Orangecat
Diamond Member
- Jun 22, 2020
- 17,710
- 19,616
Your wait is over. I'm a jurist and I agree with him.Still waiting for a jurist that agrees with you. Lol
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your wait is over. I'm a jurist and I agree with him.Still waiting for a jurist that agrees with you. Lol
And? Is there a point somewhere in there?General Welfare appears twice in the Constitution
He's discovered a new word for the day, don't rain on his parade.Your wait is over. I'm a jurist and I agree with him.
And? Is there a point somewhere in there?
The discussion was about the Preamble.
Individual welfare doesn't appear at all.General Welfare appears twice in the Constitution
And I am god. Bless you.my childYour wait is over. I'm a jurist and I agree with him.
So what?Individual welfare doesn't appear at all.
Run away girlHe's discovered a new word for the day, don't rain on his parade.
There's a god of ignorance? What religion is that? MMGW?And I am god. Bless you.my child
Settle down childThere's a god of ignorance? What religion is that? MMGW?
Individual welfare doesn't appear at all.
I'm settled down here laughing at what an intellectually impotent putz you are. Does that count?Settle down child
Remember. I as god can see you. LolI'm settled down here laughing at what an intellectually impotent putz you are. Does that count?
Generally, not individually. Words have meaning. Learn to read.it empowers Congress to do what is necessary for We the People
Good thing social programs generally promote the general welfareGenerally, not individually. Words have meaning. Learn to read.
You misspelled "ass".Remember. I as god can see you. Lol
Your opinion is just that.Good thing social programs generally promote the general welfare
I think Rs make a mistake when they focus their ire on welfare recipients.. What..? are they God? No, they're not... they did not see the evil of gov dependency (until, with some, it was too late)If you voted for Trump there’s a good chance you’re a lot like me with regard to why....I voted for him on two policies almost exclusively...First and foremost on how he would deal with illegal Mexicans and the border and second on how he would yank lowlifes off the Democrat induced welfare plantation.
Anyhoo, as we approach the point where welfare reform will be visited I ask for your opinions on EXACTLY what you think our founders meant when they used the phrase “GENERAL WELFARE” in the constitution?
Attention all Smartest Guys In The Room, and legal scholars:
Please spare us the case citations such as the U.S. vs Butler case and the like. I’m interested in YOUR opinions.
I agreeGeneral, not specific.
public assistance is unconstitutional.
.