ClosedCaption
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2010
- 53,233
- 6,719
- 1,830
Make the welfare recipient pay for it.
You clearly did not think this through before you said it.
He's logic challenged
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Make the welfare recipient pay for it.
You clearly did not think this through before you said it.
Are the ones cutting people out going to be tested also? They get paid with tax dollars. Local, county, and state employees get paid with tax dollars. Shouldn't they also be tested? And, what is the states going to do with those that fail the drug tests? If a mother fails, and has three very small children to feed, what will happen to the children? Are the states going to allow them to starve because their mother failed the drug test? And, what about testing everyone that gets tax dollars? Those that are requiring the tests, get paid via tax dollars. Are we going to be fair across the board, or just single out the poor, the less fortunate, and the disabled? Are we going to deny disabled Vets benefits? Are we going to deny small children food? What happens to those cut from the program?I support this
Lets get it expanded to cover all 50 states
-Geaux
In most states, people collecting welfare can “earn” more money than if they worked full time at a minimum wage job, and these welfare payouts can take up roughly one-quarter to one-third of eachindividual state’s budget.
In order to cut down on these insanely high and growing costs, many states have moved to crack down on waste, fraud and abuse in their welfare programs.
One method many states have chosen to do this, and that 12 more states are now seriously looking at, is through drug testing for welfare recipients, the theory being that if someone has enough money to buy and use drugs, they don’t need or deserve welfare assistance from taxpayers.
Of course liberals will weep and wail and gnash their teeth, calling the drug testing of welfare recipients cruel, unfair and discriminatory, apparently oblivious to the fact that a majority of the workers who pay the taxes that fund welfare were required to pass a drug test in order to get their jobs
Welfare Abusers in 12 States Just Got Some Brutal Bad News
( P.S. --- I'm NOT Liberal, Conservative, Republican, Democrat, nor anything other than an American for America )
Make the welfare recipient pay for it.
You clearly did not think this through before you said it.
Don't you have a Crack pipe to clean?Make the welfare recipient pay for it.
You clearly did not think this through before you said it.
He's logic challenged
Make the welfare recipient pay for it.
You clearly did not think this through before you said it.Don't you have a Crack pipe to clean?Make the welfare recipient pay for it.
You clearly did not think this through before you said it.
He's logic challenged
Those drug tests make conservatives feel good but they yield painfully few violators
A waste of taxpayer dollars
Lets put it to the test and find out
-Geaux
What 7 States Discovered After Spending More Than 1 Million Drug Testing Welfare Recipients ThinkProgress
According to state data gathered by ThinkProgress, the seven states with existing programs — Arizona, Kansas, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Utah — are spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to ferret out very few drug users. The statistics show that applicants actually test positive at a lower rate than the drug use of the general population. The national drug use rate is 9.4 percent. In these states, however, the rate of positive drug tests to total welfare applicants ranges from 0.002 percent to 8.3 percent, but all except one have a rate below 1 percent. Meanwhile, they’ve collectively spent nearly $1 million on the effort, and millions more may have to be spent in coming years.
Yo, drug testing should pay for itself after catching a few? The money used for Welfare should pay for it in the long run!!! The Radicals don`t like it because it might cost them voters in the long run!!! Because the ones who get caught will have to find a JOB, and eventually their mindset will change, hey, being responsible for yourself is the "RIGHT" thing to do!!!!!!
"GTP"
View attachment 37436
1. Show that she is on welfare
2. Show that welfare money paid for those things
All you have so far is a picture of a black woman
Cons who used to be teenagers sure have a poor memory, did they forget cocaine is water solvable and only lasts 3 days in ones system? And there is many ways to defeat a simple pee Test if one smokes potThose drug tests make conservatives feel good but they yield painfully few violators
A waste of taxpayer dollars
Lets put it to the test and find out
-Geaux
What 7 States Discovered After Spending More Than 1 Million Drug Testing Welfare Recipients ThinkProgress
According to state data gathered by ThinkProgress, the seven states with existing programs — Arizona, Kansas, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Utah — are spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to ferret out very few drug users. The statistics show that applicants actually test positive at a lower rate than the drug use of the general population. The national drug use rate is 9.4 percent. In these states, however, the rate of positive drug tests to total welfare applicants ranges from 0.002 percent to 8.3 percent, but all except one have a rate below 1 percent. Meanwhile, they’ve collectively spent nearly $1 million on the effort, and millions more may have to be spent in coming years.
DelusionalMake the welfare recipient pay for it.
You clearly did not think this through before you said it.Don't you have a Crack pipe to clean?Make the welfare recipient pay for it.
You clearly did not think this through before you said it.
He's logic challenged
*butthurt*
Alcohol is legal in all 50 states in case you forgot.How about sobriety testing welfare recipients, starting with our politicians.
So, someone that spends tax dollars to get drunk is different from those that spend tax dollars to get high? What? You're kidding, right?Alcohol is legal in all 50 states in case you forgot.How about sobriety testing welfare recipients, starting with our politicians.
Alcohol is legal in all 50 states in case you forgot.How about sobriety testing welfare recipients, starting with our politicians.
DelusionalMake the welfare recipient pay for it.
You clearly did not think this through before you said it.Don't you have a Crack pipe to clean?Make the welfare recipient pay for it.
You clearly did not think this through before you said it.
He's logic challenged
*butthurt*
What you think every one who drinks do it to get drunk? You have to be kidding me right?So, someone that spends tax dollars to get drunk is different from those spend tax dollars to get high? What? You're kidding, right?Alcohol is legal in all 50 states in case you forgot.How about sobriety testing welfare recipients, starting with our politicians.
Deduct it from their aid dumbass. And if they fail you save all their aid.DelusionalMake the welfare recipient pay for it.
You clearly did not think this through before you said it.Don't you have a Crack pipe to clean?You clearly did not think this through before you said it.
He's logic challenged
*butthurt*
From the guy who's idea was basically to get blood from a rock lol
If they fail the test, they do. If they pass, they can have it deducted from their taxes.Wouldn't drug testing all welfare recipients cost more? Who is expected to pay for that additional expense?
Deduct it from their aid dumbass. And if they fail you save all their aid.DelusionalYou clearly did not think this through before you said it.Don't you have a Crack pipe to clean?He's logic challenged
*butthurt*
From the guy who's idea was basically to get blood from a rock lol
You libs sure are stupid
Nope, not at all. I'm saying that we're testing for drugs because some think that if someone is using drugs, they don't need money from taxpayers to buy food. But, we're not testing for alcohol, and some that get food stamps maybe buying beer, wine, or hard liquor. What's the difference?What you think every one who drinks do it to get drunk? You have to be kidding me right?So, someone that spends tax dollars to get drunk is different from those spend tax dollars to get high? What? You're kidding, right?Alcohol is legal in all 50 states in case you forgot.How about sobriety testing welfare recipients, starting with our politicians.
You really are stupid. It's a simple solution. Is it the black or the liberal that makes you so dumb?Deduct it from their aid dumbass. And if they fail you save all their aid.Delusional
From the guy who's idea was basically to get blood from a rock lol
You libs sure are stupid
lmao!! Yeah, thats the ticket lol
You really are stupid. It's a simple solution. Is it the black or the liberal that makes you so dumb?Deduct it from their aid dumbass. And if they fail you save all their aid.Delusional*butthurt*
From the guy who's idea was basically to get blood from a rock lol
You libs sure are stupid
lmao!! Yeah, thats the ticket lol