ptbw forever
Gold Member
- May 9, 2015
- 16,522
- 1,779
- Thread starter
- #41
Down from 100% white and 100% ethnic BritishThe images Essien posted prove otherwise.All you showed was that the UK is being colonized. In the 13th century there were no black people, no Arabs and no East Asians in England other than traders and merchants. What you did is no different than me showing you a picture of the South African Rugby team and claiming that South Africa isn't black.Did you or did you not go to the white man's definition of the word "prejudice" ?"Prejudice" is an ENGLISH word, dolt.
Many black people are EnglishEnglish people are WHITE.
The England Women's netball team
England Soccer Team
Plus the first people in England were black "Cheddar Man"
Wrong again. There are many black Latino's.The word "prejudice" comes from the Latin word "praeiudicium", meaning PRIOR JUDGMENT, and the people who spoke Latin were also WHITE. prejudice | Origin and meaning of prejudice by Online Etymology DictionaryThe majority of writers for popular and academic dictionaries have been white men. In the western world, as there are systems in place which privilege white people, it is not surprizing to see that the definition of racism put forward by white men is inaccurate. They are socialized to believe that the racism people of color experience is in any way comparable to the “racism” white people experience (i.e. being called out for perpetrating and upholding white supremacy). There is simply no credibility in white people defining racism.You want to change words made in the 13th century that were based off of words that are too old to even know when they originated.
So the white president and owner of dictionary.com (Doug Leeds) has no say as to what goes in dictionary.com ?It has nothing to do with what Doug Leeds or dictionary.com believes.
OK. Dude.
The Cheddar Man was debunked as the same kind of racist lie as your definitions of "racism" and "prejudice" are.
Ancient 'dark-skinned' Briton Cheddar Man find may not be true
It is impossible to determine the skin color of skeletons found without any flesh or any DNA remnants. Funny how you don't believe white man's language created before any black slaves were in America but yet you believe the findings of modern technology created by almost all white people without any tangible evidence.
Latinos don't speak and have never spoken Latin, idiot. Latin is a dead language. Latinos speak Spanish or English. Latin was spoken by Ancient Rome, aka modern day Italy, aka white people.
Your definition of "racism" and "prejudice" is extremely new and completely opportunistic to suit your black supremacist agenda with the complete disregard of the human rights of white people, and not only that, but the SYSTEM in academia and media created those definitions. You are the one trying to defend the status quo. The problem is that you are a dumbass sociopath and people like you are not capable of defending this racist system from people like me.
Dictionary.com is using the actual definition of the word created 8 fucking centuries ago. They are not going to use bullshit made less than 30 years ago by lunatics on specific crazy ass college campuses who sided with the weather underground.
The UK is not being colonized.
Your uneducated denials don't prove anything.
The UK is 87 percent white. There is no colonization in the UK.
And continuing to decline.
According to your idiotic logic no country in Asia or Africa ever were colonized.