Truthmatters
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2007
- 80,182
- 2,272
- 1,283
- Banned
- #21
the people don't want your party
you have to CHEAT to gain office
you have to CHEAT to gain office
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you believed in democracy you cant love the republican party
the people don't want your party
you have to CHEAT to gain office
Your right, I'm all for bipartisanship so long as all parties are operating within the strict limits of the Constitution, AS WRITTEN. Yep I'm for that.
and you are not the one who gets to tell us what the constitution means.
that is not within YOUR powers in this country.
Stop thinking YOUR the dictator here
No. The Constitution is what gets to say what the Constitution means.
For example, when the Constitution says "Congress shall make no law," it means that Congress shall make no law. Not some laws. Not alot of laws. Not laws only if this applies. No laws. Zero. Zilch Nada. None.
the people don't want your party
you have to CHEAT to gain office
Again:
Al Gore
Al Franken
John Kennedy
and you are not the one who gets to tell us what the constitution means.
that is not within YOUR powers in this country.
Stop thinking YOUR the dictator here
No. The Constitution is what gets to say what the Constitution means.
For example, when the Constitution says "Congress shall make no law," it means that Congress shall make no law. Not some laws. Not alot of laws. Not laws only if this applies. No laws. Zero. Zilch Nada. None.
does EVERYONE in the country see the constitution and define it exactly like your idiot mind does?
NO
that mean you think EVERYONE should do what YOU say.
Go to hell you dictator
the people don't want your party
you have to CHEAT to gain office
Again:
Al Gore
Al Franken
John Kennedy
you gave three names and NO EVIDENCE of anything.
I gave you a 30 years of cases that culminated in a scotus decision.
YOUR PARTY cheats and the right wing leaning SCOTUS agrees your party needs to be punished for cheating non stop for 30 years.
Now what idiot?
The poll also showed that Democrats are generally more willing to compromise than Republicans or Independents. Over 60 percent of Democrats said that more compromise was preferable, while only 55 percent of Independents and 38 percent of Republicans agreed. In addition, Democrats preferred compromise over ideological intransigence by a 41 percent margin, while Republicans said they sought the same by only a 2 percent margin.
Self-identified Tea Party supporters notched the most significant opposition to compromise, with only 39 percent supporting some form of it. Nonetheless, 40 percent of Tea Partiers still preferred tangible results to ideological purity.
Poll: 53 Percent Favor Compromise in Congress
Al Gore
Al Franken
John Kennedy
Immanuel said:To progressives/liberals if you ask them what the word means it is that conservatives give in to their demands. If you ask a conservative it means both sides give a little to reach a middle ground.
Immanuel said:To progressives/liberals if you ask them what the word means it is that conservatives give in to their demands. If you ask a conservative it means both sides give a little to reach a middle ground.
Nice projection. Too bad the real world works in the opposite way. It wasn't the Democrats who shut down the government rather than compromise.
Al Gore
Al Franken
Anyone saying Gore or Franken cheated reveals themselves as a brainwashed hyper-partisan kook. Nobody except the nuttiest of the lunatic fringe is capable of making such a dishonest claim with a straight face..
John Kennedy
With wimmen, sure. But not with elections. Again, only the kookiest of the kooks try to pass off the debunked conspiracy theory about Kennedy stealing the election from Nixon.
Now, this does bring up an interesting issue. How does one compromise with people who hold a worldview that is pure bullshit fantasy? Not intelligent disagreement. We're talking flat-earth level conspiracy nonsense, like Avatar here, or a typical FOX News viewer
Immanuel said:To progressives/liberals if you ask them what the word means it is that conservatives give in to their demands. If you ask a conservative it means both sides give a little to reach a middle ground.
Nice projection. Too bad the real world works in the opposite way. It wasn't the Democrats who shut down the government rather than compromise.
Again:
Al Gore
Al Franken
John Kennedy
you gave three names and NO EVIDENCE of anything.
I gave you a 30 years of cases that culminated in a scotus decision.
YOUR PARTY cheats and the right wing leaning SCOTUS agrees your party needs to be punished for cheating non stop for 30 years.
Now what idiot?
Evidence is public record. And im not going to post it for you when I know you are going to completely ignore it.
Immanuel said:To progressives/liberals if you ask them what the word means it is that conservatives give in to their demands. If you ask a conservative it means both sides give a little to reach a middle ground.
Nice projection. Too bad the real world works in the opposite way. It wasn't the Democrats who shut down the government rather than compromise.
What are you smoking? It certainly was the Democrats who shut down the government rather than compromise. And they did so with glee trying to blame Republicans for it.
And you're claiming others are living in fantasy.
Al Gore
Al Franken
Anyone saying Gore or Franken cheated reveals themselves as a brainwashed hyper-partisan kook. Nobody except the nuttiest of the lunatic fringe is capable of making such a dishonest claim with a straight face..
Good thing it's not dishonest then. Al Gore tried to steal Florida in 2000. He was stopped.
Al Franken had votes magically appear from the back of someone's car. He wasn't.
John Kennedy
With wimmen, sure. But not with elections. Again, only the kookiest of the kooks try to pass off the debunked conspiracy theory about Kennedy stealing the election from Nixon.
Now, this does bring up an interesting issue. How does one compromise with people who hold a worldview that is pure bullshit fantasy? Not intelligent disagreement. We're talking flat-earth level conspiracy nonsense, like Avatar here, or a typical FOX News viewer
You are unfamiliar with the dead who voted in large numbers in Chicago? Nixon could have disputed it, but he had more class than future candidates.
Just because your ignorant of something doesn't mean the rest of us are.
Al Gore
Al Franken
Anyone saying Gore or Franken cheated reveals themselves as a brainwashed hyper-partisan kook. Nobody except the nuttiest of the lunatic fringe is capable of making such a dishonest claim with a straight face..
Good thing it's not dishonest then. Al Gore tried to steal Florida in 2000. He was stopped.
Al Franken had votes magically appear from the back of someone's car. He wasn't.
John Kennedy
With wimmen, sure. But not with elections. Again, only the kookiest of the kooks try to pass off the debunked conspiracy theory about Kennedy stealing the election from Nixon.
Now, this does bring up an interesting issue. How does one compromise with people who hold a worldview that is pure bullshit fantasy? Not intelligent disagreement. We're talking flat-earth level conspiracy nonsense, like Avatar here, or a typical FOX News viewer
You are unfamiliar with the dead who voted in large numbers in Chicago? Nixon could have disputed it, but he had more class than future candidates.
Just because your ignorant of something doesn't mean the rest of us are.
the people don't want your party
you have to CHEAT to gain office
The poll also showed that Democrats are generally more willing to compromise than Republicans or Independents. Over 60 percent of Democrats said that more compromise was preferable, while only 55 percent of Independents and 38 percent of Republicans agreed. In addition, Democrats preferred compromise over ideological intransigence by a 41 percent margin, while Republicans said they sought the same by only a 2 percent margin.
Self-identified Tea Party supporters notched the most significant opposition to compromise, with only 39 percent supporting some form of it. Nonetheless, 40 percent of Tea Partiers still preferred tangible results to ideological purity.
Poll: 53 Percent Favor Compromise in Congress
That is funny, but you need to define the word compromise. To progressives/liberals if you ask them what the word means it is that conservatives give in to their demands. If you ask a conservative it means both sides give a little to reach a middle ground.
Immanuel said:To progressives/liberals if you ask them what the word means it is that conservatives give in to their demands. If you ask a conservative it means both sides give a little to reach a middle ground.
Nice projection. Too bad the real world works in the opposite way. It wasn't the Democrats who shut down the government rather than compromise.
What are you smoking? It certainly was the Democrats who shut down the government rather than compromise. And they did so with glee trying to blame Republicans for it.
And you're claiming others are living in fantasy.