Is Kamala Black?

Before 1964, Kamala Harris would have been Black enough to be subjected to Jim Crowe.

Why, suddenly, is she no longer “Black enough”?

Same applies to Obama.
 
images
It is Progs who introduce race into everything. And some fools who are Republican take the mantle while most do not care. We get lied to from Progs and that is what the whole issue ever is. Anyway, our nation is in decline. I say to you how important that is and Progs do not care. Which makes it understandable how 2nd and 3rd world nation people vote for this. The United States should be so much richer with a healthier foundation.
 
AGAIN:

And? Her father has mixed race.

Harris's paternal grandmother, born Christiana Brown, told Harris that she was descended from Irish-born plantation owner Hamilton Brown (1776–1843)

Neither parent was born here, so she isn't African-American nor black. But that ISN'T the point of the Coulter article in the OP.

And her father is a Marxist. The acorn didn't fall far from that tree.

One of Harris's most notable contributions to economics is his 1978 book Capital Accumulation and Income Distribution, a critique of orthodox economic theories that provides an alternative, synthesizing the work of David Ricardo, Kalecki, Marx, Roy Harrod, and others.

 
Democrat policies.
Irrelevant.

Why suddenly is she not “Black enough” for you when she would have been “Black enough” for Jim Crowe?

What is “Black enough for you”? What percentage of melanin is required?
 
Irrelevant.

Why suddenly is she not “Black enough” for you when she would have been “Black enough” for Jim Crowe?

What is “Black enough for you”? What percentage of melanin is required?


Jim Crow, mentioned by you, was relevant enough for you to mention, so I am mentioning your mention of mentioning Jim Crow.

Oh, and it was Democrat policy.
 
Jim Crow, mentioned by you, was relevant enough for you to mention, so I am mentioning your mention of mentioning Jim Crow.

Oh, and it was Democrat policy.
You keep dodging and attempting to redirect this.

What percentage of melanin is required to be Black enough to call themselves Black in your book?

Don’t you realize this is just a really stupid way to attack her?
 
Sorry, that was Kamala's road to success, going down.

And you obviously did NOT read the OP, because the OP is about something much more. Try reading it, S_L_O_W_L_Y.
I cant be arsed. As a tip your first para should set the scene for your story, not repel people.
Your dig in the latter thread is another reasson you clowns are losing.
Your ugliness repels decent folk.
 
Well, as has been pointed out by my humble self previously, not really.

As she has referred to her lineage as Jamaican-American (plenty of white Jamaicans), Indian-American, and Asian -American long before Biden picked her from her total failure as a Presidential candidate. The suddenly, poof!, she's, black. Oh, and her mother is listed as Caucasian.


Donald Trump made an important point last week when he said of the Democrats’ most recent presidential nominee, Kamala Harris:

“She was always of Indian heritage, and she was only promoting Indian heritage. I didn’t know she was Black until a number of years ago, when she happened to turn Black, and now she wants to be known as Black.”

Cue media exploding in ritualistic rage at Trump for his “racist attack.” (I had no idea it was such an insult to be called an Indian!)

In fact, it actually is important that Harris is not a foundational black American (FBA), but rather, the child of immigrants. I know we don’t talk about it nearly enough, but remember slavery?

A couple of centuries ago, slaves purchased in Africa from black African slave traders were transported to America. They were freed by Republicans (at the cost of 600,000 American lives), then discriminated against for another hundred years — mostly by Democrats — until Republicans finally forced the Democrats to cease their infernal Jim Crow policies.

Because Americans felt such shame for how (a minority of) whites treated black people, we went to work on a massive enterprise to remedy these past injustices. The idea was: OK, we’ve got 13% of the population that got the short end of the stick for a couple of centuries, so we’re spending it all on them.

America altered constitutional provisions about freedom of association, private property and contract law — for the descendants of American slaves. Huge social welfare programs were established — for the descendants of American slaves. Affirmative action and racial quotas were imposed — for the descendants of American slaves. We agreed to virtually criminalize the use of certain words — for the descendants of American slaves.

Are you seeing the pattern? There’s no justification for special treatment for any ethnic group apart from victims of America’s history of slavery and Jim Crow.

But starting in the 1970s, parasites from around the world came in and announced, Here’s a new agenda for America — and it doesn’t include you, descendants of American slaves (DOAS).

Overnight, “DIVERSITY” became the new buzzword, and “integration” was flushed down the memory hole. Integration had been about redressing historic wrongs done to black Americans. By contrast, diversity means everyone gets special rights and privileges — everyone except white Americans.

Under our history and Constitution, racial preferences could only be justified by the legacy of slavery. But now race-based benefits are being dispensed in great heaping portions to Hmong, Somalis, Latin Americans and so on — including people who arrived last year.

What happened to, It all goes back to the Middle Passage! “Uncle Tom’s Cabin,” the “triangular trade,” “Swing Low, Sweet Chariot” and We Shall Overcome!?

That’s been replaced with the demand that every organization in the nation, down to the lowliest bowling league, include Hispanics, Asians, disabled women, gays and so on.

And, as I keep pointing out to the DOAS: Immigrants are getting all the good “diversity” jobs. Look at the diversity administrators on college campuses. All immigrants, mostly Indians.

To take another example, MSNBC is very proud of its diverse lineup, meaning eight of its hosts are immigrants or the children of immigrants, but only four are descendants of American slaves — and they’re relegated to the weekend dead zone.

E.g.:

Jose Diaz-Balart — Cuban immigrant;
Ana Cabrera — second-generation Mexican immigrant;
Ayman Mohieddine — born in Egypt to Egyptian father and Palestinian mother;
Katie Phang, born to Korean immigrants;
Joy Reid — second-generation immigrant of Congolese and Guyanese descent;
Ali Velshi — Ismaili Muslim of Indian descent, immigrated from Canada;
Yasmin Vossoughian — second-generation Iranian immigrant;
Alex Wagner — mother is immigrant from Myanmar.

May we ask what historic injustice this country visited on the Congo? Korea? Iran? Myanmar? Immigrants weren’t dragged to our country against their will. They came here. But now they’re expropriating the black experience in America.


I don’t mention this out of some quixotic dream that Republicans will someday flip a meaningful percentage of the black vote. That’s not going to happen — not now, not ever. (Sorry, clueless donors!) Unfortunately, I have a sinking feeling that that’s exactly why Trump mentioned Harris’ Indian-Jamaican heritage.

The point Republicans ought to be making is to remind white Americans that the diversity agenda gives everybody an advantage except whites — especially white, heterosexual men with deep ties to our country.

Republicans across the country just cringed at that last sentence. They’re embarrassed to get the votes of white people. Pro tip: Whites are the only swing voters in the country. Slight movements in the white vote determine the outcome of every presidential election.


Totally by accident, Trump hinted at an argument that Republicans ought to be making all day long. To wit, the “diversity” regime — allowing the daughter of Indian and Jamaican immigrants to demand recompense owed only to the descendants of American slaves — is nothing but open, vicious discrimination against only one ethnic group.

You still want to vote for a party that hates you because you’re white?




She stole her ethnicity.

She stole others husbands.

She stole others accents.

She stole Trump's no tax on tips.

That's a lot of stealing. So yeah, she is black.
 
her birth certificate says differnt. they lie so miuch who knows.

Her birth certificate does NOT say different. It says her father was a Jamaican born in Jamaica and her mother's color as "caucasian" and born in India. They leave Harris' own race or color open.

Nor does it establish her eligibility to run for president.

453720981_10229441439513408_1575903652774899419_n.jpg
 
It is Progs who introduce race into everything. And some fools who are Republican take the mantle while most do not care. We get lied to from Progs and that is what the whole issue ever is. Anyway, our nation is in decline. I say to you how important that is and Progs do not care. Which makes it understandable how 2nd and 3rd world nation people vote for this. The United States should be so much richer with a healthier foundation.
That’s because Kamala is such a completely incompetent nominee that they hope to draw back the blacks they lost by hammering home “but she’s black! Black! Black!” when the only thing that matters is that she is an extremely dangerous radical Marxist, who is either totally ignorant of economics or is intentionally trying to destroy the economy. Either way, totally unacceptable.
 

Forum List

Back
Top