Truthmatters
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2007
- 80,182
- 2,272
- 1,283
- Banned
- #121
No. No you have not.
You have quoted a study in hopes that some answer to some question unasked was in there.
You have been asked a direct question and you either have chosen not to answer or cannot answer. I am guessing it is the latter instead of the former.
The longer you go without answering while swearing you have makes you look more and more, well, pathetic.
The information in this study held the answer.
You refused to think about the facts in a obvious way to draw the conclusion.
Why are you doing that?
It does not make you a moderate.
the facts are not always in the middle.
the facts are the facts no matter how you FEEL about them.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MK6TXMsvgQg]Benny Hill Theme - YouTube[/ame]
Does anybody else hear this when TM starts this never-ending downward spiral of circular logic?
OK cany corn you cover is blown.
You are nothing but a right winger pretending to be a "dem".
You have yet to give any logical reason why you claim this study should be ignored.
You have jumped right in line with the cons and simply pretended the study doesnt exsist and commensed to personal insults in the face of cold hard facts.
YOU are a con no matter what you pretend to be.