Hale
Patriot
- Feb 3, 2019
- 837
- 172
- 60
If they are coming to violate the 2nd Amendment, they are not US soldiers.Are you willing to fire on US Soldiers in order to keep your guns?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If they are coming to violate the 2nd Amendment, they are not US soldiers.Are you willing to fire on US Soldiers in order to keep your guns?
Defending the Constitution is part of the military oath. That's something you loons can't understand.Once those firearms are used against them......the military will gladly enforce the banYou think the military would throw out the Constitution and enforce a ban of firearms ? Because it would take the military to enforce such a ban.And? We have checks and balances. You think our military would throw out the constitution and follow a dictator? You insult them.Is it? They sure have proven capable of killing lots of people really fast. Call them what you want, but semi auto rifles which can use large capacity magazines must be banned.WRONG
.
thats exactly what every dictator in history said and did right before they killed millions of people
Are you willing to fire on US Soldiers in order to keep your guns?
I don't watch TV, but I do remember the oath I took to defend the Constitution.You think the military would throw out the Constitution and enforce a ban of firearms ? Because it would take the military to enforce such a ban.And? We have checks and balances. You think our military would throw out the constitution and follow a dictator? You insult them.Is it? They sure have proven capable of killing lots of people really fast. Call them what you want, but semi auto rifles which can use large capacity magazines must be banned.WRONG
.
thats exactly what every dictator in history said and did right before they killed millions of people
The Military would do nothing. You keep thinking the Military, one day, will rise up and do your bidding. Turn that damned TV off.
Depends on who is holding it and what their intent is.
Both could be used in a mass shooting of unsuspecting civilians.
So what you're saying is that the REAL "assault weapon" is the human being.
^ Absolute Truth ^The M-16 is just the Military Designator for the AR. In reality, the real Colt designation for the M-16 is AR-15 Model 604. The Colt Disignation for the Civilian AR-15 is either the AR-15 Model 750 or the Colt model LE6920. All use all but 3 parts from the same parts bin. There are some LE690s (AR-15) that are currently in the US Army that are single shot only. What is stamped on the side? It isn't LE6920 or AR-15, it's M-16. All Military Rifles will have an M designator. Even when they were using the Remington Model 700 as a sniper rifle for awhile.
So, in effect, the AR was adopted in 1959 by the Malaysians and the US Air Force in 1962 by the United States Air Force. The Air Force didn't have an M desginator requirement at the time so they called theirs by the Colt AR-15 Model 601. Later, in 1969, the M designator was adopted, the Air Force restamped theirs to read AR-15 Model 601 (M-16). The Air Force had over 14,000 of these weapons and didn't retire them until 1992. These were full auto even AFTER the Army went to the 3 shot burst. If you want a surplus Army M-16 that's been rode hard and put away wet, you can buy one starting at $15,000. But if you want a good quality Air Force AR-15 full auto Model 601 (M-16) you can purchase one for about $3000. Of course, FFL laws do apply.
In fact, I recently purchased a Colt AR15A4, and it even has the M16 style bolt group. It's only a few parts away from being fully automatic, but that would not only be a Federal Felony it would be completely senseless.
Why did I buy one? Because it's the ideal centerfire target/plinking rifle, and is totally usable for self-defense in some situations. 223 Remington is the cheapest centerfire rifle cartridge on the market (20 cents/round), and I also bought a conversion bolt group so it can fire 22LR (4 cents/round).
As a veteran, it's a very familiar platform. And being a genuine Colt, it will hold its value - unlike cheap clones.
This is what the gun-grabbers don't even want to understand. They like pretending that anyone who owns an AR15 is likely a mass murderer - and that's just a lie from the depths of Hell.
Not that I'm aware of, no. My last paragraph was directed at the obvious individuals in this thread.You were doing so well until the last paragraph. Then you went into your gunnutter mode. Tell me, am I a gungrabber?
What is an "assault rifle"?
Not that I'm aware of, no. My last paragraph was directed at the obvious individuals in this thread.You were doing so well until the last paragraph. Then you went into your gunnutter mode. Tell me, am I a gungrabber?
What is an "assault rifle"?
Any rifle that makes gun nuts feel like Rambo - especially with high-capacity magazines.
What is an "assault rifle"?
Any rifle that makes gun nuts feel like Rambo - especially with high-capacity magazines.
Well clearly an AR-15 or an AK variant it an assault rifle. I think we have established that
Clearly, they are not, unless they have select-fire.Well clearly an AR-15 or an AK variant it an assault rifle. I think we have established that
Well clearly an AR-15 or an AK variant it an assault rifle. I think we have established that
But the Mini-14 isn't although you can make it look sort of like one (See A-Team).
ARs and the like are sporting rifles nothing more nothing lessWell clearly an AR-15 or an AK variant it an assault rifle. I think we have established that
You argue one side then go right into the Democrat talking points out the other side of your mouth.ARs and the like are sporting rifles nothing more nothing lessWell clearly an AR-15 or an AK variant it an assault rifle. I think we have established that
Yes, makes a great sport rifle when hunting wild game dressed in black pajamas, turbines and school uniforms. Do they issue tags for that yet?
LolARs and the like are sporting rifles nothing more nothing lessWell clearly an AR-15 or an AK variant it an assault rifle. I think we have established that
Yes, makes a great sport rifle when hunting wild game dressed in black pajamas, turbines and school uniforms. Do they issue tags for that yet?
You're describing a behavior that you don't like. Do you advocate banning an inanimate object to eliminate this behavior? If so, do you actually think that would work?I am up for breaking the Cult of the AR. And, yes, it's a cult that's gotten out of control.