Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There's something you stupid fucking dimocraps REFUSE to understand......
Voting is NOT a Right. It is a privilege.
It is a privilege granted by the individual States.
Even in the Amendments to the Constitution that address voting, they do not affirmatively grant the Right to vote. They only forbid discrimination and set an age for people where the State grants them the Right to vote.
There.Is.No.Right.To.Vote.
God DAMN but you people are fucking stupid.
In a privilege, it is up to the Individual to make sure he or she is following ALL the rules and to make sure they are in compliance.
In a Right, it is up to the State to make sure they are correct.
dimocraps are just fucking stupid. Honest to God fucking stupid.
BUSH v. GORE
B
The individual citizen has no federal constitutional right to vote for electors for the President of the United States unless and until the state legislature chooses a statewide election as the means to implement its power to appoint members of the Electoral College. U.S. Const., Art. II, §1. This is the source for the statement in McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1, 35 (1892), that the State legislatures power to select the manner for appointing electors is plenary; it may, if it so chooses, select the electors itself, which indeed was the manner used by State legislatures in several States for many years after the Framing of our Constitution. Id., at 2833. History has now favored the voter, and in each of the several States the citizens themselves vote for Presidential electors. When the state legislature vests the right to vote for President in its people, the right to vote as the legislature has prescribed is fundamental; and one source of its fundamental nature lies in the equal weight accorded to each vote and the equal dignity owed to each voter. The State, of course, after granting the franchise in the special context of Article II, can take back the power to appoint electors. See id., at 35 ([T]here is no doubt of the right of the legislature to resume the power at any time, for it can neither be taken away nor abdicated) (quoting S. Rep. No. 395, 43d Cong., 1st Sess.).
Amendment XV
Section 1.
The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
Amendment XIX
The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.
Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
Anyone in Virginia who pulls the lever for that cronie, crook, two-faced fucking lying vagina McCauliffe in November, needs to have their fucking brain examined for massive stupidity.
This includes the entire region of Virginia up/near the Capitol Beltway. Out here in the sticks - we're not voting for that fucking communist.
I realize illegal voters are the life blood of the Democratic Party, responsible for most of their victories. But you do understand that there is a law, and the law requires purging illegal voters from the rolls, right? And Cucinelli as AG is obligated to do this.
You wouldn't give a shit of course, if Cucinelli weren't running for Governor.
I understand you folks don't like Democracy and are doing your very best to subvert it.
In Florida, with during the Al Gore/George W. Bush race, they used a "law" to purge "felons" from the rolls.
Later on, it was found that the "felons" weren't felons at all.
Back in 2000, 12,000 eligible voters a number twenty-two times larger than George W. Bushs 537 vote triumph over Al Gore were wrongly identified as convicted felons and purged from the voting rolls in Florida, according to the Brennan Center for Justice. African Americans, who favored Gore over Bush by 86 points, accounted for 11 percent of the states electorate but 41 percent of those purged. Jeb Bush attempted a repeat performance in 2004 to help his brother win reelection but was forced to back off in the face of a public outcry. Yet with another close election looming, Florida Republicans have returned to their voter-scrubbing ways.
Read more: Florida GOP Takes Voter Suppression to a Brazen New Extreme | Ari Berman | Politics News | Rolling Stone
Follow us: @rollingstone on Twitter | RollingStone on Facebook
From Rolling fucking Stone? Why don't you just link to the CPUSA's magazine "Workers World"? Which is where you get most of your opinions anyway
And then, to top it off.... Rolling Stoned cites Stink Progress?
Idiot
I realize illegal voters are the life blood of the Democratic Party, responsible for most of their victories. But you do understand that there is a law, and the law requires purging illegal voters from the rolls, right? And Cucinelli as AG is obligated to do this.
You wouldn't give a shit of course, if Cucinelli weren't running for Governor.
I understand you folks don't like Democracy and are doing your very best to subvert it.
In Florida, with during the Al Gore/George W. Bush race, they used a "law" to purge "felons" from the rolls.
Later on, it was found that the "felons" weren't felons at all.
Back in 2000, 12,000 eligible voters a number twenty-two times larger than George W. Bushs 537 vote triumph over Al Gore were wrongly identified as convicted felons and purged from the voting rolls in Florida, according to the Brennan Center for Justice. African Americans, who favored Gore over Bush by 86 points, accounted for 11 percent of the states electorate but 41 percent of those purged. Jeb Bush attempted a repeat performance in 2004 to help his brother win reelection but was forced to back off in the face of a public outcry. Yet with another close election looming, Florida Republicans have returned to their voter-scrubbing ways.
Read more: Florida GOP Takes Voter Suppression to a Brazen New Extreme | Ari Berman | Politics News | Rolling Stone
Follow us: @rollingstone on Twitter | RollingStone on Facebook
From Rolling fucking Stone? Why don't you just link to the CPUSA's magazine "Workers World"? Which is where you get most of your opinions anyway
And then, to top it off.... Rolling Stoned cites Stink Progress?
Idiot
Can you just imagine what the right wing would say if President Obama did anything remotely close to that?
You mean like having the IRS target your political enemies?
Heaven forbid
Yeah right?
Like when Charlie Rangel made the "radical" suggestion that the draft be reinstated and was subject to a tax audit by the Bush administration?
Or when the NAACP criticized the Bush administration for their policy and were audited?
President Obama should have fired those Bush appointees. But there are laws against that.
House censures a defiant Charles Rangel by overwhelming vote - John Bresnahan and Jonathan Allen - POLITICO.comThe House voted overwhelmingly on Thursday to censure Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-N.Y.), who pleaded for leniency but now finds his 40-year career tarnished after his colleagues rebuked him using a rare form of public punishment for ethics violations.
The vote was 333-79, with 77 Democrats and two Republicans voting against censure, the harshest form of punishment short of expulsion from Congress.
“By its adoption of House Resolution 1737, the House has resolved that Rep. Charles B. Rangel be censured, that Rep. Charles B. Rangel forwith present himself in the well of the House for the pronouncement of censure, that Rep. Charles B. Rangel be censured by the public reading of this resolution by the speaker, and that Rep. Rangel pay restitution to the appropriate taxing authorities for any unpaid taxes … on income received from his property in the Dominican Repbublic and provide proof of payment to the [House ethics] committee,” Pelosi intoned.
They probably don't even know they were removed.
Well considering the purge rolls are public, this is your BIG CHANCE to show that people are being removed in error, or deliberately. I'm sure some Media Matters dipshit squad is busy going over the purged rolls, and if there are any issues, they will be found.
I'm really loving these images. They describe you guys perfectly
There's something you stupid fucking dimocraps REFUSE to understand......
Voting is NOT a Right. It is a privilege.
It is a privilege granted by the individual States.
Even in the Amendments to the Constitution that address voting, they do not affirmatively grant the Right to vote. They only forbid discrimination and set an age for people where the State grants them the Right to vote.
There.Is.No.Right.To.Vote.
God DAMN but you people are fucking stupid.
In a privilege, it is up to the Individual to make sure he or she is following ALL the rules and to make sure they are in compliance.
In a Right, it is up to the State to make sure they are correct.
dimocraps are just fucking stupid. Honest to God fucking stupid.
BUSH v. GORE
B
The individual citizen has no federal constitutional right to vote for electors for the President of the United States unless and until the state legislature chooses a statewide election as the means to implement its power to appoint members of the Electoral College. U.S. Const., Art. II, §1. This is the source for the statement in McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1, 35 (1892), that the State legislatures power to select the manner for appointing electors is plenary; it may, if it so chooses, select the electors itself, which indeed was the manner used by State legislatures in several States for many years after the Framing of our Constitution. Id., at 2833. History has now favored the voter, and in each of the several States the citizens themselves vote for Presidential electors. When the state legislature vests the right to vote for President in its people, the right to vote as the legislature has prescribed is fundamental; and one source of its fundamental nature lies in the equal weight accorded to each vote and the equal dignity owed to each voter. The State, of course, after granting the franchise in the special context of Article II, can take back the power to appoint electors. See id., at 35 ([T]here is no doubt of the right of the legislature to resume the power at any time, for it can neither be taken away nor abdicated) (quoting S. Rep. No. 395, 43d Cong., 1st Sess.).
Naw..it's a right:
Amendment XV
Section 1.
The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
Amendment XIX
The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.
Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
We needed to put in two Amendments so you fucking conservatives would stop monkeying around with it.
It's unfortunate that the conservative judges legislated from the bench the right of the Federal government to swiftly enforce it in Conservative states.
Because you idiots are still monkeying around.
Voting rolls need be up to date.
The R was way behind in the polls with the D pulling away from him.
That will not change.
Um..he's purging Democratic voters.
Yeah..it might just change the election.
8 U.S.C. § 1373(c)
Cuccinelli is following the law:
(c) Obligation to respond to inquiries
The Immigration and Naturalization Service shall respond to an inquiry by a Federal, State, or local government agency, seeking to verify or ascertain the citizenship or immigration status of any individual within the jurisdiction of the agency for any purpose authorized by law, by providing the requested verification or status information.
Do you even know what Conflict of Interest even means?
He's running for governor and purging votes.
You don't see a problem with that?
Clear conflict of interest going on here. He should have been immediately removed as "legal adviser" for the Registrar if he's on the freaking ballot.
Absolutely, after all, who in their right mind wants an Attorney General that actually enforces the law. Example, Eric Holder only enforces the laws that he wants to.
So you think it's okay that an AG be involved in purging votes in the election is going to be running in?
No wonder you guys are on the outs.
Anyone in Virginia who pulls the lever for that cronie, crook, two-faced fucking lying vagina McCauliffe in November, needs to have their fucking brain examined for massive stupidity.
This includes the entire region of Virginia up/near the Capitol Beltway. Out here in the sticks - we're not voting for that fucking communist.
And even with the Purge?
Democrats swept Virginia!
And here's the kicker..
Virginia defies Democratic Party lawsuit and purges 40,000 voters before election | The Raw StoryVirginia Democratic Party spokesperson Brian Coy told the Post that red flags were raised by the fact that Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli (R) was serving as a the Board of Elections legal adviser and was also on the ballot as the Republican Partys nominee for governor
You can't make this stuff up!
And here's the kicker..
Virginia defies Democratic Party lawsuit and purges 40,000 voters before election | The Raw StoryVirginia Democratic Party spokesperson Brian Coy told the Post that red flags were raised by the fact that Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli (R) was serving as a the Board of Elections legal adviser and was also on the ballot as the Republican Partys nominee for governor
You can't make this stuff up!
If the voters are not legitimate, they should be purged from the rolls.For Republicans,..........Democracy in action
Can't win elections, go after the voters
8 U.S.C. § 1373(c)
Cuccinelli is following the law:
(c) Obligation to respond to inquiries
The Immigration and Naturalization Service shall respond to an inquiry by a Federal, State, or local government agency, seeking to verify or ascertain the citizenship or immigration status of any individual within the jurisdiction of the agency for any purpose authorized by law, by providing the requested verification or status information.
Do you even know what Conflict of Interest even means?
He's running for governor and purging votes.
You don't see a problem with that?
Amazing.
Next we'll have a guy who runs, say, a voting machine company vowing to do whatever he can to elect George Bush. Or running his campaign while serving as secretary of state in the same state.
Oh wait...
