easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,150
- 2,645
Neither do you, snowflake....but of course you don't.........LOLI don't see in his (Trump's) comments actual violence,
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Neither do you, snowflake....but of course you don't.........LOLI don't see in his (Trump's) comments actual violence,
I respectfully disagree. This is a cyclical argument based on the notion "We can't keep guns out of the hands of criminals'. Yes, we can. Why NOT? We just need to actually work harder to remove them from our society, it would take time and effort. And determination. Something we seem to lack as a culture.I hate to be contradictory, but YES, it IS about GUNS. We are all weak and prone to human flaws. We don't need guns in this society anymore, they are a an anachronism. One we are better off leaving in the past.I have to admit liberals scare the hell out of me. Their intolerance is shocking, that Bernie Sanders guy trying to shoot down innocent peeps, well, its speaks volumes for human nature and the need for gun control.
No, Mary....it's not about guns.
If guns kill people, I guess pencils misspell words, cars drive drunk, and spoons make people fat.
No....it's about Democrat-control
The problem you've highlighted would be solved if no Leftist.....Democrat, Liberals, Progressive, Socialist, Nazi, Fascist or Communist where ever...EVER......allowed to attain a position of political power.
Violence is embedded in their politics, and if not guns, they would encourage the easily led to stomp out any opposition.
Then we'd be worried about boots.
Please don't ever feel you need to apologize for disagreeing with me...
I'm not a Liberal, and never mind defending my position.
"We don't need guns in this society anymore."
1. As we gave seen, there is no way to keep guns out of the hands of criminals.
QED....the rest of us do need guns.
2. Licensed gun owners are the most law-abiding of citizens. They would lose their permits for any weapons-related infraction. It doesn’t happen
3. The CDC studied laws throughout the country, and found: “In summary, the Task Force found insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of any of the firearms laws reviewed for preventing violence.” http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/rr/rr5214.pdf
- Example: “Of the 51,078 permits that have been issued by the state since the law took effect in 2007, 44 permit holders have been charged with a crime while using a firearm through late October, according to records provided by the Kansas Attorney General’s Office.”
- Few crimes committed by concealed-carry permit holders in Kansas
- http://www.kansas.com/2012/11/17/2572467/few-crimes-committed-by-concealed.html ( .00086%)
4. According to the National Self Defense Survey conducted by Florida State University criminologists in 1994, the rate of Defensive Gun Uses can be projected nationwide to approximately 2.5 million per year -- one Defensive Gun Use every 13 seconds.
5. And....I don't want any politician...nor you....deciding whether I need a gun.
I'll decide that.
Please, relax. calling me a child, that's flattering as hell , but sets a negative tone, don't you think? OK. Firearms are cool, and I understand people's fetish for them to a degree. We have to get past that obsession for fire arms, THAT is the real problem here. It's like trying to quit smoking, but on a cultural level.Umm, OK, Why are you sinking to condescension now? That solves nothing.I respectfully disagree. This is a cyclical argument based on the notion "We can't keep guns out of the hands of criminals'. Yes, we can. Why NOT? We just need to actually work harder to remove them from our society, it would take time and effort. And determination. Something we seem to lack as a culture.Please don't ever feel you need to apologize for disagreeing with me...
I'm not a Liberal, and never mind defending my position.
"We don't need guns in this society anymore."
1. As we gave seen, there is no way to keep guns out of the hands of criminals.
QED....the rest of us do need guns.
2. Licensed gun owners are the most law-abiding of citizens. They would lose their permits for any weapons-related infraction. It doesn’t happen
3. The CDC studied laws throughout the country, and found: “In summary, the Task Force found insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of any of the firearms laws reviewed for preventing violence.” http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/rr/rr5214.pdf
- Example: “Of the 51,078 permits that have been issued by the state since the law took effect in 2007, 44 permit holders have been charged with a crime while using a firearm through late October, according to records provided by the Kansas Attorney General’s Office.”
- Few crimes committed by concealed-carry permit holders in Kansas
- http://www.kansas.com/2012/11/17/2572467/few-crimes-committed-by-concealed.html ( .00086%)
4. According to the National Self Defense Survey conducted by Florida State University criminologists in 1994, the rate of Defensive Gun Uses can be projected nationwide to approximately 2.5 million per year -- one Defensive Gun Use every 13 seconds.
5. And....I don't want any politician...nor you....deciding whether I need a gun.
I'll decide that.
"We can't keep guns out of the hands of criminals'. Yes, we can."
OMG.
Clearly I'm speaking to a child, one who has lost contact with reality.
Have a nice day.
"Why are you sinking to condescension now?"
I was pointing out.....in the kindest way possible....that your IQ has devolved to a single digit.
"That solves nothing."
Keeping you out of an adult conversation is the solution.
This remains the most counter-intuitive statement of the day.
Maybe the week.
""We can't keep guns out of the hands of criminals'. Yes, we can."
LOl'ed...
Trump goes on about how we need to be tough and violent for 3 years and yet you forget when that hits home...Thanks for thinking we're not a bunch of pussies as we're not! We're capable of defending our rights if need be.
Eat that.
That could not be a more retarded statement if you'd have let me write it for you for the purpose of making you look retarded.
I hate to be contradictory, but YES, it IS about GUNS. We are all weak and prone to human flaws. We don't need guns in this society anymore, they are an anachronism. One we are better off leaving in the past.I have to admit liberals scare the hell out of me. Their intolerance is shocking, that Bernie Sanders guy trying to shoot down innocent peeps, well, its speaks volumes for human nature and the need for gun control.
No, Mary....it's not about guns.
If guns kill people, I guess pencils misspell words, cars drive drunk, and spoons make people fat.
No....it's about Democrat-control
The problem you've highlighted would be solved if no Leftist.....Democrat, Liberals, Progressive, Socialist, Nazi, Fascist or Communist where ever...EVER......allowed to attain a position of political power.
Violence is embedded in their politics, and if not guns, they would encourage the easily led to stomp out any opposition.
Then we'd be worried about boots.
"We can't keep guns out of the hands of criminals'. Yes, we can.
Why NOT? We just need to actually work harder to remove them from our society, it would take time and effort.
That could not be a more retarded statement if you'd have let me write it for you for the purpose of making you look retarded.
Don't worry, Carbine, you do that for yourself on a regular basis. Please.
That could not be a more retarded statement if you'd have let me write it for you for the purpose of making you look retarded.
Don't worry, Carbine, you do that for yourself on a regular basis. Please.
Tell me when I have advocated violence.