Weisselberg Indicted

[bripat9643]

They refused to prosecute O'Donnel who commited the exact same offence

Lie

Truth

 

[colfax_m]

They refused to prosecute O'Donnel who commited the exact same offence

Lie

Truth

Then tell us who ODonnell convinced to make a donation that she reimbursed.

Give us a name.

 

[Synthaholic]

It was VERY NICE of Trump to make convicting him so easy!

 

[dudmuck]

They refused to prosecute O'Donnel who commited the exact same offence

Lie

Truth

it was bribery, but not serious, just a political statement

Hey, Rosie O'Donnell: It's Illegal to Offer Cash to GOP Senators to Switch Vote on Tax Bill - TheWrap

But legal experts tell TheWrap the comic is unlikely to be prosecuted even if her tweet was serious

www.thewrap.com

Dinesh D'Souza and Rosie O'Donnell FEC violations different

Backlash to President Donald Trump’s pardon of Dinesh D’Souza caused complaints of a double standard among conservatives

www.politifact.com

 

[bripat9643]

They refused to prosecute O'Donnel who commited the exact same offence

Lie

Truth

Then tell us who ODonnell convinced to make a donation that she reimbursed.

Give us a name.

She used five different names to make her donations. She committed fraud.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

They refused to prosecute O'Donnel who commited the exact same offence

Lie

Truth

Then tell us who ODonnell convinced to make a donation that she reimbursed.

Give us a name.

She used five different names to make her donations. She committed fraud.

Unlike Weisselberg, she did not commit a felony, much less 15 felonies.

 

[bripat9643]

They refused to prosecute O'Donnel who commited the exact same offence

Lie

Truth

Then tell us who ODonnell convinced to make a donation that she reimbursed.

Give us a name.

She used five different names to make her donations. She committed fraud.

Unlike Weisselberg, she did not commit a felony, much less 15 felonies.

Yes she did, turd. She used aliases to intentionally violate campaign contribution limits.

 

[bripat9643]

They refused to prosecute O'Donnel who commited the exact same offence

Lie

Truth

it was bribery, but not serious, just a political statement

Hey, Rosie O'Donnell: It's Illegal to Offer Cash to GOP Senators to Switch Vote on Tax Bill - TheWrap

But legal experts tell TheWrap the comic is unlikely to be prosecuted even if her tweet was serious

www.thewrap.com

Dinesh D'Souza and Rosie O'Donnell FEC violations different

Backlash to President Donald Trump’s pardon of Dinesh D’Souza caused complaints of a double standard among conservatives

www.politifact.com

There are no facts in Politifact.

 

[bripat9643]

They refused to prosecute O'Donnel who commited the exact same offence

Lie

Truth

Then tell us who ODonnell convinced to make a donation that she reimbursed.

Give us a name.

She used aliases to violate campaign contribution limits. She violated statute 52 U.S.C. 30116, just like Cruz. She also violated 18 U.S.C. 1001 for lying to law enforcement.

 

[dudmuck]

They refused to prosecute O'Donnel who commited the exact same offence

Lie

Truth

it was bribery, but not serious, just a political statement

Hey, Rosie O'Donnell: It's Illegal to Offer Cash to GOP Senators to Switch Vote on Tax Bill - TheWrap

But legal experts tell TheWrap the comic is unlikely to be prosecuted even if her tweet was serious

www.thewrap.com

Dinesh D'Souza and Rosie O'Donnell FEC violations different

Backlash to President Donald Trump’s pardon of Dinesh D’Souza caused complaints of a double standard among conservatives

www.politifact.com

There are no facts in Politifact.

plenty of facts there, they have a high factual rating.
If you read it, you'll find that rosie didnt try to hide anything, thats why its legal. The extra amount could be refunded or rolled over into the next campaign.

 

[colfax_m]

She used five different names to make her donations. She committed fraud.

She did? Whose names?

 

[lantern2814]

And now we see colNOfacts flip again. It was okay for Rosie O’Donnell to claim ignorance dor breaking campaign contribution laws, but now you mock people associated with Trump for not knowing the law. You’re exposed as an absolute moron.

Are you saying that the CFO of the Trump organization has as much tax knowledge as Rosie O’Donnell has knowledge or campaign finance?

It’s called equal treatment under the law. Something you don’t believe in. Showing your stupidity just makes you look stupid.

Equal treatment under the law? No. I think Rosie O’Donnell doesn’t know shit about campaign finance but I think a CPA knows when he’s evading taxes.

And so do you, you just don’t want to admit it.

No dummy, YOU just refuse to admit that you favor leniency for Dims and unfair punishment for Republicans. Sorry, Rosie broke the same law that people not in that position (and shove your pathetic “she didn’t know” excuse as somebody in her circle certainly would have known the law they INTENTIONALLY broke) went to jail for. That’s not equal punishment. But your Nazi tendencies won’t allow you to admit the truth.

Intent matters. She didn’t intend to break the law, which means she wasn’t going to be prosecuted.

Weisselberg damn sure intended to commit tax fraud.

NO, intent doesn’t matter. Try that in court and watch the judge laugh at you. By your own admission, Rosie and her people are ignorant peons. Yet you buy the garbage that her accountants and other money handlers didn’t know the law, yet you want an elderly man thrown in prison based on allegations. Simply because he works for Trump. How Nazi of you.

 

[struth]

They refused to prosecute O'Donnel who commited the exact same offence

Lie

Truth

Then tell us who ODonnell convinced to make a donation that she reimbursed.

Give us a name.

She used five different names to make her donations. She committed fraud.

Unlike Weisselberg, she did not commit a felony, much less 15 felonies.

he’s innocent until proven otherwise.

Everyone knows this indictment is Vance swan song for justifying his political witch-hunt

this type of then has never been prosecuted before

 

[colfax_m]

NO, intent doesn’t matter. Try that in court and watch the judge laugh at you. By your own admission, Rosie and her people are ignorant peons. Yet you buy the garbage that her accountants and other money handlers didn’t know the law, yet you want an elderly man thrown in prison based on allegations. Simply because he works for Trump. How Nazi of you.

Intent absolutely matters.

Intent is the difference between self defense and murder, you uneducated doofus.

So tell me why we shouldn’t prosecute violations of law simply because they’re committed by someone associated with Trump?

 

[colfax_m]

They refused to prosecute O'Donnel who commited the exact same offence

Lie

Truth

Then tell us who ODonnell convinced to make a donation that she reimbursed.

Give us a name.

She used aliases to violate campaign contribution limits. She violated statute 52 U.S.C. 30116, just like Cruz. She also violated 18 U.S.C. 1001 for lying to law enforcement.

Cruz?

 

[lantern2814]

NO, intent doesn’t matter. Try that in court and watch the judge laugh at you. By your own admission, Rosie and her people are ignorant peons. Yet you buy the garbage that her accountants and other money handlers didn’t know the law, yet you want an elderly man thrown in prison based on allegations. Simply because he works for Trump. How Nazi of you.

Intent absolutely matters.

Intent is the difference between self defense and murder, you uneducated doofus.

So tell me why we shouldn’t prosecute violations of law simply because they’re committed by someone associated with Trump?

You stupid retard. Tell the cop you didn’t INTEND to have that gun and those drugs on you. You didn’t INTEND to flee going 85 in a 45 zone. Just shut up you embarrassing waste of space. You constantly lie and only want Republicans charged whil making excuse after excuse for Dims.

 

[struth]

Pure bullshit.

Really? You want to make an argument that Weisselberg (a CPA and CFO) couldn’t figure out that his “fringe benefits” were taxable?

Go ahead. Tell us that Weisselberg is a total moron.

why hasn’t the IRS brought charges?

The reality is when this sort of thing happens is the accountants for the individual and the govt argue over what is taxable and what isn’t , and a settlement my be made.

That’s when the left hasn’t weaponized the executive to persecute political rivals...

 

[colfax_m]

You stupid retard. Tell the cop you didn’t INTEND to have that gun and those drugs on you. You didn’t INTEND to flee going 85 in a 45 zone. Just shut up you embarrassing waste of space. You constantly lie and only want Republicans charged whil making excuse after excuse for Dims.

You’re comparing different things. It’s always illegal to have illegal drugs. It’s only sometimes illegal to donate to candidates.

Someone else suggested Weisselberg wasn’t aware that his taxes were fraudulent. That’s absurd.

 

[colfax_m]

Pure bullshit.

Really? You want to make an argument that Weisselberg (a CPA and CFO) couldn’t figure out that his “fringe benefits” were taxable?

Go ahead. Tell us that Weisselberg is a total moron.

why hasn’t the IRS brought charges?

The reality is when this sort of thing happens is the accountants for the individual and the govt argue over what is taxable and what isn’t , and a settlement my be made.

That’s when the left hasn’t weaponized the executive to persecute political rivals...

Because the IRS has been whittled down by decades of political pressure and lack of funding to the point that they don’t have the resources to go after anyone who can stand to defend themselves.

The IRS only goes after poor people.

 

[bripat9643]

Pure bullshit.

Really? You want to make an argument that Weisselberg (a CPA and CFO) couldn’t figure out that his “fringe benefits” were taxable?

Go ahead. Tell us that Weisselberg is a total moron.

why hasn’t the IRS brought charges?

The reality is when this sort of thing happens is the accountants for the individual and the govt argue over what is taxable and what isn’t , and a settlement my be made.

That’s when the left hasn’t weaponized the executive to persecute political rivals...

Because the IRS has been whittled down by decades of political pressure and lack of funding to the point that they don’t have the resources to go after anyone who can stand to defend themselves.

The IRS only goes after poor people.

Good. I hope they whittle it down to zero.