Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
One word, ok two:What would American society be like if the 2nd amendment were repealed and civilians could no longer bear arms (have guns)? What are the pros and what are the cons?
Perhaps it is ridiculous........but there are many on this forum that would like the 2nd amendment either repealed or re-interpreted such that it is meaningless.One word, ok two:What would American society be like if the 2nd amendment were repealed and civilians could no longer bear arms (have guns)? What are the pros and what are the cons?
Mass genocide.
Need proof? Open a history book.
This is a ridiculous topic from the word go.
List of massacres in Australia - WikipediaAustralia did it 20 years ago after THEIR worst mass murder in their history. And they haven't had any since.
Odd but the gun cult hates this.
"You know what they do at Brian's house?" "You know...over at the Miller's they?" "You know...in Germany...France...Australia...New Zealand...on MAAAAARS.Australia did it 20 years ago after THEIR worst mass murder in their history. And they haven't had any since.
Odd but the gun cult hates this.
"You know what they do at Brian's house?" "You know...over at the Miller's they?" "You know...in Germany...France...Australia...New Zealand...on MAAAAARS.Australia did it 20 years ago after THEIR worst mass murder in their history. And they haven't had any since.
Odd but the gun cult hates this.
Fuqouta here.
Follow mine...dont blend examples. OZ is not the USA. It is a lazy man's attempt at equivocation."You know what they do at Brian's house?" "You know...over at the Miller's they?" "You know...in Germany...France...Australia...New Zealand...on MAAAAARS.Australia did it 20 years ago after THEIR worst mass murder in their history. And they haven't had any since.
Odd but the gun cult hates this.
Fuqouta here.
Follow your own advice, you have nothing.
I've never had a safety need for a gun. I'm sure some people who are not cops have, but I have to wonder what percentage of the population they constitute.What would American society be like if the 2nd amendment were repealed and civilians could no longer bear arms (have guns)? What are the pros and what are the cons?
I've never had a safety need for a gun. I'm sure some people who are not cops have, but I have to wonder what percentage of the population they constitute.What would American society be like if the 2nd amendment were repealed and civilians could no longer bear arms (have guns)? What are the pros and what are the cons?
Given that I've never needed a gun for an essential purpose, I cannot imagine that my life would be different if guns were prohibited.
I have to say...it occurs to me that fully automatic weapons have been unlawful to sell and few and far between are the instances in which a fully automatic weapon has been used to commit a crime. I realize handy individuals can probably convert a semi-automatic gun into a fully automatic one, and yet it appears criminals by and large don't bother doing so. Insofar as they aren't much using them, it stands to reason they also don't much possess such guns.
That fact pattern suggests to me that bans on firearms do indeed work to impede na'er do wells' ability to obtain them. After all, a fully automatic firearm makes available a different order of tactical options, and why wouldn't anyone with an objective that necessitates criminally using a firearm not prefer to have an edge or wider range of options?
Perhaps it is ridiculous........but there are many on this forum that would like the 2nd amendment either repealed or re-interpreted such that it is meaningless.One word, ok two:What would American society be like if the 2nd amendment were repealed and civilians could no longer bear arms (have guns)? What are the pros and what are the cons?
Mass genocide.
Need proof? Open a history book.
This is a ridiculous topic from the word go.
many on this forum that would like the 2nd amendment either repealed or re-interpreted such that it is meaningless.
I've never had a safety need for a gun. I'm sure some people who are not cops have, but I have to wonder what percentage of the population they constitute.What would American society be like if the 2nd amendment were repealed and civilians could no longer bear arms (have guns)? What are the pros and what are the cons?
Given that I've never needed a gun for an essential purpose, I cannot imagine that my life would be different if guns were prohibited.
I have to say...it occurs to me that fully automatic weapons have been unlawful to sell and few and far between are the instances in which a fully automatic weapon has been used to commit a crime. I realize handy individuals can probably convert a semi-automatic gun into a fully automatic one, and yet it appears criminals by and large don't bother doing so. Insofar as they aren't much using them, it stands to reason they also don't much possess such guns.
That fact pattern suggests to me that bans on firearms do indeed work to impede na'er do wells' ability to obtain them. After all, a fully automatic firearm makes available a different order of tactical options, and why wouldn't anyone with an objective that necessitates criminally using a firearm not prefer to have an edge or wider range of options?
I do not usually have a gun with me; however, since I live in an area where many people have CWPs and do carry their own guns I benefit. The criminal elements don't know that I'm not packing. If guns were banned then the criminal elements would know that the law abiding citizens would not be able to defend themselves.
A tiny 25 year old woman may need a gun to protect herself against large adult males that may wish to abduct and rape her. A gun would give her a fighting chance of defending herself. Otherwise, the strong can overpower the weak.
I live in a city that for ages banned gun possession. It has had no discernable impact on my life. I'm a rich white guy and that's pretty obvious to any na'er do well who pays any attention to my movements. But for being tall and fit, I'm sure I look like a good target.since I live in an area where many people have CWPs and do carry their own guns I benefit.
A tiny 25 year old woman may need a gun to protect herself against large adult males that may wish to abduct and rape her.
I guess the need for insurance falls under the "just in case fallacy" also.I've never had a safety need for a gun. I'm sure some people who are not cops have, but I have to wonder what percentage of the population they constitute.What would American society be like if the 2nd amendment were repealed and civilians could no longer bear arms (have guns)? What are the pros and what are the cons?
Given that I've never needed a gun for an essential purpose, I cannot imagine that my life would be different if guns were prohibited.
I have to say...it occurs to me that fully automatic weapons have been unlawful to sell and few and far between are the instances in which a fully automatic weapon has been used to commit a crime. I realize handy individuals can probably convert a semi-automatic gun into a fully automatic one, and yet it appears criminals by and large don't bother doing so. Insofar as they aren't much using them, it stands to reason they also don't much possess such guns.
That fact pattern suggests to me that bans on firearms do indeed work to impede na'er do wells' ability to obtain them. After all, a fully automatic firearm makes available a different order of tactical options, and why wouldn't anyone with an objective that necessitates criminally using a firearm not prefer to have an edge or wider range of options?
I do not usually have a gun with me; however, since I live in an area where many people have CWPs and do carry their own guns I benefit. The criminal elements don't know that I'm not packing. If guns were banned then the criminal elements would know that the law abiding citizens would not be able to defend themselves.
A tiny 25 year old woman may need a gun to protect herself against large adult males that may wish to abduct and rape her. A gun would give her a fighting chance of defending herself. Otherwise, the strong can overpower the weak.I live in a city that for ages banned gun possession. It has had no discernable impact on my life. I'm a rich white guy and that's pretty obvious to any na'er do well who pays any attention to my movements. But for being tall and fit, I'm sure I look like a good target.since I live in an area where many people have CWPs and do carry their own guns I benefit.
A tiny 25 year old woman may need a gun to protect herself against large adult males that may wish to abduct and rape her.
Just In Case Fallacy