Was there two different meetings?

[TNHarley]

The email chain didnt even involve her.

Yes, it did.

She, and her reason for the meeting, were hyped as something they weren't.

Goldstone claimed she was connected to the Kremlin, (she wasn't), and wanted to provide some oppo info, (she had none).

Because Trump Jr said so? Hasnt he been proven to be a liar?
He also said she discussed Hillary, it just "inane nonsense". She said she had no intention of discussing hillary. They cant even seem to agree on it but people who werent there, can?
This shit is so fucked up

No

From the emails, and her, (the lawyers) interview.

The emails stated it was about hillary. Jr said she discussed hillary. The lawyer said she didnt.

that IS interesting. Now we have the unenviable job of deciding if we believe her or Jr. Flip a coin?

What if they are both lying and the only talked about grandkids?

 

[Auld Phart]

The lawyer knew that if she said she intended to discuss adoption she would get the bush off. She said dirt on Clinton as a ruse.

The email chain didnt even involve her.

Yes, it did.

She, and her reason for the meeting, were hyped as something they weren't.

Goldstone claimed she was connected to the Kremlin, (she wasn't), and wanted to provide some oppo info, (she had none).

Not the point. The point is that when presented with that info, Jr. said "Love it!"

and?

Sorry, OL...

cant let one side get away with it, and punish the other side

 

[OldLady]

The lawyer knew that if she said she intended to discuss adoption she would get the bush off. She said dirt on Clinton as a ruse.

The email chain didnt even involve her.

Yes, it did.

She, and her reason for the meeting, were hyped as something they weren't.

Goldstone claimed she was connected to the Kremlin, (she wasn't), and wanted to provide some oppo info, (she had none).

Not the point. The point is that when presented with that info, Jr. said "Love it!"

and?

Sorry, OL...

cant let one side get away with it, and punish the other side

Of course you can. If you got some issue with the other side, prosecute them. Republicans own Washington at the moment. What's stopping you?
This is about Trump, Trump's campaign and Trump's admin. Focus.

 

[OldLady]

Yes, it did.

She, and her reason for the meeting, were hyped as something they weren't.

Goldstone claimed she was connected to the Kremlin, (she wasn't), and wanted to provide some oppo info, (she had none).

Because Trump Jr said so? Hasnt he been proven to be a liar?
He also said she discussed Hillary, it just "inane nonsense". She said she had no intention of discussing hillary. They cant even seem to agree on it but people who werent there, can?
This shit is so fucked up

No

From the emails, and her, (the lawyers) interview.

The emails stated it was about hillary. Jr said she discussed hillary. The lawyer said she didnt.

that IS interesting. Now we have the unenviable job of deciding if we believe her or Jr. Flip a coin?

What if they are both lying and the only talked about grandkids?

Really good one, TN!