We have a math shrift president! To Obama 1,600 years is a "long term"!

[healthmyths]

Obama in 2009 told a joint session of Congress the following.
"And if we are able to slow the growth of health care costs by just one-tenth of 1 percent each year --
one-tenth of 1 percent -- it will actually reduce the deficit by $4 trillion over the long term."
Remarks by the President to a Joint Session of Congress on Health Care

So how long is the "LONG TERM"???
In 2009 Health care costs were $2.5 Trillion.
1/10th of 1 percent is $2.555 billion.
It will take 1,600 years to reduce the deficit by $4 trillion at $2.5 billion.1,600 years!

So today how long would it take to reduce health care costs today of $3.1 trillion...

Thanks in large part to the expansion of coverage under Obamacare, health care spending in the U.S. is projected to have hit $3.1 trillion, or $9,695 per person, last year. That's an increase of 5.5%, according to federal estimates released Tuesday. It's the first time the rate would exceed 5% since 2007.
Health care spending expected to grow faster

Not only is Obama totally math deficient that even a 5th grader knows how to figure out it would take
1,600 years to reduce the deficit, but what in the hell was the linkage between reducing health care costs
$2.5 billion a year have with reducing the deficit by $4 trillion?

Especially since this totally math idiot has caused the national debt to rise to $18,150,206,527,000!
When Obama started the national debt was: $10.626 trillion

 

[SwimExpert]

He said growth.

Growth compounds.

Reduce a little, save alot.

And you talk about other people's math deficincies?

 

[SwimExpert]

Also, please do not cherry pick. Of all the piss poor methods of argumentation, it's the pissest poorest. Here's the entire section of Obama's words:

Now, add it all up, and the plan I'm proposing will cost around $900 billion over 10 years -- less than we have spent on the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, and less than the tax cuts for the wealthiest few Americans that Congress passed at the beginning of the previous administration. (Applause.) Now, most of these costs will be paid for with money already being spent -- but spent badly -- in the existing health care system. The plan will not add to our deficit. The middle class will realize greater security, not higher taxes. And if we are able to slow the growth of health care costs by just one-tenth of 1 percent each year -- one-tenth of 1 percent -- it will actually reduce the deficit by $4 trillion over the long term.

But here's the main question I have for you: Why the hell are you dredging up a speech from Obama's first year in office? Did it really take you this long to calculate your failed math?

 

[Auld Phart]

 

[healthmyths]

He said growth.

Growth compounds.

Reduce a little, save alot.

And you talk about other people's math deficincies?

That shows your ignorance.
1/10th of 1 percent of $2.55 trillion is $2.5 billion then the next year healthcare costs $2.54 trillion, etc. would have been reduced to today: $2.534 trillion.
At Obama's bad math of 1,600 years from 2010 to 2015 savings of $15 billion.

What is the reality? Today health care costs $3.1 trillion. HMMM... seems there was growth and not a decline in health care costs..
NOT REDUCTIONS!

But as usually ignorant people like Obama and you don't seem to have a grasp of the concept known as "long term"! 1,600 years to get
$4 trillion in reduction of the DEFICIT he said though! What does reducing the health care costs have to do with reducing DEFICITS???

Now if that means reducing Medicare expenditures... Medicare accounts for less then 1/3 of the 2.5 trillion!

 

[Wildman]

O'Husseinbama is not only math deficient.., he has total lack of patriotism for an allegedly..., "citizen"

 

[healthmyths]

Also, please do not cherry pick. Of all the piss poor methods of argumentation, it's the pissest poorest. Here's the entire section of Obama's words:

Now, add it all up, and the plan I'm proposing will cost around $900 billion over 10 years -- less than we have spent on the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, and less than the tax cuts for the wealthiest few Americans that Congress passed at the beginning of the previous administration. (Applause.) Now, most of these costs will be paid for with money already being spent -- but spent badly -- in the existing health care system. The plan will not add to our deficit. The middle class will realize greater security, not higher taxes. And if we are able to slow the growth of health care costs by just one-tenth of 1 percent each year -- one-tenth of 1 percent -- it will actually reduce the deficit by $4 trillion over the long term.

But here's the main question I have for you: Why the hell are you dredging up a speech from Obama's first year in office? Did it really take you this long to calculate your failed math?

Hey the point of this is to look back at how wrong Obama was and how those of us who READ his book knew he was a congenital liar!
"Dreams from My Father"...published July 18,1995!
"It was usually an effective tactic, another one of those tricks I had learned.
People were satisfied so long as you were courteous and smiled and made no sudden moves.
They were more than satisfied. They were revealed.
Such a pleasant surprise to find a well-mannered young black man who didn't seem angry all the time."

So Obama used "tricks" tactics" and as the Obamacare architect Jonathan Gruber said that lack of transparency was a major part of getting Obamacare passed because “the stupidity of the American voter” would have killed the law if more people knew what was in it.
Obama depends on dummies/fools like you with the stupidity to NOT question the simple math that Obama used to convince idiots like you!
A) Obama SAID after ACA was passed there never were as he said:
“Forty-six million Americans—including nearly eight million children—lack health insurance with no signs of this trend slowing down.” [TTM: pp. 31-32]

THIS f...king LIAR KNEW that 10 million of the 46 were NOT citizens and therefore NOT AMERICANS!
Income, Poverty and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2009 - Income & Wealth - Newsroom - U.S. Census Bureau
B)Obama Also knew that the 8 million children.. and if he DIDN"T he didn't know anything about how the government was run!
The Actuarial Research Corporation (ARC) estimates that about 9 million of these individuals actually were enrolled in Medicaid during the year, but were categorized as uninsured in the Census survey. In the latest Census health insurance report, the Census Bureau acknowledges that the survey “…underreports Medicare and Medicaid coverage compared with enrollment
and participation data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).” According to ARC, this “Medicaid undercount” leads to an over-assessment of the uninsured population and needs to be taken into consideration when developing uninsured estimates. While this view is shared by some policy analysts, others disagree and there is no consensus.
http://coverageforall.org/pdf/BC-BS_Uninsured-America.pdf

 

[SwimExpert]

He said growth.

Growth compounds.

Reduce a little, save alot.

And you talk about other people's math deficincies?

That shows your ignorance.
1/10th of 1 percent of $2.55 trillion is $2.5 billion then the next year healthcare costs $2.54 trillion, etc. would have been reduced to today: $2.534 trillion.
At Obama's bad math of 1,600 years from 2010 to 2015 savings of $15 billion.

What is the reality? Today health care costs $3.1 trillion. HMMM... seems there was growth and not a decline in health care costs..
NOT REDUCTIONS!

But as usually ignorant people like Obama and you don't seem to have a grasp of the concept known as "long term"! 1,600 years to get
$4 trillion in reduction of the DEFICIT he said though! What does reducing the health care costs have to do with reducing DEFICITS???

Now if that means reducing Medicare expenditures... Medicare accounts for less then 1/3 of the 2.5 trillion!

Okay, mumbling and growling and oozing a bunch of drool while you're doing it doesn't an argument make. I think you need a hobby. Something that will distract you from all this displaced rage and mindless obsession. Perhaps you should try paper mache.

 

[healthmyths]

He said growth.

Growth compounds.

Reduce a little, save alot.

And you talk about other people's math deficincies?

That shows your ignorance.
1/10th of 1 percent of $2.55 trillion is $2.5 billion then the next year healthcare costs $2.54 trillion, etc. would have been reduced to today: $2.534 trillion.
At Obama's bad math of 1,600 years from 2010 to 2015 savings of $15 billion.

What is the reality? Today health care costs $3.1 trillion. HMMM... seems there was growth and not a decline in health care costs..
NOT REDUCTIONS!

But as usually ignorant people like Obama and you don't seem to have a grasp of the concept known as "long term"! 1,600 years to get
$4 trillion in reduction of the DEFICIT he said though! What does reducing the health care costs have to do with reducing DEFICITS???

Now if that means reducing Medicare expenditures... Medicare accounts for less then 1/3 of the 2.5 trillion!

Okay, mumbling and growling and oozing a bunch of drool while you're doing it doesn't an argument make. I think you need a hobby. Something that will distract you from all this displaced rage and mindless obsession. Perhaps you should try paper mache.

So now I know that you are one of those FFOs that the according to Obamacare architect Jonathan Gruber said that lack of transparency was a major part of getting Obamacare passed because “the stupidity of the American voter” would have killed the law if more people knew what was in it.

Obamacare Architect: Lack of Transparency Was Key Because ‘Stupidity Of The American Voter’ Would Have Killed Obamacare

Makes sense since you can't evidently figure out that to Obama he could fool idiots like you because you were so stupid you couldn't divide
$2.5 billion into $4 trillion and see that is 1,600 years! He was counting on your "stupidity"!!!

 

[SwimExpert]

He said growth.

Growth compounds.

Reduce a little, save alot.

And you talk about other people's math deficincies?

That shows your ignorance.
1/10th of 1 percent of $2.55 trillion is $2.5 billion then the next year healthcare costs $2.54 trillion, etc. would have been reduced to today: $2.534 trillion.
At Obama's bad math of 1,600 years from 2010 to 2015 savings of $15 billion.

What is the reality? Today health care costs $3.1 trillion. HMMM... seems there was growth and not a decline in health care costs..
NOT REDUCTIONS!

But as usually ignorant people like Obama and you don't seem to have a grasp of the concept known as "long term"! 1,600 years to get
$4 trillion in reduction of the DEFICIT he said though! What does reducing the health care costs have to do with reducing DEFICITS???

Now if that means reducing Medicare expenditures... Medicare accounts for less then 1/3 of the 2.5 trillion!

Okay, mumbling and growling and oozing a bunch of drool while you're doing it doesn't an argument make. I think you need a hobby. Something that will distract you from all this displaced rage and mindless obsession. Perhaps you should try paper mache.

So now I know that you are one of those FFOs that the according to Obamacare architect Jonathan Gruber said that lack of transparency was a major part of getting Obamacare passed because “the stupidity of the American voter” would have killed the law if more people knew what was in it.

Obamacare Architect: Lack of Transparency Was Key Because ‘Stupidity Of The American Voter’ Would Have Killed Obamacare

Makes sense since you can't evidently figure out that to Obama he could fool idiots like you because you were so stupid you couldn't divide
$2.5 billion into $4 trillion and see that is 1,600 years! He was counting on your "stupidity"!!!

Seriously....you need to be under a doctor's care.