'VICTORY': Judge orders Clinton to provide written answers to Judicial Watch questions on emails

[Procrustes Stretched]

"During an extended exchange with Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), Comey affirmed that the FBI's investigation found information marked classified on her server even after Clinton had said that she had neither sent nor received any items marked classified.

"That is not true," Comey said. "There were a small number of portion markings on, I think, three of the documents."

THAT IS NOT TRUE = PERJURY!


Comey challenges truthfulness of Clinton's email defenses
Follow us: Politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook

COMEY:
THREE E-MAILS BORE "Q" MARKINGS DOWN IN THE BODY. NONE HAD HEADERS, WHICH IS AT THE TOP OF A DOCUMENT THAT SAYS CLASSIFIED. THREE HAD WITHIN THE BODY THE PORTION MARKING FOR "C."

Question:
DID SECRETARY CLINTON OR ANY MEMBER OF HER STAFF INTENTIONALLY VIOLATE FEDERAL LAW?

FBI Director Comey >> WE DID NOT DEVELOP CLEAR EVIDENCE OF THAT.

Dante, the law states you can not send / receive highly classified - marked classified - emails on an illegal, unauthotized, unprotected server. It doesn't say '4 or more' - that's made up liberal BS.


You just admitted Comey DID find that Hillary DID send/receive marked classified documents - GAME OVER! THAT is a CRIME! She said she never did so - she DID. That is PERJURY!

PERIOD - THANK YOU FOR PLAYING - THANK YOU FOR FINALLY ADMITTING HILLARY BROKE THE LAW AND COMMITTED PERJURY!

What a dope. You people must not be allowed computer access without adult supervision

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Don't run away now, Jake - Dante just admitted Hillary broke the law and perjured herself.

Dementia on display

 

[SwimExpert]

I'm curious, Swim...do you think it's fine for a government official to use their office to exchange political favors for cash?

If you are going to change subjects start a new thread.

Yeah, because liberals NEVER try to divert the conversation... lol

If you are going to change subjects start a new thread.

 

[easyt65]

Hillary's pay-to-play exposed in her e-mails, for which Judicial Watch petitioned / requested is not changing the subject...unlike a 9/11 Conspiracy theory

 

[boedicca]

It's a rather hollow victory. The judge is protecting hiLIARy. The written responses will be prepared by her attorneys, and they don't allow for follow up questions. And, most significantly, it's dead certain no responses will be forthcoming prior to election day.

 

[SwimExpert]

Do you not grasp that the pay for play thing that the Clinton's were doing IS what this was all about?

No, you dumb, fucking, moron. The subject is whether any Tom, Dick, or Harry has a constitutional right to interrogate another person with said person being under oath, just because you want to. Your obsession with Clinton has rendered you such an idiot that you do stupid things, like vote for Donald Trump. Fucking moron.

 

[boedicca]

Do you not grasp that the pay for play thing that the Clinton's were doing IS what this was all about?

No, you dumb, fucking, moron. The subject is whether any Tom, Dick, or Harry has a constitutional right to interrogate another person with said person being under oath, just because you want to. Your obsession with Clinton has rendered you such an idiot that you do stupid things, like vote for Donald Trump. Fucking moron.

Wow. Your vulgarity is "So Convincing"!

 

[easyt65]

Swim, the answers and info they seek are the ones she was required to give according to the law in the 1st place.

Liberals freak out and think Hillary breaking the law - specifically / especially the FOIA - is some secret that must be defended and denied. It's pointless to try to declare she DIDN'T break the law.

Hell, the govt already came out and declared the Obama administration has set a record for breaking the FOIA with 70% of ALL requests being illegally ignored / refused. The EPA, the IRS, the WH, and yes even Hillary and the State Dept.

In light of this 70% record, libs who try to claim Hillary did NOT violate FOIA look absolutely stupid. OF COURSE she was part of the 70% illegal FOIA non-compliance!

She had more to lose than anyone by releasing these documents, as we continue to see each time more are released.

 

[SwimExpert]

Do you not grasp that the pay for play thing that the Clinton's were doing IS what this was all about?

No, you dumb, fucking, moron. The subject is whether any Tom, Dick, or Harry has a constitutional right to interrogate another person with said person being under oath, just because you want to. Your obsession with Clinton has rendered you such an idiot that you do stupid things, like vote for Donald Trump. Fucking moron.

Wow. Your vulgarity is "So Convincing"!

As opposed to Donald Trump?

 

[Oldstyle]

Do you not grasp that the pay for play thing that the Clinton's were doing IS what this was all about?

No, you dumb, fucking, moron. The subject is whether any Tom, Dick, or Harry has a constitutional right to interrogate another person with said person being under oath, just because you want to. Your obsession with Clinton has rendered you such an idiot that you do stupid things, like vote for Donald Trump. Fucking moron.

It's not a Constitutional right, but is is part of the checks and balances that we as citizens have over our government. The Freedom of Information Act was designed to make it harder to hide corrupt activities by our officials. So are the regulations that require public officials to conduct their official business so that Congress can oversee what they are doing. The entire reason that Hillary Clinton spent that hundred thousand dollars to set up her own private system of servers hidden away in her home was so that if someone WERE to invoke the FIA and ask to see her communications they would only receive her "official" papers and emails and would get none of the communications through which she was running the State Department. It also hid what she was doing from Congressional oversight.

The only "moron" here is anyone who sees this for anything but what it is...a deliberate attempt by Clinton to circumvent the rules...the destruction of evidence when she was found out...and month after month spent lying about it when it became public knowledge.

 

[SwimExpert]

It's not a Constitutional right, but is is part of the checks and balances that we as citizens have over our government.

NO. NO, NO, NO; FUCKING NO. BULL FUCKING SHIT WHY ARE YOU SO STUPID, FUCKING NO, YOU FUCKING RETARD.

You morons are making up this absolute insane bullshit just because you're so obsessed with hating Clinton you will literally believe anything that gives you an orgasm.

 

[easyt65]

Swim has evidently lost it. He evidently, like Hillary, has no idea what the FOIA ...or Federal Records Act... are for and believes they are optional...at least for her.

 

[Oldstyle]

It's not a Constitutional right, but is is part of the checks and balances that we as citizens have over our government.

NO. NO, NO, NO; FUCKING NO. BULL FUCKING SHIT WHY ARE YOU SO STUPID, FUCKING NO, YOU FUCKING RETARD.

You morons are making up this absolute insane bullshit just because you're so obsessed with hating Clinton you will literally believe anything that gives you an orgasm.

So you throw a tantrum...stamp your feet and curse a lot...but that doesn't change what Clinton DID! Do you really not understand what the function of the FIA is? Or why we have Congressional oversight of the Executive Branch?

 

[Oldstyle]

Swim has evidently lost it. He evidently, like Hillary, has no idea what the FOIA ...or Federal Records Act... are for and believes they are optional...at least for her.

It appears they were indeed "optional...at least for her" when it comes to Hillary Clinton! This is about as clear cut an example of an official deliberately circumventing regulations regarding transparency as I've ever seen...yet people like Swim are bound and determined that she did nothing wrong. It's an amazing thing to watch.

 

[SwimExpert]

So you throw a tantrum...stamp your feet and curse a lot...but that doesn't change what Clinton DID!

It does not matter if Clinton buttraped 100 children using bible pages as lube, it doesn't change the fact that you aren't entitled to interrogate someone under oath just because you want to.

 

[SwimExpert]

[yet people like Swim are bound and determined that she did nothing wrong.

 

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

Her lawyers will write her answers for her: "I do not recall"; "I do not know"; I object on the grounds that answering your question would be in violation of my intellectual property rights.

More along the familiar lines of, can you tell me what the definition of is is?

 

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

The ruling will be appealed. She won't have to answer them during her presidency, maybe later. Maybe.

Why would she want to refuse to amswer the questions...WHAT'S SHE HIDING, JAKE?!

Why the fuck does anyone have any right to demand she answer questions?

Why not just skip right to the indictment, and allow everyone the opportunity to place their cards on the table? There is no need to really give her the courtesy of asking her to explain her actions, just go around her back to those she associated with while in the state department.

 

[Oldstyle]

So you throw a tantrum...stamp your feet and curse a lot...but that doesn't change what Clinton DID!

It does not matter if Clinton buttraped 100 children using bible pages as lube, it doesn't change the fact that you aren't entitled to interrogate someone under oath just because you want to.

One of the things that makes American great, Swim is that we citizens DO have the right to ask our governmental officials to explain their actions. We don't serve them...they serve us. Hillary Clinton does not have a right to privacy when it comes to how she conducted things at the State Department. The FIA was passed so that government officials can't operate in the dark...doing whatever they please with the power they've been granted by us.

You use bible pages as a lube? You're one strange, Dude...just saying...

 

[easyt65]

The ruling will be appealed. She won't have to answer them during her presidency, maybe later. Maybe.

Why would she want to refuse to amswer the questions...WHAT'S SHE HIDING, JAKE?!

Why the fuck does anyone have any right to demand she answer questions?

Why not just skip right to the indictment, and allow everyone the opportunity to place their cards on the table? There is no need to really give her the courtesy of asking her to explain her actions, just go around her back to those she associated with while in the state department.

Barry will never let it happen