Bruce_T_Laney
Platinum Member
- Banned
- #61
Even thought the piece was a hard hitting piece the title was wrong for the piece and should have never been sent to print with that title knowing the backlash it would create...
Really. The WaPo should preemptively surrender to the spluttering apoplexy of the rightarded apoplectics, and adjust their reporting accordingly? The title was "wrong"... because, apoplexy.
There was always an easy case to be made that Rightardia and the standards of journalism don't mix. It's getting easier by the public admission. Conversely, it's been saddening to behold how the WaPo apparently surrendered, and removed the oh-so "offending" parts of the headline. Because Rightardia has a right not to hear or read what they don't want to hear or read, which is mostly what troubles their perennially frightened ... minds.
Where did I say what was written beside the title was wrong?
Yes, WaPo should be very careful with their Titles because the original title was in my opinion wrong to put with the piece!
I said nothing about changing anything else about the damn article and if you claim I did then you are lying!