What are your attitudes about Homosexuals?

[JakeStarkey]

Christian businesses are being targeted, but the queer trash will never admit it.

What a silly comment. You have homosexuals in your congregation, I bet.

The great majority of American homosexuals are Christian.

You seem as obsessive as Pop23.

 

[GreenBean]

.

Couple of questions.


That's a loaded question - If I printed tee shirts lets say, and a nazi came in and ordered 1,000 shirts that said "Kill the Jews" - Yes- I should have the right to refuse service. Because it's something I find highly objectional .

If a Queer walked in and ordered shirts that said "I Suck Dick" I'd throw his ass out in half a heart beat and I would have every right to do so.

If a Queer Nazi walked in and ordered shirts that said "Eat at Joes" - with no objectional or vile content - then he should be given service .

If a Democrat walked in and ordered shirts that said "Vote forMe" it would be pretty stupid to turn down his business -simply because I am gonna vote for the other guy - Do I have a right to tell him NO ? You Betcha -but I'd be a very foolish businessman to do so.

Do you believe a gay baker has the right to refuse service to a heterosexual couple?

it would be pretty stupid to turn down their business -simply because your a pervert and their not - Does he have a right to tell him NO ? You Betcha -but he'd be a very foolish businessman to do so.


The queers involved in the Bakery Case were engaged in something the baker found detestable, and chances are thats why they chose him - to create an issue. They came and asked for a cake that basically said "WE suck Dick" and yes he had every right torefuse them.

Hitler was never considered progressive, he often cited his admiration for Bismarck. The Weimar Republic was attempting to be "progressive", never Hitler. Nor does your imaginary meaning to a wedding cake change the purpose thereof.

Hitler was never considered progressive

I beg to differ Bozo ...

Just as progressives were generally enthusiastic about socialist movements in the Soviet Union and Europe, they were also overwhelmingly supportive of the fascist movements in Italy and Germany during the 1920s and 1930s. “In many respects,” writes journalist Jonah Goldberg, “the founding fathers of modern liberalism, the men and women who laid the intellectual groundwork of the New Deal and the welfare state, thought that fascism sounded like ... a worthwhile 'experiment'”:
Progressive Support for Italian and German Fascism - Discover the Networks

 

[Ibentoken]

I forwarded your opinion onto SCOTUS, and I am sure they will rule tomorrow for you.

No rebuttal to my post? I didn't think so. That pesky constitution got you mumbling to yourself.

You are simply mental, and I am not saying that meanly.

You are simply Constitutionally challenged: that's what the clerk of the court send back to me.

Really, Ibentoken if you want serious discussion, you have to be serious. The Pop23 approach only amuses most of the Board.

Don't be a chew toy.

Let me know when you understand forced servitude and liberty. Ready when you are.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Perhaps you haven't noticed but.....

Nature makes us attracted to the opposite sex so that our species continues. There is no choice, only the irrational choose against nature.

Holly follows what is rational and natural. I follow what is rational and natural. YOU choosing against the rational and the natural is at question, nothing else.

Your opinion is just that, nothing more. Heteros produce homosexuals, that is natural as well.

Actually heteros do not produce Homosexual children, not out of the womb anyway. They simply produce Babies. Homosexuality is a psychosis that develops in the formulative years.

But concedeing the highly unlikely possibility that there could conceivably be a genetic basis for some instances of Homosexuality - Then I would simply answer your parroted question with:

Heteros also produce Mongoloid Children - does that make them desirable ?

You argument is a psychosis that develops from fear of the unknown, GreenBeanSnow.

All children are desirable. That you would think differently reveals much about you.

You would be one to abort a mongoloid fetus, wouldn't you?

You would abort a fetus genetically disposed to homosexuality.

 

[GreenBean]

93% of America does not care.

.

Couple of questions.


That's a loaded question - If I printed tee shirts lets say, and a nazi came in and ordered 1,000 shirts that said "Kill the Jews" - Yes- I should have the right to refuse service. Because it's something I find highly objectional .

If a Queer walked in and ordered shirts that said "I Suck Dick" I'd throw his ass out in half a heart beat and I would have every right to do so.

If a Queer Nazi walked in and ordered shirts that said "Eat at Joes" - with no objectional or vile content - then he should be given service .

If a Democrat walked in and ordered shirts that said "Vote forMe" it would be pretty stupid to turn down his business -simply because I am gonna vote for the other guy - Do I have a right to tell him NO ? You Betcha -but I'd be a very foolish businessman to do so.

Do you believe a gay baker has the right to refuse service to a heterosexual couple?

it would be pretty stupid to turn down their business -simply because your a pervert and their not - Does he have a right to tell him NO ? You Betcha -but he'd be a very foolish businessman to do so.


The queers involved in the Bakery Case were engaged in something the baker found detestable, and chances are thats why they chose him - to create an issue. They came and asked for a cake that basically said "WE suck Dick" and yes he had every right torefuse them.

And 95% thinks you're still an asshole - Grow up lil faggot

 

[Ibentoken]

Christian businesses are being targeted, but the queer trash will never admit it.

What a silly comment. You have homosexuals in your congregation, I bet.

The great majority of American homosexuals are Christian.

You seem as obsessive as Pop23.

That's hysterical. The Robertson family and Chik Filet weren't targeted, huh.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Do you deny Christian businesses are being targeted?

Immaterial question.

We know same sex partners are being targeted by the confused far right.

 

[JakeStarkey]

And 95% thinks you're still an asshole - Grow up lil faggot

And you wonder why you rank up there with Yurt as the Board's chew toys?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Christian businesses are being targeted, but the queer trash will never admit it.

What a silly comment. You have homosexuals in your congregation, I bet.

The great majority of American homosexuals are Christian.

You seem as obsessive as Pop23.

That's hysterical. The Robertson family and Chik Filet weren't targeted, huh.

For behavior, not religion.

Have you threatened businesses with Christian ownership and management or Christian churches that support marriage equality?

 

[HenryBHough]

Do you deny Christian businesses are being targeted?

Immaterial question.

We know same sex partners are being targeted by the confused far right.

And courted by you hard-core Democrats. A little latent something in that for pajama-wearing deniers?

 

[JakeStarkey]

GreenBean Snow. I will ask again.

You would be one to abort a mongoloid fetus, wouldn't you?

You would abort a fetus genetically disposed to homosexuality, wouldn't you?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Do you deny Christian businesses are being targeted?

Immaterial question.

We know same sex partners are being targeted by the confused far right.

And courted by you hard-core Democrats. A little latent something in that for pajama-wearing deniers?

Log Cabin Republicans? Many of us in the GOP despise the parasitic far social conservative right, like you HBH.

 

[hipeter924]

Finally! A gay person admits prison rapists are infact homosexual!
Never have I seen a gay admit that. Thanks, Wytchy!

SW did nothing of the sort. Conflating violent prison rape with same sex love is about as ludicrous as it gets. That perversion was all on you, LJ.

Mike Tyson explains how gay prison love starts:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cROJW9Jn3ds&feature=youtube_gdata_player]I'll fuck you till you love me faggot - YouTube[/ame]

Tyson is a wife beater and convicted rapist, he was refused entry to New Zealand for being a threat to society. Don't like hard prisoners or prison staff, both types of people are perverts and sickos in most cases, as power corrupts.

 

[Ibentoken]

Yes, the queers who targeted the Robertson family and Chik Filet were Christians. Right. Dan Savage is also a Christian, huh.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Yes, the queers who targeted the Robertson family and Chik Filet were Christians. Right. Dan Savage is also a Christian, huh.

Can't deny that Christians support marriage equality.

Hurts, doesn't it?

And you know as I do if you could organize to go after a business or a Christian church that supported marriage equality, you would do so.

 

[Ibentoken]

Yes, the queers who targeted the Robertson family and Chik Filet were Christians. Right. Dan Savage is also a Christian, huh.

Can't deny that Christians support marriage equality.

Hurts, doesn't it?

And you know as I do if you could organize to go after a business or a Christian church that supported marriage equality, you would do so.

Stay on topic. Why would queer Christians attack the Robertson family and Chik Filet who are Christians?

 

[LockeJaw]

there is Zero concrete evidence of genetic causes of homosexuality, so your point is null & void.

Your opinion is just that, nothing more. Heteros produce homosexuals, that is natural as well.

Actually heteros do not produce Homosexual children, not out of the womb anyway. They simply produce Babies. Homosexuality is a psychosis that develops in the formulative years.

But concedeing the highly unlikely possibility that there could conceivably be a genetic basis for some instances of Homosexuality - Then I would simply answer your parroted question with:

Heteros also produce Mongoloid Children - does that make them desirable ?

You argument is a psychosis that develops from fear of the unknown, GreenBeanSnow.

All children are desirable. That you would think differently reveals much about you.

You would be one to abort a mongoloid fetus, wouldn't you?

You would abort a fetus genetically disposed to homosexuality.

 

[GreenBean]

Your opinion is just that, nothing more. Heteros produce homosexuals, that is natural as well.

Actually heteros do not produce Homosexual children, not out of the womb anyway. They simply produce Babies. Homosexuality is a psychosis that develops in the formulative years.

But concedeing the highly unlikely possibility that there could conceivably be a genetic basis for some instances of Homosexuality - Then I would simply answer your parroted question with:

Heteros also produce Mongoloid Children - does that make them desirable ?

blah blah balh

.

You argument is a psychosis that develops from fear of the unknown, GreenBeanSnow.

Nope - never said that -and I don't have a degree in elementary education ,so I can't explain it you litle boy - HARK .... Don't I hear your Mother Calling you - go Home Jakey boy !

]All children are desirable. .

Yes - all children are desirable if you're a pedophile . And the reason for the Amneosynthesis is to help identify birth defects such a Down Syndrome, and a host of other potential birth defects. Parents are forced to make tough decisions every day based on the outcome of these tests. I for one wold certainly tread carefully on that topic faggot. You can't possibly understand the pain unless you've been there.

You would be one to abort a mongoloid fetus, wouldn't you?

I've never been there either - by the Grace of God my Children were all healthy.

Who do the Fuck do you think you are to condemn and ridcule somebody because of a tear jerking heart braking Life and Death decision they had to make regarding their Child -you fucking low life scumball piece of Shit !

You would abort a fetus genetically disposed to homosexuality

See the Above .


PS: And stop Private Messaging Me - I Told you - NO ! you can not .......! and stop sending me pictures if your ....... they will simply be deleted. What part of I am Straight did you not understand !!!!

 

[Silhouette]

I do believe forcing religious institutions to recognize them as married would have a lot less support than just letting them marry. I for one only support gay marriage as long as religious institutions can say they don't have to serve them.

That's because you don't have any of your own children. If you did, your perspective would change in a nanosecond. If you did, you would instantly see how the entire social matrix around your child was a classroom, and not just the drab walls and chain link of the schoolyard. You think learning stops once they step out of there?

Promoting gay marriage is exactly the same thing as promoting homosexuality. Surely you cannot be that dense. Marriage is the top tier, the acme, the apex of adult human achievement as far as social bonding goes and sexuality. It is the mooring to which all the crazy ships in this weird sea try to get to and tie up. Or at least it used to be. It's rusted, needs welding and some new links in the chain to its anchor, but promoting gay marriage is the final blow to its withering integrity.

Then all those ships will bash against each other willy nilly until there's nothing left in the harbor but splintered wood. What vessel will the children sail on then? You're a pirate as well as a crow. I thought you'd like the analogy.

Rather clever analogy, I'll give you that. But I still disagree with your claim. Marriage for gays does not mean they have "Holy Matrimony". And I'll teach any children I might have in the future that.


Specifically addressing your analogy, why does gay marriage have to interfere with the mooring heterosexual marriage is? If heterosexual marriage is considered separate from homosexual marriage, the blow need not fall on it.

Your influence over your theoretical children unfortunately would be like pissing in the wind over the greater influence over ALL children in our culture that the potent message via marriage that "gay is OK" would have. You can't be everywhere.

And hence the reason the concept and social embracing of gay marriage is the real concern and not how each individual apart from others handles it. It's the overall influence it will have on the greater culture we live in. Not in your house. Broaden the scope of your lens a bit.

The thing is that legally and from an observer's point of view, gay marriage will be one and the same as hetero. Our legal system cannot discriminate once they ascend to that privelege. So they'll get the same access to orphaned kids to adopt, the same "what they do is normal" curriculum forced into school sex ed classes. And this presents problems given their spoken and public affiliation with and defensive regard for a man who preyed sexually on teen boys. [see my signature].

Yes, put a new lens on that scope you're looking through. Widen your range a bit beyond just how gay marriage affects you or your theoretical children. Then you'll see where we are coming from.

 

[LockeJaw]

SW did nothing of the sort. Conflating violent prison rape with same sex love is about as ludicrous as it gets. That perversion was all on you, LJ.

Mike Tyson explains how gay prison love starts:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cROJW9Jn3ds&feature=youtube_gdata_player]I'll fuck you till you love me faggot - YouTube[/ame]

Tyson is a wife beater and convicted rapist, he was refused entry to New Zealand for being a threat to society. Don't like hard prisoners or prison staff, both types of people are perverts and sickos in most cases, as power corrupts.

It's pretty well known by people in the prison system that while locked up he was a homosexual predator. That why I used that video, not because I hold him in high regard. I wasn't prison staff, but I worked as a gang intelligence expert for 5 years to many prisons from CA to WA state.