Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Racist-- A word used by anyone, White or not, who hates White people.
Racism--A derogatory scare word to describe a natural tribal instinct currently forbidden to only one tribe.
White Privilege--The honor of being constantly blamed for everything bad throughout world history.
White Supremacist--Any White person who isn't constantly apologizing for their skin color.
racism (noun)
An undetectable (but unquestionably real) “systemic, societal, institutional, omnipresent, and epistemologically embedded phenomenon that pervades every vestige of our reality” (in the words of Negro scholar Omowale Akintunde), forcing brown-skinned people to fail out of school, smoke crack, not get a job, abandon their kids, contract AIDS, commit every crime at a staggering rate, underperform on culturally unbiased tests of highly heritable cognitive abilities, and generally act like a bunch of goddamn jungle savages, thus making them seem inferior to whites in every way outside of certain sports, or at least certain positions in certain sports (and to which Asians are somehow, mysteriously immune).
Usually rendered blatant racism.
In minorities, the leading cause of depression, death, animal and child abuse, tears, impotence, low self-esteem, persistent whining, and congestive heart failure. Literally the worst thing in the entire world.
racist (adjective)
- Expressing, suggesting, or hinting at discomforting truths about race.
- Failing to sufficiently denigrate and discriminate against whites.
- Directed at a white person by a non-white person: causing the speaker, or some (actual or hypothetical) like-race individual, to feel (or suspect that he may feel) unwanted, uncared for, unlikeable, uneasy, uncomfortable, upset, angry, guilty, hurt, cross, inferior, or stupid in some way, usually by the offending party being racist (def. 1),
- Derogatory. Punishable by death in most jurisdictions.
- Often rendered raciss, as in you raciss and das raciss.
but seriously....
This condition you call "racism" has always existed and it always will. Here's how the real world works;
Humans are tribal and ethnocentric creatures (and given the freedom to do so without government interference) will always self segregate into groups according to race.
People like to be around other people who share their culture, history and beliefs and they tend to reject outsiders.
That's just the way it is and all attempts at marxist social engineering to create artificial "equality"...or lowering standards in order to ensure "equality" do nothing to improve society and, in fact, lead to further racial friction.
This is that "Us and Them" mentality that liberals so often accuse conservatives of having.
It's also the way a racist's mind works. It isn't how open-minded, forward-thinking, accepting, loving, caring, hopeful, and sympathetic people's minds work.
Ps. I'm white and I do not constantly nor ever apologize for the color of my skin. Should I put my white robes on and head down to the ol' cross burnin' tonight?
sure...sure..whatever you say.
What is the demographic of your town/city? Just curious. That usually is very telling.
For the typical suburban white that doesn't have to live around non-whites it's easy to intellectualize things in the abstract. To form views of people or things in a vacuum and then convince yourself your beliefs are correct. After-all, if everyone else is conservative you have to challenge the status-quo because you're somehow unique and different from all of them, right?
I can tell you the definition of racist, if that helps any. A racist is anyone who bests a liberal in an argument.
Well then......you all are right! There are no racists in America.
Derp........Derp.
Way too late in the day to read Ayn...I'm more worried about Mo-ne...
You should be.....she's not going to dominate that lineup.
Racist-- A word used by anyone, White or not, who hates White people.
Racism--A derogatory scare word to describe a natural tribal instinct currently forbidden to only one tribe.
White Privilege--The honor of being constantly blamed for everything bad throughout world history.
White Supremacist--Any White person who isn't constantly apologizing for their skin color.
racism (noun)
An undetectable (but unquestionably real) “systemic, societal, institutional, omnipresent, and epistemologically embedded phenomenon that pervades every vestige of our reality” (in the words of Negro scholar Omowale Akintunde), forcing brown-skinned people to fail out of school, smoke crack, not get a job, abandon their kids, contract AIDS, commit every crime at a staggering rate, underperform on culturally unbiased tests of highly heritable cognitive abilities, and generally act like a bunch of goddamn jungle savages, thus making them seem inferior to whites in every way outside of certain sports, or at least certain positions in certain sports (and to which Asians are somehow, mysteriously immune).
Usually rendered blatant racism.
In minorities, the leading cause of depression, death, animal and child abuse, tears, impotence, low self-esteem, persistent whining, and congestive heart failure. Literally the worst thing in the entire world.
racist (adjective)
- Expressing, suggesting, or hinting at discomforting truths about race.
- Failing to sufficiently denigrate and discriminate against whites.
- Directed at a white person by a non-white person: causing the speaker, or some (actual or hypothetical) like-race individual, to feel (or suspect that he may feel) unwanted, uncared for, unlikeable, uneasy, uncomfortable, upset, angry, guilty, hurt, cross, inferior, or stupid in some way, usually by the offending party being racist (def. 1),
- Derogatory. Punishable by death in most jurisdictions.
- Often rendered raciss, as in you raciss and das raciss.
but seriously....
This condition you call "racism" has always existed and it always will. Here's how the real world works;
Humans are tribal and ethnocentric creatures (and given the freedom to do so without government interference) will always self segregate into groups according to race.
People like to be around other people who share their culture, history and beliefs and they tend to reject outsiders.
That's just the way it is and all attempts at marxist social engineering to create artificial "equality"...or lowering standards in order to ensure "equality" do nothing to improve society and, in fact, lead to further racial friction.
This is that "Us and Them" mentality that liberals so often accuse conservatives of having.
It's also the way a racist's mind works. It isn't how open-minded, forward-thinking, accepting, loving, caring, hopeful, and sympathetic people's minds work.
Ps. I'm white and I do not constantly nor ever apologize for the color of my skin. Should I put my white robes on and head down to the ol' cross burnin' tonight?
sure...sure..whatever you say.
What is the demographic of your town/city? Just curious. That usually is very telling.
For the typical suburban white that doesn't have to live around non-whites it's easy to intellectualize things in the abstract. To form views of people or things in a vacuum and then convince yourself your beliefs are correct. After-all, if everyone else is conservative you have to challenge the status-quo because you're somehow unique and different from all of them, right?
I live in Denver surrounded by Hispanic and African-American people. And gay people. And liberals. And red necks. They all seem very nice to me. I work with Hispanic people. They are extremely hard working and never complain. Their food is delicious, their music tends to be awful, and they are just like white people.
.anyway..like I said, it's generally lack of proximity to non-Whites that makes an area liberal because it allows liberals to maintain false views of non-Whites without reality constantly contradicting their ideology.
Case in point.
EDIT: I was going to link to the site I found all this but I accidentally closed the window and don't remember the name of it..Citysearch or something like that.
.anyway..like I said, it's generally lack of proximity to non-Whites that makes an area liberal because it allows liberals to maintain false views of non-Whites without reality constantly contradicting their ideology.
Case in point.
EDIT: I was going to link to the site I found all this but I accidentally closed the window and don't remember the name of it..Citysearch or something like that.
Here's the demography of Denver. I can get right into particular census tracks if I have a ZIP code to work with. It does look like "surrounded by" was the correct phrase to describe what is going on.
As for your claim about non-proximity to non-whites resulting in a more liberal political orientation, here is how the 2008 vote for Obama went - the most liberal states had the least exposure to blacks, other the The Cosby Show and the Fresh Prince, of course.
.anyway..like I said, it's generally lack of proximity to non-Whites that makes an area liberal because it allows liberals to maintain false views of non-Whites without reality constantly contradicting their ideology.
Case in point.
EDIT: I was going to link to the site I found all this but I accidentally closed the window and don't remember the name of it..Citysearch or something like that.
Here's the demography of Denver. I can get right into particular census tracks if I have a ZIP code to work with. It does look like "surrounded by" was the correct phrase to describe what is going on.
As for your claim about non-proximity to non-whites resulting in a more liberal political orientation, here is how the 2008 vote for Obama went - the most liberal states had the least exposure to blacks, other the The Cosby Show and the Fresh Prince, of course.
Nice work, bro. Appreciate it.
I could NOT find anything on crime demographics by race..Only raw numbers...For some reason it's getting harder and harder to find that kind of information..
Probably just a coincidence, though I cant imagine why anyone want to conceal those numbers? /sarcasm.
.anyway..like I said, it's generally lack of proximity to non-Whites that makes an area liberal because it allows liberals to maintain false views of non-Whites without reality constantly contradicting their ideology.
Case in point.
EDIT: I was going to link to the site I found all this but I accidentally closed the window and don't remember the name of it..Citysearch or something like that.
Here's the demography of Denver. I can get right into particular census tracks if I have a ZIP code to work with. It does look like "surrounded by" was the correct phrase to describe what is going on.
As for your claim about non-proximity to non-whites resulting in a more liberal political orientation, here is how the 2008 vote for Obama went - the most liberal states had the least exposure to blacks, other the The Cosby Show and the Fresh Prince, of course.
Nice work, bro. Appreciate it.
I could NOT find anything on crime demographics by race..Only raw numbers...For some reason it's getting harder and harder to find that kind of information..
Probably just a coincidence, though I cant imagine why anyone want to conceal those numbers? /sarcasm.
It's harder to find that data because the Bureau of Justice Statistics has, under the Obama Administration, stopped publishing that data to the web. Now they purposely embed the data deep into reports. What used to be on their web pages is now gone.
I don't come across any of Ayn's writings very often that I agree with but she nails that topic pretty well. I think her Jewishness was probably a factor and gave her intimate experience with racism that informed her take on the subject.
I don't come across any of Ayn's writings very often that I agree with but she nails that topic pretty well. I think her Jewishness was probably a factor and gave her intimate experience with racism that informed her take on the subject.
I find it verbose and pompous.
Here's my take;
This condition you call "racism" has always existed and it always will.
Here's how the real world works; Humans are tribal and ethnocentric creatures (and given the freedom to do so without government interference) will always self segregate into groups according to race.
People like to be around other people who share their culture, history and beliefs
That's just the way it is and all attempts at marxist social engineering to create artificial "equality"...or lowering standards in order to ensure "equality" do nothing to improve society and, in fact, lead to further racial friction.
I don't come across any of Ayn's writings very often that I agree with but she nails that topic pretty well. I think her Jewishness was probably a factor and gave her intimate experience with racism that informed her take on the subject.
I don't come across any of Ayn's writings very often that I agree with but she nails that topic pretty well. I think her Jewishness was probably a factor and gave her intimate experience with racism that informed her take on the subject.
I find it verbose and pompous.
Here's my take;
This condition you call "racism" has always existed and it always will.
Here's how the real world works; Humans are tribal and ethnocentric creatures (and given the freedom to do so without government interference) will always self segregate into groups according to race.
People like to be around other people who share their culture, history and beliefs
That's just the way it is and all attempts at marxist social engineering to create artificial "equality"...or lowering standards in order to ensure "equality" do nothing to improve society and, in fact, lead to further racial friction.
I don't come across any of Ayn's writings very often that I agree with but she nails that topic pretty well. I think her Jewishness was probably a factor and gave her intimate experience with racism that informed her take on the subject.
I find it verbose and pompous.
That much, agreed.
Here's my take;
This condition you call "racism" has always existed and it always will.
Here's how the real world works; Humans are tribal and ethnocentric creatures (and given the freedom to do so without government interference) will always self segregate into groups according to race.
People like to be around other people who share their culture, history and beliefs
That's just the way it is and all attempts at marxist social engineering to create artificial "equality"...or lowering standards in order to ensure "equality" do nothing to improve society and, in fact, lead to further racial friction.
I don't believe race-as-difference (i.e. the concept of "racism") even existed before the slave trade made it necessary to rationalize human trafficking. Certainly cultural diversity did but the idea that one race would be inferior to another, I think that was contrived in the 15th century.
Cultural tensions and clashes have always existed and always will, as they are formats for how a people express themselves. Skin color however has nothing to do with expression. Racism was manufactured myth for the occasion.
I don't come across any of Ayn's writings very often that I agree with but she nails that topic pretty well. I think her Jewishness was probably a factor and gave her intimate experience with racism that informed her take on the subject.
I find it verbose and pompous.
That much, agreed.
Here's my take;
This condition you call "racism" has always existed and it always will.
Here's how the real world works; Humans are tribal and ethnocentric creatures (and given the freedom to do so without government interference) will always self segregate into groups according to race.
People like to be around other people who share their culture, history and beliefs
That's just the way it is and all attempts at marxist social engineering to create artificial "equality"...or lowering standards in order to ensure "equality" do nothing to improve society and, in fact, lead to further racial friction.
I don't believe race-as-difference (i.e. the concept of "racism") even existed before the slave trade made it necessary to rationalize human trafficking. Certainly cultural diversity did but the idea that one race would be inferior to another, I think that was contrived in the 15th century.
Cultural tensions and clashes have always existed and always will, as they are formats for how a people express themselves. Skin color however has nothing to do with expression. Racism was manufactured myth for the occasion.
Do you see behavioral patterns in your own family tree?
I don't come across any of Ayn's writings very often that I agree with but she nails that topic pretty well. I think her Jewishness was probably a factor and gave her intimate experience with racism that informed her take on the subject.
I find it verbose and pompous.
That much, agreed.
Here's my take;
This condition you call "racism" has always existed and it always will.
Here's how the real world works; Humans are tribal and ethnocentric creatures (and given the freedom to do so without government interference) will always self segregate into groups according to race.
People like to be around other people who share their culture, history and beliefs
That's just the way it is and all attempts at marxist social engineering to create artificial "equality"...or lowering standards in order to ensure "equality" do nothing to improve society and, in fact, lead to further racial friction.
I don't believe race-as-difference (i.e. the concept of "racism") even existed before the slave trade made it necessary to rationalize human trafficking. Certainly cultural diversity did but the idea that one race would be inferior to another, I think that was contrived in the 15th century.
Cultural tensions and clashes have always existed and always will, as they are formats for how a people express themselves. Skin color however has nothing to do with expression. Racism was manufactured myth for the occasion.
Do you see behavioral patterns in your own family tree?
There was no such word as "racism" until the early 20th century. I believe the word was coined by the murderous jew Lev Bronstein..(You probably know him as Leon Trotsky) and was used in a benign way to describe people's natural affinity for their own kind.I don't come across any of Ayn's writings very often that I agree with but she nails that topic pretty well. I think her Jewishness was probably a factor and gave her intimate experience with racism that informed her take on the subject.
I find it verbose and pompous.
That much, agreed.
Here's my take;
This condition you call "racism" has always existed and it always will.
Here's how the real world works; Humans are tribal and ethnocentric creatures (and given the freedom to do so without government interference) will always self segregate into groups according to race.
People like to be around other people who share their culture, history and beliefs
That's just the way it is and all attempts at marxist social engineering to create artificial "equality"...or lowering standards in order to ensure "equality" do nothing to improve society and, in fact, lead to further racial friction.
I don't believe race-as-difference (i.e. the concept of "racism") even existed before the slave trade made it necessary to rationalize human trafficking. Certainly cultural diversity did but the idea that one race would be inferior to another, I think that was contrived in the 15th century.
Cultural tensions and clashes have always existed and always will, as they are formats for how a people express themselves. Skin color however has nothing to do with expression. Racism was manufactured myth for the occasion.
I don't come across any of Ayn's writings very often that I agree with but she nails that topic pretty well. I think her Jewishness was probably a factor and gave her intimate experience with racism that informed her take on the subject.
I find it verbose and pompous.
That much, agreed.
Here's my take;
This condition you call "racism" has always existed and it always will.
Here's how the real world works; Humans are tribal and ethnocentric creatures (and given the freedom to do so without government interference) will always self segregate into groups according to race.
People like to be around other people who share their culture, history and beliefs
That's just the way it is and all attempts at marxist social engineering to create artificial "equality"...or lowering standards in order to ensure "equality" do nothing to improve society and, in fact, lead to further racial friction.
I don't believe race-as-difference (i.e. the concept of "racism") even existed before the slave trade made it necessary to rationalize human trafficking. Certainly cultural diversity did but the idea that one race would be inferior to another, I think that was contrived in the 15th century.
Cultural tensions and clashes have always existed and always will, as they are formats for how a people express themselves. Skin color however has nothing to do with expression. Racism was manufactured myth for the occasion.
Do you see behavioral patterns in your own family tree?
"Behavioral patterns"??
I don't come across any of Ayn's writings very often that I agree with but she nails that topic pretty well. I think her Jewishness was probably a factor and gave her intimate experience with racism that informed her take on the subject.
I find it verbose and pompous.
That much, agreed.
Here's my take;
This condition you call "racism" has always existed and it always will.
Here's how the real world works; Humans are tribal and ethnocentric creatures (and given the freedom to do so without government interference) will always self segregate into groups according to race.
People like to be around other people who share their culture, history and beliefs
That's just the way it is and all attempts at marxist social engineering to create artificial "equality"...or lowering standards in order to ensure "equality" do nothing to improve society and, in fact, lead to further racial friction.
I don't believe race-as-difference (i.e. the concept of "racism") even existed before the slave trade made it necessary to rationalize human trafficking. Certainly cultural diversity did but the idea that one race would be inferior to another, I think that was contrived in the 15th century.
Cultural tensions and clashes have always existed and always will, as they are formats for how a people express themselves. Skin color however has nothing to do with expression. Racism was manufactured myth for the occasion.
Do you see behavioral patterns in your own family tree?
I'm touched by your concern but the environmentally learned behaviors are malleable while the inherited behavioral traits are vastly more stable across generations. Just because my great great grandfather used a buggy-whip when driving a horse drawn carriage and his son saw that, doesn't mean that this learned behavior was passed down to me.
Careful or you will have to admit slavery and the survival mechanisms learned from it is still a factor in the economically deprived Black community.
There was no such word as "racism" until the early 20th century. I believe the word was coined by the murderous jew Lev Bronstein..(You probably know him as Leon Trotsky) and was used in a benign way to describe people's natural affinity for their own kind.I don't come across any of Ayn's writings very often that I agree with but she nails that topic pretty well. I think her Jewishness was probably a factor and gave her intimate experience with racism that informed her take on the subject.
I find it verbose and pompous.
That much, agreed.
Here's my take;
This condition you call "racism" has always existed and it always will.
Here's how the real world works; Humans are tribal and ethnocentric creatures (and given the freedom to do so without government interference) will always self segregate into groups according to race.
People like to be around other people who share their culture, history and beliefs
That's just the way it is and all attempts at marxist social engineering to create artificial "equality"...or lowering standards in order to ensure "equality" do nothing to improve society and, in fact, lead to further racial friction.
I don't believe race-as-difference (i.e. the concept of "racism") even existed before the slave trade made it necessary to rationalize human trafficking. Certainly cultural diversity did but the idea that one race would be inferior to another, I think that was contrived in the 15th century.
Cultural tensions and clashes have always existed and always will, as they are formats for how a people express themselves. Skin color however has nothing to do with expression. Racism was manufactured myth for the occasion.
Unfortunately the word was co opted and weaponized by anti whites as a way to browbeat and neuter white people.
