What Biden mumbled "I guarantee We Are Going To Get Rid of Fossil Fuels”

Hochul, the NY Governor, (who called a moderate heat wave 'not natural' 🤦‍♂️) shuttered Indian Point and its 2GW of clean nuclear power, now the rates have skyrocketed to ConEd customers because they have to pay market rates for well over half that power.

These people are lost and messed up in the head. 90 degrees, that happens in summer but its just not natural. Lol.
 
I knew you couldn't do it.

You kids lie like cheap rugs.
I can not help your ignorance and it is about time that you realize that google/bing is not the truth.

Either way, start following the news that way you can figure out what all these anti fossil fuel rules, regulations, and executive orders will result in.
 
Biden guarantee: "I guarantee We Are Going To Get Rid of Fossil Fuels” September 06, 2019,

Remember when Biden said this none of the following was evidently considered by Biden and his administration!

Electricity demand will be growing globally by 26% to 36% and Biden wants to rid the energy source :Fossil fuels (total) which generates 2,505,000,000 kWh by 3,400 electric generating plants create the 79% of the nation's energy comes from fossil fuels,
So with his GUARANTEE to rid "fossil fuels" 3,400 electric plants needed JUST to replace the fossil fuel.
THEN add the new demands:
  • Electric vehicles
  • Artificial Intelligence data centers
  • Cryptocurrency


Now here are the facts and because most of you that won't believe this, have a limited attention span so I'm just
covering the data centers usage of electricity and water!

Additional DATA centers demands for power.
  • There are more than 8,000 data centers in operation globally, with approximately one-third located in the US, driving significant demand for water and critical infrastructure components.
  • On average, data centers are estimated to use between 1 million and 5 million gallons of water per day, equivalent to the daily demand of 10,000 to 50,000 residents.
  • Long-term planning is critical, and the Federal Regulatory Energy Commission's Order No. 1920 now requires transmission operators to plan for future demand, addressing capacity needs over the next 20 years.
  • A shortage of transformers, a critical component of grid infrastructure, continues to create constraints within US energy markets, exacerbated by the increased demand from data centers and AI technologies.

And the above doesn't cover the additional electricity that will be needed for EVs as Biden guarantees 50% of new cars by 2032 to be EVs!

Biden's dictate that 50% of all car sales by 2032 be EVs this means by 2032, an additional need for electricity for EVs is 1,325,318,313,600 kWh.

~~~~~~
Growth of the existing of the electric grid has never been included in the pipe dreams of the Democrat neo-Marxist dreams.
 
So are you one of the growing number of Americans who doubt Biden's words? He "guaranteed" to
destroy fossil fuels. But you don't believe him now? Maybe it's his way of saying things right?

President Biden appears to freeze at White House Juneteenth concert​

President Biden appeared to freeze while watching a concert at the Juneteenth celebration at the White House on Monday.
LOL...

No, I'm one of the growing number of people who realize that we have a finite supply of oil and at some point, we will have to look for another form of fuel to move us from point A to point B.

Look on the bright side dude...at some point, someone my age will be refining your body for oil as the ICE goes the way of the dodo or in you case, Healthmyths.
 
Interpreting the below :"I guarantee We Are Going To Get Rid of Fossil Fuels” September 06, 2019,


You can never stop producing crude oil...what would you all type on?

cargo ships.jpg
 
A cleaner environment?
how so, you must build, over build, how does building on a scale never ever seen before result in a cleaner environment?

Instead of one Nuclear Power Plant, we must build how many wind turbines? Sure, you could take nameplate capacity of wind turbines. Presume (incorrectly) a constant wind speed, then calculate how many wind turbines equal one nuclear power plant. That type of calculation does not take into account the erratic intermittent nature of wind.

In addition to the incredible amount of wind turbines required, there is the fact that they have a short lifespan.

We now have endless manufacturing by heavy industry. That is endless manufacturing the by the petro-chemical fossil fuel industry. Endless because the technology is very weak, inefficient. Endless manufacturing because wind turbines and solar panels have a very short life span. We do not have the manufacturing ability to replace all the broken, old wind turbines let alone meet the future demand for electricity.

No, rightwinger, manufacturing by heavy industry does not result in a cleaner environment.
 
how so, you must build, over build, how does building on a scale never ever seen before result in a cleaner environment?

Instead of one Nuclear Power Plant, we must build how many wind turbines? Sure, you could take nameplate capacity of wind turbines. Presume (incorrectly) a constant wind speed, then calculate how many wind turbines equal one nuclear power plant. That type of calculation does not take into account the erratic intermittent nature of wind.

In addition to the incredible amount of wind turbines required, there is the fact that they have a short lifespan.

We now have endless manufacturing by heavy industry. That is endless manufacturing the by the petro-chemical fossil fuel industry. Endless because the technology is very weak, inefficient. Endless manufacturing because wind turbines and solar panels have a very short life span. We do not have the manufacturing ability to replace all the broken, old wind turbines let alone meet the future demand for electricity.

No, rightwinger, manufacturing by heavy industry does not result in a cleaner environment.
Fossil Fuel is not a viable long term energy plan
it is being gradually replaced
 
Explain to me how we are in trouble because the Current world emissions of CO2 amount to 423.33 ppm (parts per million).
BUT the atmosphere CO2 emissions were as high as 4,000 ppm (nearly 9 times as much as today's) during the Cambrian period about 500 million years ago.
If the earth will be destroyed due to above 423 ppm... why wasn't it destroyed when it was 9 times that?
Why are we still here?
Believe in Common Sense, not Commie Science

We have to exterminate all these killer microbes. Maybe pumping chlorine into the atmosphere will do the trick at levels that humans won't even notice. As you pointed out, these ancient bacteria survived high levels of carbon dioxide, so some other compound in auto emissions prevented pandemics from 1919 until 2020's Green Death.

Also, there may be plague-killing microbes, especially man-made ones, that will finish off the dominance of toxicity in the atmosphere
once and for all. And Man himself can drive the human-hating Nature-worshippers out of science.

The education of these bitter escapist sensationalists is childish, depressing, humiliating, and insulting. That's what turns them into unproductive or destructive freaks. The Unabomber Cult.
 

Forum List

Back
Top