Welcome Alarmists. Did you know Earth is still in an ice age?

[Captain Caveman]

I think him speaking on this topic is precisely him being a fake climate scientists.

No, he had facts, not silly computer models.

 

[Crick]

No, he had facts, not silly computer models.

Do you think his statement that temperatures from areas lacking instrumentation were "made up" was a fact?
Do you think his claim that "most studies" are based on the RCP 8.5 emissions scenario was a fact?
Do you think his claim that "most economists" feel addressing low emissions scenario warming is a waste of money was a fact?

 

[Captain Caveman]

Do you think his statement that temperatures from areas lacking instrumentation were "made up" was a fact?
Do you think his claim that "most studies" are based on the RCP 8.5 emissions scenario was a fact?
Do you think his claim that "most economists" feel addressing low emissions scenario warming is a waste of money was a fact?

It was a factual video.

 

[Crick]

It was a factual video.

A great deal of what he put out was subjective opinion and everything else was scientifically irrelevant. His point that we're still in an ice age, the Holocene is a cooler interglacial, that modern thermometers were invented during the LIA, that temperature readings between instruments is made up, that CO2 has been higher for most of Earth's history, that less than 97% of climate scientists opt to characterize global warming with subjective, ill-defined terms, that climate models tend to be too warm all range from completely irrelevant to disingenuous deception.

The reason this was done by a historian is because a scientists wouldn't have spewed a con like this.

 

[Captain Caveman]

A great deal of what he put out was subjective opinion and everything else was scientifically irrelevant. His point that we're still in an ice age, the Holocene is a cooler interglacial, that modern thermometers were invented during the LIA, that temperature readings between instruments is made up, that CO2 has been higher for most of Earth's history, that less than 97% of climate scientists opt to characterize global warming with subjective, ill-defined terms, that climate models tend to be too warm all range from completely irrelevant to disingenuous deception.

The reason this was done by a historian is because a scientists wouldn't have spewed a con like this.

Facts, he put out facts.

 

[Crick]

Facts, he put out facts.

List a few. Explain their significance.

 

[Captain Caveman]

List a few. Explain their significance.

I can only do one sentence replies with you so I have to decline.

 

[Captain Caveman]

Crick if you're subjective, you will follow climate scientists, but if you're objective, you will follow scientists.