What gives us the right?

[1776]

Oh looky, looky..

Partying to Death: Drug Abuse and Gay Nightlife Culture | Michael's House

 

[1776]

So you are claiming golden showers, feces eating, etc aren't common in the gay community???

I'd say a shitstain like you will be the first one booted out of this country compared to me with my prior 22 year military service. You are nothing but a leach here.

Just because you like golden showers, eating feces from your boyfriend, etc....that doesn't mean we're "bigots" if we are disgusted by you and your boyfriend.....you are the scumbag, not us.

You are making decisions based on bigoted feelings and emotions about homosexuality.

You really don't seem well adjusted to me.

These constant lies don't really help your "position".

Since you rw's don't believe in equality, as guaranteed by the US Constitution,

LEAVE.

Just LEAVE.

 

[1776]

Ahhhh, that gay lifestyle seems to increase medical problems aka costs for others.

https://medschool.vanderbilt.edu/lgbti/health/gaymen

It is ironic that is a LGBT link on a well known US university yet is proclaims being a gay man in dangerous for their health....

 

[KNB]

Why is this such a big deal to Christian fanatics? Homosexuality has been around for thousands of years in every culture, and society still progressed to today. It's not some new phenomenon that started in the liberal 60s. Will you psycho religious freaks please cite one real example of homosexuality causing the downfall of any civilization? If you cite Sodom and Gomorrah, I'll tell you again to find some real examples. Do you honestly believe that an invisible man in the sky laid waste to a couple of cities just because a bunch of guys were having sex with each other? Then why hasn't San Francisco been destroyed yet? Or Las Vegas? Or West Hollywood? Or Broadway? Or every fashion show ever? Because an invisible man in the sky did NOT destroy two cities because of dudes blowing each other. That's a bedtime story for sociopaths.

Why do you Conservatives get so uptight about the thought of two people in love? If it disgusts you so much then stop thinking about it.

 

[Contumacious]

Uh....gay males have brought HIV/AIDS to our medical system

Really, I thougth they were transmitted by monkeys in Afica.

which has driven up medical costs and deaths in this country.

Really? ithought it was medicaid/medicare and other government regulations.

People like you (probably gay), don't want normal Americans to know about the medical costs associated with gays and the increasing drug culture too. It isn't "PC" to point immoral people are also a drain on society....

Not gay. I firmly believe that if the good lord made something better than pussy he kept it for himself.

So knock yourself out, let them know how much it costs to destabilize the anal sphincter.



.

 

[1776]

of course you are for gay sex....

Why is this such a big deal to Christian fanatics? Homosexuality has been around for thousands of years in every culture, and society still progressed to today. It's not some new phenomenon that started in the liberal 60s. Will you psycho religious freaks please cite one real example of homosexuality causing the downfall of any civilization? If you cite Sodom and Gomorrah, I'll tell you again to find some real examples. Do you honestly believe that an invisible man in the sky laid waste to a couple of cities just because a bunch of guys were having sex with each other? Then why hasn't San Francisco been destroyed yet? Or Las Vegas? Or West Hollywood? Or Broadway? Or every fashion show ever? Because an invisible man in the sky did NOT destroy two cities because of dudes blowing each other. That's a bedtime story for sociopaths.

Why do you Conservatives get so uptight about the thought of two people in love? If it disgusts you so much then stop thinking about it.

 

[Redfish]

Why is this such a big deal to Christian fanatics? Homosexuality has been around for thousands of years in every culture, and society still progressed to today. It's not some new phenomenon that started in the liberal 60s. Will you psycho religious freaks please cite one real example of homosexuality causing the downfall of any civilization? If you cite Sodom and Gomorrah, I'll tell you again to find some real examples. Do you honestly believe that an invisible man in the sky laid waste to a couple of cities just because a bunch of guys were having sex with each other? Then why hasn't San Francisco been destroyed yet? Or Las Vegas? Or West Hollywood? Or Broadway? Or every fashion show ever? Because an invisible man in the sky did NOT destroy two cities because of dudes blowing each other. That's a bedtime story for sociopaths.

Why do you Conservatives get so uptight about the thought of two people in love? If it disgusts you so much then stop thinking about it.

Let me see if I get this-------------its OK for you to criticize, demonize, and insult Christians but its not OK for someone else to believe that homosexuality is a perversion?

You are saying that your beliefs must be accepted by everyone without question, but those of others are to be ridiculed and demonized.

Yes, you are a typical hate filled intolerant liberal.

 

[Contumacious]

of course you are for gay sex....

Why is this such a big deal to Christian fanatics? Homosexuality has been around for thousands of years in every culture, and society still progressed to today. It's not some new phenomenon that started in the liberal 60s. Will you psycho religious freaks please cite one real example of homosexuality causing the downfall of any civilization? If you cite Sodom and Gomorrah, I'll tell you again to find some real examples. Do you honestly believe that an invisible man in the sky laid waste to a couple of cities just because a bunch of guys were having sex with each other? Then why hasn't San Francisco been destroyed yet? Or Las Vegas? Or West Hollywood? Or Broadway? Or every fashion show ever? Because an invisible man in the sky did NOT destroy two cities because of dudes blowing each other. That's a bedtime story for sociopaths.

Why do you Conservatives get so uptight about the thought of two people in love? If it disgusts you so much then stop thinking about it.

You are partially right - there is nothing more pleasurable than seeing two pretty girls go at each other.......yeah man........that's the ticket.

No AIDS and no destabilization of the anal sphincters.........awesome.

.

 

[Bombur]

My decisions are based on experience, knowledge, logic, facts, and common sense.

Yours are based on--------------------feeeeeeeeeeeelings and emoooooooootion.

liberals know that if they actually think they will realize that their entire philosophy is a pile of steaming horseshit, thats why they refuse to think.

Tell me more about how you feel. It is really fascinating to see a bigot in full on meltdown.

did I hit a nerve with the steaming pile of horseshit analogy? Well, if the shoe fits--------------

Froth away.

Honestly your views are so backward and ignorant that the only thing you do here is help the left discredit the entire right as a bunch of fanatics. Congratulations on being the poster child for conservatives.

 

[1776]

Yes, that is their fucked up minds on display.

You are a problem/bigot if you don't give the thumbs up on the gay lifestyle with its costs on society. Gay men spreading STDs, doing drugs, etc is supposed to be the norm compared to straight laced middle class nuclear families living quiet lives in the suburbs.

Why is this such a big deal to Christian fanatics? Homosexuality has been around for thousands of years in every culture, and society still progressed to today. It's not some new phenomenon that started in the liberal 60s. Will you psycho religious freaks please cite one real example of homosexuality causing the downfall of any civilization? If you cite Sodom and Gomorrah, I'll tell you again to find some real examples. Do you honestly believe that an invisible man in the sky laid waste to a couple of cities just because a bunch of guys were having sex with each other? Then why hasn't San Francisco been destroyed yet? Or Las Vegas? Or West Hollywood? Or Broadway? Or every fashion show ever? Because an invisible man in the sky did NOT destroy two cities because of dudes blowing each other. That's a bedtime story for sociopaths.

Why do you Conservatives get so uptight about the thought of two people in love? If it disgusts you so much then stop thinking about it.

Let me see if I get this-------------its OK for you to criticize, demonize, and insult Christians but its not OK for someone else to believe that homosexuality is a perversion?

You are saying that your beliefs must be accepted by everyone without question, but those of others are to be ridiculed and demonized.

Yes, you are a typical hate filled intolerant liberal.

 

[Redfish]

of course you are for gay sex....

Why is this such a big deal to Christian fanatics? Homosexuality has been around for thousands of years in every culture, and society still progressed to today. It's not some new phenomenon that started in the liberal 60s. Will you psycho religious freaks please cite one real example of homosexuality causing the downfall of any civilization? If you cite Sodom and Gomorrah, I'll tell you again to find some real examples. Do you honestly believe that an invisible man in the sky laid waste to a couple of cities just because a bunch of guys were having sex with each other? Then why hasn't San Francisco been destroyed yet? Or Las Vegas? Or West Hollywood? Or Broadway? Or every fashion show ever? Because an invisible man in the sky did NOT destroy two cities because of dudes blowing each other. That's a bedtime story for sociopaths.

Why do you Conservatives get so uptight about the thought of two people in love? If it disgusts you so much then stop thinking about it.

You are partially right - there is nothing more pleasurable than seeing two pretty girls go at each other.......yeah man........that's the ticket.

No AIDS and no destabilization of the anal sphincters.........awesome.

.

How about Hillary and Rosie O'Donnell ? would that turn you on? because that is much more typical of lesbians than two pretty girls being filmed and acting for money.

 

[Contumacious]

of course you are for gay sex....

You are partially right - there is nothing more pleasurable than seeing two pretty girls go at each other.......yeah man........that's the ticket.

No AIDS and no destabilization of the anal sphincters.........awesome.

.

How about Hillary and Rosie O'Donnell ? would that turn you on? because that is much more typical of lesbians than two pretty girls being filmed and acting for money.

OMG

Perish the thought.

.

 

[1776]

I wonder if "right-wing" fanatics were spreading STDs, doing drugs, etc down at local bars at night....you'd be ok with it?

Oh but an inbred like you doesn't think that lifestyle affects others in society outside your "club." HIV in the blood supply, increased medical costs on hospitals/insurance companies, drugs being dealt around the gay scene, etc....

Tell me more about how you feel. It is really fascinating to see a bigot in full on meltdown.

did I hit a nerve with the steaming pile of horseshit analogy? Well, if the shoe fits--------------

Froth away.

Honestly your views are so backward and ignorant that the only thing you do here is help the left discredit the entire right as a bunch of fanatics. Congratulations on being the poster child for conservatives.

 

[Redfish]

Tell me more about how you feel. It is really fascinating to see a bigot in full on meltdown.

did I hit a nerve with the steaming pile of horseshit analogy? Well, if the shoe fits--------------

Froth away.

Honestly your views are so backward and ignorant that the only thing you do here is help the left discredit the entire right as a bunch of fanatics. Congratulations on being the poster child for conservatives.

My "views". How do you know what my views are? this is about the USA trying to force its moral code on another nation.

 

[1776]

It is not shocking liberals and losertarians defend people with fucked up lives given they are also fucked up too.....

 

[Bombur]

did I hit a nerve with the steaming pile of horseshit analogy? Well, if the shoe fits--------------

Froth away.

Honestly your views are so backward and ignorant that the only thing you do here is help the left discredit the entire right as a bunch of fanatics. Congratulations on being the poster child for conservatives.

My "views". How do you know what my views are? this is about the USA trying to force its moral code on another nation.

Magic. I used magic.

It is called reading.

 

[Londoner]

What gives us the right to force homosexuality on Russia?

The State should not impose sexuality on consenting adults. The state should preserve maximum choice for the individual. Hatred of gays stems from barbaric social customs and pre-modern texts like the Bible, which endorsed slavery and sexism and is filled with bad science that leads people to believe that sexual desire is a cognitive process rather than an instinctual response.

The state should not impose religion either. It should not use public resources like high schools to impose a Christian vision. It should remain neutral and let each individual decide for himself what is sacred. Government should be run like a vending machine which merely supplies contracts, infrastructure, national defense, and law enforcement to protect property. It's not government's job to define love or God for two consenting adults. Don't give Big Government the power to define the Sacred. You need to have more faith in freedom. You need to accept the consequences of moving government out of the way and letting consenting adults choose what to do with their bodies in the privacy of their sexual behavior, which is none of your business.

The mere fact that my neighbor is gay doesn't constitute an imposition on my life. Why? because my life has nothing to do with what kind of love or sexuality he practices with another consenting adult. He doesn't have the power to hurt my marriage, nor does a silly Big Government Marriage Contract. Individuals deserve privacy, but you want to peer in their windows. You want to place a government agent at the foot of every bed. You want to turn the wombs of women into an incubator for Jesus, and put the government's greasy hands inside woman in order to pull out God's glorious seed. I, on the other hand, want to move government out of the way and let the individual make adult decisions so that he can face God on his own, without intervention by the nanny state or the moral Big Brother. You want the biggest government of all. You belong in the Soviet Union

 

[occupied]

What gives us the right to force homosexuality on Russia?

The State should not impose sexuality on consenting adults. The state should preserve maximum choice for the individual. Hatred of gays stems from barbaric social customs and pre-modern texts like the Bible, which endorsed slavery and sexism and is filled with bad science that leads people to believe that sexual desire is a cognitive process rather than an instinctual response.

The state should not impose religion either. It should not use public resources like high schools to impose a Christian vision. It should remain neutral and let each individual decide for himself what is sacred. Government should be run like a vending machine which merely supplies contracts, infrastructure, national defense, and law enforcement which protects property. It's not government's job to define love or God for two consenting adults. Don't give Big Government the power to define the Sacred. You need to have more faith in freedom. You need to accept the consequences of moving government out of the way and letting consenting adults choose what to do with their bodies in the privacy of their sexual behavior, which is none of your business.

There mere fact that my neighbor is gay doesn't constitute an imposition on my life. Why? because my life has nothing to do with what kind of love or sexuality he practices with another consenting adult. He deserves privacy, but you want to peer in his windows. You want to place a government agent at the foot of every bed. You want to turn the wombs of women into an incubator for Jesus, and put the government's greasy hands inside woman in order to pull out God's glorious seed. I, on the other hand, want to move government out of the way and let the individual make adult decisions so that he can face God on his own, without intervention by the nanny state or the moral Big Brother. You want the biggest government of all. You belong in the Soviet Union

Very good, I would also like to add that the rightists are not the paragons of virtue they like to imagine themselves to be. They think they own the moral high ground while being just as immoral as any group of fallible humans. Hypocrite, thy name is "proud conservative". Jesus had a few words on being a moralizing jackass: "remove the beam from your own eye before pointing out the speck in someone else's eye".

 

[Contumacious]

What gives us the right to force homosexuality on Russia?

The State should not impose sexuality on consenting adults. .....The state should not impose religion either.

Concur on both counts.

Why can't you extend the principle to:

The state should not impose its socialistic/fascistic/elitic views on consenting adults. Adults should not be taxed to support the welfare/warfare police state.

.

 

[JWBooth]

What gives us the right to force homosexuality on Russia?

The State should not impose sexuality on consenting adults. The state should preserve maximum choice for the individual. Hatred of gays stems from barbaric social customs and pre-modern texts like the Bible, which endorsed slavery and sexism and is filled with bad science that leads people to believe that sexual desire is a cognitive process rather than an instinctual response.

The state should not impose religion either. It should not use public resources like high schools to impose a Christian vision. It should remain neutral and let each individual decide for himself what is sacred. Government should be run like a vending machine which merely supplies contracts, infrastructure, national defense, and law enforcement which protects property. It's not government's job to define love or God for two consenting adults. Don't give Big Government the power to define the Sacred. You need to have more faith in freedom. You need to accept the consequences of moving government out of the way and letting consenting adults choose what to do with their bodies in the privacy of their sexual behavior, which is none of your business.

There mere fact that my neighbor is gay doesn't constitute an imposition on my life. Why? because my life has nothing to do with what kind of love or sexuality he practices with another consenting adult. He deserves privacy, but you want to peer in his windows. You want to place a government agent at the foot of every bed. You want to turn the wombs of women into an incubator for Jesus, and put the government's greasy hands inside woman in order to pull out God's glorious seed. I, on the other hand, want to move government out of the way and let the individual make adult decisions so that he can face God on his own, without intervention by the nanny state or the moral Big Brother. You want the biggest government of all. You belong in the Soviet Union

Very good, I would also like to add that the rightists are not the paragons of virtue they like to imagine themselves to be. They think they own the moral high ground while being just as immoral as any group of fallible humans. Hypocrite, thy name is "proud conservative". Jesus had a few words on being a moralizing jackass: "remove the beam from your own eye before pointing out the speck in someone else's eye".

Yep