Weisselberg Indicted

[Clipper]

The indictment doesn't mention anything. "contrition" only comes to effect just before sentencing, not in submitting an indictment.

You're obviously just making things up..

The indictment mentions the crimes they committed. That's why they're being charged. Nothing to do with their relationship to Trump.

Anybody else committing those crimes, for that length of time, would get the same treatment as Al Capone.

They aren't crimes. No one would be punished like Al Capone for what they are charged with. Normally they wouldn't even be charged with a crime, just fined.

Clown, Trump & his partner in crime were carrying two sets of books. That tell you anything? If "they weren't crimes" why'd they do that? Huh?

Time for Trump to hit the panic button!

 

[Nostra]

This kind of case has never been criminally prosecuted

Why shouldn’t it be?

Damn you’re ignorant. Hey dimbulb, this kind of case is settled civilly with audits and/or fines. Not criminal prosecution and dragging an elderly man around in handcuffs to try to act tough. You Dims are so desperate to spin your utter failure here it’s laughable.

You think fining a rich dude for evading taxes is suitable punishment?

This guy hid as much money as most Americans make in their entire life.

I’ll ask again, why SHOULDNT it be criminal?

Al Sharpton owed millions in unpaid taxes.

I don't recall you suggesting criminal charges.

Hypocrite much?

 

[Nostra]

The indictment doesn't mention anything. "contrition" only comes to effect just before sentencing, not in submitting an indictment.

You're obviously just making things up..

The indictment mentions the crimes they committed. That's why they're being charged. Nothing to do with their relationship to Trump.

Anybody else committing those crimes, for that length of time, would get the same treatment as Al Capone.

They aren't crimes. No one would be punished like Al Capone for what they are charged with. Normally they wouldn't even be charged with a crime, just fined.

Clown, Trump & his partner in crime were carrying two sets of books. That tell you anything? If "they weren't crimes" why'd they do that? Huh?

Time for Trump to hit the panic button!

Any day now.......................

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I don't recall you suggesting criminal charges.

Because behind behind on taxes isn't fraud.

 

[Clipper]

I don't recall you suggesting criminal charges.

Because behind behind on taxes isn't fraud.

Yea, he was behind by only 15 years.

 

[dudmuck]

. They are bogus charges.

Based on nothing but your fetishes and neuroses.

Based on every time similar charges have been made, which is never, and based on everything about Dim DAs, which is that they are partisan scum.

The indictments come from a grand jury, not the DA.
If the DA was partisan instead of following the law, the grand jury wouldnt issue indictment.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Yea, he was behind by only 15 years.

Well, he didn't actually "get behind" on taxes, because that would be stressful. So, being the brilliant man he is, he invented the life hack of just not reporting income to be taxed. Just to make sure he covered all the bases, he decided not to report some to the rest of the company, either.

I am sure he was very proud of himself. And Trump of him.

And then another person actually got to take a look and informed him those were not actually new lifehacks he invented, but that they were actually fraud and theft. Unfortunately, that person is the DA of Manhattan.

Imagine Weisselberg's surprise!

 

[Nostra]

I don't recall you suggesting criminal charges.

Because behind behind on taxes isn't fraud.

Rev Al evaded taxes for years to the tune of millions in unpaid taxes.

That's a crime, Dumbass.

 

[Nostra]

Yea, he was behind by only 15 years.

Well, he didn't actually "get behind" on taxes, because that would be stressful. So, being the brilliant man he is, he invented the life hack of just not reporting income to be taxed. Just to make sure he covered all the bases, he decided not to report some to the rest of the company, either.

I am sure he was very proud of himself. And Trump of him.

And then another person actually got to take a look and informed him those were not actually new lifehacks he invented, but that they were actually fraud and theft. Unfortunately, that person is the DA of Manhattan.

Imagine Weisselberg's surprise!

Imagine Weisselberg's surprise!

You misspelled All Sharpton. Pay attention to what you are replying to, Dumbfuck.

 

[lantern2814]

This kind of case has never been criminally prosecuted

Why shouldn’t it be?

Damn you’re ignorant. Hey dimbulb, this kind of case is settled civilly with audits and/or fines. Not criminal prosecution and dragging an elderly man around in handcuffs to try to act tough. You Dims are so desperate to spin your utter failure here it’s laughable.

You think fining a rich dude for evading taxes is suitable punishment?

This guy hid as much money as most Americans make in their entire life.

I’ll ask again, why SHOULDNT it be criminal?

Jesus Christ you’re truly stupid. The punishment for said act (if it can be proven) is civil action resulting in an audit and/or fine. Not criminal prosecution. It’s called following both the law and precedent. I’ll ask Nostra’s question as well. You don’t care that Al Sharpton owes millions in taxes and has routinely lied about his assets. Why is that?

 

[lantern2814]

And now we see colNOfacts flip again. It was okay for Rosie O’Donnell to claim ignorance dor breaking campaign contribution laws, but now you mock people associated with Trump for not knowing the law. You’re exposed as an absolute moron.

Are you saying that the CFO of the Trump organization has as much tax knowledge as Rosie O’Donnell has knowledge or campaign finance?

It’s called equal treatment under the law. Something you don’t believe in. Showing your stupidity just makes you look stupid.

Equal treatment under the law? No. I think Rosie O’Donnell doesn’t know shit about campaign finance but I think a CPA knows when he’s evading taxes.

And so do you, you just don’t want to admit it.

No dummy, YOU just refuse to admit that you favor leniency for Dims and unfair punishment for Republicans. Sorry, Rosie broke the same law that people not in that position (and shove your pathetic “she didn’t know” excuse as somebody in her circle certainly would have known the law they INTENTIONALLY broke) went to jail for. That’s not equal punishment. But your Nazi tendencies won’t allow you to admit the truth.

 

[lantern2814]

The value of a property is a matter of opinion, so it's hardly fraud.

Hmm, sorry, that's wrong and completely made up and you clearly have no idea what you are talking about.

Oh really? Get 5 different realtors to look at a property. They’ll all have a different value for it. You really should stop speaking. You’re embarrassing yourself further.

 

[bripat9643]

bripat9643 for trump cultists, the truth is a long lost memory.

What could be more hilarious than a prog bleating about truth? Progressivism is a pack of lies designed to justify organized plunder.

 

[bripat9643]

The indictment doesn't mention anything. "contrition" only comes to effect just before sentencing, not in submitting an indictment.

You're obviously just making things up..

The indictment mentions the crimes they committed. That's why they're being charged. Nothing to do with their relationship to Trump.

Anybody else committing those crimes, for that length of time, would get the same treatment as Al Capone.

They aren't crimes. No one would be punished like Al Capone for what they are charged with. Normally they wouldn't even be charged with a crime, just fined.

Clown, Trump & his partner in crime were carrying two sets of books. That tell you anything? If "they weren't crimes" why'd they do that? Huh?

Time for Trump to hit the panic button!

No they weren't, moron.

 

[bripat9643]

. They are bogus charges.

Based on nothing but your fetishes and neuroses.

Based on every time similar charges have been made, which is never, and based on everything about Dim DAs, which is that they are partisan scum.

The indictments come from a grand jury, not the DA.
If the DA was partisan instead of following the law, the grand jury wouldnt issue indictment.

ROFL! God, are you ever naive. First off, it's a New York grand jury, and we all know how much they hate Trump. And second, haven't you ever hear the expression that a good prosecutor can get a Grand Jury to indict a ham sandwich?

 

[bripat9643]

Yea, he was behind by only 15 years.

Well, he didn't actually "get behind" on taxes, because that would be stressful. So, being the brilliant man he is, he invented the life hack of just not reporting income to be taxed. Just to make sure he covered all the bases, he decided not to report some to the rest of the company, either.

I am sure he was very proud of himself. And Trump of him.

And then another person actually got to take a look and informed him those were not actually new lifehacks he invented, but that they were actually fraud and theft. Unfortunately, that person is the DA of Manhattan.

Imagine Weisselberg's surprise!

You don't report your personal taxes to your company, moron.

 

[bripat9643]

The fact is that we all do it. Maybe a few hundred for normal folk but a few million for them.

So it’s okay to defraud the government for a few million because they’re rich?

When did I say it is OK? I only said leftist dolts tried hard not to look stupid.

You said it’s not that bad.

Actually, he is not that bad, less than a million per year.

It's really not....actually less then $100K...had he not been tied to Trump, and Vance and the Dems not weaponized the Executive against political rivials....ie if this was normal, there would be no charges.

The Feds aren't even touching this...how it normally would work is the tax agency accountants would contact his accountants and they'd argue over why this wasn't paid, or why this was deducted...etc....and maybe they make a settlement on what's owed....but this is the new Fascist DNC, that for five years weaponized the executive in NY to go after Trump, his family, and his company...and all they got, even after going all the way to the Supreme Court, is that his CFO didn't claim the car the company leased for him as income...wow...just wow.

So why shouldn’t this be criminally charged?

That can be argued all day long. What you can't argue is that some people, who happened to be associated with Trump, should suffer a much stiffer penalty than the people Vance has charged..

They should suffer the penalties that the law dictates. No one associated with Trump is being penalized any more than that.

The law doesn't dictate that they should even be criminally prosecuted, asshole.

Oh really? Ever hear of Habeus Corpus, genius? Which A.W.'s lawyers didn't bring up after he was indicted & did the perp walk. But go ahead & carry on with your fantasies if it makes you feel better.

What does habeas corpus have to do with anything?

 

[struth]

The fact is that we all do it. Maybe a few hundred for normal folk but a few million for them.

So it’s okay to defraud the government for a few million because they’re rich?

When did I say it is OK? I only said leftist dolts tried hard not to look stupid.

You said it’s not that bad.

Actually, he is not that bad, less than a million per year.

It's really not....actually less then $100K...had he not been tied to Trump, and Vance and the Dems not weaponized the Executive against political rivials....ie if this was normal, there would be no charges.

The Feds aren't even touching this...how it normally would work is the tax agency accountants would contact his accountants and they'd argue over why this wasn't paid, or why this was deducted...etc....and maybe they make a settlement on what's owed....but this is the new Fascist DNC, that for five years weaponized the executive in NY to go after Trump, his family, and his company...and all they got, even after going all the way to the Supreme Court, is that his CFO didn't claim the car the company leased for him as income...wow...just wow.

So why shouldn’t this be criminally charged?

That can be argued all day long. What you can't argue is that some people, who happened to be associated with Trump, should suffer a much stiffer penalty than the people Vance has charged..

They should suffer the penalties that the law dictates. No one associated with Trump is being penalized any more than that.

The law doesn't dictate that they should even be criminally prosecuted, asshole.

Oh really? Ever hear of Habeus Corpus, genius? Which A.W.'s lawyers didn't bring up after he was indicted & did the perp walk. But go ahead & carry on with your fantasies if it makes you feel better.

huh? what does Haneus Corpus have to do with anything you were saying?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Yes, and Comey let Hillary off supposedly because she didn't know she was breaking the law.

i really want someone to explain to me how Weisselberg wouldn’t know he was committing tax fraud.

I mean, it’s sorta his job to know these things.

Explain how Hillary did not know posting secret was not illegal. Remember she also designated what was secret as well.

 

[struth]

The indictment doesn't mention anything. "contrition" only comes to effect just before sentencing, not in submitting an indictment.

You're obviously just making things up..

The indictment mentions the crimes they committed. That's why they're being charged. Nothing to do with their relationship to Trump.

Anybody else committing those crimes, for that length of time, would get the same treatment as Al Capone.

They aren't crimes. No one would be punished like Al Capone for what they are charged with. Normally they wouldn't even be charged with a crime, just fined.

Clown, Trump & his partner in crime were carrying two sets of books. That tell you anything? If "they weren't crimes" why'd they do that? Huh?

Time for Trump to hit the panic button!

the indictment doesn’t say anything about two sets of books....stop lying