What a sinister government we have.

[The Irish Ram]

So did your children get the polio vaccine?

Yes, and they never got polio. Because it was a vaccine...

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

How about the creator of the mRNA serums? Can you believe him?

The creator?
The self proclaimed "inventor", and Malone just worked on mRNA technology, not the vaccine.
Two other doctors actually invented the vaccine in 1998.

How about 5 hours of EXPERT testimony? Can you believe the dr. and nurses and scientists that do this for a living??

"EXPERTS"?
Hand-picked by Dr. Ron Johnson?

Want a good tip?
Find out what they are pushing before they push it into your DNA...

If only they would, instead I have to listen to these nutjobs, root canals would be less painful.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Yes, and they never got polio. Because it was a vaccine...

It sure is and it involves such a regimen of shots.

In the United States receive inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) to protect against polio, or poliomyelitis. IPV is given by injection in the leg or arm, depending the person’s age. It may be given at the same time as other vaccines.

Children get four doses of IPV, with one dose at each of these ages:

• 2 months
• 4 months
• 6 through 18 months
• 4 through 6 years

Some “combination” vaccines (several different vaccines in the same shot) contain IPV, such as Pentacel (DTaP-IPV/Hib), Pediarix (DTaP-IPV-HepB), or Kinrix (DTaP-IPV). Children getting these vaccines may get one more (fifth) dose of IPV. It is safe for children to get a fifth dose of polio vaccine. For more information about using these combination vaccines.

Darn, it's mixed with other ingredients, needs four shots and may need a fifth.

Are you sure it's a "vaccine"?

 

[konradv]

No, it is not a vaccine by any description. And it does NOT provide protection. It makes you a carrier. You are being lied to. Go on a vax only cruise if you believe otherwise.
It does however make covid a part of your DNA. Your child's DNA. Our children are going to have a very hard time conceiving when the time comes. Spike proteins end up in the gonads and ovaries after you were assured that the proteins stay at the injection site. That was a lie.

The CDC actually changed the definition of a vaccine because covid didn't do what a vaccine requires. To find out the alarming truth and some gain of functions, Sen. Johnson held a 2 hour hearing of Drs, scientists, nurses, that ended up 5 hours long. 5 hours of expert testimony on how bad this particular gene therapy actually is for humans.

VIDEO RELEASE Sen. Ron Johnson COVID-19: A Second Opinion Panel Garners Over 800,000 Views in 24 Hours

www.ronjohnson.senate.gov

If you have children, watching that hearing should be mandatory. They are one of the targets. And pay attention to the testimony of the scientists telling us about the serum binding the cells that kill roaming cancer cells in our bodies.

Gain of function is such a sinister practice, that Obama had to un-ban it to get the serum to do what they wanted and did it 11 days before Trump took office to insure Trump got the blame.

I’ll go with the real scientists, not the pseudo-science for which outlets like Epoch Times are well known.

 

[there4eyeM]

What is more "sinister" than all the atmospheric testing that was done in the U.S.? It is nothing new that 'our' government 'experiments' with dubious consideration of the consequences. It is not clear that deception or bad intention are involved with covid, but it is certainly clear and proven that we have been lied to repeatedly in recent decades with often catastrophic results. No wonder so many question everything, including these health regulations. Yet, voters do not use their power to hold officials to account. We effectively forgive war crimes, embezzlement, treason and malfeasance by allowing it to go unpunished at the polls.

 

[playtime]

You should be leery of "Fact Checker," sites, the tend to reinforce the narrative of government and corporate elite billionaires that rule over you, and quash any questioning of the prominent epistemology, with out any regard to truth.

This Media Bias/Fact Check site, does not have a lot behind it to prove that its rating are, in fact, true. Have you noticed, only in the era when wealth concentration has become almost to obscene levels, and the emergence of the "Tea Party," and the "Occupy Movement," IOW popular populist movements questioning the ruling elites, do they need to roll out "fact checking," sites to gas light anyone who questions government or corporate power?

"Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC) is an American fact-checking website founded in 2015 by editor Dave M. Van Zandt.[1] It uses a 0-10 scale to rate sites on two areas: bias and factual accuracy. It has been criticised for its methodology and accuracy.[2]

<snip>

Criticism​

According to the Poynter Institute, "Media Bias/Fact Check is a widely cited source for news stories and even studies about misinformation, despite the fact that its method is in no way scientific,"[2] something that Media Bias/Fact Check does admit and, according to their website, their method is frequently updated.[8] In 2018, the Columbia Journalism Review described Media Bias/Fact Check as an amateur attempt at categorizing media bias and characterized their assessments as "subjective assessments [that] leave room for human biases, or even simple inconsistencies, to creep in".[3]"

Media Bias/Fact Check - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Criticism​

An image from the critical report by the Palmer Report

Various sites have criticised MFBC.[7] The Palmer Report published an article in April 2017 entitled Scam site “Media Bias Fact Check” caught cribbing its ratings from Wikipedia.[8]

The Poynter Institute, itself recommended by MFBC, wrote that "Media Bias/Fact Check is a widely cited source for news stories and even studies about misinformation, despite the fact that its method is in no way scientific."[9]

The site was #2 on a list of Zero Hedge's Top 9 “fakest ‘fake-news’ checkers.”[3]

Media Bias/Fact Check - Wikispooks

wikispooks.com

Exposing The 9 Fakest Fake-News Checkers​

Exposing The 9 Fakest Fake-News Checkers | Zero Hedge

"Trust us," they say. "We’ll help you navigate Facebook and filter out the fake news stories,” they promise. But just who are these self-appointed gatekeepers who claim to be the ultimate arbiters of what is or is not “fake news”?

web.archive.org

2. Media Bias Fact Check​

"MediaBIasFactCheck.com describes itself as “the most comprehensive media bias resource in the Internet.” The site is owned by Dave Van Zandt from North Carolina, who offers no biographical information about himself aside from the following: “Dave has been freelancing for 25+ years for a variety of print and web mediums (sic), with a focus on media bias and the role of media in politics. Dave is a registered Non-Affiliated voter who values evidence based reporting” and, “Dave Van Zandt obtained a Communications Degree before pursuing a higher degree in the sciences. Dave currently works full time in the health care industry. Dave has spent more than 20 years as an arm chair researcher on media bias and its role in political influence.”

WND was unable to locate a single article with Van Zandt’s byline. Ironically, the “fact checker” fails to establish his own credibility by disclosing his qualifications and training in evaluating news sources.

Asked for information concerning his expertise in the field of journalism and evaluating news sources, Van Zandt told WND: “I am not a journalist and just a person who is interested in how media bias impacts politics. You will find zero claims of expertise on the website.”

Concerning his purported “25+ years” of experience writing for print and web media, he said: “I am not sure why the 25+ years is still on the website. That was removed a year ago when I first started the website. All of the writing I did was small print news zines from the ’90s. I felt that what I wrote in the ’90s is not related to what I am doing today so I removed it. Again, I am not a journalist. I simply have a background in communications and more importantly science where I learned to value evidence over all else. Through this I also became interested in research of all kinds, especially media bias, which is difficult to measure and is subjective to a degree.”

WND asked: Were your evaluations reviewed by any experts in the industry?

“I can’t say they have,” Van Zandt replied. “Though the right-of-center Atlantic Council is using our data for a project they are working on.”



Van Zandt says he uses “three volunteers” to “research and assist in fact checking.” However, he adds that he doesn’t pay them for their services.

Van Zandt lists WND on his “Right Bias” page, alongside news organizations such as Fox News, the Drudge Report, the Washington Free Beacon, the Daily Wire, the Blaze, Breitbart, Red State, Project Veritas, PJ Media, National Review, Daily Caller and others.

“These media sources are highly biased toward conservative causes,” Van Zandt writes. “They utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Sources in this category may be untrustworthy.”

His special notes concerning WND link to Snopes.com and PolitiFact.com, websites that have their own questionable reputations and formulas as so-called “fact checkers.” (See the “Snopes” and “PolitiFact” entries below.)

Van Zandt says he uses a “strict methodology” in determining which news sources are credible, but his website offers vague and typo-ridden explanations of his criteria, such as the following:



Asked if his own political leanings influence his evaluations, Van Zandt said: “Sure it is possible. However, our methodology is designed to eliminate most of that. We also have a team of 4 researchers with different political leanings so that we can further reduce researcher bias.”

Bill Palmer of the website Daily News Bin accused Van Zandt of retaliating when the Daily News Bin contacted him about his rating. Palmer wrote:



But Van Zandt accused Palmer of threatening him, and he said MediaBiasFactCheck welcomes criticism. If evidence is provided, he said, the site will correct its errors.

“Bottom line is, we are not trying to be something we are not,” he said. “We have disclaimers on every page of the website indicating that our method is not scientifically proven and that there is [sic] subjective judgments being used as it is unavoidable with determining bias.”

every friggin' source you gave is biased.

now tell me how they rated CNN & MSNBC as liberal/left is wrong. lol ...

as for their fact checking?

International Fact-Checking Network​

Empowering fact-checkers worldwide​

International Fact-Checking Network - Poynter

 

[The Irish Ram]

It sure is and it involves such a regimen of shots.

In the United States receive inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) to protect against polio, or poliomyelitis. IPV is given by injection in the leg or arm, depending the person’s age. It may be given at the same time as other vaccines.

Children get four doses of IPV, with one dose at each of these ages:

• 2 months
• 4 months
• 6 through 18 months
• 4 through 6 years

Some “combination” vaccines (several different vaccines in the same shot) contain IPV, such as Pentacel (DTaP-IPV/Hib), Pediarix (DTaP-IPV-HepB), or Kinrix (DTaP-IPV). Children getting these vaccines may get one more (fifth) dose of IPV. It is safe for children to get a fifth dose of polio vaccine. For more information about using these combination vaccines.

Darn, it's mixed with other ingredients, needs four shots and may need a fifth.

Are you sure it's a "vaccine"?

No, the actual polio vaccine was one dose on a sugar cube. And those who took it never got polio.

Fast forward to the Gates polio giving "vaccine":
To combat vaccine-derived polio outbreaks, WHO has been deploying a rapid response team in Africa since last fall.
"It's actually an interesting conundrum. The very tool you are using for [polio] eradication is causing the problem," Raul Andino, a professor of microbiology at the University of California, San Francisco, told NPR in 2017

 

[MisterBeale]

every friggin' source you gave is biased.

now tell me how they rated CNN & MSNBC as liberal/left is wrong. lol ...

as for their fact checking?

International Fact-Checking Network​

Empowering fact-checkers worldwide​

International Fact-Checking Network - Poynter

Fake news blacklist

In 2019, Poynter used various "fake news" databases (including those curated by the Annenberg Public Policy Center, Merrimack College, PolitiFact, and Snopes) to compile a list of over 515 news websites that it labeled "unreliable". Poynter called on advertisers to "blacklist" the sites on the list. The list included conservative news websites such as the Washington Examiner, The Washington Free Beacon, and The Daily Signal. After backlash, Poynter retracted the list, citing "weaknesses in the methodology".[26] Poynter issued a statement, saying: "We regret that we failed to ensure that the data was rigorous before publication, and apologize for the confusion and agitation caused by its publication."[27] Reason magazine says that in May 2019, the Poynter Institute retracted a List of 500 Fake news Sites, many of them conservative news and Think tank websites.[28]

Poynter Institute - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Who Fact Checks the Fact Checkers? A Report on Media Censorship

"When we see fact checkers like NewsGuard, who not only fail to uphold their high-sounding principles but even publicly encourage working with the government to suppress speech, we should raise red flags." ~ Phillip W. Magness & Ethan Yang

www.aier.org

It would seem, even the sources you like, are biased.

But you would prefer to believe, they are not.

 

[konradv]

No, the actual polio vaccine was one dose on a sugar cube. And those who took it never got polio.

Fast forward to the Gates polio giving "vaccine":
To combat vaccine-derived polio outbreaks, WHO has been deploying a rapid response team in Africa since last fall.
"It's actually an interesting conundrum. The very tool you are using for [polio] eradication is causing the problem," Raul Andino, a professor of microbiology at the University of California, San Francisco, told NPR in 2017

There are two polio vaccines. The Salk vaccine is an injection, while the Sabin is the drop on a sugar cube. That being said, it has nothing to do with the Covid vaccines, if that’s where this narrative is heading.

 

[The Irish Ram]

I’ll go with the real scientists, not the pseudo-science for which outlets like Epoch Times are well known.

Be sure all your kids and grandkids get the injections. At least some good might come of this...

 

[The Irish Ram]

There are two polio vaccines. The Salk vaccine is an injection, while the Sabin is the drop on a sugar cube. That being said, it has nothing to do with the Covid vaccines, if that’s where this narrative is heading.

Surada asked a question about the polio vaccine. I answered it. It is a good representation of a vaccine vs a serum though...

Did a lot of people contract polio after receiving the actual polio vaccine Salk gave us?
How many have contracted polio after getting the new and improved Bill Gates serum?
What is the difference between a vaccine and a serum?

 

[konradv]

Be sure all your kids and grandkids get the injections. At least some good might come of this...

Don’t worry I will and will be laughing at your stupid ass for believing Epoch Times.

 

[konradv]

Nope, not according to the community immunization argument theory ruling back in the early 1900s, in Cambridge, Massachusetts based on resident Henning Jacobson. If it doesn't provide immunization to the community, than, a person need not be subjected to the possible harms. It is a personal choice then.

Wow, you really missed the whole point of the article and those various state laws.

But the Covid vaccines DO provide protection, so your story is pointless.

 

[MisterBeale]

But the Covid vaccines DO provide protection, so your story is pointless.

Fine. Who cares.

That is NOT what the SCOTUS ruled as the legal justification on forcing the population to take them though. The legal justification was, if a person were to get inoculated, it would prevent transmission throughout the population, which these, clearly do not do. Entire populations of jabbed folks, still transmit it to each other.

Thus. . . these do not meet that definition. They only protect.

We are going around in circles here.

You are either woefully lacking in logic, or a shill.

Individual "protection," is not a compelling state interest to violate bodily autonomy. Sorry.

Only community transmission. AND THESE DO NOT STOP TRANSMISSION.

 

[The Irish Ram]

Don’t worry I will and will be laughing at your stupid ass for believing Epoch Times.

You forgot about all those testimonies at the senate hearing from all over the world. I believe them too.
You'll be dead from covid. We'll bury you in the family plot.

 

[Colin norris]

Would you take chemo gene therapy if you didn't have cancer? Would you make your child take it? Then why let our lying government insist we take their gene therapy?
Read this before you subject your family to government experimentation:

The Difference Between mRNA Injections and Vaccines

www.theepochtimes.com

The epoch times.
That left wing communist backed rag.

 

[The Irish Ram]

That and the senate hearing, and the Pfizer list. And apparently they are all wrong except you. Your credentials are from where again?

 

[theHawk]

To trigger an immune response, many vaccines put a weakened or inactivated germ into our bodies. Not mRNA vaccines. Instead, mRNA vaccines use mRNA created in a laboratory to teach our cells how to make a protein—or even just a piece of a protein—that triggers an immune response inside our bodies.

Understanding mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines | CDC​

Except that the mRNA never subjects your body to the actual virus, hence no long term immunity. Just artificial spike protein production, and the body making antigens for them. Such antigen production is normally temporary when fighting a virus, but with mRNA and “booster” shots, it goes on and on and on. This injections are garbage, we have no long term studies to know the long term effects of them. We know the short term can cause blood clots, strokes, myocarditis, ITP, Bell’s Palsy, among many other side effects and health problems, plus of course death.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

No, the actual polio vaccine was one dose on a sugar cube. And those who took it never got polio.

Not true.
Back then they gave two doses, one month apart, until Salk came out with his vaccine.

Virus Polio Type 1, strain LSc, 2ab and 106.0 CCID50 Virus Polio Type 3, strain Leon 12a, 1b

Polio Sabin One and Three (oral) cannot be given at the same time as other live attenuated vaccines, an interval of at least one month should be left between both vaccinations. Immunosuppressive treatment may reduce the immune response, may favour the multiplication of the vaccine viruses and may increase the length of excretion of the vaccine viruses in the stools

Fast forward to the Gates polio giving "vaccine":
To combat vaccine-derived polio outbreaks, WHO has been deploying a rapid response team in Africa since last fall.
"It's actually an interesting conundrum. The very tool you are using for [polio] eradication is causing the problem," Raul Andino, a professor of microbiology at the University of California, San Francisco, told NPR in 2017

Could be, fast-forward to 2020.

The World Health Organization says a new polio outbreak in Sudan is linked to an ongoing vaccine-sparked epidemic in Chad — a week after the U.N. health agency declared the African continent free of the wild polio virus.

In a statement this week, WHO said two children in Sudan — one from South Darfur state and the other from Gedarif state, close to the border with Ethiopia and Eritrea — were paralyzed in March and April. Both had been recently vaccinated against polio. WHO said initial outbreak investigations show the cases are linked to an ongoing vaccine-derived outbreak in Chad that was first detected last year and is now spreading in Chad and Cameroon.

The World Health Organization says a new polio outbreak in Sudan is linked to an ongoing vaccine-sparked epidemic in Chad — a week after the U.N. health agency declared the African continent free of the wild polio virus.

In a statement this week, WHO said two children in Sudan — one from South Darfur state and the other from Gedarif state, close to the border with Ethiopia and Eritrea — were paralyzed in March and April. Both had been recently vaccinated against polio. WHO said initial outbreak investigations show the cases are linked to an ongoing vaccine-derived outbreak in Chad that was first detected last year and is now spreading in Chad and Cameroon.

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

Would you take chemo gene therapy if you didn't have cancer? Would you make your child take it? Then why let our lying government insist we take their gene therapy?
Read this before you subject your family to government experimentation:

The Difference Between mRNA Injections and Vaccines

www.theepochtimes.com

The good news is that all the people that have been lying to you have now deboooonked the Ukrainian bio labs


We have the most honest caring government in the whole wide world

I saw some schmuck with Florida plates on the road today .....what's he got on both sides of his back windows ...those little flags.....they weren't American flags they were Ukrainian flags ....

Couldn't resist I motioned to him to roll down his window then proceeded to ask him how long has he been "a nazi sympathizer you fucking fag"

The woman he was riding with had more balls

Reeeeee