Warehouse Robots Improve Efficiency by 800%; How Will Workers Survive in this Future?

[bripat9643]

No one said your TV could learn, dumbass. That doesn't mean the in the future there won't be machines that can learn.

Wake me when that becomes a reality instead of pretending its occurring now.

When did I pretend it was occurring now?

You are a special kind of dumbass, aren't you?

When you asked how I could tell the difference between real learning and simulated learning.

Computers that can learn exist now.

You're still a dumbass.

No they dont learn. They store data thats already accumulated and present it to you like they learned it. Thats why its simulated. Learning is an organic process not a mechanical one. I computer cannot learn because there is no original thought present to ask questions.

Wrong, asshat. They show 10,000 pictures of a cat to the computer, and then when it sees a new picture of a cat, it can recognize it as a cat. That's learning that is indistinguishable from the way humans learn. Every organic process can be duplicated by an artificial process.

Most computers can't learn yet because they weren't designed to learn. However, in the future computers will have the capacity to learn. It's much easier than programming them.

You keep assuming the way things work now is the way they will always work.

 

[bripat9643]

I don't want there to be poor people in the future. Think avatar. Were any of those people hungry? Unemployed? World Population Clock: 7.4 Billion People (2016) - Worldometers

7 billion 400 million reasons why

There were no poor people in Avatar. The blue people lived off the land.

How are Republicans going to make America great again when they don't want to pay workers anymore than $15 hr? Great again for who?

I dont recall a time when america was great. Repubs are the least likely to make it great. In the capitalistic system you determine your own worth. Dont settle for $15 hr.

We all know you hate America, so what's your point?

We don't hate America. We hate Americans like you.

You hate America. You hate me because I believe in the principles America was founded on.

 

[Asclepias]

Wake me when that becomes a reality instead of pretending its occurring now.

When did I pretend it was occurring now?

You are a special kind of dumbass, aren't you?

When you asked how I could tell the difference between real learning and simulated learning.

Computers that can learn exist now.

You're still a dumbass.

No they dont learn. They store data thats already accumulated and present it to you like they learned it. Thats why its simulated. Learning is an organic process not a mechanical one. I computer cannot learn because there is no original thought present to ask questions.

Wrong, asshat. They show 10,000 pictures of a cat to the computer, and then when it sees a new picture of a cat, it can recognize it as a cat. That's learning that is indistinguishable from the way humans learn. Every organic process can be duplicated by an artificial process.
Most computers can't learn yet because they weren't designed to learn. Howevdo, cm.

You keep assuming the way things work now is the way they will always work.

No dummy. Computers dont work like that. it doesnt think in pictures. It thinks in binary. How hard is this for you to understand? Computers cant learn. They can only fool the unknowing into thinking they are learning when all they are doing is following instructions from a programmer.

Bascially in your scenario the computer is taking the images and converting them into a pattern of code. At each new picture it compares the code to any records it has of the same code. If that code is outside of the parameters of X its not a cat.

 

[bripat9643]

When did I pretend it was occurring now?

You are a special kind of dumbass, aren't you?

When you asked how I could tell the difference between real learning and simulated learning.

Computers that can learn exist now.

You're still a dumbass.

No they dont learn. They store data thats already accumulated and present it to you like they learned it. Thats why its simulated. Learning is an organic process not a mechanical one. I computer cannot learn because there is no original thought present to ask questions.

Wrong, asshat. They show 10,000 pictures of a cat to the computer, and then when it sees a new picture of a cat, it can recognize it as a cat. That's learning that is indistinguishable from the way humans learn. Every organic process can be duplicated by an artificial process.
Most computers can't learn yet because they weren't designed to learn. Howevdo, cm.

You keep assuming the way things work now is the way they will always work.

No dummy. Computers dont work like that. it doesnt think in pictures. It thinks in binary. How hard is this for you to understand? Computers cant learn. They can only fool the unknowing into thinking they are learning when all they are doing is following instructions from a programmer.

Bascially in your scenario the computer is taking the images and converting them into a pattern of code. At each new picture it compares the code to any records it has of the same code. If that code is outside of the parameters of X its not a cat.

That's exactly what your brain does, numskull.

Basically your theory is that computers can't learn because computers can't learn.

You don't even know how your own brain works, so what makes you imagine a computer brain couldn't do the same thing?

You're simply an obstinate ignoramus who can't accept the fact that technology is going to make you obsolete.

 

[Asclepias]

When you asked how I could tell the difference between real learning and simulated learning.

Computers that can learn exist now.

You're still a dumbass.

No they dont learn. They store data thats already accumulated and present it to you like they learned it. Thats why its simulated. Learning is an organic process not a mechanical one. I computer cannot learn because there is no original thought present to ask questions.

Wrong, asshat. They show 10,000 pictures of a cat to the computer, and then when it sees a new picture of a cat, it can recognize it as a cat. That's learning that is indistinguishable from the way humans learn. Every organic process can be duplicated by an artificial process.
Most computers can't learn yet because they weren't designed to learn. Howevdo, cm.

You keep assuming the way things work now is the way they will always work.

No dummy. Computers dont work like that. it doesnt think in pictures. It thinks in binary. How hard is this for you to understand? Computers cant learn. They can only fool the unknowing into thinking they are learning when all they are doing is following instructions from a programmer.

Bascially in your scenario the computer is taking the images and converting them into a pattern of code. At each new picture it compares the code to any records it has of the same code. If that code is outside of the parameters of X its not a cat.

That's exactly what your brain does, numskull.

Basically your theory is that computers can't learn because computers can't learn.

You don't even know how your own brain works, so what makes you imagine a computer brain couldn't do the same thing?

You're simply an obstinate ignoramus who can't accept the fact that technology is going to make you obsolete.

No dummy thats not what your brain does. People dont think in binary. They think in images. Binary is a numbering system where 0 is "off" and 1 is "on". Pictures dont work like that.

No. The fact is that computers cant "learn" for several reasons. They are not organic and incapable of original thought. Thats like claiming a rock can learn to speak english.

 

[Unkotare]

This is an example of how the Third Industrial or Digital Revolution is making human labor obsolete. How will working class people survive with 90% unemployment rates? How will conservatives adjust their rhetoric to survive? Will we see socialism take over both parties?

These warehouse robots can boost productivity by 800%

Hopefully we downsize. In the future, maybe people don't have kids or have as many kids. And poor people should stop having kids. Maybe eventually we won't have poor people. Cut the population in half.

Why are you so fascinated with keeping poor people from procreating?

Of all the endeavors known to man that is the least likely to every be successful.

I don't want there to be poor people in the future. ...y

There will be. There will also stupid people like you, fish.

China's lonely hearts: The millions of men who will NEVER find love

Many British singletons struggle to find love, but for many men in China the task seems insurmountable, due to a severe shortage of women.
Thirty years of China's one-child policy, coupled with a cultural preference for male children, led to mass abortions of girls. As a result, by the year 2020 it's predicted there will be 24 million men with no partner.

Simple solution. Just turn gay and don't worry about having kids.

And?

 

[Unkotare]

I don't want there to be poor people in the future. Think avatar. Were any of those people hungry? Unemployed? World Population Clock: 7.4 Billion People (2016) - Worldometers

7 billion 400 million reasons why

There were no poor people in Avatar. The blue people lived off the land.

How are Republicans going to make America great again when they don't want to pay workers anymore than $15 hr? Great again for who?

I dont recall a time when america was great. Repubs are the least likely to make it great. In the capitalistic system you determine your own worth. Dont settle for $15 hr.

We all know you hate America, so what's your point?

We don't hate America. We hate Americans like you.

Neither of you are American.

 

[Unkotare]

There were no poor people in Avatar. The blue people lived off the land.

How are Republicans going to make America great again when they don't want to pay workers anymore than $15 hr? Great again for who?

I dont recall a time when america was great. Repubs are the least likely to make it great. In the capitalistic system you determine your own worth. Dont settle for $15 hr.

We all know you hate America, so what's your point?

We don't hate America. We hate Americans like you.

You hate America. You hate me because I believe in the principles America was founded on.

No, you don't.

 

[bripat9643]

Computers that can learn exist now.

You're still a dumbass.

No they dont learn. They store data thats already accumulated and present it to you like they learned it. Thats why its simulated. Learning is an organic process not a mechanical one. I computer cannot learn because there is no original thought present to ask questions.

Wrong, asshat. They show 10,000 pictures of a cat to the computer, and then when it sees a new picture of a cat, it can recognize it as a cat. That's learning that is indistinguishable from the way humans learn. Every organic process can be duplicated by an artificial process.
Most computers can't learn yet because they weren't designed to learn. Howevdo, cm.

You keep assuming the way things work now is the way they will always work.

No dummy. Computers dont work like that. it doesnt think in pictures. It thinks in binary. How hard is this for you to understand? Computers cant learn. They can only fool the unknowing into thinking they are learning when all they are doing is following instructions from a programmer.

Bascially in your scenario the computer is taking the images and converting them into a pattern of code. At each new picture it compares the code to any records it has of the same code. If that code is outside of the parameters of X its not a cat.

That's exactly what your brain does, numskull.

Basically your theory is that computers can't learn because computers can't learn.

You don't even know how your own brain works, so what makes you imagine a computer brain couldn't do the same thing?

You're simply an obstinate ignoramus who can't accept the fact that technology is going to make you obsolete.

No dummy thats not what your brain does. People dont think in binary. They think in images. Binary is a numbering system where 0 is "off" and 1 is "on". Pictures dont work like that.

No. The fact is that computers cant "learn" for several reasons. They are not organic and incapable of original thought. Thats like claiming a rock can learn to speak english.

Saying people "think in images" is a gross over simplification of how your brain works. You brain has to learn a lot before it can even comprehend an image. Babies are blind because their brains haven't developed enough to comprehend the meaning of the input from their eyes.

Saying computers think in binary and people think in images only shows that you don't know the slightest thing about either. Your claim that computers are "incapable of organic thought" is just another way of saying computers can't think because computers can't think. Where is it written that thought has to be the result of a biological process? That sounds like something only Bible thumpers would say. It's certainly not a scientific proposition.

Just give up this line of argument before you make a total fool of yourself.

Whoops, to late!

 

[bripat9643]

There were no poor people in Avatar. The blue people lived off the land.

How are Republicans going to make America great again when they don't want to pay workers anymore than $15 hr? Great again for who?

I dont recall a time when america was great. Repubs are the least likely to make it great. In the capitalistic system you determine your own worth. Dont settle for $15 hr.

We all know you hate America, so what's your point?

We don't hate America. We hate Americans like you.

Neither of you are American.

My passport says otherwise.

 

[Asclepias]

No they dont learn. They store data thats already accumulated and present it to you like they learned it. Thats why its simulated. Learning is an organic process not a mechanical one. I computer cannot learn because there is no original thought present to ask questions.

Wrong, asshat. They show 10,000 pictures of a cat to the computer, and then when it sees a new picture of a cat, it can recognize it as a cat. That's learning that is indistinguishable from the way humans learn. Every organic process can be duplicated by an artificial process.
Most computers can't learn yet because they weren't designed to learn. Howevdo, cm.

You keep assuming the way things work now is the way they will always work.

No dummy. Computers dont work like that. it doesnt think in pictures. It thinks in binary. How hard is this for you to understand? Computers cant learn. They can only fool the unknowing into thinking they are learning when all they are doing is following instructions from a programmer.

Bascially in your scenario the computer is taking the images and converting them into a pattern of code. At each new picture it compares the code to any records it has of the same code. If that code is outside of the parameters of X its not a cat.

That's exactly what your brain does, numskull.

Basically your theory is that computers can't learn because computers can't learn.

You don't even know how your own brain works, so what makes you imagine a computer brain couldn't do the same thing?

You're simply an obstinate ignoramus who can't accept the fact that technology is going to make you obsolete.

No dummy thats not what your brain does. People dont think in binary. They think in images. Binary is a numbering system where 0 is "off" and 1 is "on". Pictures dont work like that.

No. The fact is that computers cant "learn" for several reasons. They are not organic and incapable of original thought. Thats like claiming a rock can learn to speak english.

Saying people "think in images" is a gross over simplification of how your brain works. You brain has to learn a lot before it can even comprehend an image. Babies are blind because their brains haven't developed enough to comprehend the meaning of the input from their eyes.

Saying computers think in binary and people think in images only shows that you don't know the slightest thing about either. Your claim that computers are "incapable of organic thought" is just another way of saying computers can't think because computers can't think. Where is it written that thought has to be the result of a biological process? That sounds like something only Bible thumpers would say. It's certainly not a scientific proposition.

Just give up this line of argument before you make a total fool of yourself.

Whoops, to late!

Babies are not blind dummy unless they are blind. Your brain begins storing images even in the womb. Where in the hell are you getting this wild ass shit?

No dummy organic thought is an awareness. Machines dont have an awareness.

 

[Unkotare]

How are Republicans going to make America great again when they don't want to pay workers anymore than $15 hr? Great again for who?

I dont recall a time when america was great. Repubs are the least likely to make it great. In the capitalistic system you determine your own worth. Dont settle for $15 hr.

We all know you hate America, so what's your point?

We don't hate America. We hate Americans like you.

Neither of you are American.

My passport says otherwise.

That is exactly the kind of stupidity that indicates you are NOT a real American.

 

[Asclepias]

How are Republicans going to make America great again when they don't want to pay workers anymore than $15 hr? Great again for who?

I dont recall a time when america was great. Repubs are the least likely to make it great. In the capitalistic system you determine your own worth. Dont settle for $15 hr.

We all know you hate America, so what's your point?

We don't hate America. We hate Americans like you.

Neither of you are American.

My passport says otherwise.

I bet you think your passport is capable of learning too right?

 

[bripat9643]

Wrong, asshat. They show 10,000 pictures of a cat to the computer, and then when it sees a new picture of a cat, it can recognize it as a cat. That's learning that is indistinguishable from the way humans learn. Every organic process can be duplicated by an artificial process.
Most computers can't learn yet because they weren't designed to learn. Howevdo, cm.

You keep assuming the way things work now is the way they will always work.

No dummy. Computers dont work like that. it doesnt think in pictures. It thinks in binary. How hard is this for you to understand? Computers cant learn. They can only fool the unknowing into thinking they are learning when all they are doing is following instructions from a programmer.

Bascially in your scenario the computer is taking the images and converting them into a pattern of code. At each new picture it compares the code to any records it has of the same code. If that code is outside of the parameters of X its not a cat.

That's exactly what your brain does, numskull.

Basically your theory is that computers can't learn because computers can't learn.

You don't even know how your own brain works, so what makes you imagine a computer brain couldn't do the same thing?

You're simply an obstinate ignoramus who can't accept the fact that technology is going to make you obsolete.

No dummy thats not what your brain does. People dont think in binary. They think in images. Binary is a numbering system where 0 is "off" and 1 is "on". Pictures dont work like that.

No. The fact is that computers cant "learn" for several reasons. They are not organic and incapable of original thought. Thats like claiming a rock can learn to speak english.

Saying people "think in images" is a gross over simplification of how your brain works. You brain has to learn a lot before it can even comprehend an image. Babies are blind because their brains haven't developed enough to comprehend the meaning of the input from their eyes.

Saying computers think in binary and people think in images only shows that you don't know the slightest thing about either. Your claim that computers are "incapable of organic thought" is just another way of saying computers can't think because computers can't think. Where is it written that thought has to be the result of a biological process? That sounds like something only Bible thumpers would say. It's certainly not a scientific proposition.

Just give up this line of argument before you make a total fool of yourself.

Whoops, to late!

Babies are not blind dummy unless they are blind. Your brain begins storing images even in the womb. Where in the hell are you getting this wild ass shit?

No dummy organic thought is an awareness. Machines dont have an awareness.

God, what a moron. Babies can't see anything when they are born. The impulses coming from their eyes are meaningless gibberish until the are a few months old. Scientists have don't extensive research on this subject which you are obviously unaware of. Babies have to learn how to see.

The statement "organic thought is an awareness" translated into English means "thought is thought. You've said exactly nothing. You also said "machines can't think." That's all you've been saying for the last several posts. You haven't proved jack, however.

 

[bripat9643]

I dont recall a time when america was great. Repubs are the least likely to make it great. In the capitalistic system you determine your own worth. Dont settle for $15 hr.

We all know you hate America, so what's your point?

We don't hate America. We hate Americans like you.

Neither of you are American.

My passport says otherwise.

I bet you think your passport is capable of learning too right?

I'll bet you think you're capable of learning, but your performance in this thread indicates otherwise.

 

[bripat9643]

I dont recall a time when america was great. Repubs are the least likely to make it great. In the capitalistic system you determine your own worth. Dont settle for $15 hr.

We all know you hate America, so what's your point?

We don't hate America. We hate Americans like you.

Neither of you are American.

My passport says otherwise.

That is exactly the kind of stupidity that indicates you are NOT a real American.

How does that indicate I'm not an American?

 

[Unkotare]

Your comments demonstrate you are not an American, you piece of shit.

 

[Asclepias]

No dummy. Computers dont work like that. it doesnt think in pictures. It thinks in binary. How hard is this for you to understand? Computers cant learn. They can only fool the unknowing into thinking they are learning when all they are doing is following instructions from a programmer.

Bascially in your scenario the computer is taking the images and converting them into a pattern of code. At each new picture it compares the code to any records it has of the same code. If that code is outside of the parameters of X its not a cat.

That's exactly what your brain does, numskull.

Basically your theory is that computers can't learn because computers can't learn.

You don't even know how your own brain works, so what makes you imagine a computer brain couldn't do the same thing?

You're simply an obstinate ignoramus who can't accept the fact that technology is going to make you obsolete.

No dummy thats not what your brain does. People dont think in binary. They think in images. Binary is a numbering system where 0 is "off" and 1 is "on". Pictures dont work like that.

No. The fact is that computers cant "learn" for several reasons. They are not organic and incapable of original thought. Thats like claiming a rock can learn to speak english.

Saying people "think in images" is a gross over simplification of how your brain works. You brain has to learn a lot before it can even comprehend an image. Babies are blind because their brains haven't developed enough to comprehend the meaning of the input from their eyes.

Saying computers think in binary and people think in images only shows that you don't know the slightest thing about either. Your claim that computers are "incapable of organic thought" is just another way of saying computers can't think because computers can't think. Where is it written that thought has to be the result of a biological process? That sounds like something only Bible thumpers would say. It's certainly not a scientific proposition.

Just give up this line of argument before you make a total fool of yourself.

Whoops, to late!

Babies are not blind dummy unless they are blind. Your brain begins storing images even in the womb. Where in the hell are you getting this wild ass shit?

No dummy organic thought is an awareness. Machines dont have an awareness.

God, what a moron. Babies can't see anything when they are born. The impulses coming from their eyes are meaningless gibberish until the are a few months old. Scientists have don't extensive research on this subject which you are obviously unaware of. Babies have to learn how to see.

The statement "organic thought is an awareness" translated into English means "thought is thought. You've said exactly nothing. You also said "machines can't think." That's all you've been saying for the last several posts. You haven't proved jack, however.

Youre not making sense. First you claimed humans see things in binary like computers and now youre claiming babies are blind because they dont understand what they see? Does it not register to you that not understanding something doesnt mean you cant physically see something? Are you saying that when you were first introduced to the concept of 2+2=4 you couldnt see the symbols on the page?

 

[Asclepias]

We all know you hate America, so what's your point?

We don't hate America. We hate Americans like you.

Neither of you are American.

My passport says otherwise.

I bet you think your passport is capable of learning too right?

I'll bet you think you're capable of learning, but your performance in this thread indicates otherwise.

You have already proven you flunked out of school at an early age. I dont think I know anyone stupid enough to say babies are blind because they dont understand what they see. You are an idiot but now that I think about it you have proven you were an idiot before.

 

[Asclepias]

We all know you hate America, so what's your point?

We don't hate America. We hate Americans like you.

Neither of you are American.

My passport says otherwise.

That is exactly the kind of stupidity that indicates you are NOT a real American.

How does that indicate I'm not an American?

It indicates you are an idiot.