Actually the uk has no vote for PM. The leader of the majority party is PMthe Dems have won the popular vote (or a plurality with three parties) in 6 of the last 7 elections.Well, there you go then. It's settledI cannot deny you picking that option, but I am personally completely convinced that that is the way it is.Trump may not be manipulated by Putin.Is there a difference between those subjects?It is ideal in politics to be a few steps ahead - not behind because you're too lazy to think.I'll worry about that after we spend a few years worry whether Obumma and Hillary weren't Russian assets for years first. I know for a fact that Russians have been screwing with America from AT LEAST the 1970s---- and if I know it, then that makes this whole russian scare thing a joke because others know it as well. A more likely scenario is that Russia and Soros run the whole show and the DNC and GOP are just two fronts giving a faux illusion of an actual choice. That's why all the angst over Trump---- he was an unseen, unexpected fluke that got in that WASN'T part of the master plan!
Don't be trying to change the topic from Russian corruption to why the DNC keeps losing election after election.
You keep thinking you're in England and keep going after the popular vote. The Right will stick to actually winning elections.
BTW-- -- -- -- if your SO SURE you got the MAJORITY in America, then institute Voter ID to make sure every vote is legal, then let's see what you win!