What if we aren't taking this as seriously as we should?

But it certainly appears like President of the USA Trump, is acting as an agent to achieve Russia's goal and quest for decades.....

After World War II, the U.S. had created a liberal international order and underwritten its safety by maintaining the world’s strongest military. A central goal of Soviet, and later Russian, foreign policy was to split the U.S. from its allies.

That was then, this is now. They stick high tariffs on our exported goods, and we pay for their security? Pardon my "French" but fuck that!
And that's a reason in your head to trust them, eh comrade, instead of our allies????

Get outta here!

You can't be so naive! Or can you? :rofl:

When taxpayer money is going to foreign countries that don't do anything for us, it is concerning.
Most certainly they are doing something for you - you just don't know what it is.
 
Seriously, have any if you looked at this not as a series of discreet events, but as a whole pattern?

An interesting and compelling look from NY Magazine
What If Trump Has Been a Russian Asset Since 1987?

A little snip from the opening. Read the rest at the link and discuss.
The unfolding of the Russia scandal has been like walking into a dark cavern. Every step reveals that the cave runs deeper than we thought, and after each one, as we wonder how far it goes, our imaginations are circumscribed by the steps we have already taken. The cavern might go just a little farther, we presume, but probably not much farther. And since trying to discern the size and shape of the scandal is an exercise in uncertainty, we focus our attention on the most likely outcome, which is that the story goes a little deeper than what we have already discovered. Say, that Donald Trump Jr., Jared Kushner, and Paul Manafort told their candidate about the meeting they held at Trump Tower with a Russian lawyer after they were promised dirt on Hillary Clinton; and that Trump and Kushner have some shady Russian investments; and that some of Trump’s advisers made some promises about lifting sanctions.

But what if that’s wrong? What if we’re still standing closer to the mouth of the cave than the end?

The media has treated the notion that Russia has personally compromised the president of the United States as something close to a kook theory. A minority of analysts, mostly but not exclusively on the right, have promoted aggressively exculpatory interpretations of the known facts, in which every suspicious piece of evidence turns out to have a surprisingly innocent explanation. And it is possible, though unlikely, that every trail between Trump Tower and the Kremlin extends no farther than its point of current visibility.

Frankly, this whole thing is about--and please pardon my necessary crass directness--panties in a bunch. Really, that's it. The radical feminist revolution has collided with a wall named Donald Trump. He's a strong, unforgiving force of male dominance--a patriarchal godhead--and a threat to Roe, LGTBQ, radical Leftist intellectual elitism, and political correctness.

To quote old Jack Nicholson "You can't handle the truth"

The only words on radical Left tongues is how dare he! That's the sum of their outrage. Treason, I am afraid, lies in bed only with Clintons and Obamas and governors the nation over who refuse lawful executive orders. And what about the Justice Department.

Want to trace ultimate corruption in American politics? Follow the history of the cultural revolution from present day back six decades or so--you'll find commie red all over it. Follow Saudi money from present back through the last four decades. Investigate Planned Parenthood, big Pharma, and child kidnappings from Central and South America. Los Desaparecidos anyone?
:lmao:
 
What does that have to do with anything? Nothing!!!!

Ahhhhh.....you closeted racists should openly shout your true sentiments.....

under trump, its now "perfectly" OK to do so..........be honest with yourselves...LOL

If the right were racists, WOULDN'T we just say so? I mean, surely you don't think the threat of YOUR disapproval is a deterrent?

Maybe the problem here is that YOU are hyper-aware of race, and you're projecting your own prejudices onto others.
:meow:oh.... :lmao::lmao::lmao:

No. You wouldn't say so:laughing0301:
 
Seriously, have any if you looked at this not as a series of discreet events, but as a whole pattern?

An interesting and compelling look from NY Magazine
What If Trump Has Been a Russian Asset Since 1987?

A little snip from the opening. Read the rest at the link and discuss.
The unfolding of the Russia scandal has been like walking into a dark cavern. Every step reveals that the cave runs deeper than we thought, and after each one, as we wonder how far it goes, our imaginations are circumscribed by the steps we have already taken. The cavern might go just a little farther, we presume, but probably not much farther. And since trying to discern the size and shape of the scandal is an exercise in uncertainty, we focus our attention on the most likely outcome, which is that the story goes a little deeper than what we have already discovered. Say, that Donald Trump Jr., Jared Kushner, and Paul Manafort told their candidate about the meeting they held at Trump Tower with a Russian lawyer after they were promised dirt on Hillary Clinton; and that Trump and Kushner have some shady Russian investments; and that some of Trump’s advisers made some promises about lifting sanctions.

But what if that’s wrong? What if we’re still standing closer to the mouth of the cave than the end?

The media has treated the notion that Russia has personally compromised the president of the United States as something close to a kook theory. A minority of analysts, mostly but not exclusively on the right, have promoted aggressively exculpatory interpretations of the known facts, in which every suspicious piece of evidence turns out to have a surprisingly innocent explanation. And it is possible, though unlikely, that every trail between Trump Tower and the Kremlin extends no farther than its point of current visibility.

What if Barbie had a hand grenade? What the hell are you blithering about?

Playing the "what-if" game is lots of fun, but unless you have some actual evidence of something, it's pointless and being taken every bit as seriously as it deserves.
:auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:

Not an intellectual, are you?

If people really thought like that we would still give birth and die in caves.

I don't think anyone doubts Putin plays Trump, but Trump is probably willing and not coerced in anyway. Trump may very well see the world as a place properly ruled by the most powerful.

And blondes are not to be trusted.
 
Seriously, have any if you looked at this not as a series of discreet events, but as a whole pattern?

An interesting and compelling look from NY Magazine
What If Trump Has Been a Russian Asset Since 1987?


I'll worry about that after we spend a few years worry whether Obumma and Hillary weren't Russian assets for years first. I know for a fact that Russians have been screwing with America from AT LEAST the 1970s---- and if I know it, then that makes this whole russian scare thing a joke because others know it as well. A more likely scenario is that Russia and Soros run the whole show and the DNC and GOP are just two fronts giving a faux illusion of an actual choice. That's why all the angst over Trump---- he was an unseen, unexpected fluke that got in that WASN'T part of the master plan!
It is ideal in politics to be a few steps ahead - not behind because you're too lazy to think.
 
What does that have to do with anything? Nothing!!!!

Ahhhhh.....you closeted racists should openly shout your true sentiments.....

under trump, its now "perfectly" OK to do so..........be honest with yourselves...LOL

If the right were racists, WOULDN'T we just say so? I mean, surely you don't think the threat of YOUR disapproval is a deterrent?

Maybe the problem here is that YOU are hyper-aware of race, and you're projecting your own prejudices onto others.
:meow:oh.... :lmao::lmao::lmao:

No. You wouldn't say so:laughing0301:[/Q
What does that have to do with anything? Nothing!!!!

Ahhhhh.....you closeted racists should openly shout your true sentiments.....

under trump, its now "perfectly" OK to do so..........be honest with yourselves...LOL

If the right were racists, WOULDN'T we just say so? I mean, surely you don't think the threat of YOUR disapproval is a deterrent?

Maybe the problem here is that YOU are hyper-aware of race, and you're projecting your own prejudices onto others.
:meow:oh.... :lmao::lmao::lmao:

No. You wouldn't say so:laughing0301:
What the does that mean?
 
What if hiLIARy enabled Putin to takeover 20% of the U.S. Uranium supply?

Oops, that already happened.
 
Seriously, have any if you looked at this not as a series of discreet events, but as a whole pattern?

An interesting and compelling look from NY Magazine
What If Trump Has Been a Russian Asset Since 1987?

A little snip from the opening. Read the rest at the link and discuss.
The unfolding of the Russia scandal has been like walking into a dark cavern. Every step reveals that the cave runs deeper than we thought, and after each one, as we wonder how far it goes, our imaginations are circumscribed by the steps we have already taken. The cavern might go just a little farther, we presume, but probably not much farther. And since trying to discern the size and shape of the scandal is an exercise in uncertainty, we focus our attention on the most likely outcome, which is that the story goes a little deeper than what we have already discovered. Say, that Donald Trump Jr., Jared Kushner, and Paul Manafort told their candidate about the meeting they held at Trump Tower with a Russian lawyer after they were promised dirt on Hillary Clinton; and that Trump and Kushner have some shady Russian investments; and that some of Trump’s advisers made some promises about lifting sanctions.

But what if that’s wrong? What if we’re still standing closer to the mouth of the cave than the end?

The media has treated the notion that Russia has personally compromised the president of the United States as something close to a kook theory. A minority of analysts, mostly but not exclusively on the right, have promoted aggressively exculpatory interpretations of the known facts, in which every suspicious piece of evidence turns out to have a surprisingly innocent explanation. And it is possible, though unlikely, that every trail between Trump Tower and the Kremlin extends no farther than its point of current visibility.

What if Barbie had a hand grenade? What the hell are you blithering about?

Playing the "what-if" game is lots of fun, but unless you have some actual evidence of something, it's pointless and being taken every bit as seriously as it deserves.
:auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:

Not an intellectual, are you?

If people really thought like that we would still give birth and die in caves.

I don't think anyone doubts Putin plays Trump, but Trump is probably willing and not coerced in anyway. Trump may very well see the world as a place properly ruled by the most powerful.

And blondes are not to be trusted.
Through and through manipulated people are willing to do anything. Doesn't mean they should.
 
Sorry excuse to cover Mueller's nothingness and let him continue forever.

"Comforting" words to those soon-to-be-convicts, correct, you fucking moron???........LOL

View attachment 203757
Must have been pretty nice for Hillary to have the DOJ and the FBI in her back pocket, huh?
The swamp is full of scum.
That damn Comey dumping on President Trump at the last moment.
Ummm, I thought we were talking about Hillary. Just remember changing the wording from 'gross negligence' to
'extremely careless', made all the difference from being investigated or not
 
What does that have to do with anything? Nothing!!!!

Ahhhhh.....you closeted racists should openly shout your true sentiments.....

under trump, its now "perfectly" OK to do so..........be honest with yourselves...LOL

If the right were racists, WOULDN'T we just say so? I mean, surely you don't think the threat of YOUR disapproval is a deterrent?

Maybe the problem here is that YOU are hyper-aware of race, and you're projecting your own prejudices onto others.
:meow:oh.... :lmao::lmao::lmao:

No. You wouldn't say so:laughing0301:[/Q
What does that have to do with anything? Nothing!!!!

Ahhhhh.....you closeted racists should openly shout your true sentiments.....

under trump, its now "perfectly" OK to do so..........be honest with yourselves...LOL

If the right were racists, WOULDN'T we just say so? I mean, surely you don't think the threat of YOUR disapproval is a deterrent?

Maybe the problem here is that YOU are hyper-aware of race, and you're projecting your own prejudices onto others.
:meow:oh.... :lmao::lmao::lmao:

No. You wouldn't say so:laughing0301:
What the does that mean?
The rightists wouldn't simply say they are racists
 
Seriously, have any if you looked at this not as a series of discreet events, but as a whole pattern?

An interesting and compelling look from NY Magazine
What If Trump Has Been a Russian Asset Since 1987?

A little snip from the opening. Read the rest at the link and discuss.
The unfolding of the Russia scandal has been like walking into a dark cavern. Every step reveals that the cave runs deeper than we thought, and after each one, as we wonder how far it goes, our imaginations are circumscribed by the steps we have already taken. The cavern might go just a little farther, we presume, but probably not much farther. And since trying to discern the size and shape of the scandal is an exercise in uncertainty, we focus our attention on the most likely outcome, which is that the story goes a little deeper than what we have already discovered. Say, that Donald Trump Jr., Jared Kushner, and Paul Manafort told their candidate about the meeting they held at Trump Tower with a Russian lawyer after they were promised dirt on Hillary Clinton; and that Trump and Kushner have some shady Russian investments; and that some of Trump’s advisers made some promises about lifting sanctions.

But what if that’s wrong? What if we’re still standing closer to the mouth of the cave than the end?

The media has treated the notion that Russia has personally compromised the president of the United States as something close to a kook theory. A minority of analysts, mostly but not exclusively on the right, have promoted aggressively exculpatory interpretations of the known facts, in which every suspicious piece of evidence turns out to have a surprisingly innocent explanation. And it is possible, though unlikely, that every trail between Trump Tower and the Kremlin extends no farther than its point of current visibility.

What if Barbie had a hand grenade? What the hell are you blithering about?

Playing the "what-if" game is lots of fun, but unless you have some actual evidence of something, it's pointless and being taken every bit as seriously as it deserves.
:auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:

Not an intellectual, are you?

If people really thought like that we would still give birth and die in caves.

I don't think anyone doubts Putin plays Trump, but Trump is probably willing and not coerced in anyway. Trump may very well see the world as a place properly ruled by the most powerful.

And blondes are not to be trusted.
Through and through manipulated people are willing to do anything. Doesn't mean they should.

Trump may not be manipulated by Putin. He may see a convergence of interests.

That said, I'll be very surprised if there isn't a direct link to his campaign and Russia.
 
Neither one of you fools bothered to read the link, it's hundreds of words and you dismissed it in seconds.
Oh, i dismissed that the president is a russian agent before finishing the thread title
 
Seriously, have any if you looked at this not as a series of discreet events, but as a whole pattern?

An interesting and compelling look from NY Magazine
What If Trump Has Been a Russian Asset Since 1987?

A little snip from the opening. Read the rest at the link and discuss.

What if Barbie had a hand grenade? What the hell are you blithering about?

Playing the "what-if" game is lots of fun, but unless you have some actual evidence of something, it's pointless and being taken every bit as seriously as it deserves.
:auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:

Not an intellectual, are you?

If people really thought like that we would still give birth and die in caves.

I don't think anyone doubts Putin plays Trump, but Trump is probably willing and not coerced in anyway. Trump may very well see the world as a place properly ruled by the most powerful.

And blondes are not to be trusted.
Through and through manipulated people are willing to do anything. Doesn't mean they should.

Trump may not be manipulated by Putin.
I cannot deny you picking that option, but I am personally completely convinced that that is the way it is.
 
Seriously, have any if you looked at this not as a series of discreet events, but as a whole pattern?

An interesting and compelling look from NY Magazine
What If Trump Has Been a Russian Asset Since 1987?

A little snip from the opening. Read the rest at the link and discuss.

What if Barbie had a hand grenade? What the hell are you blithering about?

Playing the "what-if" game is lots of fun, but unless you have some actual evidence of something, it's pointless and being taken every bit as seriously as it deserves.
:auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:

Not an intellectual, are you?

If people really thought like that we would still give birth and die in caves.

I don't think anyone doubts Putin plays Trump, but Trump is probably willing and not coerced in anyway. Trump may very well see the world as a place properly ruled by the most powerful.

And blondes are not to be trusted.
Through and through manipulated people are willing to do anything. Doesn't mean they should.

Trump may not be manipulated by Putin. He may see a convergence of interests.

That said, I'll be very surprised if there isn't a direct link to his campaign and Russia.
Of course you would. You're a democrat slut
 
What if Barbie had a hand grenade? What the hell are you blithering about?

Playing the "what-if" game is lots of fun, but unless you have some actual evidence of something, it's pointless and being taken every bit as seriously as it deserves.
:auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:

Not an intellectual, are you?

If people really thought like that we would still give birth and die in caves.

I don't think anyone doubts Putin plays Trump, but Trump is probably willing and not coerced in anyway. Trump may very well see the world as a place properly ruled by the most powerful.

And blondes are not to be trusted.
Through and through manipulated people are willing to do anything. Doesn't mean they should.

Trump may not be manipulated by Putin.
I cannot deny you picking that option, but I am personally completely convinced that that is the way it is.
Well, there you go then. It's settled
 
What if hiLIARy enabled Putin to takeover 20% of the U.S. Uranium supply?

Oops, that already happened.
This isn't about enabeling we're all enabling.

Sorry to disappoint, but the vast majority of us most certainly were not involved in enabling Putin to get access to 20% of the Uranium Supply. It did not Take A Village, it just took the incredibly corrupt Clinton Crime Family Syndicate and their comrades in the Obabble Admin.
 
Last edited:
What if hiLIARy enabled Putin to takeover 20% of the U.S. Uranium supply?

Oops, that already happened.
This isn't about enabeling we're all enabling.

Sorry to disappoint, but the vast majority of us most certainly were not involved in enabling Putin get access to 20% of the Uranium Supply. It did not Take A Village, it just took the incredibly corrupt Clinton Crime Family Syndicate and their comrades in the Obabble Admin.
You're not thinking clearly
 

Forum List

Back
Top