Washington Post Eulogizes ISIS Leader Al-Baghdadi as “Austere Religious Leader”

Even thought the piece was a hard hitting piece the title was wrong for the piece and should have never been sent to print with that title knowing the backlash it would create...

Really. The WaPo should preemptively surrender to the spluttering apoplexy of the rightarded apoplectics, and adjust their reporting accordingly? The title was "wrong"... because, apoplexy.

There was always an easy case to be made that Rightardia and the standards of journalism don't mix. It's getting easier by the public admission. Conversely, it's been saddening to behold how the WaPo apparently surrendered, and removed the oh-so "offending" parts of the headline. Because Rightardia has a right not to hear or read what they don't want to hear or read, which is mostly what troubles their perennially frightened ... minds.

Where did I say what was written beside the title was wrong?

Yes, WaPo should be very careful with their Titles because the original title was in my opinion wrong to put with the piece!

I said nothing about changing anything else about the damn article and if you claim I did then you are lying!
 
Yes, WaPo should be very careful with their Titles because the original title was in my opinion wrong to put with the piece!

The article still described Baghdadi as an "austere religious leader". Just never mention that in the headline because Bruce has an opinion, and that opinion is this would be "wrong". Presumably it's wrong because... apoplexy - no reason given.

You think headlines exist in another universe, not related to the content of the article, and not part of reporting?

For many years we've seen righties inconsolable over the failure to put religion right next to every mention of Middle Eastern terrorist gangs. Now, the WaPo does it, right in the headline, and we have our righties fuming over that unconscionable "wrong". They're funny like that.
 
Yes, WaPo should be very careful with their Titles because the original title was in my opinion wrong to put with the piece!

The article still described Baghdadi as an "austere religious leader". Just never mention that in the headline because Bruce has an opinion, and that opinion is this would be "wrong". Presumably it's wrong because... apoplexy - no reason given.

You think headlines exist in another universe, not related to the content of the article, and not part of reporting?

For many years we've seen righties inconsolable over the failure to put religion right next to every mention of Middle Eastern terrorist gangs. Now, the WaPo does it, right in the headline, and we have our righties fuming over that unconscionable "wrong". They're funny like that.

What the fuck are you rambling about?

The Title was incorrect for the piece written. I listened to the writer on Michael Smerconish show yesterday and even Smerconish the radio host on POTUS stated the title was wrong and should have never been with the article.

So before you even start with me with that childish nonsense maybe you should ask where I get my opinion from and as stated the Title was wrong for the piece.

Also if the title was correct then why did WaPo change it?

The fact is it seem you believe the monster killed was a great person and the title should have never been changed, correct?
 
Where is the outrage from the Muslim community? Should we all believe that this terrorist is an austere example of Islam? What happened to the “peaceful religion” narrative? Apparently the WAPO believes that to be a strict Muslim, you need to practice terrorism.
What happened to the rest of the Post obituary? the usual taking out of context innuendo garbage propaganda I see... My from another propaganda GOP rag online only. Read a newspaper... Sorry they don't swear and carry on like your rags and orange clowns. Showing disrespect to Muslim laws is not a great idea really. People have civilization and journalists and law enforcement for a reason, hater dupes. However congratulations to special forces real heroes. Who are not happy with the orange clown.
What makes you think a man who killed himself, three children, and tortured and killed hundred of others deserves any respect?

Hint: He doesn't. The world is better off with him dead. Democrats hate Trump so much they'd rather see this piece of shit still alive.
 
Where is the outrage from the Muslim community? Should we all believe that this terrorist is an austere example of Islam? What happened to the “peaceful religion” narrative? Apparently the WAPO believes that to be a strict Muslim, you need to practice terrorism.
What happened to the rest of the Post obituary? the usual taking out of context innuendo garbage propaganda I see... My from another propaganda GOP rag online only. Read a newspaper... Sorry they don't swear and carry on like your rags and orange clowns. Showing disrespect to Muslim laws is not a great idea really. People have civilization and journalists and law enforcement for a reason, hater dupes. However congratulations to special forces real heroes. Who are not happy with the orange clown.



You don't get it, franco. The WP admired Mr. al-Baghdadi, especially after President Trump put him on notice.

They are crying, just like they did when Mr. Khashoggi was executed
Admired my ass. Where is the rest of this article? Out of context garbage propaganda, super duper. civilized people don't like journalists being tortured and killed.
ISIS has done that.

But you can't seem to be bothered enough to criticize them for it.
 
The article still described Baghdadi as an "austere religious leader". Just never mention that in the headline because Bruce has an opinion, and that opinion is this would be "wrong". Presumably it's wrong because... apoplexy - no reason given.

Has the Washington Post ever given such gushing praise to President Trump as they did to the world's #1 terrorist and mass-murderer?
 
Oh, look...yet another leftist who's upset that people are pleased a terrorist was killed.

Fascinating. None of the Trumptards seem to care about lying. They actually think it's justified for the GreaterGood, and that God blesses their lies. Of course, God would never tell them to lie like they do. The voice that they're listening to belongs to Satan, the Lord of Lies.

They've pledged their allegiance to Satan. It's only a matter of whether they realize it. Some do. They think they've cut a deal for a luxury suite in Hell. I've got news for them. Being the Lord of Lies, Satan doesn't keep his promises. They'll burn along with the pedos, traitors, terrorists and Stalinists that they've spend their lives running cover for.

You folks sure do pick some fucked-up shit to get angry about.

Says the guy from that cult that just had group screaming meltdown over a very critical and honest obit, entirely because their Stalinist cult masters ordered them to have a screaming meltdown.

You can't make this stuff up.
You can...because you're a liar.

Well, you might actually believe all that horseshit -- which makes you insane.

Have you lowered your ISIS flag to half-staff?
 
Even thought the piece was a hard hitting piece the title was wrong for the piece and should have never been sent to print with that title knowing the backlash it would create...

Really. The WaPo should preemptively surrender to the spluttering apoplexy of the rightarded apoplectics, and adjust their reporting accordingly? The title was "wrong"... because, apoplexy.

There was always an easy case to be made that Rightardia and the standards of journalism don't mix. It's getting easier by the public admission. Conversely, it's been saddening to behold how the WaPo apparently surrendered, and removed the oh-so "offending" parts of the headline. Because Rightardia has a right not to hear or read what they don't want to hear or read, which is mostly what troubles their perennially frightened ... minds.
WaPo? Journalism?

Do you know any reason I shouldn't laugh in your face? Because, honestly, there isn't one.
 
Yes, WaPo should be very careful with their Titles because the original title was in my opinion wrong to put with the piece!

The article still described Baghdadi as an "austere religious leader". Just never mention that in the headline because Bruce has an opinion, and that opinion is this would be "wrong". Presumably it's wrong because... apoplexy - no reason given.

You think headlines exist in another universe, not related to the content of the article, and not part of reporting?

For many years we've seen righties inconsolable over the failure to put religion right next to every mention of Middle Eastern terrorist gangs. Now, the WaPo does it, right in the headline, and we have our righties fuming over that unconscionable "wrong". They're funny like that.
Hey, you know what? You're allowed to criticize a raping, murdering piece of shit. Yes, even if he was killed by American forced during Trump's presidency.

You won't burst into flames. Promise.
 
The ruling elites went ape over headlines not sufficiently critical of Trump. Telling. They much prefer an “austere scholar” from ISIS.
Don’t let these people gaslight you.

“Times editors were concerned that the initial headline — “Trump Urges Unity vs. Racism” — did not contextualize Mr. Trump’s message on Monday and decided to change it for later editions to “Assailing Hate but Not Guns.”

Many readers, including Democratic politicians and other critics of the president, condemned the first headline on Twitter.”

0FFC2432-ED7D-4BED-91E7-21F2D8E7C0FA.jpeg
 
Anybody who believes fake MSM news is an idiot.
Yes yes, the whole world of respected journalism and law enforcement is wrong, only bought off x cokehead DJ's know the truth.
No need to bring up Hunter Biden.
whether he was the son of Biden or not, he is a very highly educated highly respected international lawyer. The point is your Heroes are totally bought demagogues and you are a dupe of greedy mega-rich idiot a****** GOP billionaires and a Saudi one or two.....
 
Anybody who believes fake MSM news is an idiot.
Yes yes, the whole world of respected journalism and law enforcement is wrong, only bought off x cokehead DJ's know the truth.
No need to bring up Hunter Biden.
whether he was the son of Biden or not, he is a very highly educated highly respected international lawyer. The point is your Heroes are totally bought demagogues and you are a dupe of greedy mega-rich idiot a****** top billionaires and a Saudi one or two.....


Actually, Hunter Biden is a dope addict that got chucked of the US Navy for dirty urine, who has quite the reputation as a whoremonger.

If he wasn't the son of the Vice President, he'd be living in a fleabag Times Square hotel and working at a dirty book store.
 
Anybody who believes fake MSM news is an idiot.
Yes yes, the whole world of respected journalism and law enforcement is wrong, only bought off x cokehead DJ's know the truth.
No need to bring up Hunter Biden.
whether he was the son of Biden or not, he is a very highly educated highly respected international lawyer. The point is your Heroes are totally bought demagogues and you are a dupe of greedy mega-rich idiot a****** top billionaires and a Saudi one or two.....


Actually, Hunter Biden is a dope addict that got chucked of the US Navy for dirty urine, who has quite the reputation as a whoremonger.

If he wasn't the son of the Vice President, he'd be living in a fleabag Times Square hotel and working at a dirty book store.
If he wasn't the son of the Vice President, there's no way he'd have been given a direct commission.
 
Anybody who believes fake MSM news is an idiot.
Yes yes, the whole world of respected journalism and law enforcement is wrong, only bought off x cokehead DJ's know the truth.
No need to bring up Hunter Biden.
whether he was the son of Biden or not, he is a very highly educated highly respected international lawyer. The point is your Heroes are totally bought demagogues and you are a dupe of greedy mega-rich idiot a****** GOP billionaires and a Saudi one or two.....
Considering you guys are mourning Bagdadhi, you probably should hush while you're behind.
 
Considering you guys are mourning Bagdadhi, you probably should hush while you're behind.

You'll dream about it tonight, the fires of Hell licking at your lying cult boi toes. Take that as a warning, before it's too late.

It is funny how triggered you are by reality now. Trump humiliated himself with this stunt, so all of his asslickers are in a meltdown state. He made a speech full of snuff porn, he faked a photo, the military says they succeeded only in spite of Trump, and everyone is laughing at him. And you.

Now, if you need something to feel better, do what always makes Trump cultists feel better. Go insult some veterans.
 
Anybody who believes fake MSM news is an idiot.
Yes yes, the whole world of respected journalism and law enforcement is wrong, only bought off x cokehead DJ's know the truth.
No need to bring up Hunter Biden.
whether he was the son of Biden or not, he is a very highly educated highly respected international lawyer. The point is your Heroes are totally bought demagogues and you are a dupe of greedy mega-rich idiot a****** GOP billionaires and a Saudi one or two.....
Considering you guys are mourning Bagdadhi, you probably should hush while you're behind.


Exactly!

Trump and the Patriots killed one of their own after all! they are pissed.


:muahaha:
 
Anybody who believes fake MSM news is an idiot.
Yes yes, the whole world of respected journalism and law enforcement is wrong, only bought off x cokehead DJ's know the truth.
No need to bring up Hunter Biden.
whether he was the son of Biden or not, he is a very highly educated highly respected international lawyer. The point is your Heroes are totally bought demagogues and you are a dupe of greedy mega-rich idiot a****** GOP billionaires and a Saudi one or two.....
Considering you guys are mourning Bagdadhi, you probably should hush while you're behind.
We are mourning that a******? You're out of your tiny brain washed little mind, hater dupe. That was another area where Trump just continued Obama's policy until he f***** up.
 

Forum List

Back
Top