What is an "ice age?"

[jc456]

Or, as land moves away from a pole and ice melts, more land then can produce plant life, and that makes CO2 go up.

Or, as land moves away from a pole and ice melts,

How far did North America have to move to make the ice sheet on top of Chicago melt?

it's too bad the Chicago Tribune wasn't there to log the date. LOL

It was in the Daily News.

great, let's see the article.

The glacier put them out of business.

that's unfortunate.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Or, as land moves away from a pole and ice melts,

How far did North America have to move to make the ice sheet on top of Chicago melt?

it's too bad the Chicago Tribune wasn't there to log the date. LOL

It was in the Daily News.

great, let's see the article.

The glacier put them out of business.

that's unfortunate.

Yeah, no proof of LaDerpster's stupid claim survived.

 

[jc456]

it's too bad the Chicago Tribune wasn't there to log the date. LOL

It was in the Daily News.

great, let's see the article.

The glacier put them out of business.

that's unfortunate.

Yeah, no proof of LaDerpster's stupid claim survived.

so it could have happened.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

It was in the Daily News.

great, let's see the article.

The glacier put them out of business.

that's unfortunate.

Yeah, no proof of LaDerpster's stupid claim survived.

so it could have happened.

The glacier over Chicago could have melted because the NA plate moved further than 600 miles from the North Pole?

If you say so. LOL!

 

[jc456]

great, let's see the article.

The glacier put them out of business.

that's unfortunate.

Yeah, no proof of LaDerpster's stupid claim survived.

so it could have happened.

The glacier over Chicago could have melted because the NA plate moved further than 600 miles from the North Pole?

If you say so. LOL!

do you know why it melted? I mean, it seems fairly obvious to me it melted cause of temperatures warming. You have something different? Like your smart photons?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The glacier put them out of business.

that's unfortunate.

Yeah, no proof of LaDerpster's stupid claim survived.

so it could have happened.

The glacier over Chicago could have melted because the NA plate moved further than 600 miles from the North Pole?

If you say so. LOL!

do you know why it melted? I mean, it seems fairly obvious to me it melted cause of temperatures warming. You have something different? Like your smart photons?

do you know why it melted?

Usually it takes temperatures above 32 F to melt ice.

I mean, it seems fairly obvious to me it melted cause of temperatures warming. You have something different?

It was warming. Do you believe LaDerpster's theory that NA got warm because it moved more than 600 miles away from the pole? Or is that theory the dumbest one since SSDD's "smart photon" claims?

 

[LaDexter]

So, what you are saying is that, as the NA plate moves SW, that doesn't warm NA?

LOL!!!

The Equator and the poles are the same temperature, right Todd?

 

[jc456]

that's unfortunate.

Yeah, no proof of LaDerpster's stupid claim survived.

so it could have happened.

The glacier over Chicago could have melted because the NA plate moved further than 600 miles from the North Pole?

If you say so. LOL!

do you know why it melted? I mean, it seems fairly obvious to me it melted cause of temperatures warming. You have something different? Like your smart photons?

do you know why it melted?

Usually it takes temperatures above 32 F to melt ice.

I mean, it seems fairly obvious to me it melted cause of temperatures warming. You have something different?

It was warming. Do you believe LaDerpster's theory that NA got warm because it moved more than 600 miles away from the pole? Or is that theory the dumbest one since SSDD's "smart photon" claims?

I have no idea, nor do you. If you did, you'd have posted where he's in error. The fact is, I know the continent moved and since the daily news went out of business and left no archives we'll most likely never know exactly, It is plausible.

I do know that Greenland is Icy and we're not. The proximity thingy I think would come into play. Especially since the temperatures confirm it.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

So, what you are saying is that, as the NA plate moves SW, that doesn't warm NA?

LOL!!!

The Equator and the poles are the same temperature, right Todd?

So, what you are saying is that, as the NA plate moves SW, that doesn't warm NA?

I would never say such a ridiculous thing.

The Equator and the poles are the same temperature, right Todd?

Wrong.

When the most recent Ice Age started, how far from the North Pole was Chicago?
After the most recent Ice Age started, how far SW did the NA plate have to move to melt the ice?

 

[jc456]

So, what you are saying is that, as the NA plate moves SW, that doesn't warm NA?

LOL!!!

The Equator and the poles are the same temperature, right Todd?

So, what you are saying is that, as the NA plate moves SW, that doesn't warm NA?

I would never say such a ridiculous thing.

The Equator and the poles are the same temperature, right Todd?

Wrong.

When the most recent Ice Age started, how far from the North Pole was Chicago?
After the most recent Ice Age started, how far SW did the NA plate have to move to melt the ice?

When the most recent Ice Age started, how far from the North Pole was Chicago?

Has Chicago moved from where it was when the ice age started?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

So, what you are saying is that, as the NA plate moves SW, that doesn't warm NA?

LOL!!!

The Equator and the poles are the same temperature, right Todd?

So, what you are saying is that, as the NA plate moves SW, that doesn't warm NA?

I would never say such a ridiculous thing.

The Equator and the poles are the same temperature, right Todd?

Wrong.

When the most recent Ice Age started, how far from the North Pole was Chicago?
After the most recent Ice Age started, how far SW did the NA plate have to move to melt the ice?

When the most recent Ice Age started, how far from the North Pole was Chicago?

Has Chicago moved from where it was when the ice age started?

A bit.

 

[jc456]

So, what you are saying is that, as the NA plate moves SW, that doesn't warm NA?

LOL!!!

The Equator and the poles are the same temperature, right Todd?

So, what you are saying is that, as the NA plate moves SW, that doesn't warm NA?

I would never say such a ridiculous thing.

The Equator and the poles are the same temperature, right Todd?

Wrong.

When the most recent Ice Age started, how far from the North Pole was Chicago?
After the most recent Ice Age started, how far SW did the NA plate have to move to melt the ice?

When the most recent Ice Age started, how far from the North Pole was Chicago?

Has Chicago moved from where it was when the ice age started?

A bit.

an inch?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

So, what you are saying is that, as the NA plate moves SW, that doesn't warm NA?

LOL!!!

The Equator and the poles are the same temperature, right Todd?

So, what you are saying is that, as the NA plate moves SW, that doesn't warm NA?

I would never say such a ridiculous thing.

The Equator and the poles are the same temperature, right Todd?

Wrong.

When the most recent Ice Age started, how far from the North Pole was Chicago?
After the most recent Ice Age started, how far SW did the NA plate have to move to melt the ice?

When the most recent Ice Age started, how far from the North Pole was Chicago?

Has Chicago moved from where it was when the ice age started?

A bit.

an inch?

A foot?

 

[jc456]

So, what you are saying is that, as the NA plate moves SW, that doesn't warm NA?

LOL!!!

The Equator and the poles are the same temperature, right Todd?

So, what you are saying is that, as the NA plate moves SW, that doesn't warm NA?

I would never say such a ridiculous thing.

The Equator and the poles are the same temperature, right Todd?

Wrong.

When the most recent Ice Age started, how far from the North Pole was Chicago?
After the most recent Ice Age started, how far SW did the NA plate have to move to melt the ice?

When the most recent Ice Age started, how far from the North Pole was Chicago?

Has Chicago moved from where it was when the ice age started?

A bit.

an inch?

A foot?

600 miles?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

So, what you are saying is that, as the NA plate moves SW, that doesn't warm NA?

I would never say such a ridiculous thing.

The Equator and the poles are the same temperature, right Todd?

Wrong.

When the most recent Ice Age started, how far from the North Pole was Chicago?
After the most recent Ice Age started, how far SW did the NA plate have to move to melt the ice?

When the most recent Ice Age started, how far from the North Pole was Chicago?

Has Chicago moved from where it was when the ice age started?

A bit.

an inch?

A foot?

600 miles?

When did the Ice Age start?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

So, what you are saying is that, as the NA plate moves SW, that doesn't warm NA?

LOL!!!

The Equator and the poles are the same temperature, right Todd?

So, what you are saying is that, as the NA plate moves SW, that doesn't warm NA?

I would never say such a ridiculous thing.

The Equator and the poles are the same temperature, right Todd?

Wrong.

When the most recent Ice Age started, how far from the North Pole was Chicago?
After the most recent Ice Age started, how far SW did the NA plate have to move to melt the ice?

When the most recent Ice Age started, how far from the North Pole was Chicago?

Has Chicago moved from where it was when the ice age started?

Has Chicago moved from where it was when the ice age started?

The Pacific Plate is moving to the northwest at a speed of between 7 and 11 centimeters (cm) or ~3-4 inches a year. The North American plate is moving to the west-southwest at about 2.3 cm (~1 inch) per year driven by the spreading center that created the Atlantic Ocean, the Mid Atlantic Ridge.


Plate Tectonics | Pacific Northwest Seismic Network

When did that Ice Age start?
How close was Chicago to the North Pole when it started?

 

[Crick]

Chicago to North Pole: roughly 3,000 miles

South component of west-southwest (237.5 degrees) 38.27%
So, 2.3 cm/yr * 0.3827 = 0.88 cm/yr away from the pole
3,000 miles = 4.828e8 cms
482,800,000 years to make the trip

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Chicago to North Pole: roughly 3,000 miles

South component of west-southwest (237.5 degrees) 38.27%
So, 2.3 cm/yr * 0.3827 = 0.88 cm/yr away from the pole
3,000 miles = 4.828e8 cms
482,800,000 years to make the trip

Considering the magnetic stripes are due to rift spinning, not pole shifting,
it probably only takes a couple thousand years to make the trip/LaDerpster off

 

[jc456]

When the most recent Ice Age started, how far from the North Pole was Chicago?

Has Chicago moved from where it was when the ice age started?

A bit.

an inch?

A foot?

600 miles?

When did the Ice Age start?

which one?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

A bit.

an inch?

A foot?

600 miles?

When did the Ice Age start?

which one?

The last one.