What are your thoughts on the NRA?

[danielpalos]

Would you like to start with, fallacy of composition?

The fallacy of composition arises when one infers that something is true of the whole from the fact that it is true of some part of the whole (or even of every proper part). For example: "This fragment of metal cannot be fractured with a hammer, therefore the machine of which it is a part cannot be fractured with a hammer." This is clearly fallacious, because many machines can be broken apart, without any of those parts being able to be fractured.--Source: Fallacy of composition - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Thus, the line of reasoning of DC v Heller is unsound to the point of fallacy since, not all of the militia of the United States is well regulated; only well regulated militias are declared necessary to the security of a free State, and there is no appeal to ignorance of 10USC311.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Would you like to start with, fallacy of composition?
The fallacy of composition arises when one infers that something is true of the whole from the fact that it is true of some part of the whole (or even of every proper part). For example: "This fragment of metal cannot be fractured with a hammer, therefore the machine of which it is a part cannot be fractured with a hammer." This is clearly fallacious, because many machines can be broken apart, without any of those parts being able to be fractured.--Source: Fallacy of composition - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Thus, the line of reasoning is unsound to the point of fallacy since, not all of the militia of the United States is well regulated; only well regulated militias are declared necessary to the security of a free State, and there is no appeal to ignorance of 10USC311.

None of this has any meaning as The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. HELLER

 

[Uncensored2008]

nope; that is the right, practicing in Cuba.

You seek to strip Americans of basic civil rights - fact.

 

[danielpalos]

Would you like to start with, fallacy of composition?
The fallacy of composition arises when one infers that something is true of the whole from the fact that it is true of some part of the whole (or even of every proper part). For example: "This fragment of metal cannot be fractured with a hammer, therefore the machine of which it is a part cannot be fractured with a hammer." This is clearly fallacious, because many machines can be broken apart, without any of those parts being able to be fractured.--Source: Fallacy of composition - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Thus, the line of reasoning is unsound to the point of fallacy since, not all of the militia of the United States is well regulated; only well regulated militias are declared necessary to the security of a free State, and there is no appeal to ignorance of 10USC311.

None of this has any meaning as The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. HELLER

No it doesn't. That is an appeal to ignorance of 10USC311. As any form of equal work for equal pay

 

[danielpalos]

nope; that is the right, practicing in Cuba.

You seek to strip Americans of basic civil rights - fact.

no grasshopper; i really do have your best interests at heart as a member of the electorate of the United States.

 

[Uncensored2008]

no grasshopper; i really do have your best interests at heart as a member of the electorate of the United States.

You have the interests of your filthy party at heart. You seek to crush civil liberty, ergo you do not have the interests of a free people at heart.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Would you like to start with, fallacy of composition?
The fallacy of composition arises when one infers that something is true of the whole from the fact that it is true of some part of the whole (or even of every proper part). For example: "This fragment of metal cannot be fractured with a hammer, therefore the machine of which it is a part cannot be fractured with a hammer." This is clearly fallacious, because many machines can be broken apart, without any of those parts being able to be fractured.--Source: Fallacy of composition - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Thus, the line of reasoning is unsound to the point of fallacy since, not all of the militia of the United States is well regulated; only well regulated militias are declared necessary to the security of a free State, and there is no appeal to ignorance of 10USC311.

None of this has any meaning as The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. HELLER

No it doesn't. That is an appeal to ignorance of 10USC311. As any form of equal work for equal pay

Explaun in detail how Heller, in fully disassociating the right to arms from the militia, does not negate the point you want to try to make here..

 

[danielpalos]

Would you like to start with, fallacy of composition?
The fallacy of composition arises when one infers that something is true of the whole from the fact that it is true of some part of the whole (or even of every proper part). For example: "This fragment of metal cannot be fractured with a hammer, therefore the machine of which it is a part cannot be fractured with a hammer." This is clearly fallacious, because many machines can be broken apart, without any of those parts being able to be fractured.--Source: Fallacy of composition - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Thus, the line of reasoning is unsound to the point of fallacy since, not all of the militia of the United States is well regulated; only well regulated militias are declared necessary to the security of a free State, and there is no appeal to ignorance of 10USC311.

None of this has any meaning as The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. HELLER

No it doesn't. That is an appeal to ignorance of 10USC311. As any form of equal work for equal pay

Explaun in detail how Heller, in fully disassociating the right to arms from the militia, does not negate the point you want to try to make here..

There is no appeal to ignorance of 10USC311.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Would you like to start with, fallacy of composition?
The fallacy of composition arises when one infers that something is true of the whole from the fact that it is true of some part of the whole (or even of every proper part). For example: "This fragment of metal cannot be fractured with a hammer, therefore the machine of which it is a part cannot be fractured with a hammer." This is clearly fallacious, because many machines can be broken apart, without any of those parts being able to be fractured.--Source: Fallacy of composition - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Thus, the line of reasoning is unsound to the point of fallacy since, not all of the militia of the United States is well regulated; only well regulated militias are declared necessary to the security of a free State, and there is no appeal to ignorance of 10USC311.

None of this has any meaning as The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. HELLER

No it doesn't. That is an appeal to ignorance of 10USC311. As any form of equal work for equal pay

Explaun in detail how Heller, in fully disassociating the right to arms from the militia, does not negate the point you want to try to make here..

There is no appeal to ignorance of 10USC311.

10 USC 311 is meaningless in a discussion regarding the rights protected by the 2nd Amendment.
You refuse to understand this; in doing so you chose to be wrong.

 

[danielpalos]

Would you like to start with, fallacy of composition?
The fallacy of composition arises when one infers that something is true of the whole from the fact that it is true of some part of the whole (or even of every proper part). For example: "This fragment of metal cannot be fractured with a hammer, therefore the machine of which it is a part cannot be fractured with a hammer." This is clearly fallacious, because many machines can be broken apart, without any of those parts being able to be fractured.--Source: Fallacy of composition - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Thus, the line of reasoning is unsound to the point of fallacy since, not all of the militia of the United States is well regulated; only well regulated militias are declared necessary to the security of a free State, and there is no appeal to ignorance of 10USC311.

None of this has any meaning as The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. HELLER

No it doesn't. That is an appeal to ignorance of 10USC311. As any form of equal work for equal pay

Explaun in detail how Heller, in fully disassociating the right to arms from the militia, does not negate the point you want to try to make here..

There is no appeal to ignorance of 10USC311.

10 USC 311 is meaningless in a discussion regarding the rights protected by the 2nd Amendment.
You refuse to understand this; in doing so you chose to be wrong.

Not meaningless at all; grasshopper. The term Militia is used in our Second Amendment.

 

[M14 Shooter]

None of this has any meaning as The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. HELLER

No it doesn't. That is an appeal to ignorance of 10USC311. As any form of equal work for equal pay

Explaun in detail how Heller, in fully disassociating the right to arms from the militia, does not negate the point you want to try to make here..

There is no appeal to ignorance of 10USC311.

10 USC 311 is meaningless in a discussion regarding the rights protected by the 2nd Amendment.
You refuse to understand this; in doing so you chose to be wrong.

Not meaningless at all; grasshopper. The term Militia is used in our Second Amendment.

Heller fully disassociates the the right to arms from the militia.
Thus, you choose to be wrong.

 

[danielpalos]

No it doesn't. That is an appeal to ignorance of 10USC311. As any form of equal work for equal pay

Explaun in detail how Heller, in fully disassociating the right to arms from the militia, does not negate the point you want to try to make here..

There is no appeal to ignorance of 10USC311.

10 USC 311 is meaningless in a discussion regarding the rights protected by the 2nd Amendment.
You refuse to understand this; in doing so you chose to be wrong.

Not meaningless at all; grasshopper. The term Militia is used in our Second Amendment.

Heller fully disassociates the the right to arms from the militia.
Thus, you choose to be wrong.

Heller does not give any reason for appealing to ignorance of 10USC311 in regard to the Term militia found in our Second Amendment.

And, does support my contention in paragraph (2).

 

[M14 Shooter]

Explaun in detail how Heller, in fully disassociating the right to arms from the militia, does not negate the point you want to try to make here..

There is no appeal to ignorance of 10USC311.

10 USC 311 is meaningless in a discussion regarding the rights protected by the 2nd Amendment.
You refuse to understand this; in doing so you chose to be wrong.

Not meaningless at all; grasshopper. The term Militia is used in our Second Amendment.

Heller fully disassociates the the right to arms from the militia.
Thus, you choose to be wrong.

Heller does not give any reason for appealing to ignorance of 10USC311....

This is a lie as Heller has significant duscission of this.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. HELLER
Fact remains - you choose to be wrong.

 

[pismoe]

just a heads up , NRA and 'loretta lynch' related . --- Gun groups rally against Loretta Lynch TheHill --- lynch may be holders replacement and is nasty , some say nastier than holder so just some info and a heads up to whats coming !!

 

[danielpalos]

There is no appeal to ignorance of 10USC311.

10 USC 311 is meaningless in a discussion regarding the rights protected by the 2nd Amendment.
You refuse to understand this; in doing so you chose to be wrong.

Not meaningless at all; grasshopper. The term Militia is used in our Second Amendment.

Heller fully disassociates the the right to arms from the militia.
Thus, you choose to be wrong.

Heller does not give any reason for appealing to ignorance of 10USC311....

This is a lie as Heller has significant duscission of this.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. HELLER
Fact remains - you choose to be wrong.

Heller does not give any reason for appealing to ignorance of 10USC311.

You are welcome to cite it.

 

[kaz]

I was a member for decades. Quit when their focus was shifted from safe enjoyable use of guns to anything it takes to sell more guns. Even the most adamant gun enthusiast knows there are some people who should never have a gun. The NRA fights every effort to protect the public from crazies with guns. I would hope that some day I can rejoin, but that doesn't look like it will be any time soon.

Wow, another liberal against the NRA, that's a stunning condemnation. LOL

 

[pismoe]

that's why I call these guys the best advertisement that USA gun people should unite and fight . And he11 , they advertise for free !!

 

[pismoe]

if everyone that is pro gun would just join NRA or GOA for 35 bucks a year the ORGS would be much stronger and much better able to destroy gun control in the USA !!

 

[danielpalos]

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

There is no appeal to ignorance of the law nor its intent and purpose.

 

[pismoe]

like I say , these libs are best advertisement the progun side can have to get off their azz and join up with progun people and organizations .