Votto
Diamond Member
- Oct 31, 2012
- 57,125
- 58,225
- 3,605
Stalin and Mao for the love of Christ. And yes, all three could be reasoned with.I'm not against disagreement, as long as it is BENEFICIAL.
I won't even so productive, because, you can be productive in a bad way.....
But if it helps the Country, the People, I think disagreement to find what works best is optimal.
Disagreement without an open mind is just noise.
Some people you can't reason with. For example, could one reason with Hitler? Stain? Moa?
For some, it's simply a matter of abject power. That is all that matters to them
All three were collectivists. Those in power today are also collectivists.