Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
go out and vote and stop whining then or start your *cough* "revolution" because people don't see things your way.
obozo's favorables are below 50%, I am in sync with the majority, you are in sync with the left wing fringers.
ummm..... yeah. His favorables are in the mid to high 40's. What were the last repub President's favorables when he left office?
Yes, he is. Have you read his books, the statements of his friends? He is clearly a marxist collectivist. ignore reality if it makes you sleep better.
You have (1) no idea what a Marxist collectivist is and (2) you can't demonstrate how the president (I can't believe I am defending but you are a far worse danger to the Republic) is applying such principles to his policies.
" I want to redistribute the wealth" "You didn't build that" Obama
"from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs" marx
I rest my case.
Yes, he is. Have you read his books, the statements of his friends? He is clearly a marxist collectivist. ignore reality if it makes you sleep better.
You have (1) no idea what a Marxist collectivist is and (2) you can't demonstrate how the president (I can't believe I am defending but you are a far worse danger to the Republic) is applying such principles to his policies.
" I want to redistribute the wealth" "You didn't build that" Obama
"from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs" marx
I rest my case.
You have (1) no idea what a Marxist collectivist is and (2) you can't demonstrate how the president (I can't believe I am defending but you are a far worse danger to the Republic) is applying such principles to his policies.
" I want to redistribute the wealth" "You didn't build that" Obama
"from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs" marx
I rest my case.
Marx said you didn't build roads and bridges?
OP- You're nuts. Change the channel and relax, dupe LOL
You are so going to be in for a rough decade ahead of us. You have no idea what's coming and the trains coming down the track.
Politics as usual?
Listen to the sheriff. If you don't own a gun now, you need to go get one.
You reactionary red necks would get your treasonous butts kicked in a heart beat.
what you forget is that most of our current day military come from the "reactionary red neck" states.
You marxists and progressives do not represent our military force, you represent the worst kind of tyranny in government.
But fear not, the revolution will be peaceful and bloodless. The country is waking up to the failure of liberalism and the corruption of Obama.
hyperbole muchWhat are you like 19? I'm a Progressive & a vet and so were other non-rw'ers here. Your anecdotal evidence has no bearing here. You were saying?
The US military would support the United States, not a corrupt usurping government. There would be no need for any shots to be fired. Do you think the our soldiers are all libtardian marxists? NOPE
I'm a vet, are you?
I took an oath to defend the Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic and you seem to qualify as a domestic enemy of the Constitution. You can spin bullshit all day, and you do, but the POTUS is the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces and can be removed by impeachment, term limits or the vote of the people - ONLY.
Any other action to usurp the Presidency is criminal and potentially treasonous; you and the rest of the faux army of self appointed patriots seem to live in a world of fantasy, a world where allegations of wrongdoing in the future are reason enough to offer hate and fear of our democratically elected president. Of course in your fantasy millions of the dead vote for President Obama as well as every living black man and women, thrice.
Nice speech but off topic. Yes, when we enter military service we swear an oath to obey the CIC, but we are also under no obligation to follow an illegal order.
You didn't answer the question: Are you a vet?
My issues with Obama have nothing to do with the fact that he is half black. I object to his views of this country, not his skin color.
Do you on the left hate Herman Cain and Alan West because they are black?
I don't hate either of them. In fact no greater argument can be made by anyone else that today's conservatives are far far out on the fringe; their ideology is anathema to the vast majority of the American people.
My point earlier was that I do not believe that the US military would attack US citizens who were fighting for their rights under the constitution---rather that they would join them.
You know, I have to laugh at the people who seem to think all conspiracies are fake when people are charged and sent to prison for conspiracies all the time.
You do realize what a conspiracy is, right?
Remember how nobody thought the government would ever spy on us? Called people who made that contention a conspiracy theorist? Well, lo and behold they were proven correct.
Conspiracy to a Liberal is anything involving Bush.
I've been seeing a lot of death wishes being hurled at people by liberals lately. This is the weakest justification of the president's behavior ever. Race had no influence on the Posse Comitatus Act, nor the Insurrection Act, and no, he cant use his military any way he wants. You really have gone off your rocker this morning, haven't you? We will raise hell and and high water before our president declares us all enemy combatants!
You misunderestimate the evil intentions of President Obama
He needs just one more Supreme Court Justice to overturn all laws relating to the powers of the Executive Branch. None of those laws say that they apply to a BLACK President
You are a mere pawn in the game of life to President Obama
He will have no problems squashing you
Rofl. Have you gone insane? Or are you just mocking people? I am nobody's pawn, I am a soldier of the Lord God Almighty.
And even if you were serious, what makes you believe he would think any more of you?
The 2nd amendment exists so that the people can protect themselves from the government.
To ignore that is to ignore history.
Well now, you just take your little popgun, and face off with that Apache Helicopter.
I know that you think you are being funny and clever, but that is exactly how Chavez and Castro came to power, and Hitler, Mussolini, Mao, and Pol Pot.
be careful what you joke about.
I'm not joking....read the OP
I may scrap my plans for the day and toy with you for a while. Your delusions of totalitarianism are fascinating to say the least. You sound just like Hitler did before he slaughtered 6,000,000 Jews.
23,600 men vs the full on might of the Persian Army, over 2,600,000 men strong.
Guess who won? Even so, do you think that our soldiers would blindly follow his orders? You must be joking, there is no way in hell you're serious.
The problem with your analogy is you have to ask ....In today's situation
Who would be the Spartans and who would be the Persians?
Todays Spartans are our Rangers, SEALS and RECON units while the poorly led, poorly trained, poorly equipped Persians would be the Red Neck gun owners
Alright, now I'm annoyed. This isn't funny anymore.
What you fail to understand, is the the Persians went on to win that battle before being defeated altogether in the Battle of Plataea. The battle of Thermopylae is perhaps the greatest of example of patriotism from an inferior defending force against a superior force. But oh hey, the Revolutionaries had no business defeating the British either, but they did. Indeed, you should study history my friend.
It was before my time
Did they have Attack Helicopters?
23,600 men vs the full on might of the Persian Army, over 2,600,000 men strong.
Guess who won? Even so, do you think that our soldiers would blindly follow his orders? You must be joking, there is no way in hell you're serious.
The problem with your analogy is you have to ask ....In todays situation
Who would be the Spartans and who would be the Persians?
Todays Spartans are our Rangers, SEALS and RECON units while the poorly led, poorly trained, poorly equipped Persians would be the Red Neck gun owners
Our military personnel were not born and raised on military bases. They came from the same places all of us came from, and it's not likely they are going to be ok with slaughtering fellow Americans because their cic tells them to. I'm sure a lot of the more rabid black ones with an axe to grind against Whitey probably would, but most would side with the citizens.
Does anyone think our military is going to wage war against their neighbors, people who share their moral beliefs, people they grew up with? If Obama wants to slaughter Americans, he's gonna have to get a foreign power to do it for him.
Alright, now I'm annoyed. This isn't funny anymore.
What you fail to understand, is the the Persians went on to win that battle before being defeated altogether in the Battle of Plataea. The battle of Thermopylae is perhaps the greatest of example of patriotism from an inferior defending force against a superior force. But oh hey, the Revolutionaries had no business defeating the British either, but they did. Indeed, you should study history my friend.
Once again, your analogy fails
1.The key to the battle was terrain, tactics, training and leadership
The Persians had to get through a narrow passage that was held by the Greeks. They were unable to get their full force into the fight because of the terrain
2. Attack Helicopters would have negated that advantage and in this case the good guys have air superiority over the traitorous gun owners
3.The American Revolution had the French come in on their side which secured the victory at the Battle of Yorktown. I don't think today's gun nuts can count on the French to bail them out.
Indeed, you should study history my friend
1. Yes, us rednecks know the terrain very well, tactics? Who needs tactics when you have them outnumbered 100 to 1? My analogy is spot on. You insist on a superior trained force (the Persians) defeating a ragtag group of poorly trained (what amounted to militiamen) force. As I explained before The Persians were defeated later on by the Greek Navy, by all rights the Persians should have conquered Greece.
2. Where do you get your maniacal notions from? Traitorous? Care to explain this position?
3. We don't need the French, the amount of "traitorous" gun nuts here in America outnumber their population by more than half.
