Washington Post admits that Jack Smith is politically motivated

TroglocratsRdumb

Diamond Member
Aug 11, 2017
36,106
46,146
2,915

Washington Post contributor Jason Willick wrote an opinion article titled, “Politics Are Now Clearly Shaping Jack Smith’s Trump Prosecution”, criticizing Smith’s alleged bias against Donald Trump.

Willick attacked the special counsel Smith and accused him of pursuing a political agenda, particularly in relation to the charge of attempting to overturn the 2020 election results.

He also criticized Smith’s attempt to expedite the trial before the 2024 election, suggesting a political motive rather than a pursuit of justice.
“There are real legal problems with special counsel Jack Smith’s election-interference case against Donald Trump,” admitted Willick.

“The former president’s effort to overturn the 2020 election was despicable, but political lying isn’t generally a crime. Smith’s case thus must rely on some of the vaguest laws in the federal penal code, applying them in untested ways,” explained the analyst.

“Now, in a filing at the Supreme Court, Smith has all but announced that his prosecutorial timeline is controlled by the 2024 general election in which Trump is likely to be a candidate,” he continued.

Willick alleged that Smith was attempting to, “fast-track the Trump trial based on what can be described only as a political timetable.”

Comment:
The Crazy Democrat Cult constantly screams that Trump is a "threat to our democracy" whilst they are the ones who are constantly using the FBI and DOJ as their political weapons.
Democrat ballot stuffing is a "threat to our democracy".
Democrat censorship is a "threat to our democracy".
The Democrat Party has less integrity than a banana republic junta.
 
The Democratic Party is deeply full of shit these days. They've transgressed every boundary, broken every rule, mocked every tradition. Democrats are all about race riots and mask mandates. And show trials - boy, talk about a banana republic - show trials at public expense are distinctly Stalinesque in character.
 
The left wing media does NOTHING in the name of truth. This is for a reason. Maybe it is preempting something bad coming up for Jack SMith.....who knows the real reason.

Do not believe for a moment that WAPO is all of a sudden not a FAR FAR FAR left rag not even suitable for birds to shit on.
 
Tommy, if you haven't figured it out, I'm a poster first and moderator second.
You have only yourself to blame with your posts and threads being moderated.
It's not rocket science, dude. :rolleyes-41:

No, that's not, "IT". :rolleyes-41:
You lack integrity and common sense, Winnie.
Party above 'The People'? :eusa_whistle:
Fuck Off Biased Poster, that is also a Mod.
"I'm a poster first." says Meister.

Your Bullshit Claims insist that I lack integrity.
Have you looked in the mirror you piece of shit, that attacks people he disagrees with.

Fuck You and your Mod Status.
 
Fuck Off Biased Poster, that is also a Mod.
"I'm a poster first." says Meister.

Your Bullshit Claims insist that I lack integrity.
Have you looked in the mirror you piece of shit, that attacks people he disagrees with.

Fuck You and your Mod Status.
Truth always hurts, doesn't it, Winnie? Yeah, I am a poster first, you have issues with that?
Take it up with your psychiatrist. :eusa_whistle:

First of all, Smith should have recused himself as the prosecutor. He
now is blatantly being proven to be nothing but a political hack as a prosecutor.
But, you knew that, and it didn't make any difference to you, why? You also lack integrity.
Party above 'The People'.
 
First of all, Smith should have recused himself as the prosecutor.
BullShit.
He
now is blatantly being proven to be nothing but a political hack as a prosecutor.
How, be specific with actual cases.
Don't continue your bias, discuss some of Smith's 'Decisions' that YOU determine show Bias.

You have obviously done your research to make such a claim.
Just Post why you think Smith should 'recuse himself'

Don't tell me to Google it or that you've already posted it.
Those are cop-outs.
 
BullShit.

How, be specific with actual cases.
Don't continue your bias, discuss some of Smith's 'Decisions' that YOU determine show Bias.

You have obviously done your research to make such a claim.
Just Post why you think Smith should 'recuse himself'

Don't tell me to Google it or that you've already posted it.
Those are cop-outs.
Smith is a politically motivated goon, put in place by the DOJ/Garland.
Not only with this case, but also the Mir-a-Lago case. He needs to step aside and have an another grown-up prosecute.

Now he wants to forego the Appeals Court to move the case along because of his timeline that he's trying to beat.
Obviously, he's part of your party motivated by politics and willing to do anything to bring down
Trump. He has a history of face planting himself in front of jurors. He's going to attempt to do it again.

Smith led the Justice Department’s public corruption unit more than a decade ago, when it brought several cases against lawmakers and politicians that legal experts say were based on far-reaching interpretations of federal law that sometimes backfired before juries and courts.

Jack Smith Is Known to Take On Tough Cases. But He Doesn’t Always Win.

He is such a political goon, he should recuse himself. If he can't make a case with the laws on the books,
he shouldn't be making them up or twisting them to create a crime.
But you're to much of a hack to agree with that, aren't you, hater?
 
The Democratic Party is deeply full of shit these days. They've transgressed every boundary, broken every rule, mocked every tradition. Democrats are all about race riots and mask mandates. And show trials - boy, talk about a banana republic - show trials at public expense are distinctly Stalinesque in character.


Second that! ^^:clap2:
 
Fuck Off Biased Poster, that is also a Mod.
"I'm a poster first." says Meister.

Your Bullshit Claims insist that I lack integrity.
Have you looked in the mirror you piece of shit, that attacks people he disagrees with.

Fuck You and your Mod Status.
Is your diaper rash bad today?...
 

Washington Post contributor Jason Willick wrote an opinion article titled, “Politics Are Now Clearly Shaping Jack Smith’s Trump Prosecution”, criticizing Smith’s alleged bias against Donald Trump.

Willick attacked the special counsel Smith and accused him of pursuing a political agenda, particularly in relation to the charge of attempting to overturn the 2020 election results.

He also criticized Smith’s attempt to expedite the trial before the 2024 election, suggesting a political motive rather than a pursuit of justice.
“There are real legal problems with special counsel Jack Smith’s election-interference case against Donald Trump,” admitted Willick.

“The former president’s effort to overturn the 2020 election was despicable, but political lying isn’t generally a crime. Smith’s case thus must rely on some of the vaguest laws in the federal penal code, applying them in untested ways,” explained the analyst.

“Now, in a filing at the Supreme Court, Smith has all but announced that his prosecutorial timeline is controlled by the 2024 general election in which Trump is likely to be a candidate,” he continued.

Willick alleged that Smith was attempting to, “fast-track the Trump trial based on what can be described only as a political timetable.”

Comment:
The Crazy Democrat Cult constantly screams that Trump is a "threat to our democracy" whilst they are the ones who are constantly using the FBI and DOJ as their political weapons.
Democrat ballot stuffing is a "threat to our democracy".
Democrat censorship is a "threat to our democracy".
The Democrat Party has less integrity than a banana republic junta.
Anyone with an IQ above sea level knows that which of course excludes the looney left on this board and inside DC>
 
No, that's not, "IT". :rolleyes-41:
You lack integrity and common sense, Winnie.
Party above 'The People'? :eusa_whistle:
Hi Meister. Is it possible to send this thread down to the Badlands for a few minutes. I want to say something to Winco that would probably get me banned up here. It's NOT flattering to it!!

Greg
 

Forum List

Back
Top