....proving that the Left has no way to document the value and rectitude of their doctrines.
Another of the irrefutable axioms is that, in the marketplace of ideas, conservatives eat Liberals' lunch.
1. When the ideas of the Left and the Right are compared, the weight of experience makes it clear and evident that the Right wins. If this were not the case, the Left would not have to default to murder, mayhem, violence and shutting down opposing voices.
2. When they can, they silence opposition,...e.g., gag orders, clearly in opposition to the first amendment.
Control of the media makes it possible to lie by both omission and by commission.
Rather than cogent arguments, disputing and/or refuting the Right's protagonists, the response is, more often, anger and vulgarity.
3. But the dispositive indication that the Left knows it cannot win by argument, experience, or explanation is the default to violence.
The evidentiary timeline, from then to now:
a. Then: Every presidential assassin in the history of the nation has been a liberal- or has not been associated with a political outlook- none were right-wingers.
b. Now: The attempted massacre of the GOP House baseball team by an avowed progressive.
4. "...their incendiary demands for “massive resistance” since November have been an open plea for the escalation of words into violent action. The daily repetition that President Trump is an illegitimate usurper who stole the election through collusion with foreign powers has been a hypnotic incantation in search of an Oswald: a siren call for an assassin.
5. It's easy "to find extremist rhetoric from influential people whose appeals for violence are only partially veiled. In March, former attorney general Loretta Lynch made a brief video in which she called for people “who see our rights being assailed, being trampled on and even being rolled back” to follow the example of freedom fighters of the past. “They’ve marched, they’ve bled and yes, some of them died. ....We can do this again.” The Senate Democrats shared Lynch’s call for street action leading to bloody sacrifice on their Facebook page."
6. "At the Women’s March on Washington the day after Trump’s inauguration, Angela Davis’s appeal for militancy was met with cheers. “Over the next months and years we will be called upon to intensify our demands for social justice to become more militant in our defense of vulnerable populations,” announced Davis, who in 1970 bought the shotgun used two days later to murder a judge. “Those who still defend the supremacy of white male hetero-patriarchy had better watch out,” she concluded. At the same event, pop legend Madonna spoke about her fantasies of “blowing up the White House.”
Incitement to Violence
What we have seen is the Democrat's/Liberal's political movement morph into a blood cult which brooks no restrictions of any kind to their victory.
None whatsoever.
And it goes far in explaining their affinity for the 7th barbarians of the Middle East, too.
Another of the irrefutable axioms is that, in the marketplace of ideas, conservatives eat Liberals' lunch.
1. When the ideas of the Left and the Right are compared, the weight of experience makes it clear and evident that the Right wins. If this were not the case, the Left would not have to default to murder, mayhem, violence and shutting down opposing voices.
2. When they can, they silence opposition,...e.g., gag orders, clearly in opposition to the first amendment.
Control of the media makes it possible to lie by both omission and by commission.
Rather than cogent arguments, disputing and/or refuting the Right's protagonists, the response is, more often, anger and vulgarity.
3. But the dispositive indication that the Left knows it cannot win by argument, experience, or explanation is the default to violence.
The evidentiary timeline, from then to now:
a. Then: Every presidential assassin in the history of the nation has been a liberal- or has not been associated with a political outlook- none were right-wingers.
b. Now: The attempted massacre of the GOP House baseball team by an avowed progressive.
4. "...their incendiary demands for “massive resistance” since November have been an open plea for the escalation of words into violent action. The daily repetition that President Trump is an illegitimate usurper who stole the election through collusion with foreign powers has been a hypnotic incantation in search of an Oswald: a siren call for an assassin.
5. It's easy "to find extremist rhetoric from influential people whose appeals for violence are only partially veiled. In March, former attorney general Loretta Lynch made a brief video in which she called for people “who see our rights being assailed, being trampled on and even being rolled back” to follow the example of freedom fighters of the past. “They’ve marched, they’ve bled and yes, some of them died. ....We can do this again.” The Senate Democrats shared Lynch’s call for street action leading to bloody sacrifice on their Facebook page."
6. "At the Women’s March on Washington the day after Trump’s inauguration, Angela Davis’s appeal for militancy was met with cheers. “Over the next months and years we will be called upon to intensify our demands for social justice to become more militant in our defense of vulnerable populations,” announced Davis, who in 1970 bought the shotgun used two days later to murder a judge. “Those who still defend the supremacy of white male hetero-patriarchy had better watch out,” she concluded. At the same event, pop legend Madonna spoke about her fantasies of “blowing up the White House.”
Incitement to Violence
What we have seen is the Democrat's/Liberal's political movement morph into a blood cult which brooks no restrictions of any kind to their victory.
None whatsoever.
And it goes far in explaining their affinity for the 7th barbarians of the Middle East, too.
