a robe dipped in blood, and his title was the Word of God. 14 The armies of heaven, dressed in the finest of pure white linen, followed him on white horses. 15 From his mouth came a sharp sword to strike down the nations. He will rule them with an iron rod. He will release the fierce wrath of God, the Almighty, like juice flowing from a winepress. 16 On his robe at his thigh[e] was written this title: King of all kings and Lord of all lords.

17 Then I saw an angel standing in the sun, shouting to the vultures flying high in the sky: “Come! Gather together for the great banquet God has prepared. 18 Come and eat the flesh of kings, generals, and strong warriors; of horses and their riders; and of all humanity, both free and slave, small and great.”

19 Then I saw the beast and the kings of the world and their armies gathered together to fight against the one sitting on the horse and his army. 20 And the beast was captured, and with him the false prophet who did mighty miracles on behalf of the beast—miracles that deceived all who had accepted the mark of the beast and who worshiped his statue. Both the beast and his false prophet were thrown alive into the fiery lake of burning sulfur. 21 Their entire army was killed by the sharp sword that came from the mouth of the one riding the white horse. And the vultures all gorged themselves on the dead bodies.
REVELATION 19:

Such a sad choice you've made, to burn in Hell for all eternity. Oh well, roatsy toasty.