What are your attitudes about Homosexuals?

[Derideo_Te]

Finally! A gay person admits prison rapists are infact homosexual!
Never have I seen a gay admit that. Thanks, Wytchy!

SW did nothing of the sort. Conflating violent prison rape with same sex love is about as ludicrous as it gets. That perversion was all on you, LJ.

Mike Tyson explains how gay prison love starts:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cROJW9Jn3ds&feature=youtube_gdata_player]I'll fuck you till you love me faggot - YouTube[/ame]

Mike Tyson is not qualified.

That this is the source for your misinformation on the topic says volumes.

 

[Derideo_Te]

there is Zero concrete evidence of genetic causes of homosexuality, so your point is null & void.

Actually heteros do not produce Homosexual children, not out of the womb anyway. They simply produce Babies. Homosexuality is a psychosis that develops in the formulative years.

But concedeing the highly unlikely possibility that there could conceivably be a genetic basis for some instances of Homosexuality - Then I would simply answer your parroted question with:

Heteros also produce Mongoloid Children - does that make them desirable ?

You argument is a psychosis that develops from fear of the unknown, GreenBeanSnow.

All children are desirable. That you would think differently reveals much about you.

You would be one to abort a mongoloid fetus, wouldn't you?

You would abort a fetus genetically disposed to homosexuality.

BZZZT Wrong!

Epigenetics Is A Critical Factor In Homosexuality - Medical News Today

Epigenetics is a Key Player in Sexual Preference Epi-marks act as another layer of information fused to our genes that control their expression. Essentially, genes hold the directions, while epi-marks instruct how they are put into motion and completed.

Historically, epi-marks are eliminated and created anew with each generation, but new research shows that they can occasionally pass over between generations, causing similarities within families and appearing as shared genes.

Sex-specific epi-marks are made during early fetal development and serve as security against the considerable natural variation in testosterone that happens in late fetal development. For example, sex-specific epi-marks prevent female fetuses from becoming masculine when there are unusually high testosterone levels present, and vice versa for male fetuses.

Different kinds of epi-marks safeguard different sex-specific characteristics; some protect the genitals, others protect sexual identity, and this study suggests others keep safe sexual partner preference.

When these epi-marks are passed between generations from fathers to daughters or mothers to sons, they have the potential to result in reverse effects. The outcome is feminization of characteristics in sons or masculinization of some characteristics in daughters, occasionally affecting sexual preference.

This study provides an answer to the evolutionary mystery of homosexuality, suggesting that "sexually antagonistic" epi-marks can, at times, pass from generation to generation and result in homosexuality in opposite-sex children. The mathematical modeling shows that the coding of the genes for these epi-marks can spread in the population easily because they invariably raise the fitness of the parent, but are very rarely erased and do not reduce fitness in their children.

The study's co-author Sergey Gavrilets, NIMBioS' associate director for scientific activities and a professor at the University of Tennessee-Knoxville, concluded, "Transmission of sexually antagonistic epi-marks between generations is the most plausible evolutionary mechanism of the phenomenon of human homosexuality."

 

[JakeStarkey]

Lj thinks he is some kind of expert on homosexuality.

Hmmm.

Yeah, genetic influence on homosexuality is pretty much proven.

 

[LockeJaw]

Dirideo, Im going to put you on ignore pretty soon here if you do not admit your lie that I endorses a society-wide ban on gay propaganda if it offends religious people.

Reply to the post where I have proven you're a knee jerk lying liberal before I give this reply any more attention.

 

[NLT]

lj thinks he is some kind of expert on homosexuality.

Hmmm.

Yeah, genetic influence on homosexuality is pretty much proven.

bfs

 

[Nosmo King]

Dirideo, Im going to put you on ignore pretty soon here if you do not admit your lie that I endorses a society-wide ban on gay propaganda if it offends religious people.

Reply to the post where I have proven you're a knee jerk lying liberal before I give this reply any more attention.

A society wide ban, eh? There's that pesky constitution again!

You have no right NOT to be offended.

We're not talking about pornography here. We are indeed talking about ideas. What part of our constitution says we can ban ideas?

What the repressive class fails to understand is, our constitution protects unpopular rights. Those unpopular folks are the ones in need of protection.

 

[JakeStarkey]

lj thinks he is some kind of expert on homosexuality.

Hmmm.

Yeah, genetic influence on homosexuality is pretty much proven.

bfs

That's pretty much what the Romans said when told Jesus had risen from dead.

The evidence, LJ and Pop23 and whoever you are that PMd me, is pretty much conclusive that homosexuality is hard wired to a great extent.

 

[LockeJaw]

They are claiming to have concretely proven epigenic causes in that headline, but it's not true. I have emails stating this from contacting the scientists involved in the study of it, you need to stop. They say it is "promising", not PROVEN.

Eeeee! So you're wrong!

 

[JakeStarkey]

Dirideo, Im going to put you on ignore pretty soon here if you do not admit your lie that I endorses a society-wide ban on gay propaganda if it offends religious people.

Reply to the post where I have proven you're a knee jerk lying liberal before I give this reply any more attention.

A society wide ban, eh? There's that pesky constitution again!

You have no right NOT to be offended.

We're not talking about pornography here. We are indeed talking about ideas. What part of our constitution says we can ban ideas?

What the repressive class fails to understand is, our constitution protects unpopular rights. Those unpopular folks are the ones in need of protection.

Lj wants the small majority who believe as he does to control literature in the schools on the issue.

He does not have such a constitutional right.

 

[JakeStarkey]

They are claiming to have concretely proven epigenic causes in that headline, but it's not true. I have emails stating this from contacting the scientists involved in the study of it, you need to stop. They say it is "promising", not PROVEN. Eeeee! So you're wrong!

No, you haven't, and, no, you won't. And you won't place your propaganda in public schools.

 

[LockeJaw]

Dirideo, Im going to put you on ignore pretty soon here if you do not admit your lie that I endorses a society-wide ban on gay propaganda if it offends religious people.

Reply to the post where I have proven you're a knee jerk lying liberal before I give this reply any more attention.

A society wide ban, eh? There's that pesky constitution again!

You have no right NOT to be offended.

We're not talking about pornography here. We are indeed talking about ideas. What part of our constitution says we can ban ideas?

What the repressive class fails to understand is, our constitution protects unpopular rights. Those unpopular folks are the ones in need of protection.

Another stupid knee jerk liberal doesn't comprehend what I said! What a surprise*sarcasm*! All you saw was that one line? Are you blind, dummy?

I said Derideo LIED about me supporting a society wide ban on homosexual propaganda, that means, Moron, that I DiD NOT advocate it.

Why are you people so slow-witted?!!!

 

[R.D.]

Immaterial question.

We know same sex partners are being targeted by the confused far right.

And courted by you hard-core Democrats. A little latent something in that for pajama-wearing deniers?

Log Cabin Republicans? Many of us in the GOP despise the parasitic far social conservative right, like you HBH.

Every time you post that it make me giggle

 

[Nosmo King]

Dirideo, Im going to put you on ignore pretty soon here if you do not admit your lie that I endorses a society-wide ban on gay propaganda if it offends religious people.

Reply to the post where I have proven you're a knee jerk lying liberal before I give this reply any more attention.

A society wide ban, eh? There's that pesky constitution again!

You have no right NOT to be offended.

We're not talking about pornography here. We are indeed talking about ideas. What part of our constitution says we can ban ideas?

What the repressive class fails to understand is, our constitution protects unpopular rights. Those unpopular folks are the ones in need of protection.

Another stupid knee jerk liberal doesn't comprehend what I said! What a surprise*sarcasm*! All you saw was that one line? Are you blind, dummy?

I said Derideo LIED about me supporting a society wide ban on homosexual propaganda, that means, Moron, that I DiD NOT advocate it.

Why are you people so slow-witted?!!!

Bless your heart.

 

[Ibentoken]

Lj thinks he is some kind of expert on homosexuality.

Hmmm.

Yeah, genetic influence on homosexuality is pretty much proven.

Who is the geneticist doing that study?

 

[LockeJaw]

They are claiming to have concretely proven epigenic causes in that headline, but it's not true. I have emails stating this from contacting the scientists involved in the study of it, you need to stop. They say it is "promising", not PROVEN. Eeeee! So you're wrong!

No, you haven't, and, no, you won't. And you won't place your propaganda in public schools.

Yea I do, you little faggot. On my home PC, and when I get home...I will post them with my name & email omitted.

You're a lying little punk & you accuse me of lying? Fuck off, troll!

 

[Ibentoken]

They are claiming to have concretely proven epigenic causes in that headline, but it's not true. I have emails stating this from contacting the scientists involved in the study of it, you need to stop. They say it is "promising", not PROVEN. Eeeee! So you're wrong!

No, you haven't, and, no, you won't. And you won't place your propaganda in public schools.

Nothing you can do about it. We're going to remove the federal government and unions from indoctrinating our kids. You educate your own kids and we'll do the same. God Bless America.

 

[JakeStarkey]

And courted by you hard-core Democrats. A little latent something in that for pajama-wearing deniers?

Log Cabin Republicans? Many of us in the GOP despise the parasitic far social conservative right, like you HBH.

Every time you post that it make me giggle

Glad to entertain children like you.

 

[R.D.]

Log Cabin Republicans? Many of us in the GOP despise the parasitic far social conservative right, like you HBH.

Every time you post that it make me giggle

Glad to entertain children like you.

 

[JakeStarkey]

They are claiming to have concretely proven epigenic causes in that headline, but it's not true. I have emails stating this from contacting the scientists involved in the study of it, you need to stop. They say it is "promising", not PROVEN. Eeeee! So you're wrong!

No, you haven't, and, no, you won't. And you won't place your propaganda in public schools.

Yea I do, you little faggot. On my home PC, and when I get home...I will post them with my name & email omitted. You're a lying little punk & you accuse me of lying? Fuck off, troll!

Post the emails clearly as to who is writing you. It is good to not post your name. I am never one to take reprisal or try to find folks out, but, believe me, there are some real fools like that on the Board. Also post a link to the research online if it is there.

 

[JakeStarkey]

They are claiming to have concretely proven epigenic causes in that headline, but it's not true. I have emails stating this from contacting the scientists involved in the study of it, you need to stop. They say it is "promising", not PROVEN. Eeeee! So you're wrong!

No, you haven't, and, no, you won't. And you won't place your propaganda in public schools.

Nothing you can do about it. We're going to remove the federal government and unions from indoctrinating our kids. You educate your own kids and we'll do the same. God Bless America.

No, you haven't and no you won't.

Home and private schooling is fine for the likes of you.